Search

As the life expectancy of the population continues to increase, more facial-rejuvenating procedures are sought. As the number of facelift procedures increases, it is mandatory to acknowledge, and most importantly prevent, any possible associated complications. One of the complications after rhytidectomy, and a sign of facelift, is the so-called "pixie ear deformity" or "bat ear." This is regarded as a telltale sign of a facelift procedure and appears to be identified in 5% of earlobe inset cases. The ear's location is a crucial hallmark of an aesthetically pleasing face, not only by itself but also in relation with other aesthetic units. When performing a facelift procedure, tension vectors of the rhytidectomy flap could cause alterations in ear's position and appearance: the ear loses its great mobility and becomes more fixed in its acquired position, resulting in a "stuck-on" appearance. The auricle is displaced following an anteroinferior direction, with the otobasion inferius (the most caudal anterior attachment of the earlobe to the cheek) being dislocated from its original more posterior and upper position to a new more anterior and caudal location. The displacement of the auricle is usually accompanied by distortion of the earlobe rotating forward and becoming more anterior than the rest of the ear. In recent decades, many techniques and procedures have been described to prevent and correct the pixie ear; in this review, we aim to analyze and describe them comprehensively., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Breast augmentation in 2019 was the first among the top five cosmetic surgical procedures performed worldwide, according to the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. It is not only the most commonly performed cosmetic surgery, but also the aesthetic procedure with the highest reoperation rate., Methods: A retrospective observational study of 306 female patients who underwent secondary breast surgery, with a follow-up of at least 1 year after surgery, from 2010 to 2020 is presented. For patients'selection, we decided to include all patients who performed a secondary breast surgery for aesthetic reasons; only patients with history of previous radiotherapy were excluded., Results: Patients were divided into different groups according to the performed procedure (the six winning moves) and associated postoperative outcomes are shown., Conclusions: The aim of this paper, based on authors' own experience, is to present a personalized approach to secondary breast reshaping, describing the six "winning" moves to apply, which, differently combined among each other, intend to address each specific cause of reintervention with a dedicated surgical procedure., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Facelift surgery, also known as rhytidectomy, is a popular cosmetic procedure aimed at reversing the signs of facial aging. While facelift surgery is more commonly performed in women, an increasing number of men are seeking this procedure to maintain a youthful appearance. The long recovery period conflicts the overall primary outcome anticipated by men undergoing rhytidectomy, i.e., appear younger, youthful, and ready to reaffirm their value in the working environment. Anterior direct neck lift, blepharoplasty (upper and lower eyelid blepharoplasty), and lipofilling are three techniques that have been shown to be effective in improving facial rejuvenation outcomes in elderly male patients. However, there is little to no evidence of the safety and efficacy of these techniques when used in combination. By combining these techniques, we hypothesized that we could achieve outcomes comparable to traditional facelift surgery, but with a lower risk of complications and a shorter recovery time. We conducted a retrospective case series study of 18 male patients who underwent facial rejuvenation surgery using the combination of anterior direct neck lift, blepharoplasty (upper and lower eyelid blepharoplasty), and lipofilling at our institution between 2018 and 2021. All 18 patients completed the study, with an average follow-up of 12 months. No major complications were observed, and all patients reported a high level of satisfaction with their outcomes.Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a postoperative complication experienced in all branches of surgery, including plastic surgery. Its occurrence can be lowered with adequate prophylaxis in the light of the patient's risk category and the type of surgery that will be performed. Nevertheless, thromboembolic prophylaxis is not routinely administered in plastic surgery. The prevention of VTE has gained significant attention in the past 5 years due to increased knowledge about the disease process and the alarming incidence rates. This literature review is specifically aimed at carrying out a synopsis of VTE prophylaxis trials conducted on plastic surgery patients. Antithrombotic agents have generally been avoided by plastic surgeons due to the increased risk of bleeding or hematomas; however, the prevalence of clinically important bleeding has not been found to increase with their use, as it emerges from numerous studies. VTE events can lead to increased morbidity and mortality rates, as well as a rise in healthcare costs. As it emerges from multiple studies, as a preventive measure against VTE, it is strongly advised to use mechanical prophylaxis along with low-molecular-weight heparin as the primary treatment option for plastic surgery patients who are at a greater risk. Up to date though, this practice is not commonly embraced by physicians. Preventing VTE is crucial, and measures to do so are necessary. However, there is no clear evidence to support the use of anticoagulation for plastic surgery patients, and some surgeons are hesitant to use it due to potential bleeding in extensive dissection areas.Level of Evidence III This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 ., (© 2023. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.)