Search

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy and safety of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) including oligorecurrent and oligoprogressive disease., Methods: Single-institution retrospective analysis of 60 NSCLC patients with 62 discrete lesions treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2017. Patients were stratified into three groups, including early stage, locally recurrent, and oligoprogressive disease. Group 1 included early stage local disease with no prior local therapy. Group 2 included locally recurrent disease after local treatment of a primary lesion, and group 3 included regional or well-controlled distant metastatic disease receiving SBRT for a treatment naive lung lesion (oligoprogressive disease). Patient/tumor characteristics and adverse effects were recorded. Local failure free survival (LFFS), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan Meier method., Results: At median follow-up of 34 months, 67% of the study population remained alive. The estimated 3-year LFFS for group 1, group 2, and group 3 patients was 95% (95% CI: 86%-100%), 82%(62% - 100%), and 83% (58-100%), respectively. The estimated 3-year PFS was 59% (42-83%), 40% (21%-78%), and 33% (12%-95%), and the estimated 3-year OS was 58% (41-82%), 60% (37-96%), and 58% (31-100%)), respectively for each group. When adjusted for age and size of lesion, no significant difference in OS, LFFS, and PFS emerged between groups (p > 0.05). No patients experienced grade 3 to 5 toxicity. Eighteen patients (29%) experienced grade 1 to 2 toxicity. The most common toxicities reported were cough and fatigue., Conclusions: Our data demonstrates control rates in group 1 patients comparable to historical controls. Our study also reveals comparable clinical results for SBRT in the treatment of NSCLC by demonstrating similar rates of LFFS and OS in group 2 and group 3 patients with locally recurrent and treatment naïve lung lesion with well-controlled distant metastatic disease., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Katz, Ng, Wu, Yan, Grew, Shin, Colangelo, McCarthy, Pass, Chachoua and Schiff.)

Purpose: The internal mammary arteries (IMA's) are historically recognized to be protected against atherosclerosis. Whether chest wall-irradiation for breast cancer leads to significant IMA damage remains unclear. The utility of computed tomography (CT) and mammography to detect radiation-induced damage to the IMA's and its branches is not known. The objective of this study is to assess the susceptibility of IMA's to radiation-induced atherosclerosis, and the utility of CT scan and mammography in the assessment of IMA and its branches., Methods: A retrospective analysis of breast cancer patients who received chest wall-radiotherapy was performed. Patients with CT scans and/or mammograms ≥5 years post-radiotherapy were included. Baseline characteristics, coronary artery calcification (CAC), the presence of IMA damage assessed by CT scan, and IMA branch calcifications by mammography were recorded., Results: None of the 66 patients with CT scans post-radiotherapy revealed IMA atherosclerosis. There were 28 (42.4%) patients with CAC, of which four (14.3% of CAC subgroup or 6.1% of the total cohort) had calcifications on either side on mammogram (Chi-square test, p = 0.74). Out of the 222 patients with mammograms, 36 (16.2%) had IMA branch calcifications. Two hundred and ten patients received unilateral radiotherapy, and 27 (12.9%) of these patients had calcifications on the irradiated side, and 26 patients (12.4%) had calcifications on the contralateral side (OR = 1.0)., Conclusion: IMA's do not exhibit signs of radiation-induced atherosclerosis when evaluated by CT scan. In addition, there is no association between radiotherapy for breast cancer and the presence of IMA branch calcification on mammograms., (© 2022 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Background: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a safe and effective option for treatment of liver metastases. However, existing data are mostly reported by high-volume centers. There have been reports that advanced radiotherapy techniques performed at low-volume centers result in inferior outcomes. Our goal was to assess the implementation of SBRT for the treatment of liver metastases at a low-volume center by studying the efficacy and toxicity of this technology through retrospective database review at a single, community-based institution., Methods: We performed an IRB approved patient registry study. Patients had a median age of 65, KPS of at least 70 (median 90) and primary tumor controlled. All patients underwent fiducial marker placement under CT-guidance 1-2 weeks prior to planning scans. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated using contrast enhanced CT scans, as well as fusion with PET and/or MRI scans. GTV was expanded by 5 mm to create the planning target volume (PTV). Treatment was delivered by image guided stereotactic robotic radiosurgery with respiratory motion tracking. Lesions were treated with 3 fractions to a median total dose of 54 Gy. Overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and local failure-free survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank statistic was used to compare local control based on GTV volume., Results: Between 2006 and 2016, 42 consecutively treated patients with 81 metastatic liver lesions were treated with SBRT. Median follow-up was 25 months. Major primary tumor sites were colon (n=18) and lung (n=7). Synchronous extrahepatic disease was present in 15% of the treated lesions and 46% had prior local treatment of liver metastases. The number of lesions treated concurrently ranged from 1 to 4. Lesions had a median maximum diameter of 2.5 cm (range, 0.5-9.5 cm), and a mean volume of 53 cc (range, 0.5-363.0 cc). Kaplan-Meier estimated 1- and 2-year overall survival was 72% and 62%. Estimated 1- and 2-year progression free survival was 32% and 23%. Estimated 1- and 2-year local control was 86% and 80%. Two-year local control was worse for lesions >50 cc compared to lesions ≤50 cc (62% vs. 84%, P=0.04). Toxicity occurred in 26% of treatment courses and included grade 1 (n=12) and grade 2 toxicity (n=3)., Conclusions: These results are comparable to available published data regarding the safety and efficacy of liver metastasis SBRT on trial at high volume institutions. Our findings, therefore, demonstrate the successful implementation of a liver metastasis SBRT program in the low-volume, community-hospital setting. These findings suggest that low-volume and high-volume centers are both options for liver metastasis SBRT., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The results of this study were in part presented at the 2017 RSNA Annual meeting. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: HIV status may affect outcomes after definitive chemoradiotherapy for anal cancer., Objective: Here, we report a large series in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era comparing outcomes between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients with anal cancer., Design: This was a retrospective chart review., Settings: The study was conducted at an outpatient oncology clinic at large academic center., Patients: A total of 107 patients were reviewed, 39 HIV positive and 68 HIV negative. All of the patients underwent definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer., Main Outcome Measures: Data on patient characteristics, treatment, toxicity, and outcomes were collected. Overall survival, colostomy-free survival, local recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival were analyzed., Results: Median follow-up was 15 months. HIV-positive patients were younger (median, 52 vs 64 years; p < 0.001) and predominantly men (82% men vs 49% men; p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in T, N, or stage groups. HIV-positive patients had a significantly longer duration from biopsy to start of chemoradiation (mean number of days, 82 vs 54; p = 0.042). There were no differences in rates of acute toxicities including diarrhea, fatigue, or dermatitis. HIV-positive patients had significantly higher rates of hospitalization (33% vs 15%; p = 0.024). The 3-year overall survival rate was 42% in HIV-positive and 76% in HIV-negative patients (p = 0.037; HR, 2.335 (95% CI, 1.032-5.283)). Three-year colostomy-free survival was 67% in HIV-positive and 88% in HIV-negative patients (p = 0.036; HR, 3.231 (95% CI, 1.014-10.299)). Differences in overall survival rates were not significant on multivariate analysis., Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective design and small patient numbers., Conclusions: In this cohort, HIV-positive patients had significantly worse overall and colostomy-free survival rates than HIV-negative patients. However, differences in survival were not significant on multivariate analysis. Additional studies are necessary to establish the etiology of this difference.

Objective: To compare clinical and treatment characteristics and outcomes in locally advanced anal cancer, a potentially curable disease, in patients referred from a public or private hospital., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 112 anal cancer patients from a public and a private hospital who received definitive chemoradiotherapy at the same cancer center between 2004 and 2013. Tumor stage, radiotherapy delay, radiotherapy duration, and unplanned treatment breaks ≥10 days were compared using t-test and χ(2) test. Overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), and colostomy free survival (CFS) were examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models for OS and DFS were developed., Results: The follow-up was 14.9 months (range, 0.7-94.8 months). Public hospital patients presented with significantly higher clinical T stage (P<0.05) and clinical stage group (P<0.05), had significantly longer radiotherapy delays (P<0.05) and radiotherapy duration (P<0.05), and had more frequent radiation therapy (RT) breaks ≥10 days (P<0.05). Three-year OS showed a marked trend in favor of private hospital patients for 3-year OS (72.8% vs. 48.9%; P=0.171), 3-year DFS (66.3% vs. 42.7%, P=0.352), and 3-year CFS (86.4% vs. 68.9%, P=0.299). Referral hospital was not predictive of OS or DFS on multivariate analysis., Conclusions: Public hospital patients presented at later stage and experienced more delays in initiating and completing radiotherapy, which may contribute to the trend in poorer DFS and OS. These findings emphasize the need for identifying clinical and treatment factors that contribute to decreased survival in low socioeconomic status (SES) populations.