18 results on '"Dester M"'
Search Results
2. P157 MammaPrint 8-year follow up results in patients with early breast cancer from a single-center Italian cohort study
- Author
-
Fiorino, E., primary, Giudici, F., additional, Aguggini, S., additional, Strina, C., additional, Milani, M., additional, Ziglioli, N., additional, Dester, M., additional, Barbieri, G., additional, Alberio, M., additional, Azzini, C., additional, Ferrero, G., additional, Ungari, M., additional, Dreezen, C., additional, Pronin, D., additional, and Generali, D., additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study
- Author
-
Cicchiello, F., Riva, F., Cazzaniga, M. E., Pedani, F., Nicolini, Matteo, Butti, C., Liscia, N., Pogliani, C., Capri, Giorgia, Alu', Matteo, Febbraro, A., Petrucelli, L., D'Onofrio, L., De Laurentiis, M., Pellegrini, D., Mentuccia, L., Cocciolone, V., Miraglio, E., Bajardi, E., Dester, M., Paternò, Enrico, Guaitoli, G., Ferrarini, I., Gervasi, Elisea, Licata, L., Benedetto, C., Andreis, D., Bordin, E., Ancona, C., Pizzuti, L., Fotia, V., Berardi, R., Airoldi, M., Arcangeli, V., Artale, S., Atzori, F., Ballerio, A., Bianchi, G. V., Blasi, L., Campidoglio, S., Ciccarese, M., Cursano, M. C., Piezzo, M., Fabi, A., Ferrari, L., Ferzi, A., Ficorella, C., Frassoldati, A., Fumagalli, A., Garrone, O., Gebbia, V., Generali, D., La Verde, N., Maur, M., Michelotti, A., Moretti, G., Musolino, Anna, Palumbo, R., Pistelli, M., Porpiglia, M., Sartori, D., Scavelli, C., Schirone, A., Turletti, A., Valerio, M. R., Vici, P., Zambelli, Ruggero Astolfo, Clivio, L., Torri, V., Cicchiello, F, Riva, F, Cazzaniga, M, Pedani, F, Nicolini, M, Butti, C, Liscia, N, Pogliani, C, Capri, G, Alu, M, Febbraro, A, Petrucelli, L, D'Onofrio, L, De Laurentiis, M, Pellegrini, D, Mentuccia, L, Cocciolone, V, Miraglio, E, Bajardi, E, Dester, M, Paterno, E, Guaitoli, G, Ferrarini, I, Gervasi, E, Licata, L, Benedetto, C, Andreis, D, Bordin, E, Ancona, C, Pizzuti, L, Fotia, V, Berardi, R, Airoldi, M, Arcangeli, V, Artale, S, Atzori, F, Ballerio, A, Bianchi, G, Blasi, L, Campidoglio, S, Ciccarese, M, Cursano, M, Piezzo, M, Fabi, A, Ferrari, L, Ferzi, A, Ficorella, C, Frassoldati, A, Fumagalli, A, Garrone, O, Gebbia, V, Generali, D, La Verde, N, Maur, M, Michelotti, A, Moretti, G, Musolino, A, Palumbo, R, Pistelli, M, Porpiglia, M, Sartori, D, Scavelli, C, Schirone, A, Turletti, A, Valerio, M, Vici, P, Zambelli, A, Clivio, L, Torri, V, Cazzaniga, M. E, Bianchi, G. V, Cursano, M. C, Valerio, M. R, Torri, V., De Laurentiis, Michelino, Cicchiello, F., Riva, F., Cazzaniga, M. E., Pedani, F., Nicolini, M., Butti, C., Liscia, N., Pogliani, C., Capri, G., Alù, M., Febbraro, A., Petrucelli, L., D'Onofrio, L., De Laurentiis, M., Pellegrini, D., Mentuccia, L., Cocciolone, V., Miraglio, E., Bajardi, E., Dester, M., Paternò, E., Guaitoli, G., Ferrarini, I., Gervasi, E., Licata, L., Benedetto, C., Andreis, D., Bordin, E., Ancona, C., Pizzuti, L., Fotia, V., Berardi, R., Airoldi, M., Arcangeli, V., Artale, S., Atzori, F., Ballerio, A., Bianchi, G. V., Blasi, L., Campidoglio, S., Ciccarese, M., Cursano, M. C., Piezzo, M., Fabi, A., Ferrari, L., Ferzi, A., Ficorella, C., Frassoldati, A., Fumagalli, A., Garrone, O., Gebbia, V., Generali, D., La Verde, N., Maur, M., Michelotti, A., Moretti, G., Musolino, A., Palumbo, R., Pistelli, M., Porpiglia, M., Sartori, D., Scavelli, C., Schirone, A., Turletti, A., Valerio, M. R., Vici, P., Zambelli, A., Clivio, L., Cazzaniga, M., Ala, M., ARRIVAS BAJARDI, E., Paternã², E., Bianchi, G., Cursano, M., and Valerio, M.
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Receptor, ErbB-2 ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,ErbB-2 ,0302 clinical medicine ,Dose-intensity ,Exemestane ,80 and over ,Neoplasm Metastasis ,Fulvestrant ,Aged, 80 and over ,education.field_of_study ,Advanced breast cancer, Dose-intensity, Everolimus, Fulvestrant, Hormone-receptor positive ,Advanced breast cancer ,Everolimus ,Hormone-receptor positive ,Adult ,Aged ,Androstadienes ,Breast Neoplasms ,Female ,Follow-Up Studies ,Humans ,Middle Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Surgery ,General Medicine ,Everolimu ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Receptor ,medicine.drug ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Population ,Socio-culturale ,03 medical and health sciences ,Breast cancer ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Adverse effect ,education ,Gynecology ,business.industry ,fungi ,Cancer ,medicine.disease ,Clinical trial ,030104 developmental biology ,chemistry ,business - Abstract
Background The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant. Patients and methods This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting. Results From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33–83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1%), soft tissue (34.7%) and viscera (33.2%). Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1–7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4–58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2%), non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8%), anaemia (3.8%) and fatigue (3.2%). Conclusions The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.
- Published
- 2017
4. Impact of BMI on the outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus: A retrospective exploratory analysis of the BALLET study
- Author
-
Corona, S., primary, Giudici, F., additional, Jerusalem, G., additional, Ciruelos, E., additional, Strina, C., additional, Sirico, M., additional, Bernocchi, O., additional, Milani, M., additional, Dester, M., additional, Ziglioli, N., additional, Barbieri, G., additional, Cervoni, V., additional, Montemurro, F., additional, and Generali, D., additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. ΔKi67 proliferation index as independent predictive and prognostic factor of outcome in luminal breast cancer: data from neoadjuvant letrozole-based treatment
- Author
-
Ianza, A, primary, Giudici, F, additional, Pinello, C, additional, Corona, SP, additional, Strina, C, additional, Bernocchi, O, additional, Bortul, M, additional, Milani, M, additional, Sirico, M, additional, Allevi, G, additional, Aguggini, S, additional, Cocconi, A, additional, Azzini, C, additional, Dester, M, additional, Cervoni, V, additional, Bottini, A, additional, Cappelletti, M, additional, and Generali, D, additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study
- Author
-
Cicchiello, F, Riva, F, Cazzaniga, M, Pedani, F, Nicolini, M, Butti, C, Liscia, N, Pogliani, C, Capri, G, Alu, M, Febbraro, A, Petrucelli, L, D'Onofrio, L, De Laurentiis, M, Pellegrini, D, Mentuccia, L, Cocciolone, V, Miraglio, E, Bajardi, E, Dester, M, Paterno, E, Guaitoli, G, Ferrarini, I, Gervasi, E, Licata, L, Benedetto, C, Andreis, D, Bordin, E, Ancona, C, Pizzuti, L, Fotia, V, Berardi, R, Airoldi, M, Arcangeli, V, Artale, S, Atzori, F, Ballerio, A, Bianchi, G, Blasi, L, Campidoglio, S, Ciccarese, M, Cursano, M, Piezzo, M, Fabi, A, Ferrari, L, Ferzi, A, Ficorella, C, Frassoldati, A, Fumagalli, A, Garrone, O, Gebbia, V, Generali, D, La Verde, N, Maur, M, Michelotti, A, Moretti, G, Musolino, A, Palumbo, R, Pistelli, M, Porpiglia, M, Sartori, D, Scavelli, C, Schirone, A, Turletti, A, Valerio, M, Vici, P, Zambelli, A, Clivio, L, Torri, V, Cicchiello F., Riva F., Cazzaniga M. E., Pedani F., Nicolini M., Butti C., Liscia N., Pogliani C., Capri G., Alu M., Febbraro A., Petrucelli L., D'Onofrio L., De Laurentiis M., Pellegrini D., Mentuccia L., Cocciolone V., Miraglio E., Bajardi E., Dester M., Paterno E., Guaitoli G., Ferrarini I., Gervasi E., Licata L., Benedetto C., Andreis D., Bordin E., Ancona C., Pizzuti L., Fotia V., Berardi R., Airoldi M., Arcangeli V., Artale S., Atzori F., Ballerio A., Bianchi G. V., Blasi L., Campidoglio S., Ciccarese M., Cursano M. C., Piezzo M., Fabi A., Ferrari L., Ferzi A., Ficorella C., Frassoldati A., Fumagalli A., Garrone O., Gebbia V., Generali D., La Verde N., Maur M., Michelotti A., Moretti G., Musolino A., Palumbo R., Pistelli M., Porpiglia M., Sartori D., Scavelli C., Schirone A., Turletti A., Valerio M. R., Vici P., Zambelli A., Clivio L., Torri V., Cicchiello, F, Riva, F, Cazzaniga, M, Pedani, F, Nicolini, M, Butti, C, Liscia, N, Pogliani, C, Capri, G, Alu, M, Febbraro, A, Petrucelli, L, D'Onofrio, L, De Laurentiis, M, Pellegrini, D, Mentuccia, L, Cocciolone, V, Miraglio, E, Bajardi, E, Dester, M, Paterno, E, Guaitoli, G, Ferrarini, I, Gervasi, E, Licata, L, Benedetto, C, Andreis, D, Bordin, E, Ancona, C, Pizzuti, L, Fotia, V, Berardi, R, Airoldi, M, Arcangeli, V, Artale, S, Atzori, F, Ballerio, A, Bianchi, G, Blasi, L, Campidoglio, S, Ciccarese, M, Cursano, M, Piezzo, M, Fabi, A, Ferrari, L, Ferzi, A, Ficorella, C, Frassoldati, A, Fumagalli, A, Garrone, O, Gebbia, V, Generali, D, La Verde, N, Maur, M, Michelotti, A, Moretti, G, Musolino, A, Palumbo, R, Pistelli, M, Porpiglia, M, Sartori, D, Scavelli, C, Schirone, A, Turletti, A, Valerio, M, Vici, P, Zambelli, A, Clivio, L, Torri, V, Cicchiello F., Riva F., Cazzaniga M. E., Pedani F., Nicolini M., Butti C., Liscia N., Pogliani C., Capri G., Alu M., Febbraro A., Petrucelli L., D'Onofrio L., De Laurentiis M., Pellegrini D., Mentuccia L., Cocciolone V., Miraglio E., Bajardi E., Dester M., Paterno E., Guaitoli G., Ferrarini I., Gervasi E., Licata L., Benedetto C., Andreis D., Bordin E., Ancona C., Pizzuti L., Fotia V., Berardi R., Airoldi M., Arcangeli V., Artale S., Atzori F., Ballerio A., Bianchi G. V., Blasi L., Campidoglio S., Ciccarese M., Cursano M. C., Piezzo M., Fabi A., Ferrari L., Ferzi A., Ficorella C., Frassoldati A., Fumagalli A., Garrone O., Gebbia V., Generali D., La Verde N., Maur M., Michelotti A., Moretti G., Musolino A., Palumbo R., Pistelli M., Porpiglia M., Sartori D., Scavelli C., Schirone A., Turletti A., Valerio M. R., Vici P., Zambelli A., Clivio L., and Torri V.
- Abstract
Background The BOLERO-2 trial reported efficacy and safety of Everolimus (EVE) and Exemestane (EXE) combination in HR+ advanced breast cancer (ABC) patients. The BALLET trial further evaluated the safety of EVE-EXE in HR+ ABC patients, without reporting efficacy data. Aim of the EVA real-life study was to collect data of efficacy and safety of EVE-EXE combination in the clinical setting, as well as exploring efficacy according to EVE Dose-Intensity (DI) and to previous treatment with Fulvestrant. Patients and methods This study aimed to describe the outcome of ABC pts treated with EVE-EXE combination in terms of median duration of EVE treatment and ORR in a real-life setting. Results From July 2013 to December 2015, the EVA study enrolled 404 pts. Median age was 61 years (33–83). Main metastatic sites were: bone (69.1%), soft tissue (34.7%) and viscera (33.2%). Median number of previous treatments was 2 (1–7). 43.3% of the pts had received Fulvestrant. Median exposure to EVE was 31.0 weeks (15.4–58.3) in the whole population. No difference was observed in terms of EVE exposure duration according to DI (p for trend = 0.27) or type of previous treatments (p = 0.33). ORR and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were observed in 31.6% and 60.7% of the patients, respectively, with the lowest ORRs confined in CHT pre-treated patients or in those who received the lowest DI of EVE. Grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 37.9% of the patients. Main AEs were: stomatitis (11.2%), non-infectious pneumonitis - NIP (3.8%), anaemia (3.8%) and fatigue (3.2%). Conclusions The EVA study provided new insights in the use of EVE-EVE combination in HR+ ABC pts many years after the publication of the pivotal trial. The combination is safe and the best response could be obtained in patients receiving the full dose of EVE and/or after hormone-therapy as Fulvestrant in ABC.
- Published
- 2017
7. Efficacy and safety of Everolimus and Exemestane in hormone-receptor positive (HR+) human-epidermal-growth-factor negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer patients: New insights beyond clinical trials. The EVA study
- Author
-
Cazzaniga, M.E., primary, Airoldi, M., additional, Arcangeli, V., additional, Artale, S., additional, Atzori, F., additional, Ballerio, A., additional, Bianchi, G.V., additional, Blasi, L., additional, Campidoglio, S., additional, Ciccarese, M., additional, Cursano, M.C., additional, Piezzo, M., additional, Fabi, A., additional, Ferrari, L., additional, Ferzi, A., additional, Ficorella, C., additional, Frassoldati, A., additional, Fumagalli, A., additional, Garrone, O., additional, Gebbia, V., additional, Generali, D., additional, La Verde, N., additional, Maur, M., additional, Michelotti, A., additional, Moretti, G., additional, Musolino, A., additional, Palumbo, R., additional, Pistelli, M., additional, Porpiglia, M., additional, Sartori, D., additional, Scavelli, C., additional, Schirone, A., additional, Turletti, A., additional, Valerio, M.R., additional, Vici, P., additional, Zambelli, A., additional, Clivio, L., additional, Torri, V., additional, Alù, M., additional, Ancona, C., additional, Andreis, D., additional, Bajardi, E., additional, Benedetto, C., additional, Berardi, R., additional, Bordin, E., additional, Butti, C., additional, Capri, G., additional, Cicchiello, F., additional, Cocciolone, V., additional, Dester, M., additional, D'Onofrio, L., additional, Febbraro, A., additional, Ferrarini, I., additional, Fotia, V., additional, Gervasi, E., additional, Guaitoli, G., additional, Licata, L., additional, Liscia, N., additional, Mentuccia, L., additional, Miraglio, E., additional, Nicolini, M., additional, Paternò, E., additional, Pedani, F., additional, Pellegrini, D., additional, Petrucelli, L., additional, De Laurentiis, M., additional, Pizzuti, L., additional, Pogliani, C., additional, and Riva, F., additional
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. ΔKi67 proliferation index as independent predictive and prognostic factor of outcome in luminal breast cancer: data from neoadjuvant letrozole-based treatment
- Author
-
Anna Ianza, Sergio Aguggini, C. Azzini, Alberto Bottini, Carla Strina, Silvia Paola Corona, Fabiola Giudici, G Allevi, Ottavia Bernocchi, V Cervoni, Marianna Sirico, Manuela Milani, Daniele Generali, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, C Pinello, M Dester, A. Cocconi, Marina Bortul, Ianza, A., Giudici, F., Pinello, C., Corona, S. P., Strina, C., Bernocchi, O., Bortul, M., Milani, M., Sirico, M., Allevi, G., Aguggini, S., Cocconi, A., Azzini, C., Dester, M., Cervoni, V., Bottini, A., Cappelletti, M., and Generali, D.
- Subjects
neoadjuvant systemic therapy ,0301 basic medicine ,Oncology ,Sorafenib ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Proliferation index ,Cyclophosphamide ,Breast Neoplasms ,clinical response ,Disease-Free Survival ,03 medical and health sciences ,breast cancer ,0302 clinical medicine ,Breast cancer ,Internal medicine ,Ki67 ,proliferation index ,Biopsy ,medicine ,Humans ,Cell Lineage ,RC254-282 ,Aged ,Cell Proliferation ,Predictive marker ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,business.industry ,Letrozole ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,General Medicine ,medicine.disease ,Prognosis ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic ,030104 developmental biology ,Ki-67 Antigen ,Treatment Outcome ,Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
A key tool for monitoring breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant treatment is the identification of reliable predictive markers. Ki67 has been identified as a prognostic and predictive marker in ER-positive breast cancer. Ninety ER-positive, HER2 negative locally advanced breast cancer patients received letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) with/without Sorafenib (400 mg/bid daily) for 6 months before undergoing surgery. Ki67 expression and tumor size measured with caliber were determined at baseline, after 30 days of treatment and at the end of treatment. Patients were assigned to a clinical response category according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, both at 30 days and before surgery and further classified as high-responder and low-responder according to the median variation of Ki67 values between biopsy and 30 days and between biopsy and surgery time. The predictive role of Ki67 and its changes with regard to clinical response and survival was analyzed. No differences in terms of survival outcomes emerged between the arms of treatment, while we observed a higher percentage of women with progression or stable disease in arm with the combination containing Sorafenib (20.5% vs 7.1%, p = 0.06). Clinical complete responders experienced a greater overall variation in Ki67 when compared with partial responders and patients with progressive/stable disease (66.7% vs 30.7%, p = 0.009). High responders showed a better outcome than low responders in terms of both disease-free survival ( p = 0.009) and overall survival ( p = 0.002). ΔKi67 score evaluated between basal and residual tumor at definitive surgery showed to be highly predictive of clinical complete response, and a potential parameter to be used for predicting disease-free survival and overall survival in luminal breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant endocrine-based therapy.
- Published
- 2020
9. Early changes of the standardized uptake values (SUVmax) predict the efficacy of everolimus-exemestane in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
- Author
-
Federico Nichetti, Carla Strina, Marianna Sirico, Giulia Bianchi, Maria Rosa Cappelletti, Silvia P. Corona, Valeria Cervoni, Manuela Milani, Filippo de Braud, Navid Sobhani, Giuseppina Barbieri, Daniele Generali, Martina Dester, Fabiola Giudici, Claudio Vernieri, Ottavia Bernocchi, Nicoletta Ziglioli, Sirico, M., Bernocchi, O., Sobhani, N., Giudici, F., Corona, S. P., Vernieri, C., Nichetti, F., Cappelletti, M. R., Milani, M., Strina, C., Cervoni, V., Barbieri, G., Ziglioli, N., Dester, M., Bianchi, G. V., Braud, F. D., and Generali, D.
- Subjects
Oncology ,18F-FDG PET/CT ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,∆SUV% ,lcsh:RC254-282 ,Article ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Exemestane ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Everolimus ,Prospective cohort study ,Predictive marker ,Aromatase inhibitor ,business.industry ,F-FDG PET/CT ,Metastatic breast cancer ,Predictive biomarker ,Retrospective cohort study ,medicine.disease ,lcsh:Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Everolimu ,chemistry ,Hormone receptor ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Background: The mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus has been approved in combination with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2&minus, ) metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC) progressing on prior therapy with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. To date, no predictive biomarkers of tumor sensitivity/resistance for everolimus-based treatments have been identified. We hypothesized that precocious changes in the Standardized Uptake Volume (∆SUV%), as assessed by 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucosepositron-emission tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT), may be a marker of everolimus efficacy. Methods: This was a retrospective study including 31 HR+ HER2- patients treated with everolimus and exemestane in two Italian centers between 2013 and 2018. The objective of the study was to investigate ∆SUV% as a predictive marker of everolimus antitumor efficacy. 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and after three months of treatment. Patients were defined as long responders (LRs) if disease progression occurred at least 10 months after treatment initiation and long survivors (LSs) if death occurred later than 36 months after starting therapy. ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of ∆SUV% to distinguish LRs from non-LRs and LSs from non-LSs. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan&ndash, Meier method. Results: The SUVmax values decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after therapy (p = 0.003). Dynamic changes of SUVmax (Delta SUV) had a higher accuracy in discriminating long-responders from non-long-responders (AUC = 0.67, Delta SUV cut-off = 28.8%) respects to its ability to identify long survivors from no-long survivors (AUC = 0.60, Delta SUV cut-off = 53.8%). Patients were divided into groups according to the Delta SUV cut-offs and survival outcomes were evaluated: patients with a decrease of ∆SUV% &ge, 28.8% had significantly better PFS (10 months-PFS: 63.2%, 95% CI: 37.9&ndash, 80.4% and 16.7%, 95% CI: 2.7&ndash, 41.3% respectively, p = 0.005). As regard as OS, patients with ∆SUV% &ge, 53.8% had longer OS when compared to patients with ∆SUV% <, 53.8% (36 month-OS: 82.5% vs. 45.9% vs. p = 0.048). Conclusion: We found two precocious ∆SUV% thresholds capable of identifying HR+ HER2-mBC patients, which would achieve long-term benefit or long-term survival during everolimus-exemestane therapy. These results warrant further validation in prospective studies and should be integrated with molecular biomarkers related to tumor metabolism and mTORC1 signaling.
- Published
- 2020
10. Impact of BMI on the outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus: A retrospective exploratory analysis of the BALLET study
- Author
-
Giuseppina Barbieri, Martina Dester, Marianna Sirico, Eva Ciruelos, Manuela Milani, Fabiola Giudici, Daniele Generali, Silvia Paola Corona, Valeria Cervoni, Carla Strina, Guy Jerusalem, Filippo Montemurro, Nicoletta Ziglioli, Ottavia Bernocchi, Corona, S, Giudici, F, Jerusalem, G, Ciruelos, E, Strina, C, Sirico, M, Bernocchi, O, Milani, M, Dester, M, Ziglioli, N, Barbieri, G, Cervoni, V, Montemurro, F, and Generali, D
- Subjects
Oncology ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Ballet ,outcomes ,BMI ,Weight loss ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Retrospective analysis ,Everolimus ,business.industry ,biomarkers ,weight ,Exploratory analysis ,everolimus ,medicine.disease ,Metastatic breast cancer ,mTOR inhibition ,metastatic breast cancer ,biomarker ,medicine.symptom ,Weight Decrease ,business ,Exposure duration ,Research Paper ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Introduction Reliable biomarkers of response to mTOR inhibition are yet to be identified. As mTOR is heavily implicated in cell-metabolism, we investigated the relation between BMI variation and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with everolimus. Results we found a linear correlation between everolimus exposure duration and BMI/weight decrease. Patients exhibiting >2 kg weight loss or >3% BMI decrease from baseline at the end of treatment (EOT) had a statistically significant improvement in PFS. Interestingly, a similar BMI/weight decrease within the first 8 weeks of therapy identified patients at higher risk of progression. Patients and methods we performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the BALLET trial who progressed during the study. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-point was the identification of other predictors of response. Conclusion A >3% weight loss at EOT is associated with better outcome in mBC patients treated with everolimus. On the contrary, a significant early weight loss represents a predictor of poor survival and could therefore be used as an early negative prognostic marker. As PI3K-inhibition also converges onto mTOR, these findings might extend to patients treated with selective PI3K inhibitors and warrant further investigation.
- Published
- 2020
11. 266 Poster - Impact of BMI on the outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus: A retrospective exploratory analysis of the BALLET study.
- Author
-
Corona, S., Giudici, F., Jerusalem, G., Ciruelos, E., Strina, C., Sirico, M., Bernocchi, O., Milani, M., Dester, M., Ziglioli, N., Barbieri, G., Cervoni, V., Montemurro, F., and Generali, D.
- Subjects
- *
BREAST tumors , *CANCER patients , *CONFERENCES & conventions , *BODY mass index , *TREATMENT effectiveness , *EVEROLIMUS , *EVALUATION - Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Addendum: Impact of BMI on the outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus: a retrospective exploratory analysis of the BALLET study.
- Author
-
Corona SP, Giudici F, Jerusalem G, Ciruelos E, Strina C, Sirico M, Bernocchi O, Milani M, Dester M, Ziglioli N, Barbieri G, Cervoni V, Montemurro F, and Generali D
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Early Changes of the Standardized Uptake Values (SUV max ) Predict the Efficacy of Everolimus-Exemestane in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Sirico M, Bernocchi O, Sobhani N, Giudici F, Corona SP, Vernieri C, Nichetti F, Cappelletti MR, Milani M, Strina C, Cervoni V, Barbieri G, Ziglioli N, Dester M, Bianchi GV, De Braud F, and Generali D
- Abstract
Background: The mTORC1 inhibitor everolimus has been approved in combination with the aromatase inhibitor exemestane for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (HR+ mBC) progressing on prior therapy with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. To date, no predictive biomarkers of tumor sensitivity/resistance for everolimus-based treatments have been identified. We hypothesized that precocious changes in the Standardized Uptake Volume (∆SUV%), as assessed by
18 F-Fluorodeoxyglucosepositron-emission tomography (18 F-FDG PET/CT), may be a marker of everolimus efficacy. Methods: This was a retrospective study including 31 HR+ HER2- patients treated with everolimus and exemestane in two Italian centers between 2013 and 2018. The objective of the study was to investigate ∆SUV% as a predictive marker of everolimus antitumor efficacy.18 F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and after three months of treatment. Patients were defined as long responders (LRs) if disease progression occurred at least 10 months after treatment initiation and long survivors (LSs) if death occurred later than 36 months after starting therapy. ROC analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off values of ∆SUV% to distinguish LRs from non-LRs and LSs from non-LSs. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The SUVmax values decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months after therapy ( p = 0.003). Dynamic changes of SUVmax (Delta SUV) had a higher accuracy in discriminating long-responders from non-long-responders (AUC = 0.67, Delta SUV cut-off = 28.8%) respects to its ability to identify long survivors from no-long survivors (AUC = 0.60, Delta SUV cut-off = 53.8%). Patients were divided into groups according to the Delta SUV cut-offs and survival outcomes were evaluated: patients with a decrease of ∆SUV% ≥ 28.8% had significantly better PFS (10 months-PFS: 63.2%, 95% CI: 37.9-80.4% and 16.7%, 95% CI: 2.7-41.3% respectively, p = 0.005). As regard as OS, patients with ∆SUV% ≥ 53.8% had longer OS when compared to patients with ∆SUV% < 53.8% (36 month-OS: 82.5% vs. 45.9% vs. p = 0.048). Conclusion: We found two precocious ∆SUV% thresholds capable of identifying HR+ HER2-mBC patients, which would achieve long-term benefit or long-term survival during everolimus-exemestane therapy. These results warrant further validation in prospective studies and should be integrated with molecular biomarkers related to tumor metabolism and mTORC1 signaling.- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Impact of BMI on the outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients treated with everolimus: a retrospective exploratory analysis of the BALLET study.
- Author
-
Corona SP, Giudici F, Jerusalem G, Ciruelos E, Strina C, Sirico M, Bernocchi O, Milani M, Dester M, Ziglioli N, Barbieri G, Cervoni V, Montemurro F, and Generali D
- Abstract
Introduction: Reliable biomarkers of response to mTOR inhibition are yet to be identified. As mTOR is heavily implicated in cell-metabolism, we investigated the relation between BMI variation and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients treated with everolimus., Results: we found a linear correlation between everolimus exposure duration and BMI/weight decrease. Patients exhibiting >2 kg weight loss or >3% BMI decrease from baseline at the end of treatment (EOT) had a statistically significant improvement in PFS. Interestingly, a similar BMI/weight decrease within the first 8 weeks of therapy identified patients at higher risk of progression., Patients and Methods: we performed a retrospective analysis of patients enrolled in the BALLET trial who progressed during the study. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-point was the identification of other predictors of response., Conclusion: A >3% weight loss at EOT is associated with better outcome in mBC patients treated with everolimus. On the contrary, a significant early weight loss represents a predictor of poor survival and could therefore be used as an early negative prognostic marker. As PI3K-inhibition also converges onto mTOR, these findings might extend to patients treated with selective PI3K inhibitors and warrant further investigation., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare., (Copyright: © 2020 Corona et al.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Are EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors effective in elderly patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer?
- Author
-
Roviello G, Zanotti L, Cappelletti MR, Gobbi A, Dester M, Paganini G, Pacifico C, Generali D, and Roudi R
- Subjects
- Aged, Humans, Mutant Proteins genetics, Mutant Proteins metabolism, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, ErbB Receptors genetics, ErbB Receptors metabolism, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases antagonists & inhibitors
- Abstract
EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib changed dramatically the history of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring EGFR mutations. However, not enough data are available on the efficacy of these targeted drugs in elderly patients. The aim of this study is to analyse the available clinical data evaluating the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapies in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutations. A literature-based meta-analysis of the results of randomized clinical trials was undertaken. Relevant publications from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and abstracts from American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings were searched. Progression-free survival (PFS), as a measure of the efficacy of treatment, was the primary outcome investigated. The pooled analysis revealed an overall significant improvement in PFS (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.69; p = 0.0004) with the use of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The data stratification per age subgroups showed that EGFR TKIs were more effective in prolonging PFS in elderly patients, with HR 0.39 (p = 0.008), in comparison with young patients (HR = 0.48; p = 0.04). The results of this study suggest that EGFR TKIs have a significant effect in slowing down diseases progression in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, therefore representing a valid therapeutic option in this age group.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Low-Dose Oral Ethinylestradiol With Concomitant Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid for Advanced Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
- Author
-
Roviello G, Zanotti L, Gobbi A, Dester M, Generali D, Pacifico C, Cappelletti MR, and Bonetta A
- Subjects
- Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols adverse effects, Aspirin adverse effects, Drug Dosage Calculations, Ethinyl Estradiol adverse effects, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostate-Specific Antigen metabolism, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant metabolism, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Aspirin administration & dosage, Ethinyl Estradiol administration & dosage, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of low-dose oral ethinylestradiol (EE) and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue with concomitant low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) as a thromboprophylactic agent for advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)., Patients and Methods: The patients received an EE dose of 150 μg daily (50 μg 3 times daily) and an ASA dose of 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen response., Results: A total of 32 patients were enrolled. A PSA response was observed in 19 patients (59.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 41%-76%). The median progression-free survival was 9.4 months (95% CI, 6.5-14.1 months). The treatment was generally well tolerated and no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. Only 1 patient interrupted EE because of a cardiac event and 1 patient experienced grade 2 nausea and vomiting. No major bleeding occurred., Conclusion: Low-dose EE with concomitant low-dose ASA is safe, showing potential activity in patients with advanced CRPC, and should be investigated further., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2-positive breast cancer.
- Author
-
Corona SP, Ravelli A, Cretella D, Cappelletti MR, Zanotti L, Dester M, Gobbi A, Petronini PG, and Generali D
- Subjects
- Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 antagonists & inhibitors, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 antagonists & inhibitors, Estradiol analogs & derivatives, Estradiol therapeutic use, Fulvestrant, Humans, Letrozole, Nitriles therapeutic use, Protein Kinase Inhibitors therapeutic use, Receptor, ErbB-2 biosynthesis, Triazoles therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Molecular Targeted Therapy methods
- Abstract
Notwithstanding the continuous progress made in cancer treatment in the last 20 years, and the availability of new targeted therapies, metastatic Breast Cancer (BC) is still incurable. Targeting the cell cycle machinery has emerged as an attractive strategy to tackle cancer progression, showing very promising results in the preclinical and clinical settings. The first selective inhibitors of CDK4/6 received breakthrough status and FDA approval in combination with letrozole (February 2015) and fulvestrant (February 2016) as first-line therapy in ER-positive advanced and metastatic BC. Considering the success of this family of compounds in hormone-positive BC, new possible applications are being investigated in other molecular subtypes. This review summarizes the latest findings on the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in HER2 positive BC., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. A Phase II study of olaparib in breast cancer patients: biological evaluation from a 'window of opportunity' trial.
- Author
-
Roviello G, Milani M, Gobbi A, Dester M, Cappelletti MR, Allevi G, Aguggini S, Ravelli A, Gussago F, Cocconi A, Zanotti L, Senti C, Strina C, Bottini A, and Generali D
- Subjects
- Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Breast Neoplasms mortality, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Neoplasm Staging, Phthalazines administration & dosage, Phthalazines adverse effects, Piperazines administration & dosage, Piperazines adverse effects, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors administration & dosage, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors adverse effects, Treatment Outcome, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms mortality, Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Phthalazines therapeutic use, Piperazines therapeutic use, Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors therapeutic use
- Abstract
The OLTRE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02681562) is an open-label, 'window of opportunity' Phase II controlled trial to evaluate the biological activity of olaparib in locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer compared with other subtypes of locally advanced breast cancer patients carrying germinal BRCA mutation receiving olaparib with the same treatment approach. The primary end point is to investigate the correlation between baseline gene and protein expression profile in order to identify possible predictive markers of response to olaparib. The OLTRE trial is expected to identify the surrogate markers of the biological activity of olaparib in the treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.