1. Doctoral graduates' attitudes toward scholarly work and Institutional Review Board and Quality Improvement Committee education and submission processes: A pilot study.
- Author
-
Burrell SA, McKeever A, Shearer D, Hahessy S, and Battaglia E
- Subjects
- Humans, Pilot Projects, Cross-Sectional Studies, Male, Female, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Students, Nursing psychology, Students, Nursing statistics & numerical data, Ethics Committees, Research standards, Nursing Research, Curriculum, Education, Nursing, Graduate, Quality Improvement
- Abstract
Background: Educators are challenged to find better ways to prepare doctoral nursing students to conduct scholarly work involving human subjects., Purpose: To better understand doctoral nursing students' attitudes toward programmatic scholarly work and Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) education and submission processes., Methods: Recent Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) and Philosophy of Nursing (PhD) graduates were recruited using convenience sampling techniques to participate in this cross-sectional, descriptive, mixed-methods pilot study. Data were collected using two researcher-developed instruments., Discussion: Nineteen doctoral nursing students participated in this study. Students most often used a quantitative approach with health care providers to complete their scholarly work requirements. Both PhD and DNP participants were overall satisfied with the IRB/QIC content in the curricula and the submission process. Four themes were identified: (a) Efficiency, (b) Collaboration, (c) Faculty Mentorship, and (d) Areas for Improvement., Conclusion: Findings from this pilot study may be used to enhance IRB/QIC processes through revision of administrative processes and student education., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF