Search

Background and Objectives: Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) and paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNSs) encompass a heterogeneous group of antibody-associated disorders. Both the number of syndromes and commercially available antibody tests have increased considerably over the past decade. High-quality population-based data on epidemiology of these disorders and real-world performance of antibody tests are needed., Methods: In this nationwide retrospective cohort study, we identified all serum and CSF samples tested for antibodies against intracellular antigens (IAs: Hu [ANNA1], Yo [PCA1], CV2 [CRMP5], Ri [ANNA2], Ma1, Ma2 [Ta], amphiphysin, GAD65, GFAP, KLHL11, CARP VIII) or extracellular antigens (EAs: NMDAR, LGI1, Caspr2, GABA-B-R, GABA-A-R, AMPAR, DPPX, GlyR, mGluR1, VGCC, IgLON5, Tr [DNER]) between January 2016 and December 2021 in the Netherlands. Nationwide coverage was guaranteed for all antibodies except anti-GAD65 and anti-VGCC. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV); obtained clinical information about patients who tested positive; assigned diagnosis of AIE/PNS according to diagnostic criteria; and calculated incidence rates for IA, EA, and individual antibody-associated syndromes., Results: In the study period, 2,877 (9.5%) of 30,246 samples, belonging to 1,228 patients, tested positive. Sensitivity and specificity were high (>95%) to very high (>99%) for most tests in both serum and CSF. PPVs for several tests were moderate to poor, especially for serum testing of IA antibodies (25%-80%). Clinical data were available for 940 (76.5%) of 1,228 patients. A total of 578 AIE/PNS diagnoses were made. The incidence rate for AIE/PNS (per million person-years) increased from 4.70 (95% CI 3.72-5.85) in 2016 to 5.76 (4.69-7.00) in 2021. Overall, the incidence rate was 5.57 (5.13-6.05), 2.96 (2.64-3.31) for the EA and 2.61 (2.31-2.94) for the IA subgroup. The 4 most common AIE/PNS types were anti-NMDAR, anti-LGI1, anti-Hu, and anti-GAD65, together comprising almost two-thirds of all diagnoses (364/578, 63.0%)., Discussion: Most commercial antibody tests perform well overall, but important pitfalls remain. Although almost all tests had high specificity, PPV was only modest in the setting of these rare diseases and mass testing. We observe trends toward increasing incidence of antibody-associated AIE/PNS.

Background: The aim of this study was to determine treatment response and whether it is associated with antibody titre change in patients with autoimmune nodopathy (AN) previously diagnosed as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and to compare clinical features and treatment response between AN and CIDP., Methods: Serum IgG antibodies to neurofascin-155 (NF155), contactin-1 (CNTN1) and contactin-associated protein 1 (CASPR1) were detected with cell-based assays in patients diagnosed with CIDP. Clinical improvement was determined using the modified Rankin scale, need for alternative and/or additional treatments and assessment of the treating neurologist., Results: We studied 401 patients diagnosed with CIDP and identified 21 patients with AN (10 anti-NF155, 6 anti-CNTN1, 4 anti-CASPR1 and 1 anti-NF155/anti-CASPR1 double positive). In patients with AN ataxia (68% vs 28%, p=0.001), cranial nerve involvement (34% vs 11%, p=0.012) and autonomic symptoms (47% vs 22%, p=0.025) were more frequently reported; patients with AN improved less often after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (39% vs 80%, p=0.002) and required additional/alternative treatments more frequently (84% vs 34%, p<0.001), compared with patients with CIDP. Antibody titres decreased or became negative in patients improving on treatment. Treatment withdrawal was associated with a titre increase and clinical deterioration in four patients., Conclusions: Distinguishing CIDP from AN is important, as patients with AN need a different treatment approach. Improvement and relapses were associated with changes in antibody titres, supporting the pathogenicity of these antibodies., Competing Interests: Competing interests: MB reports grants from the Dutch Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds (W.OR16-18). LW reports grants from Grifols and the GBS/CIDP Foundation for the study of disease activity biomarkers in CIDP. EE is supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) BIDEB-2219 Postdoctoral Research Program. MT was supported by the Erasmus MC Pain Foundation, has received funding from ZonMw (Memorabel programme), the Dutch EpilepsieNL Foundation (NEF 19-08), Dioraphte (2001 0403) and E-RARE JTC 2018 (UltraAIE, 90030376505). PAvD reports grants from Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), Sanquin Blood supply, Takeda and Grifols, he is a member of Scientific Advisory Committee/Steering Committee Trials for Annexon, Argenx, Hansa, Octapharma, Sanofi and Roche, all grants and fees were paid to his institution. FE reports grants from ZonMw (Dutch Governmental Agency) and Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds (Dutch Charity Organization) and grants from CSLBehring, Kedrion, Terumo BCT, Grifols and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, outside the submitted work. Grants were paid to institution and are used for investigator-initiated randomised controlled trials and studies within INCbase, an international CIDP registry. In addition, he received consultancy fee from UCB Pharma, Sanofi and Grifols, paid to institution, outside the submitted work. KK reports grants from Takeda and Grifols (SPIN award). LQ reports grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III – Ministry of Economy and Innovation (Spain), Fundació La Marató, GBS-CIDP Foundation International, Novartis Pharma Spain, Roche, UCB and Grifols, and received speaker or expert testimony honoraria from CSL Behring, Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Merck, Annexon, Biogen, Janssen, ArgenX, UCB, LFB, Octapharma and Roche, and serves at Clinical Trial Steering Committee for Sanofi Genzyme and Roche, and is Principal Investigator for UCB’s CIDP01 trial. BCJ reports grants for research from Baxalta, Grifols, CSL-Behring, Annexon, Hansa Biopharma, Roche, Prinses Beatrix Spierfonds, GBS-CIDP Foundation International and Horizon 2020, and consultancy fees from Roche and Annexon, and he is chair of the Steering Committee of Internation GBS Outcome Study (IGOS) and member of the Steering Committee of International CIDP Outcome Study (ICOS) and INCbase. RH reports grants from Health~Holland, GBS-CIDP Foundation and Grifols. The ICOS was supported by funding from CSL-Behring and Grifols., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background and Objectives: The clinical criteria for autoimmune encephalitis (AE) were proposed by Graus et al. in 2016. In this study, the AE criteria were validated in the real world, and common AE mimics were described. In addition, criteria for probable anti-LGI1 encephalitis were proposed and validated., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, patients referred to our national referral center with suspicion of AE and specific neuroinflammatory disorders with similar clinical presentations were included from July 2016 to December 2019. Exclusion criteria were pure cerebellar or peripheral nerve system disorders. All patients were evaluated according to the AE criteria., Results: In total, 239 patients were included (56% female; median age 42 years, range 1-85). AE was diagnosed in 104 patients (44%) and AE mimics in 109 patients (46%). The most common AE mimics and misdiagnoses were neuroinflammatory CNS disorders (26%), psychiatric disorders (19%), epilepsy with a noninflammatory cause (13%), CNS infections (7%), neurodegenerative diseases (7%), and CNS neoplasms (6%). Common confounding factors were mesiotemporal lesions on brain MRI (17%) and false-positive antibodies in serum (12%). Additional mesiotemporal features (involvement extralimbic structures, enhancement, diffusion restriction) were observed more frequently in AE mimics compared with AE (61% vs 24%; p = 0.005). AE criteria showed the following sensitivity and specificity: possible AE, 83% (95% CI 74-89) and 27% (95% CI 20-36); definite autoimmune limbic encephalitis (LE), 10% (95% CI 5-17) and 98% (95% CI 94-100); and probable anti-NMDAR encephalitis, 50% (95% CI 26-74) and 96% (95% CI 92-98), respectively. Specificity of the criteria for probable seronegative AE was 99% (95% CI 96-100). The newly proposed criteria for probable anti-LGI1 encephalitis showed a sensitivity of 66% (95% CI 47-81) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 93-98)., Discussion: AE mimics occur frequently. Common pitfalls in AE misdiagnosis are mesiotemporal lesions (predominantly with atypical features) and false-positive serum antibodies. As expected, the specificity of the criteria for possible AE is low because these criteria represent the minimal requirements for entry in the diagnostic algorithm for AE. Criteria for probable AE (-LGI1, -NMDAR, seronegative) and definite autoimmune LE are applicable for decisions on immunotherapy in early disease stage, as specificity is high., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Background & Objectives: Autoimmune encephalitis (AIE) may present with prominent cognitive disturbances without overt inflammatory changes in MRI and CSF. Identification of these neurodegenerative dementia diagnosis mimics is important because patients generally respond to immunotherapy. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of neuronal antibodies in patients with presumed neurodegenerative dementia and describe the clinical characteristics of the patients with neuronal antibodies., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 920 patients were included with neurodegenerative dementia diagnosis from established cohorts at 2 large Dutch academic memory clinics. In total, 1,398 samples were tested (both CSF and serum in 478 patients) using immunohistochemistry (IHC), cell-based assays (CBA), and live hippocampal cell cultures (LN). To ascertain specificity and prevent false positive results, samples had to test positive by at least 2 different research techniques. Clinical data were retrieved from patient files., Results: Neuronal antibodies were detected in 7 patients (0.8%), including anti-IgLON5 (n = 3), anti-LGI1 (n = 2), anti-DPPX, and anti-NMDAR. Clinical symptoms atypical for neurodegenerative diseases were identified in all 7 and included subacute deterioration (n = 3), myoclonus (n = 2), a history of autoimmune disease (n = 2), a fluctuating disease course (n = 1), and epileptic seizures (n = 1). In this cohort, no patients with antibodies fulfilled the criteria for rapidly progressive dementia (RPD), yet a subacute deterioration was reported in 3 patients later in the disease course. Brain MRI of none of the patients demonstrated abnormalities suggestive for AIE. CSF pleocytosis was found in 1 patient, considered as an atypical sign for neurodegenerative diseases. Compared with patients without neuronal antibodies (4 per antibody-positive patient), atypical clinical signs for neurodegenerative diseases were seen more frequently among the patients with antibodies (100% vs 21%, p = 0.0003), especially a subacute deterioration or fluctuating course (57% vs 7%, p = 0.009)., Discussion: A small, but clinically relevant proportion of patients suspected to have neurodegenerative dementias have neuronal antibodies indicative of AIE and might benefit from immunotherapy. In patients with atypical signs for neurodegenerative diseases, clinicians should consider neuronal antibody testing. Physicians should keep in mind the clinical phenotype and confirmation of positive test results to avoid false positive results and administration of potential harmful therapy for the wrong indication., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology.)

Half of the world's population is at risk of arthropod-borne virus (arbovirus) infections. Several arbovirus infections have been associated with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). We investigated whether arboviruses are driving GBS beyond epidemic phases of transmission and studied the antibody response to glycolipids. The protocol of the International Guillain-Barré syndrome Outcome Study (IGOS), an observational prospective cohort study, was adapted to a case-control design. Serum samples were tested for a recent infection with Zika virus (ZIKV), dengue virus (DENV), chikungunya (CHIKV) virus, hepatitis E virus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Campylobacter jejuni, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and for antibodies to glycolipids. Forty-nine patients were included from Brazil (63%), Argentina (14%), and Malaysia (22%). Evidence of a recent infection was found in 27/49 (55%) patients: C jejuni (n = 15, 31%), M pneumoniae (n = 5, 10%), CHIKV (n = 2, 4%), EBV (n = 1, 2%), C jejuni and M pneumoniae (n = 2, 4%), CMV and DENV (n = 1, 2%), and C jejuni and DENV (n = 1, 2%). In 22 patients, 35 paired controls were collected. Odds ratio for recent infections did not significantly differ between cases and controls. No typical anti-ganglioside antibody binding was associated with recent arbovirus infection. We conclude that arbovirus infections occur in GBS patients outside of epidemic viral transmission, although not significantly more than in controls. Broad infection and anti-ganglioside antibody serology are important to establish the most likely pathogenic trigger in GBS patients. Larger studies are necessary to determine the association between arboviruses and GBS., (© 2021 The Authors. Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Peripheral Nerve Society.)