Search

Emergency medical services (EMS) clinicians are expected to provide expert care to all patients, but face obstacles in maintaining skillsets required in the care of critically ill or injured children. The objectives of this study were to describe and assess the effectiveness of a pediatric-focused, simulation-based, procedural training program for EMS clinicians, delivered on-site by a pediatric simulation education team. We also describe a novel, remote, asynchronous performance outcome measurement system using first-person-view video review. This was a prospective study of simulation-based training and procedural outcomes. The study population involved EMS clinicians at three fire-based EMS agencies stratified as urban, suburban, and rural sites. The primary outcome was performance of intraosseous catheterization (IO), bag-valve-mask ventilation (BVM), and supraglottic device placement (SGD), measured across three time points. Secondary outcomes were identification of differences across EMS agencies and participant survey responses. We obtained video data from 122 clinicians, totaling 561 videos, with survey response rates of 89.0–91.3%. Pre-intervention scores were high: least-square means (95% confident-intervals) 9.5 (8.9, 10.2) for IO; 9.6 (9.3, 9.9) for BVM; and 11.6 (10.9, 12.2) for SGD. There was significant improvement post-intervention: 11.5 (10.7, 12.3) for IO; 11.0 (10.7, 11.4) for BVM; and 13.6 (12.8, 14.4) for SGD. Improvement was maintained at follow-up after a median of 9.5 months: 10.5 (9.8, 11.2) for IO; 10.2 (9.9, 10.6) for BVM; and 12.4 (11.7, 13.1) for SGD. There were no statistical differences between sites. Of survey respondents, half had not cared for a critically ill or injured child in at least a year, the vast majority had not had hands-on pediatric training in over 6 months, and the majority felt that training should occur at least every 6 months. Our pediatric-focused, simulation-based procedural training program was associated with improvement and maintenance of high-baseline procedural performance for EMS clinicians over the study period. Findings were consistent across sites. Remote assessment was feasible. Participant surveys emphasized a desire for more pediatric-focused training and highlighted the low frequency of clinical exposure to procedures potentially needed in the care of critically ill or injured pediatric patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The lower clinical exposure of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) fellows to critical procedures may impede skill acquisition. We sought to determine the tracheal intubation learning curve of PEM fellows during training and compared PEM fellow success against standards for tracheal intubation success., Methods: This was a retrospective, video-based study of a cohort of PEM fellows at a single academic pediatric emergency department (PED). All forms of tracheal intubation were included (rapid sequence intubation and crash or no medication). The cohort consisted of 36 PEM fellows from all or part of 5 consecutive fellowship classes. Data were collected by structured review of both existing ceiling-mounted videos and the electronic medical record. The main outcome was PEM fellows' success on the first or second attempt. We used cumulative summation to generate tracheal intubation learning curves. We specifically assessed the proportion of PEM fellows who reached 1 of 4 thresholds for procedural performance: 90% and 80% predicted success on the first and the first or second attempt., Results: From July 2014 to June 2020, there were 610 patient encounters with at least 1 attempt at tracheal intubation. The 36 PEM fellows performed at least 1 attempt at tracheal intubation for 414 ED patient encounters (65%). Median patient age was 2.1 years (interquartile range, 0.4-8.1). The PEM fellows were successful on the first attempt for 276 patients (67%) and on the first or second attempt for 337 (81%). None of the 36 PEM fellows reached the 90% threshold for either first or second attempt success. Four fellows (11%) met the 80% threshold for first attempt success and 11 (31%) met the 80% threshold for first or second attempt success., Conclusions: Despite performing the majority of attempts, PEM fellows often failed to reach the standard thresholds for performance of tracheal intubation. Clinical exposure alone is too low to ensure acquisition of airway skills., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: This systematic review was performed to assess the effectiveness of in situ simulation education. We searched databases including MEDLINE and Embase for studies comparing in situ simulation with other educational approaches. Two reviewers screened articles and extracted information. Sixty-two articles met inclusion criteria, of which 24 were synthesized quantitatively using random effects meta-analysis. When compared with current educational practices alone, the addition of in situ simulation to these practices was associated with small improvements in clinical outcomes, including mortality [odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55 to 0.78], care metrics (standardized mean difference, -0.34; 95% CI, -0.45 to -0.21), and nontechnical skills (standardized mean difference, -0.52; 95% CI, -0.99 to -0.05). Comparisons between in situ and traditional simulation showed mixed learner preference and knowledge improvement between groups, while technical skills showed improvement attributable to in situ simulation. In summary, available evidence suggests that adding in situ simulation to current educational practices may improve patient mortality and morbidity., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.)

Introduction: As part of onboarding and systems testing for a clinical expansion, immersive virtual reality (VR) incorporating digital twin technology was used. While digital twin technology has been leveraged by industry, its use in health care has been limited with no prior application for onboarding or training. The tolerability and acceptability of immersive VR for use by a large population of healthcare staff were unknown., Methods: A prospective, observational study of an autonomous immersive VR onboarding experience to a new clinical space was conducted from May to September 2021. Participants were healthcare staff from several critical care and acute care units. Primary outcomes were tolerance and acceptability measured by reported adverse effects and degree of immersion. Secondary outcomes were attitudes toward the efficacy of VR compared with standard onboarding experiences., Results: A total of 1522 healthcare staff participated. Rates of adverse effects were low and those with prior VR experience were more likely to report no adverse effects. Odds of reporting immersion were high across all demographic groups, though decreased with increasing age. The preference for VR over low-fidelity methods was high across all demographics; however, preferences were mixed when compared with traditional simulation and real-time clinical care., Conclusions: Large-scale VR onboarding is feasible, tolerable, and acceptable to a diverse population of healthcare staff when using digital twin technology. This study also represents the largest VR onboarding experience to date and may address preconceived notions that VR-based training in health care is not ready for widespread adoption., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.)

Background: Improving the assessment and training of tracheal intubation is hindered by the lack of a sufficiently validated profile of expertise. Although several studies have examined biomechanics of tracheal intubation, there are significant gaps in the literature. We used 3-dimensional motion capture to study pediatric providers performing simulated tracheal intubation to identify candidate kinematic variables for inclusion in an expert movement profile., Methods: Pediatric anesthesiologists (experienced) and pediatric residents (novices) were recruited from a pediatric institution to perform tracheal intubation on airway mannequins in a motion capture laboratory. Subjects performed 21 trials of tracheal intubation, 3 each of 7 combinations of laryngoscopic visualization (direct or indirect), blade type (straight or curved), and mannequin size (adult or pediatric). We used repeated measures analysis of variance to determine whether various kinematic variables (3-trial average for each participant) were associated with experience., Results: Eleven experienced and 15 novice providers performed 567 successful tracheal intubation attempts (9 attempts unsuccessful). For laryngoscopy, experienced providers exhibited shorter path length (total distance traveled by laryngoscope handle; 77.6 ± 26.0 cm versus 113.9 ± 53.7 cm; P = 0.013) and greater angular variability at the left wrist (7.4 degrees versus 5.5 degrees, P = 0.013) and the left elbow (10.1 degrees versus 7.6 degrees, P = 0.03). For intubation, experienced providers exhibited shorter path length of the right hand (mean = 61.1 cm versus 99.9 cm, P < 0.001), lower maximum acceleration of the right hand (0.19 versus 0.14 m/s, P = 0.033), and smaller angular, variability at the right elbow (9.7 degrees versus 7.9 degrees, P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Our study and the available literature suggest specific kinematic variables for inclusion in an expert profile for tracheal intubation. Future studies should include a larger sample of practitioners, actual patients, and measures of the cognitive and affective components of expertise.