7 results on '"DeBusk LM"'
Search Results
2. Abstract P1-12-04: A phase 2 study of eribulin in breast cancer not achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
- Author
-
Yardley, DA, primary, Peacock, N, additional, Shroff, S, additional, Molthrop, DC, additional, Anz, B, additional, Daniel, BR, additional, Young, RR, additional, Weaver, R, additional, Harwin, W, additional, Webb, CD, additional, Ward, P, additional, Shastry, M, additional, DeBusk, LM, additional, Midha, R, additional, Hainsworth, JD, additional, and Burris III, HA, additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Abstract P1-14-06: A phase II randomized study with eribulin/cyclophosphamide (ErC) and docetaxel/cyclophosphamide (TC) as neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-negative breast cancer- Final analysis of primary endpoint and correlative analysis results
- Author
-
Yardley, DA, primary, Chandra, P, additional, Hart, L, additional, Wright, GS, additional, Ward, P, additional, Mani, A, additional, Shastry, M, additional, Finney, L, additional, Guo, S, additional, DeBusk, LM, additional, Hainsworth, JD, additional, and Burris III, HA, additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Phase II trial of eribulin in patients who do not achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
- Author
-
Yardley DA, Peacock N, Daniel B, Anz B, Molthrop DC Jr, Shroff SK, Young R, Jankov A, Vander Woude A, Shastry M, Pasek J, DeBusk LM, and Hainsworth JD
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Anthracyclines administration & dosage, Biomarkers, Tumor metabolism, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Bridged-Ring Compounds administration & dosage, Cohort Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Furans administration & dosage, Humans, Ketones administration & dosage, Middle Aged, Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Prognosis, Receptor, ErbB-2 metabolism, Receptors, Estrogen metabolism, Receptors, Progesterone metabolism, Survival Rate, Taxoids administration & dosage, Trastuzumab administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant mortality, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects, Neoadjuvant Therapy mortality
- Abstract
Purpose: Women with residual invasive breast cancer at the primary site or axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a high risk of recurrence. Eribulin improves survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer who progress after anthracycline and taxane therapy. This phase 2 trial assessed the efficacy of postoperative eribulin in breast cancer patients who did not achieve a pCR following standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy., Methods: Women with localized breast cancer who had residual invasive cancer following ≥ 4 cycles of standard anthracycline and/or taxane-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy received adjuvant eribulin treatment. HER2-positive patients also received trastuzumab for 1 year. Adjuvant hormonal therapy and locoregional radiotherapy were administered as per institutional guidelines. Primary endpoint was the 2-year DFS rate. Three patient cohorts were analyzed: TNBC (Cohort A), HR+/HER2- (Cohort B), and HER2+ (Cohort C)., Results: One hundred twenty-six patients (Cohort A-53, Cohort B-42, and Cohort C-31) were enrolled. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy included a taxane and an anthracycline in 70%. Eribulin was well tolerated; 84% of patients received the planned 6 cycles. After a median follow-up of 28 months, the 24-month DFS rates were 56% (95% CI 42, 69), 83% (95% CI 67, 91), and 73% (95% CI 53, 86) for Cohorts A, B, and C, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were neutropenia (26%), leukopenia (13%), and neuropathy (7%)., Conclusion: Administration of adjuvant eribulin after neoadjuvant chemotherapy was feasible and well tolerated. The 24-month DFS rate did not reach the study target levels in any of the cohorts and was similar to DFS previously described in these cohorts following neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A Phase II Open Label Study of Everolimus in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Resistant Hormone Receptor-Positive HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer.
- Author
-
Yardley DA, Liggett W, Mainwaring M, Castrellon A, Blakely L, Hemphill B, Anz B 3rd, Young RR, Shastry M, DeBusk LM, Hainsworth JD, and Burris HA 3rd
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal pharmacology, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols pharmacology, Biopsy, Breast pathology, Breast Neoplasms mortality, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Disease Progression, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm drug effects, Everolimus pharmacology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Progression-Free Survival, Receptor, ErbB-2 analysis, Receptors, Estrogen antagonists & inhibitors, Receptors, Estrogen metabolism, Receptors, Progesterone metabolism, Signal Transduction drug effects, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases antagonists & inhibitors, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases metabolism, Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Everolimus therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Therapies targeting estrogen receptor signaling are standard for patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR
+ ) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Dysregulation of the phosphoinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is associated with treatment resistance. Addition of the mTOR inhibitor, everolimus, to exemestane doubled progression-free survival (PFS) in HR+ /HER2- MBC patients whose disease had previously progressed during endocrine therapy. In this phase II study, we used everolimus in addition to the most recent endocrine therapy during which a patient's disease progressed, in an attempt to restore and extend the benefit of the antiestrogen therapy in patients with HR+ /HER2- MBC., Patients and Methods: Patients with HR+ MBC who progressed on antiestrogen therapy received everolimus (10 mg orally daily) in combination with the antiestrogen therapy most recently administered. Treatment was administered in 4-week cycles and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Blood and archival tumor specimens were collected for VeriStrat (Biodesix, Inc) and Foundation One (Foundation Medicine) assays, respectively. Accrual of 42 evaluable patients allowed detection of improvement in median PFS from 2.8 months (expected with hormonal treatment alone) to 5 months (power 80%, α = 5%)., Results: Forty-seven patients were enrolled and treated. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, median PFS was 6.6 months. Secondary efficacy end points included: overall response rate, 6%; clinical benefit rate, 40%; and median overall survival, 21.1 months. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Efficacy could not be correlated with PI3K/AKT/mTOR alterations or VeriStrat (Biodesix, Inc) prognostic signatures., Conclusion: After progression during antiestrogen therapy, the addition of everolimus, without changing the hormonal therapy, resulted in a median PFS of 6.6 months, suggesting efficacy in patients with HR+ /HER2- MBC., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Cabazitaxel Plus Lapatinib as Therapy for HER2 + Metastatic Breast Cancer With Intracranial Metastases: Results of a Dose-finding Study.
- Author
-
Yardley DA, Hart LL, Ward PJ, Wright GL, Shastry M, Finney L, DeBusk LM, and Hainsworth JD
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents administration & dosage, Antineoplastic Agents adverse effects, Breast Neoplasms metabolism, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Central Nervous System Neoplasms pathology, Central Nervous System Neoplasms secondary, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Female, Humans, Lapatinib adverse effects, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Middle Aged, Protein Kinase Inhibitors administration & dosage, Protein Kinase Inhibitors adverse effects, Receptor, ErbB-2 metabolism, Taxoids adverse effects, Treatment Failure, Breast Neoplasms drug therapy, Central Nervous System Neoplasms drug therapy, Lapatinib administration & dosage, Taxoids administration & dosage
- Abstract
Background: Lapatinib is an oral small molecule tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor-1/HER2 inhibitor that crosses the blood-brain barrier and is active against central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Cabazitaxel is a taxoid that is effective against taxane-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and has distinguished itself by its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. The present phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01934894) evaluated the combination of these agents to treat HER2
+ MBC patients with CNS metastases., Materials and Methods: Patients with HER2+ MBC and ≥ 1 untreated or progressive, measurable CNS metastasis were eligible. Using a 3+3 dose escalation design, patients were treated with escalating doses of intravenous cabazitaxel every 21 days and oral lapatinib daily in 21-day treatment cycles. Intracranial disease restaging was performed every 2 cycles for the first 8 cycles and then every 3 cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity., Results: Eleven patients were treated at 2 dose levels. Six patients were treated at dose level 1 (intravenous cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 plus oral lapatinib 1000 mg daily), and five were treated at dose level 2 (intravenous cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 plus oral lapatinib 1000 mg daily). The most common treatment-related adverse events were myelosuppression, diarrhea, fatigue, and skin toxicity. A total of 5 dose-limiting toxicity events occurred. No intra- or extracranial objective responses were observed., Conclusion: The combination of cabazitaxel plus lapatinib was not feasible because of toxicity and because no objective CNS activity was seen in the 5 evaluable patients. The role of cabazitaxel to treat breast cancer patients with CNS metastases remains undefined., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Phase II Trial of Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Plus Apatorsen or Placebo in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The RAINIER Trial.
- Author
-
Ko AH, Murphy PB, Peyton JD, Shipley DL, Al-Hazzouri A, Rodriguez FA, Womack MS 4th, Xiong HQ, Waterhouse DM, Tempero MA, Guo S, Lane CM, Earwood C, DeBusk LM, and Bendell JC
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Albumins adverse effects, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine adverse effects, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Paclitaxel adverse effects, Pancreatic Neoplasms blood, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Prognosis, Treatment Outcome, Gemcitabine, Albumins administration & dosage, Deoxycytidine analogs & derivatives, HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins antagonists & inhibitors, HSP27 Heat-Shock Proteins blood, Oligonucleotides, Antisense administration & dosage, Paclitaxel administration & dosage, Pancreatic Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Lessons Learned: The addition of the heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27)-targeting antisense oligonucleotide, apatorsen, to a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen did not result in improved survival in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.Findings from this trial hint at the possible prognostic and predictive value of serum Hsp27 that may warrant further investigation., Background: This randomized, double-blinded, phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus either apatorsen, an antisense oligonucleotide targeting heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27) mRNA, or placebo in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to Arm A (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus apatorsen) or Arm B (gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel plus placebo). Treatment was administered in 28-day cycles, with restaging every 2 cycles, until progression or intolerable toxicity. Serum Hsp27 levels were analyzed at baseline and on treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS)., Results: One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled, 66 per arm. Cytopenias and fatigue were the most frequent grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events for both arms. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were 2.7 and 5.3 months, respectively, for arm A, and 3.8 and 6.9 months, respectively, for arm B. Objective response rate was 18% for both arms. Patients with high serum level of Hsp27 represented a poor-prognosis subgroup who may have derived modest benefit from addition of apatorsen., Conclusion: Addition of apatorsen to chemotherapy does not improve outcomes in unselected patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in the first-line setting, although a trend toward prolonged PFS and OS in patients with high baseline serum Hsp27 suggests this therapy may warrant further evaluation in this subgroup., (© AlphaMed Press; the data published online to support this summary is the property of the authors.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.