Search

Our international team highlights issues with efficacy reports in several studies on DMG with the new drug ONC201.

Background & Aims: Cancer therapy is associated with a range of toxicities that severely impact patient well-being and a range of clinical outcomes. Dietary fibre/prebiotics characteristically improve the gastrointestinal microenvironment, which consequently elicits beneficial downstream effects that could be relevant to the prevention and management of treatment-related toxicities. Despite the compelling theoretical scientific rationale there has been limited effort to synthesise the available evidence to conclude such scientific underpinning to the clinical use of fibre/prebiotics in cancer patients. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of fibre/prebiotic-based interventions on gastrointestinal-side effects; gastrointestinal-microbiome; clinical outcomes; nutrition status and body composition; and quality-of-life in children and adults being treated for cancer or undergoing a haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)., Methods: This study was conducted in adherence to PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was published prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022299428). Three databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), CINHAL, EMBASE) were searched from inception to December 2023. All articles were assessed for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool RoB 2.0 (for RCTs) and ROBINS-I (for non-RCTs)., Results: A total of 9989 de-duplicated records were identified, of these, 14 (paediatrics [n = 1], adults [n = 13]) met the inclusion criteria (randomised controlled trials (RCT) [n = 11], observational or non-RCTs [n = 3]). The risk-of-bias was graded to be serious/high (n = 6); moderate/some concerns (n = 7); low (n = 1). Interventions included prebiotic supplement (n = 8), nutrition supplement/formula with added fibre/prebiotic (n = 3) and dietary modification (n = 3). The dose of fibre intervention ranged from 2.4g to 30g per day. Substantial heterogeneity of target parameters was identified across a range all outcome categories, precluding definitive conclusions., Conclusion: The scientific rationale for fibre/prebiotics-based interventions for the prevention or management of cancer treatment-related toxicities is compelling. However, it is clear that the scientific and clinical field remains disconnected in how to effectively translate this approach to improve cancer outcomes. High-quality intervention studies translatable to clinical practice are now evidently crucial to determine if and how fibre/prebiotics should be used to support people undergoing cancer or HSCT therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Focused ultrasound-mediated opening of the blood-brain barrier offers a great opportunity to deliver therapeutics into hard-to-treat brain tumors such as glioblastoma multiforme or diffuse midline glioma. However, the potential of the technique to offer a time window for efficient nanomedicine delivery has not been thoroughly studied. Non-invasive and targeted delivery of large drug-loaded nanocarriers, such as liposomes, could offer a safe and scalable method of personalized therapy for the treatment of brain pathologies. Additionally, it is essential to monitor the safety and efficacy of such treatments, tracking drug delivery in real-time through quantitative medical imaging. In this study, liposomes were modified to have an MRI contrast agent (i.e., Gd) in both lipid membrane and core, while an infrared dye (i.e., CW800) was coupled to lipids introduced in the lipid bilayer for bimodal detection and treatment verification. Targeted delivery of 110 nm-in-diameter liposomes to the brain was quantified using 9.4-T MRI and near infrared fluorescence imaging. The spatiotemporal distribution of liposomes in vivo was assessed up to 4 h post treatment using T 1 weighted MRI. In vivo MRI signal co-localized with NIRF signal from excised brains ex vivo . Passive acoustic detection during treatments revealed a correlation between acoustic signal and MRI contrast, providing a scalable metric for assessing clinical treatment efficacy in real-time. In conclusion, therapeutic ultrasound exposure can enhance delivery of large trackable nanoparticles into the brain, while enabling real-time treatment monitoring and verification., Competing Interests: Dr. Maya Thanou is a co-founder of the King’s College London spinout Apeikon Therapeutics that holds patents related to the technology discussed in this work. Apeikon Therapeutics is an industrial partner, who collaborated with King’s College London forming agreements for managing background IP and licensing novel technologies used in the published research. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Objective: To provide understanding of practices and attitudes toward tele-neuropsychology (teleNP) among Veterans Health Administration (VA) psychologists who have joined a related community of practice., Methods: Several VA psychologists (the authors) developed this survey to better understand dissemination of teleNP and attitudes toward teleNP among those involved in a VA teleNP community of practice. We contacted VA psychologists within this group to complete the survey. The survey was open from July to August 2021, during which time a total of 62 VA psychologists participated., Results: Response rate was estimated to be 41% of those receiving the survey (62 respondents). Approximately two thirds of those completing the survey reported current practice of teleNP (68%; n  = 42). In contrast, only 25% of the entire sample ( n  = 15) conducted any teleNP pre-pandemic. Job satisfaction related to being able to perform teleNP is high. Support for continued and increased use of teleNP is high, with most respondents (84%) indicating they will be at least somewhat likely to practice teleNP post-pandemic., Conclusions: The survey provides increased support for the use of teleNP by VA psychologists who responded to the survey, with significantly increased adoption since the Covid-19 pandemic, and greater likelihood of intention to use teleNP post pandemic.

Background: Many studies highlight poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children treated for brain tumours and their parents. However, little is known about the extent to which their informational, healthcare and communication needs regarding HRQoL are met during medical outpatient consultations., Aim: To explore the experiences of families regarding communication with physicians about HRQoL issues during consultations after treatment for childhood brain tumours., Methods: Interviews were conducted with 18 families of children and adolescents aged 8-17 years after completion of brain tumour treatment. Participants had completed treatment within the last 5 years and were receiving regular outpatient follow-up care. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the Framework Method., Results: Five main themes were identified: (i) unmet emotional and mental health needs; (ii) double protection; (iii) unmet information needs; (iv) communication barriers within consultations; and (v) finding a new normal., Conclusion: There was a need to improve communication between clinicians and these families, improve information provision, and overcome barriers to conversing with children within these outpatient consultations. Children and their parents should be supported to voice their current needs and concerns regarding their HRQoL. These findings will inform further development of the UK version of the 'KLIK' patient- and parent-reported outcome (PROM) portal., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pediatric Blood & Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Our aim is to investigate the association of treatment with survival in patients with diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) by examining 6 historical treatment paths., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 409 patients with radiologically centrally reviewed DIPG, sourced from the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology HIT-HGG trial database and the SIOPE-DIPG/DMG Registry. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were estimated to study treatment effects., Results: The median overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.5-11.9). Patients who by choice received no frontline treatment had an OS of 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.0-4.0), while those treated with radiation therapy (RT) alone had a median OS of 10.4 months (95% CI, 9.1-11.8). Those receiving RT combined with chemotherapy had the longest median OS of 11.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-12.6). The median post-progression survival (PPS) was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.5-4.7). Patients who relapsed and did not receive treatment had a PPS of 2.2 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.6), while those treated with chemotherapy alone had a PPS of 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.0), and those who underwent reirradiation, with or without chemotherapy, had the longest survival after relapse of 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-8.0). Treatment differences remained significant in multivariable analysis adjusted for age and symptom duration in both diagnosis and relapse setting., Conclusions: This study shows increased survival outcomes associated with radiation and chemotherapy treatment or a combination thereof, at diagnosis and relapse, in a historical DIPG cohort., Competing Interests: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Background: The term gliomatosis cerebri (GC), a radiology-defined highly infiltrating diffuse glioma, has been abandoned since molecular GC-associated features could not be established., Methods: We conducted a multinational retrospective study of 104 children and adolescents with GC providing comprehensive clinical and (epi-)genetic characterization., Results: Median overall survival (OS) was 15.5 months (interquartile range, 10.9-27.7) with a 2-year survival rate of 28%. Histopathological grading correlated significantly with median OS: CNS WHO grade II: 47.8 months (25.2-55.7); grade III: 15.9 months (11.4-26.3); grade IV: 10.4 months (8.8-14.4). By DNA methylation profiling (n = 49), most tumors were classified as pediatric-type diffuse high-grade glioma (pedHGG), H3-/IDH-wild-type (n = 31/49, 63.3%) with enriched subclasses pedHGG_RTK2 (n = 19), pedHGG_A/B (n = 6), and pedHGG_MYCN (n = 5), but only one pedHGG_RTK1 case. Within the pedHGG, H3-/IDH-wild-type subgroup, recurrent alterations in EGFR (n = 10) and BCOR (n = 9) were identified. Additionally, we observed structural aberrations in chromosome 6 in 16/49 tumors (32.7%) across tumor types. In the pedHGG, H3-/IDH-wild-type subgroup TP53 alterations had a significant negative effect on OS., Conclusions: Contrary to previous studies, our representative pediatric GC study provides evidence that GC has a strong predilection to arise on the background of specific molecular features (especially pedHGG_RTK2, pedHGG_A/B, EGFR and BCOR mutations, chromosome 6 rearrangements)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.)

Diffuse hemispheric gliomas, H3G34R/V-mutant (DHG-H3G34), are lethal brain tumors lacking targeted therapies. They originate from interneuronal precursors; however, leveraging this origin for therapeutic insights remains unexplored. Here, we delineate a cellular hierarchy along the interneuron lineage development continuum, revealing that DHG-H3G34 mirror spatial patterns of progenitor streams surrounding interneuron nests, as seen during human brain development. Integrating these findings with genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 screens identifies genes upregulated in interneuron lineage progenitors as major dependencies. Among these, CDK6 emerges as a targetable vulnerability: DHG-H3G34 tumor cells show enhanced sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors and a CDK6-specific degrader, promoting a shift toward more mature interneuron-like states, reducing tumor growth, and prolonging xenograft survival. Notably, a patient with progressive DHG-H3G34 treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor achieved 17 months of stable disease. This study underscores interneuronal progenitor-like states, organized in characteristic niches, as a distinct vulnerability in DHG-H3G34, highlighting CDK6 as a promising clinically actionable target., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.G.F. is a consultant for Twentyeight-Seven Therapeutics and Blueprint Medicines. M.M. is an SAB member for Cygnal Therapeutics. K.L.L. is founder and equity holder of Travera Inc. and receives consulting fees from BMS, Integragen, and Rarecyte, and research support from Lilly, BMS, and Amgen. D.H. has acted as an advisor for Novartis in relation to ribociclib., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The question of how to handle clinically actionable outcomes from retrospective research studies is poorly explored. In neuropathology, this problem is exacerbated by ongoing refinement in tumour classification. We sought to establish a disclosure threshold for potential revised diagnoses as determined by the neuro-oncology speciality., Methods: As part of a previous research study, the diagnoses of 73 archival paediatric brain tumour samples were reclassified according to the WHO 2016 guidelines. To determine the disclosure threshold and clinical actionability of pathology-related findings, we conducted a result-evaluation approach within the ethical framework of BRAIN UK using a surrogate clinical multidisciplinary team (MDT) of neuro-oncology specialists., Results: The MDT identified key determinants impacting decision-making, including anticipated changes to patient management, time elapsed since initial diagnosis, likelihood of the patient being alive and absence of additional samples since cohort inception. Ultimately, none of our research findings were considered clinically actionable, largely due to the cohort's historic archival and high-risk nature. From this experience, we developed a decision-making framework to determine if research findings indicating a change in diagnosis require reporting to the relevant clinical teams., Conclusions: Ethical issues relating to the use of archival tissue for research and the potential to identify actionable findings must be carefully considered. We have established a structured framework to assess the actionability of research data relating to patient diagnosis. While our specific findings are most applicable to the pathology of poor prognostic brain tumour groups in children, the model can be adapted to a range of disease settings, for example, other diseases where research is dependent on retrospective tissue cohorts, and research findings may have implications for patients and families, such as other tumour types, epilepsy-related pathology, genetic disorders and degenerative diseases., (© 2024 The Author(s). Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Neuropathological Society.)

Objective: Cerebellar pilocytic astrocytomas (cPAs) in childhood have long been recognized to have a good prognosis after total resection, but the outcome after incomplete resective surgery remains largely unpredictable, with the incidence of radiological progressive disease ranging from 18% to 100%. It has been traditionally thought that gross-total resection was required for long-term survival, and small residuals were classically resected in a subsequent operation., Methods: The authors analyzed their pediatric low-grade glioma (PLGG) database for cases treated between 1985 and 2020 and filtered for intracranial PAs, to determine what clinical or radiological factors precipitated revisional resective surgery in their single quaternary care center cohort., Results: Using the pediatric low-grade glioma database, 283 patients were identified to have a histopathological diagnosis of intracranial PA between 1985 and 2020, of which 200 lesions were within the cerebellum (70.7%). The majority of patients with cPA were between 1 and 10 years of age (n = 145, 72.5%) without gender predominance (M/F = 99:101), usually presenting with 1 lesion (n = 197, 98.5%). Gross-total resection was achieved in 74.5% (n = 149) of initial surgeries for cPA. In patients with subtotal resection, the mean largest diameter of the postoperative residual tumor was 1.06 cm (range 0-2.95 cm). Seven patients with subtotal resection did not require a second resective intervention. In 31 patients the neuro-oncology multidisciplinary team recommended a second resection at a mean time interval of 22.9 months (range 0.13-81.6 months) from the initial surgery. Proportionally, the children who underwent multiple resections were also more likely to receive adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy. Functionally, the children in the multiple operation cohort experienced more complications of therapy including ongoing endocrinopathy, treatment-associated hearing deficit, and neurocognitive deficits., Conclusions: Residual disease in cPA should be maintained under clinicocoradiological surveillance postoperatively with adoption of a more conservative approach when residual disease is not significantly changing over time.

Background: Selumetinib is the first approved treatment for pediatric patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas (PN) in the EU and US, as well as in multiple other countries. Evidence for the management of selumetinib-associated adverse events (AEs) is mostly limited to clinical trials and expanded-access programs. We gathered a panel of European healthcare practitioners with clinical experience prescribing selumetinib and/or managing pediatric patients with NF1-PN to provide recommendations on the prevention and management of AEs., Methods: A modified Delphi approach was used to develop the recommendations among the group of experts. Initial statements were developed from a literature review of current management recommendations and regulatory reports. The panel refined the statements and rated the extent to which they agreed with them in 2 sessions and a follow-up survey. The panel comprised 2 pediatric neuro-oncologists, 1 pediatric oncologist, 1 pediatrician, 1 neuropediatrician, 1 oncologist, 1 neurologist, 2 psychologists, and 1 dermatologist., Results: The experts agreed on the relative frequency and impact of AEs potentially associated with selumetinib. Consensus-level agreement was reached for 36 statements regarding the prevention and management of AEs potentially associated with selumetinib. Experts recommended treatments for AEs based on their experience., Conclusions: The development of a variety of consensus statements indicates expert agreement on best practices for the prevention and management of AEs potentially associated with selumetinib in pediatric patients with NF1-PN. These events are generally manageable and should be considered alongside treatment benefit. Information sharing is warranted as further experience is gained., Competing Interests: A.A.A.: Member of advisory boards, and received scientific grants, speaker honoraria, travel support, and payments for workshop participation from Alexion. Member of Novartis advisory board. C.S.: Received payment for scientific consultation and speaker honoraria from Alexion/AstraZeneca. Participated on a data safety monitoring/advisory board for Alexion/AstraZeneca. Received payment for scientific consultation from IQVIA. Held a leadership or fiduciary role for ANF patient advocacy. D.H.: Member of advisory boards, and received research grants, speaker honoraria, materials for clinical trials, institutional clinical trial support, and travel support from Alexion/AstraZeneca. H.S.H.: Alexion/AstraZeneca advisory board, speaker honoraria, travel support, and consulting fees. J.P.: Alexion consulting fees, honoraria, travel expenses, participation on a data safety monitoring/advisory board. P.A.A.: Grants/contracts from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Pfizer/Array, and Sanofi. Consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Merck Serono, Pierre-Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Idera, Sandoz, 4SC, Italfarmaco, Nektar, Pfizer/Array, Lunaphore, Medicenna, Bio-Al Health, ValoTx, Replimmune, and Bayer. Support for attending meetings and/or travel from Pfizer, Bio-Al Health, and Replimmune. Participation on data safety monitoring/advisory boards from Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche-Genentech, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Immunocore, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eisai, Regeneron, Daiichi Sankyo, Oncosec, Nouscom, Seagen, iTeos, and Erasca. Member of advisory boards for Alexion. P.W.: Consulting fees, speaker payment/honoraria and logistical support from, and member of advisory boards for Alexion. Received consulting fees and speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca. Received consulting fees from SpringWorks. T.P.: Received consulting fees from, and was a member of advisory boards for, Alexion. Received grants from NF Kinder. T.R.: Member of advisory boards and participated on a data safety monitoring/advisory board for, and received speaker honoraria, travel support, personal payments, grants/contracts, and consulting fees from Alexion/AstraZeneca. Received payment/honoraria from the Taiwan Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery. Unpaid leadership/fiduciary role for the German Society for Neuropediatrics, NF Working Group Germany. V.R.: Received consulting fees and was a member of advisory boards for Alexion. An unpaid board member of psychosocial working group for Psychosoziale Arbeitsgemeinschaft in der Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie (PSAPOH) Gesellschaft für Pädiatrische Onkologie und Hämatologie (GPOH)., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Within the last few decades, we have witnessed tremendous advancements in the study of pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG), leading to a much-improved understanding of their molecular underpinnings. Consequently, we have achieved successful milestones in developing and implementing targeted therapeutic agents for treating these tumors. However, the community continues to face many unknowns when it comes to the most effective clinical implementation of these novel targeted inhibitors or combinations thereof. Questions encompassing optimal dosing strategies, treatment duration, methods for assessing clinical efficacy, and the identification of predictive biomarkers remain unresolved. Here, we offer the consensus of the international pLGG coalition (iPLGGc) clinical trial working group on these important topics and comment on clinical trial design and endpoint rationale. Throughout, we seek to standardize the global approach to early clinical trials (phase I and II) for pLGG, leading to more consistently interpretable results as well as enhancing the pace of novel therapy development and encouraging an increased focus on functional endpoints as well and quality of life for children faced with this disease., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) is essentially a single pathway disease, with most tumors driven by genomic alterations affecting the mitogen-activated protein kinase/ERK (MAPK) pathway, predominantly KIAA1549::BRAF fusions and BRAF V600E mutations. This makes pLGG an ideal candidate for MAPK pathway-targeted treatments. The type I BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib, in combination with the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the systemic treatment of BRAF V600E-mutated pLGG. However, this combination is not approved for the treatment of patients with tumors harboring BRAF fusions as type I RAF inhibitors are ineffective in this setting and may paradoxically enhance tumor growth. The type II RAF inhibitor, tovorafenib (formerly DAY101, TAK-580, MLN2480), has shown promising activity and good tolerability in patients with BRAF-altered pLGG in the phase 2 FIREFLY-1 study, with an objective response rate (ORR) per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma (RANO-HGG) criteria of 67%. Tumor response was independent of histologic subtype, BRAF alteration type (fusion vs. mutation), number of prior lines of therapy, and prior MAPK-pathway inhibitor use., Methods: LOGGIC/FIREFLY-2 is a two-arm, randomized, open-label, multicenter, global, phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tovorafenib monotherapy vs. current standard of care (SoC) chemotherapy in patients < 25 years of age with pLGG harboring an activating RAF alteration who require first-line systemic therapy. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either tovorafenib, administered once weekly at 420 mg/m 2 (not to exceed 600 mg), or investigator's choice of prespecified SoC chemotherapy regimens. The primary objective is to compare ORR between the two treatment arms, as assessed by independent review per RANO-LGG criteria. Secondary objectives include comparisons of progression-free survival, duration of response, safety, neurologic function, and clinical benefit rate., Discussion: The promising tovorafenib activity data, CNS-penetration properties, strong scientific rationale combined with the manageable tolerability and safety profile seen in patients with pLGG led to the SIOPe-BTG-LGG working group to nominate tovorafenib for comparison with SoC chemotherapy in this first-line phase 3 trial. The efficacy, safety, and functional response data generated from the trial may define a new SoC treatment for newly diagnosed pLGG., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05566795. Registered on October 4, 2022., (© 2024. The Author(s).)