Search

The use of phenoxy nanocomposite films as carriers of nanofillers involving multiwalled carbon nanotubes and nanoclays is successfully demonstrated for application in epoxy carbon fibers reinforced composites (CFRC) processed by RTM. Model studies on individual nanocomposite filaments embedded in epoxy precursors show that the nanofillers are passively transported by the interdiffusion gradient during heating over distance around 800 lm. A morphology gradient is generated after reaction induced phase separation and the nanofillers end up in the epoxy, despite their initial dispersion in the phenoxy. The proof of concept is extended to CFRC panels where nanocomposite phenoxy films are prepositioned between every odd carbon layer of the preform. Carbon nanotubes are filtered by the carbon fabrics, which limits their full diffusion and that of phenoxy through the preform. This has negative consequences on fracture toughness (GIc). For nanoclay, GIc is rather slightly improved although the origin is not fully clear.

We explore the influence of the interdiffusion of two thermoplastic tougheners and RTM6 epoxy resin precursors on the resulting morphologies after curing and the consequences on delamination toughness of the corresponding carbon fiber reinforced composites. Two thermoplastics with contrasting Tg and compatibility, i.e. poly(ether sulfone) (PES) and phenoxy are compared. The dramatic improvement of the interlaminar fracture toughness (GIC) found for the phenoxy-RTM6 system as compared to the pure thermoset reference can be ascribed to the broad morphology gradient only observed for that system. By contrast, the PES-RTM6 system is characterized by a steep morphology gradient and a corresponding decrease of as compared to the reference.