Search

The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of endovascular urgent thoracoabdominal aortic (TAAA) repair, using an off-the-shelf preloaded inner branch device (E-nside; Artivion). Data from a physician-initiated national multicenter registry, including patients treated with E-nside endograft (INBREED) were prospectively collected (2020-2024); only urgent cases were included in this study. Primary outcomes were technical success and mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes were spinal cord ischemia rate, stroke rate, major adverse events (MAE) as also branch instability at 12 months. Of 185 patients enrolled in the INBREED, 64 (34.5%) were treated in a urgent setting and were included in the study. Reason for urgent repair was presence of aneurysm-related symptoms in 31 patients (48.4%), a contained rupture in eight (12.5%), and a large aneurysm >80 mm in 25 (39.1%). Extent of repair was I to III in 32 patients (50%) and IV in 32 (50%); 18 (28%) had a narrow (<25 mm) paravisceral aortic lumen. An adjunctive proximal thoracic endograft was deployed in 29 patients (45.3%); a distal bifurcated abdominal endograft was used in 33 (51.5%). Two hundred forty-nine target vessels (97.2%) were successfully incorporated through an inner branch from an upper arm (81.2%) or femoral (18.8%) access. A balloon expandable stent was used in 184 (75.7%) target vessels, a self-expandable stent in 59 (24.3%). Mean time for target vessel bridging was 39.9 ± 28.4 minutes per target vessel. Thirty-day cumulative major adverse event (MAE) rate was 28%, and mortality occurred in five patients (9.1%). There was one postoperative stroke (1.6%), and the spinal cord ischemia (SCI) rate was 8% (n = 5). For the 249 target vessels successfully incorporated through an inner branch, 1-year freedom from target vessel instability was 93% ± 3% after 1 year. The E-nside represents a valid solution for the urgent treatment of TAAAs, including symptomatic and ruptured TAAAs, as well as large asymptomatic TAAAs that cannot wait for a custom-made device. The preloaded inner branches and available proximal and distal graft diameters might be useful in urgent settings and provided satisfactory early and 1-year results, in terms of both endograft and target vessel stability. Further studies are required to assess the clinical role of E-nside for urgent TAAA repair. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Aortitis is a rare inflammation of the aorta. It can be classified as infective, non-infective, or idiopathic. Infective aortitis can debut as an acute aortic syndrome that needs urgent or emergent treatment. Historically, these kinds of patients have been preferably treated by open surgery, with subsequent lack of information about the endovascular repair. The aim of the present study is to report the results of our experience with the urgent or emergent endovascular repair of infective aortitis with acute presentation. Methods: All consecutive urgent or emergent endovascular repairs, performed between January 2019 and January 2024 for the treatment of infective aortitis, were included. The inclusion criteria were clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings recognized as aortitis risk factors. Patients with graft or endograft infection, aortic fistulae, and mycotic aneurysm were excluded. Primary endpoints were technical success and 30-day and follow-up survival. Early and late major adverse events, any changes in lesion morphology over time, and need for re-intervention were also assessed. Results: A total of 15 patients (14 males and 1 female) with a mean age of 74.2 ± 8.3 were included. All the subjects were treated by endovascular means in an urgent or emergent setting because of a rapidly growing aneurysm, symptomatic lesion, or contained or free aortic rupture. The diagnosis of infective aortitis was confirmed postoperatively by positive blood cultures in all the patients. A rapidly growing or symptomatic lesion was noted in all 15 subjects. Among these there were six (40%) contained and two (13%) free aneurysm ruptures. The endovascular techniques performed were as follows: four thoracic-EVAR (TEVAR), three off-the-shelf branched-EVAR (BEVAR), one Chimney-EVAR (Ch-EVAR), six EVAR with bifurcated graft, and one EVAR with straight tube graft. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients. Two patients (13%) died within 30 days after the index procedure. No case of early aortic-related mortality was registered. During a mean follow-up of 31.6 ± 23.1 months (range 1–71), no further death or major adverse event was registered among the remaining 13 alive patients. Re-interventions were performed in three cases (20%). Aneurysm's shrinkage > 5 mm or stability was noted in 10 of the 13 patients who survived the early period after repair. Conclusions: Despite the relative reluctance to use an endograft in an infected area, in our experience the endovascular approach resulted to be feasible, safe, and effective in the treatment of infective aortitis with acute presentation, with acceptable peri-operative and mid-term follow-up outcomes. Further studies are needed to confirm our results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess the complex management of arterial anomalies in Vascular Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (vEDS). Methods: We report the case of a 34-year-old male, diagnosed with vEDS, who presented with acute intraperitoneal hemorrhage caused by the rupture of a splenic artery aneurysm, treated in emergency with coil embolization and splenectomy. Computed Tomography (CT) scan showed the concomitant presence of right renal artery (RRA) and common hepatic artery (CHA) aneurysms. Results: Both aneurysms were conservatively managed and the patient went through serial CT imaging. After 3 months, rapid regression of the vascular abnormalities led to complete disappearing of RRA and CHA aneurysms, confirmed at 24-month imaging follow-up. In the same time span, two pseudoaneurysms developed in other sites used for transarterial access, requiring two secondary interventions. The present case emphasizes the unpredictability of disease's evolution and arterial complications in vEDS. Conservative management of complex lesions such as visceral artery aneurysms, which in this case resulted to be the best strategy, avoided the risks associated with surgical intervention in such fragile tissues. The reported complications underline that operative indications should be carefully weighed in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to compare two commercially available off the shelf branched endografts for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, namely the E-nside (Artivion) and Zenith t-Branch (Cook Medical) devices. This multicentre retrospective study (2020 – 2023) included patients treated by branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) for TAAA using the inner branched E-nside or the outer branched t-Branch. Endpoints were 30 day technical success and major adverse events (MAEs) as well as one year freedom from target vessel instability and main endograft instability. The study included 163 patients: 79 (307 target vessels) treated with E-nside and 84 (325 target vessels) with t-branch. Aneurysm extent was I – III in 91 patients (55.8%; 47% of E-nside and 66% of t-Branch) and IV in 72 patients (44.2%; 53% of E-nside and 34% of t-Branch) (p =.011). An adjunctive proximal thoracic endograft was used in 43% of E-nside vs. 69% of t-Branch (p <.001), with less frequent thoracic endografting (14% vs. 76%; p <.001) and shorter length of coverage (p =.024) in extent IV TAAA treated by E-nside. E-nside cases had shorter renal artery bridging lengths (66 ± 17 mm vs. 76 ± 20 mm; p <.010) and less frequent use of a distal bifurcated endograft (53% vs. 80%; p <.001). Comparing 30 day results, the mortality rate was 1% vs. 2% (p =.62), any MAE occurred in 18% vs. 21% (p =.55), the stroke rate was 3% vs. 0% (p =.23), and the elective spinal cord ischaemia rate was 5% vs. 8% (p =.40) for E-nside and t-Branch, respectively. At one year, freedom from target vessel instability was 96 ± 3% for E-nside and 95 ± 3% for t-Branch (p =.58), and freedom from endograft instability was 98 ± 2% vs. 97 ± 3% (p =.46), respectively. Both off the shelf devices provided excellent early and one year results. The E-nside may require shorter thoracic aortic coverage and bridging length for the renal arteries, and less frequent implantation of a concomitant proximal thoracic or distal abdominal bifurcated endograft. However, these aspects did not determine significant differences in clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to compare the early and medium-term outcomes of bypass vs endovascular treatment of occluded femoro-popliteal stents in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (the OUT-STEPP multicentric registry). Between January 2016 and December 2021, 317 patients in 14 centers underwent treatment for a symptomatic occlusion of femoro-popliteal stent/stents. One hundred sixty-one patients were included into the present study: 46 (28.6%) underwent open bypass surgery (Group OPEN), and 115 (71.4%) underwent endovascular revascularization (Group ENDO). Early (30 days) results were assessed and compared between the two groups. Estimated 5-year outcomes were evaluated and compared with the log rank test. At 30 days, no differences were found in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, reinterventions, major amputation, and all-cause mortality between the two groups. The need for blood transfusions was higher for patients in Group OPEN (17; 36.9% vs 13; 11.3%; P <.001). The mean length of intensive care unit stay and the mean hospital stay were higher for patients in Group OPEN ([0.3 ± 0.9 vs 0 days; P <.001] and [9.7 ± 5.8 vs 3.3 ± 1.4 days; P <.001], respectively). The overall median duration of follow-up was 33.1 months (interquartile range, 14-49.5 months). At 5 years, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of survival (68.7% Group OPEN vs 68.8% Group ENDO; P =.27; log-rank, 1.21), primary patency (56.3% Group OPEN vs 67.8% Group ENDO; P =.39; log-rank, 0.75), secondary patency (59.1% Group OPEN vs 77.8% Group ENDO; P =.24; log-rank, 1.40), absence of target lesion restenosis (56.8% Group OPEN vs 62.7% Group ENDO; P =.42; log-rank, 0.65), and limb salvage (77.2% Group OPEN vs 90.4% Group ENDO; P =.17; log-rank, 1.87). Both bypass and endovascular treatment provided safe and effective restoration of patency for femoro-popliteal in-stent occlusion in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Open surgery was associated with longer stay in hospital and increased use of blood transfusions. At 5 years, no significant differences were found in the rates of overall patency or limb salvage between bypass and endovascular treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The complexity of the peripheral recanalization comes from the difficulty to cross the lesion or get into the subintimal space and its re-entry afterward, with a high risk of complications like artery dissection and/or rupture, which are life-threatening complications. To our knowledge, we report the first case of the use of a homemade steerable sheath for the successful revascularization of a heavy chronic total occlusion in a patient with unsuitable upper vascular access. Technique: By contralateral vascular access and the use of a 6Fr 55-cm Cook Flexor sheath and a pre-looped 0.014" choice guidewire, a steerable homemade sheath was used to achieve the support, pushability, and steer needed to access the subintimal space at the origin of a heavy occluded common iliac artery, thus giving us the ability to cross the lesion. Conclusions: The homemade steerable sheath is feasible, quick, cheap, and easy to use, sparing the use of re-entry systems and catheters for the attempts of subintimal navigation. In addition, this technique gives the advantage to steer the catheters and wires as needed, avoiding non-desired re-entry points with secondary collaterals lumen compromise or extensive dissections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To report the results of a single-centre in the treatment of extensive aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD) by the covered endovascular reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data obtained from the review of medical charts of all consecutive patients treated with CERAB technique for AIOD between January 2016 and December 2019 in San Giovanni-Addolorata Hospital (Rome, Italy). Clinical examination, duplex ultrasound with ankle-brachial index measurement and contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography were performed preoperatively. A clinical and ultrasound follow-up was carried out at one month and then half yearly after the intervention to evaluate patients' clinical status, limb salvage, target lesion revascularization rate, primary and secondary patency rate. Results: During the study period, 24 patients (14 men, 58.3%; 10 women, 41.7%; median age 59 years, range 37–79 years) underwent CERAB for AIOD (TASC II C 29.2%, TASC II D 70.8%). Indications for treatment were: intermittent claudication in 18 patients (75%) and critical limb ischemia in 6 (25%). Technical success was achieved in all cases. Perioperative minor complications occurred in three cases (12.5%). One patient reported an intraoperative iliac rupture requiring adjunctive covered stenting. Median hospital length of stay was two days (range 1–9). No patient died perioperatively nor at the last follow-up. At a median follow-up of 18 months (range 6–48 months), mean ankle-brachial index increased significantly (from 0.62 ± 0.15 before the procedure to 0.84 ± 0.18) (P < 0.001) and target lesion revascularization rate was 12.5%. At two years, the limb salvage rate was 100%, and primary and secondary patency rates were 87.5% and 100%, respectively. Conclusion: CERAB technique demonstrated to be effective at the mid-term follow-up with low rate of complications and short length of stay. Long-term results and more robust data are needed to affirm this technique as the first-line treatment for extensive AIOD. However, it could become the preferred option especially in fragile patients and during contemporary COVID-19 pandemic due to the current limitations in vascular and critical care bed capacity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Secondary aorto-enteric fistulae (SAEF) are rare life-threatening complications that occur after abdominal aortic graft implant to treat aortic aneurysm or occlusive disease. Conventional treatments such as extra-anatomic bypass grafting with aortic ligation and subsequent graft removal with bowel repair are associated with a 25% to 90% operative mortality rate. In the emergency setting, patients unsuitable for major arterial surgery may benefit from a staged, less invasive approach. We present a case of SAEF treated with endoluminal deployment of a stent graft followed by duodenojejunal resection and anastomosis without further aortic reconstruction and graft removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The aim of this study was to report the results of a single-centre experience with a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Viabahn VBX; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ, USA) as bridging stent in branched endovascular aortic repair (B-EVAR)., Methods: This is a retrospective single institution analysis of a prospectively maintained database. All patients undergone implantation of at least one VBX as bridging stent in B-EVAR over the last 5 years (from July 1, 2018, to November 31, 2023) were included. Primary outcomes were technical success, primary and secondary stent patency rate, branch-related reinterventions, and branch instability. Secondary outcomes were clinical success, mortality, and rate of aortic-related reinterventions., Results: This study involved 40 patients for a total of 147 VBX stent-grafts implanted in 141 target vessels as bridging stents in B-EVAR (62.5% off-the-shelf and 37.5% custom made devices; 65% with outer branches and 35% with inner branches) for the treatment of 38 (95%) degenerative and 2 (5%) postdissection aneurysms. In 28 cases (70%) a total transfemoral approach was used to deliver the bridging stents. Technical success was 100%. No target vessel was lost intraoperatively. Over a median follow-up of 26.5 months (range 0-74), primary and secondary patency, branch-related reintervention, and branch instability were 98.5% (139/141), 99.3% (140/141), 15% (6/40), and 4.9% (7/141), respectively. Four of the 7 cases of branch instability, all requiring an endovascular correction, were secondary to type Ic endoleak. Clinical success was 97.5% as effect of 1 perioperative death. During the follow-up other 6 patients died, contributing to an overall survival rate of 82.5%. The overall rate of aortic-related reinterventions was 20%., Conclusions: Despite further evaluation is mandatory to determine durability of the VBX in the long-term after B-EVAR, in our experience VBX demonstrated a high flexibility and trackability, excellent stent retention, and outstanding patency over time. A generous distal landing of the bridging stent into the target vessel should be always achieved, whereas possible, to reduce the risk of type Ic endoleak, which seems to be the main cause of branch instability.