Search

Study Design: Controlled Laboratory Study., Objective: To compare multilevel posterior cervical fusion (PCF) constructs stopping at C7, T1, and T2 under cyclic load to determine the range of motion (ROM) between the lowest instrumented level and lowest instrumented-adjacent level (LIV-1)., Summary of Background Data: PCF is a mainstay of treatment for various cervical spine conditions. The transition between the flexible cervical spine and rigid thoracic spine can lead to construct failure at the cervicothoracic junction. There is little evidence to determine the most appropriate level at which to stop a multilevel PCF., Methods: Fifteen human cadaveric cervicothoracic spines were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: PCF stopping at C7, T1, or T2. Specimens were tested in their native state, following a simulated PCF, and after cyclic loading. Specimens were loaded in flexion-extension), lateral bending, and axial rotation. Three-dimensional kinematics were recorded to evaluate ROM., Results: The C7 group had greater flexion-extension motion than the T1 and T2 groups following instrumentation (10.17±0.83 degree vs. 2.77±1.66 degree and 1.06±0.55 degree, P <0.001), and after cyclic loading (10.42±2.30 degree vs. 2.47±0.64 degree and 1.99±1.23 degree, P <0.001). There was no significant difference between the T1 and T2 groups. The C7 group had greater lateral bending ROM than both thoracic groups after instrumentation (8.81±3.44 degree vs. 3.51±2.52 degree, P =0.013 and 1.99±1.99 degree, P =0.003) and after cyclic loading. The C7 group had greater axial rotation motion than the thoracic groups (4.46±2.27 degree vs. 1.26±0.69 degree, P =0.010; and 0.73±0.74 degree, P =0.003) following cyclic loading., Conclusion: Motion at the cervicothoracic junction is significantly greater when a multilevel PCF stops at C7 rather than T1 or T2. This is likely attributable to the transition from a flexible cervical spine to a rigid thoracic spine. Although this does not account for in vivo fusion, surgeons should consider extending multilevel PCF constructs to T1 when feasible., Level of Evidence: Not applicable., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Patients with Crohn's disease [CD] harbour an increased number of adherent-invasive E. coli [AIEC]. The strain LF82, identified in the ileal mucosa of CD patients, has been extensively studied for pathogenic mechanisms. However, understanding of the interaction of LF82 with the intestinal mucosa of CD patients is lacking., Methods: Here, we investigated the importance of long polar fimbriae [LPF] type 1 pili and the carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell-adhesion molecule 6 [CEACAM6] for translocation of LF82 in an in vitro model of follicle-associated epithelium [FAE], and in the FAE and villus epithelium [VE] of patients with CD and controls, using Ussing chambers., Results: Significantly greater LF82 passage occurred in the FAE model compared with in the VE Caco-2cl1 mono-culture. Moreover, bacterial translocation was inhibited by either LPF disruption or pre-incubation with anti-CEACAM6 antibody. Tissue mounted in Ussing chambers showed significantly higher LF82 passage in FAE from patients with CD compared with control FAE, that was diminished in LF82 lacking LPF and by blocking host CEACAM6. Interestingly, addition of LF82 to the CD FAE tissues significantly increased paracellular permeability [of 51Chromium-EDTA] compared with baseline, and the increase was inhibited by anti-CEACAM6. Immunofluorescence and immunoblots showed higher expression of CEACAM6 in FAE of patients with CD compared with in FAE from controls., Conclusions: These data suggest that the FAE of CD patients is a site of vulnerability for invasion by LF82 via a mechanism that requires both bacterial LPF and host CEACAM6. Further, LF82 has the ability to increase paracellular passage through the FAE of patients with CD. These data can help define novel therapeutic targets in CD for the prevention of clinical recurrence., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)