Search

Your search keyword '"Cunningham, Julie M."' showing total 917 results
Start Over Author "Cunningham, Julie M." Publication Year Range Last 10 years
917 results on '"Cunningham, Julie M."'

1. Genome-wide association analyses of ovarian cancer patients undergoing primary debulking surgery identify candidate genes for residual disease

Author

Ramachandran, Dhanya, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kommoss, Stefan, DeFazio, Anna, Riggan, Marjorie J, Webb, Penelope M, Fasching, Peter A, Lambrechts, Diether, García, María J, Rodríguez-Antona, Cristina, Goodman, Marc T, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Høgdall, Estrid, Goode, Ellen L, Cliby, William A, Kumar, Amanika, Wang, Chen, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Monteiro, Alvaro N, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Titus, Linda, Bjorge, Line, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Pejovic, Tanja, Høgdall, Claus K, McNeish, Iain A, May, Taymaa, Huntsman, David G, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Canzler, Ulrich, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Schröder, Willibald, Belau, Antje, Hanker, Lars, Harter, Philipp, Sehouli, Jalid, Kimmig, Rainer, de Gregorio, Nikolaus, Schmalfeldt, Barbara, Baumann, Klaus, Hilpert, Felix, Burges, Alexander, Winterhoff, Boris, Schürmann, Peter, Speith, Lisa-Marie, Hillemanns, Peter, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Ramus, Susan J, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dörk, Thilo, and Heitz, Florian

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Cancer, Prevention, Human Genome, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Orphan Drug, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, AOCS Group, OPAL Study Group, Medical biotechnology
Abstract

Survival from ovarian cancer depends on the resection status after primary surgery. We performed genome-wide association analyses for resection status of 7705 ovarian cancer patients, including 4954 with high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSOC), to identify variants associated with residual disease. The most significant association with resection status was observed for rs72845444, upstream of MGMT, in HGSOC (p = 3.9 × 10-8). In gene-based analyses, PPP2R5C was the most strongly associated gene in HGSOC after stage adjustment. In an independent set of 378 ovarian tumours from the AGO-OVAR 11 study, variants near MGMT and PPP2R5C correlated with methylation and transcript levels, and PPP2R5C mRNA levels predicted progression-free survival in patients with residual disease. MGMT encodes a DNA repair enzyme, and PPP2R5C encodes the B56γ subunit of the PP2A tumour suppressor. Our results link heritable variation at these two loci with resection status in HGSOC.

Published
2024

2. CCNE1 and survival of patients with tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma: An Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study

Author

Kang, Eun‐Young, Weir, Ashley, Meagher, Nicola S, Farrington, Kyo, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng‐Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Bolithon, Adelyn, Popovic, Gordana, Leung, Betty, Tang, Katrina, Lambie, Neil, Millstein, Joshua, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Ataseven, Beyhan, Barlow, Ellen, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Bösmüller, Hans, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brooks‐Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Carney, Michael E, Casablanca, Yovanni, Cazorla‐Jiménez, Alicia, Cohen, Paul A, Conrads, Thomas P, Cook, Linda S, Coulson, Penny, Courtney‐Brooks, Madeleine, Cramer, Daniel W, Crowe, Philip, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Darcy, Kathleen M, El‐Bahrawy, Mona A, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Farrell, Rhonda, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, García, María J, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gilks, C Blake, Group, AOCS, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harrington, Shariska Petersen, Harter, Philipp, Hartmann, Arndt, Hecht, Jonathan L, Heikaus, Sebastian, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Polo, Susanna Hernando, Heublein, Sabine, Hirasawa, Akira, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Horlings, Hugo M, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jewell, Andrea, Jimenez‐Linan, Mercedes, Jones, Michael E, Kaufmann, Scott H, Kennedy, Catherine J, Khabele, Dineo, Kommoss, Felix KF, Kruitwagen, Roy FPM, Lambrechts, Diether, Le, Nhu D, Lener, Marcin, Lester, Jenny, Leung, Yee, Linder, Anna, Loverix, Liselore, Lubiński, Jan, Madan, Rashna, Maxwell, G Larry, Modugno, Francesmary, Neuhausen, Susan L, Olawaiye, Alexander, Olbrecht, Siel, Orsulic, Sandra, Palacios, José, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Quinn, Carmel M, Mohan, Ganendra Raj, Rodríguez‐Antona, Cristina, Ruebner, Matthias, and Ryan, Andy

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Clinical Research, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Transcription Factors, Carcinoma, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Oncogene Proteins, Cyclin E, CCNE1 amplification, cyclin E1 expression, high-grade serous carcinoma, ovarian cancer, prognosis, AOCS Group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Public health
Abstract

BackgroundCyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large-scale, histotype-specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high-level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC.MethodsWithin the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated.ResultsHigh-level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high-level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high-level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09-1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high-level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss.ConclusionThis study provides large-scale validation that CCNE1 high-level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.

Published
2023

3. Increased FOXJ1 protein expression is associated with improved overall survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis Consortium Study

Author

Weir, Ashley, Kang, Eun-Young, Meagher, Nicola S, Nelson, Gregg S, Ghatage, Prafull, Lee, Cheng-Han, Riggan, Marjorie J, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Ryan, Andy, Singh, Naveena, Widschwendter, Martin, Alsop, Jennifer, Anglesio, Michael S, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berger, Jessica, Bisinotto, Christiani, Boros, Jessica, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Cybulski, Cezary, Elishaev, Esther, Erber, Ramona, Fereday, Sian, Fischer, Anna, Paz-Ares, Luis, Gayarre, Javier, Gilks, Blake C, Grube, Marcel, Harnett, Paul R, Harris, Holly R, Hartmann, Arndt, Hein, Alexander, Hendley, Joy, Hernandez, Brenda Y, Heublein, Sabine, Huang, Yajue, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Kennedy, Catherine J, Kommoss, Felix KF, Koziak, Jennifer M, Kraemer, Bernhard, Le, Nhu D, Lesnock, Jaime, Lester, Jenny, Lubiński, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Ney, Britta, Olawaiye, Alexander, Orsulic, Sandra, Osorio, Ana, Robles-Díaz, Luis, Ruebner, Matthias, Shah, Mitul, Sharma, Raghwa, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Steed, Helen, Talhouk, Aline, Taylor, Sarah E, Traficante, Nadia, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang, Chen, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey J, Benitez, Javier, Berchuck, Andrew, Bowtell, David D, Candido dos Reis, Francisco J, Cook, Linda S, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Fasching, Peter A, García, María J, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Kommoss, Stefan, Modugno, Francesmary, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Sinn, Hans-Peter, Staebler, Annette, Kelemen, Linda E, Ford, Caroline E, Menon, Usha, Pharoah, Paul DP, Köbel, Martin, and Ramus, Susan J

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Humans, Female, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Survival Analysis, RNA, Messenger, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Biomarkers, Tumor, Forkhead Transcription Factors, AOCs group, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundRecently, we showed a >60% difference in 5-year survival for patients with tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) when stratified by a 101-gene mRNA expression prognostic signature. Given the varied patient outcomes, this study aimed to translate prognostic mRNA markers into protein expression assays by immunohistochemistry and validate their survival association in HGSC.MethodsTwo prognostic genes, FOXJ1 and GMNN, were selected based on high-quality antibodies, correlation with protein expression and variation in immunohistochemical scores in a preliminary cohort (n = 134 and n = 80, respectively). Six thousand four hundred and thirty-four (FOXJ1) and 5470 (GMNN) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovarian neoplasms (4634 and 4185 HGSC, respectively) represented on tissue microarrays from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium underwent immunohistochemical staining and scoring, then univariate and multivariate survival analysis.ResultsConsistent with mRNA, FOXJ1 protein expression exhibited a linear, increasing association with improved overall survival in HGSC patients. Women with >50% expression had the most favourable outcomes (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.91, p 35% GMNN expression showed a trend for better outcomes, though this was not significant.ConclusionWe provide foundational evidence for the prognostic value of FOXJ1 in HGSC, validating the prior mRNA-based prognostic association by immunohistochemistry.

Published
2023

4. Molecular subclasses of clear cell ovarian carcinoma and their impact on disease behavior and outcomes

Author

Bolton, Kelly L, Chen, Denise, de la Fuente, Rosario I Corona, Fu, Zhuxuan, Murali, Rajmohan, K�bel, Martin, Tazi, Yanis, Cunningham, Julie M, Chan, Irenaeus CC, Wiley, Brian J, Moukarzel, Lea A, Winham, Stacey J, Armasu, Sebastian M, Lester, Jenny, Elishaev, Esther, Laslavic, Angela, Kennedy, Catherine J, Piskorz, Anna, Sekowska, Magdalena, Brand, Alison H, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Pharoah, Paul, Elias, Kevin M, Drapkin, Ronny, Churchman, Michael, Gourley, Charlie, DeFazio, Anna, Karlan, Beth, Brenton, James D, Weigelt, Britta, Anglesio, Michael S, Huntsman, David, Gayther, Simon A, Konner, Jason, Modugno, Francesmary, Lawrenson, Kate, Goode, Ellen L, and Papaemmanuil, Elli

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Women's Health, Human Genome, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Biotechnology, Cancer Genomics, Precision Medicine, Clinical Research, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, Female, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Mutation, Endometriosis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeTo identify molecular subclasses of clear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) and assess their impact on clinical presentation and outcomes.Experimental designWe profiled 421 primary CCOCs that passed quality control using a targeted deep sequencing panel of 163 putative CCOC driver genes and whole transcriptome sequencing of 211 of these tumors. Molecularly defined subgroups were identified and tested for association with clinical characteristics and overall survival.ResultsWe detected a putative somatic driver mutation in at least one candidate gene in 95% (401/421) of CCOC tumors including ARID1A (in 49% of tumors), PIK3CA (49%), TERT (20%), and TP53 (16%). Clustering of cancer driver mutations and RNA expression converged upon two distinct subclasses of CCOC. The first was dominated by ARID1A-mutated tumors with enriched expression of canonical CCOC genes and markers of platinum resistance; the second was largely comprised of tumors with TP53 mutations and enriched for the expression of genes involved in extracellular matrix organization and mesenchymal differentiation. Compared with the ARID1A-mutated group, women with TP53-mutated tumors were more likely to have advanced-stage disease, no antecedent history of endometriosis, and poorer survival, driven by their advanced stage at presentation. In women with ARID1A-mutated tumors, there was a trend toward a lower rate of response to first-line platinum-based therapy.ConclusionsOur study suggests that CCOC consists of two distinct molecular subclasses with distinct clinical presentation and outcomes, with potential relevance to both traditional and experimental therapy responsiveness. See related commentary by Lheureux, p. 4838.

Published
2022

5. Genetic polymorphisms and correlation with treatment induced cardiotoxicity and prognosis in breast cancer patients.

Author

Peddi, Parvin F, Fasching, Peter A, Liu, Duan, Quinaux, Emmanuel, Robert, Nicholas J, Valero, Vicente, Crown, John, Falkson, Carla, Brufsky, Adam, Cunningham, Julie M, Weinshilboum, Richard M, Pienkowski, Tadeusz, Eiermann, Wolfgang, Martín, Miguel, Bee, Valerie, Wang, Xiaoyan, Wang, Liewei, Yang, Eric, Slamon, Dennis J, and Hurvitz, Sara A

Abstract

Cardiac toxicity is a serious complication of HER2-directed therapies and anthracyclines. HER2 codon 655 and SLC28A3 gene polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with cardiac toxicity from anti-HER2 and anthracycline therapy, respectively. Association of the polymorphism at HER2 codon 655 with prognosis has also been reported.Whole blood samples from patients treated on a randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial (BCIRG-006) that compared anthracycline-based chemotherapy to trastuzumab plus either anthracycline or non-anthracycline chemotherapy were tested for genetic polymorphisms in HER2 codon 655 and SLC28A3 Genotypes were correlated with cardiac function and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes.Of 3,222 patients enrolled in BCIRG-006, 662 patient samples were successfully genotyped for the rs1136201 allele in HER2 (codon 655): 424 (64%) were AA, 30 (4.5%) were GG, and 208 (31%) were AG genotype. Additionally, 665 patient samples were successfully genotyped for the rs7853758 allele in the SLC28A3 gene: 19 (3%) were AA, 475 (71%) were GG, and 171 (26%) were AG genotype. Follow up time was 10 years. No correlation between DFS, cardiac event rate or mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and rs1136201 genotype was seen in the trastuzumab treated or non-trastuzumab treated patients. Moreover, mean LVEF and cardiac event rates were similar in all rs7853758 genotype groups treated with anthracycline-based therapy.In the largest study to date to evaluate whether two polymorphisms are associated with DFS and/or cardiac toxicity in HER2 positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab and/or anthracyclines, we observed no correlation.

Published
2022

6. DNA Methylation Profiles of Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma

Author

Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Wang, Chen, Weiglt, Britta, Fu, Zhuxuan, Armasu, Sebastian M, McCauley, Bryan M, Brand, Alison H, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Elishaev, Esther, Gourley, Charlie, Kennedy, Catherine J, Laslavic, Angela, Lester, Jenny, Piskorz, Anna, Sekowska, Magdalena, Brenton, James D, Churchman, Michael, DeFazio, Anna, Drapkin, Ronny, Elias, Kevin M, Huntsman, David G, Karlan, Beth Y, Köbel, Martin, Konner, Jason, Lawrenson, Kate, Papaemmanuil, Elli, Bolton, Kelly L, Modugno, Francesmary, and Goode, Ellen L

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aneuploidy, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, DNA-Binding Proteins, Disease Progression, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Transcription Factors, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundOvarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a rare ovarian cancer histotype that tends to be resistant to standard platinum-based chemotherapeutics. We sought to better understand the role of DNA methylation in clinical and biological subclassification of OCCC.MethodsWe interrogated genome-wide methylation using DNA from fresh frozen tumors from 271 cases, applied nonsmooth nonnegative matrix factorization (nsNMF) clustering, and evaluated clinical associations and biological pathways.ResultsTwo approximately equally sized clusters that associated with several clinical features were identified. Compared with Cluster 2 (N = 137), Cluster 1 cases (N = 134) presented at a more advanced stage, were less likely to be of Asian ancestry, and tended to have poorer outcomes including macroscopic residual disease following primary debulking surgery (P < 0.10). Subset analyses of targeted tumor sequencing and IHC data revealed that Cluster 1 tumors showed TP53 mutation and abnormal p53 expression, and Cluster 2 tumors showed aneuploidy and ARID1A/PIK3CA mutation (P < 0.05). Cluster-defining CpGs included 1,388 CpGs residing within 200 bp of the transcription start sites of 977 genes; 38% of these genes (N = 369 genes) were differentially expressed across cluster in transcriptomic subset analysis (P < 10-4). Differentially expressed genes were enriched for six immune-related pathways, including IFNα and IFNγ responses (P < 10-6).ConclusionsDNA methylation clusters in OCCC correlate with disease features and gene expression patterns among immune pathways.ImpactThis work serves as a foundation for integrative analyses that better understand the complex biology of OCCC in an effort to improve potential for development of targeted therapeutics.

Published
2022

7. Identification of a Locus Near ULK1 Associated With Progression-Free Survival in Ovarian Cancer

Author

Quinn, Michael CJ, McCue, Karen, Shi, Wei, Johnatty, Sharon E, Beesley, Jonathan, Civitarese, Andrew, O'Mara, Tracy A, Glubb, Dylan M, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Armasu, Sebastian M, Ong, Jue-Sheng, Gharahkhani, Puya, Lu, Yi, Gao, Bo, Patch, Ann-Marie, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Garcia, Maria J, Goodman, Marc T, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten, du Bois, Andreas, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Bauman, Klaus, Group, for the AGO Study, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Cunningham, Julie M, Larson, Melissa C, McCauley, Bryan M, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Riggan, Marjorie J, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bjorge, Line, Webb, Penelope M, Group, for the OPAL Study, Friedlander, Michael, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Glasspool, Rosalind, May, Taymaa, Ene, Gabrielle EV, Huntsman, David G, Woo, Michelle, Carney, Michael E, Hinsley, Samantha, Heitz, Florian, Fereday, Sian, Kennedy, Catherine J, Edwards, Stacey L, Winham, Stacey J, deFazio, Anna, Group, for Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Pharoah, Paul DP, Goode, Ellen L, MacGregor, Stuart, and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Human Genome, Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Autophagy-Related Protein-1 Homolog, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Gene Knockout Techniques, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Progression-Free Survival, AGO Study Group, OPAL Study Group, for Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Epidemiology, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundMany loci have been found to be associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). However, although there is considerable variation in progression-free survival (PFS), no loci have been found to be associated with outcome at genome-wide levels of significance.MethodsWe carried out a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of PFS in 2,352 women with EOC who had undergone cytoreductive surgery and standard carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy.ResultsWe found seven SNPs at 12q24.33 associated with PFS (P < 5 × 10-8), the top SNP being rs10794418 (HR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.15-1.34; P = 1.47 × 10-8). High expression of a nearby gene, ULK1, is associated with shorter PFS in EOC, and with poor prognosis in other cancers. SNP rs10794418 is also associated with expression of ULK1 in ovarian tumors, with the allele associated with shorter PFS being associated with higher expression, and chromatin interactions were detected between the ULK1 promoter and associated SNPs in serous and endometrioid EOC cell lines. ULK1 knockout ovarian cancer cell lines showed significantly increased sensitivity to carboplatin in vitro.ConclusionsThe locus at 12q24.33 represents one of the first genome-wide significant loci for survival for any cancer. ULK1 is a plausible candidate for the target of this association.ImpactThis finding provides insight into genetic markers associated with EOC outcome and potential treatment options.See related commentary by Peres and Monteiro, p. 1604.

Published
2021

8. Cross-Cancer Genome-Wide Association Study of Endometrial Cancer and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Identifies Genetic Risk Regions Associated with Risk of Both Cancers

Author

Glubb, Dylan M, Thompson, Deborah J, Aben, Katja KH, Alsulimani, Ahmad, Amant, Frederic, Annibali, Daniela, Attia, John, Barricarte, Aurelio, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bischof, Katharina, Bjorge, Line, Bodelon, Clara, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brinton, Louise A, Bruinsma, Fiona, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burghaus, Stefanie, Butzow, Ralf, Cai, Hui, Carney, Michael E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cunningham, Julie M, De Vivo, Immaculata, deFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dunning, Alison M, Dürst, Matthias, Edwards, Todd, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fasching, Peter A, Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M, Fostira, Florentia, Fountzilas, George, Friedenreich, Christine M, Gao, Bo, Gaudet, Mia M, Gawełko, Jan, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harris, Holly R, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Holliday, Elizabeth G, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Jones, Michael E, Karlan, Beth Y, Karnezis, Anthony, Kelley, Joseph L, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Killeen, Jeffrey L, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Konopka, Bozena, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kopperud, Reidun K, Koti, Madhuri, Kraft, Peter, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Lele, Shashikant, Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J, Liang, Dong, Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Lingeng, Lu, Karen H, Macciotta, Alessandra, Mattiello, Amalia, May, Taymaa, McAlpine, Jessica N, and McGuire, Valerie

Subjects
Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Human Genome, Uterine Cancer, Genetics, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Cancer, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Endometrial Neoplasms, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Ovarian Neoplasms, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Factors, OPAL Study Group, AOCS Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundAccumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers.MethodsUsing LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data.ResultsGenetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10-5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (P Bonferroni < 2.4 × 10-9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P < 5 × 10-7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation.ConclusionsUsing cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis.ImpactOur research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.

Published
2021

9. The genomic and immune landscape of long-term survivors of high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Author

Garsed, Dale W., Pandey, Ahwan, Fereday, Sian, Kennedy, Catherine J., Takahashi, Kazuaki, Alsop, Kathryn, Hamilton, Phineas T., Hendley, Joy, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Traficante, Nadia, Provan, Pamela, Ariyaratne, Dinuka, Au-Yeung, George, Bateman, Nicholas W., Bowes, Leanne, Brand, Alison, Christie, Elizabeth L., Cunningham, Julie M., Friedlander, Michael, Grout, Bronwyn, Harnett, Paul, Hung, Jillian, McCauley, Bryan, McNally, Orla, Piskorz, Anna M., Saner, Flurina A. M., Vierkant, Robert A., Wang, Chen, Winham, Stacey J., Pharoah, Paul D. P., Brenton, James D., Conrads, Thomas P., Maxwell, George L., Ramus, Susan J., Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C., Nelson, Brad H., Goode, Ellen L., DeFazio, Anna, and Bowtell, David D. L.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Cross-cancer genome-wide association study of endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer identifies genetic risk regions associated with risk of both cancers

Author

Glubb, Dylan M, Thompson, Deborah J, Aben, Katja KH, Alsulimani, Ahmad, Amant, Frederic, Annibali, Daniela, Attia, John, Barricarte, Aurelio, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Bischof, Katharina, Bjorge, Line, Bodelon, Clara, Brand, Alison H, Brenton, James D, Brinton, Louise, Bruinsma, Fiona, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burghaus, Stefanie, Butzow, Ralf, Cai, Hui, Carney, Michael E, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cunningham, Julie M, De Vivo, Immaculata, deFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dunning, Alison M, Dürst, Matthias, Edwards, Todd, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Ewing, Ailith, Fasching, Peter A, Ferguson, Sarah, Flanagan, James M, Fostira, Florentia, Fountzilas, George, Friedenreich, Christine M, Gao, Bo, Gaudet, Mia M, Gawełko, Jan, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Group, OPAL Study, Group, AOCS, Harris, Holly R, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Holliday, Elizabeth G, Huntsman, David G, Huzarski, Tomasz, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Jones, Michael E, Karlan, Beth Y, Karnezis, Anthony, Kelley, Joseph L, Khusnutdinova, Elza, Killeen, Jeffrey L, Kjaer, Susanne K, Klapdor, Rüdiger, Köbel, Martin, Konopka, Bozena, Konstantopoulou, Irene, Kopperud, Reidun K, Koti, Madhuri, Kraft, Peter, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Larson, Melissa C, Le Marchand, Loic, Lele, Shashikant B, Lester, Jenny, Li, Andrew J, Liang, Dong, Liebrich, Clemens, Lipworth, Loren, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Lingeng, Lu, Karen H, Macciotta, Alessandra, Mattiello, Amalia, and May, Taymaa

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Statistics, Mathematical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Aging, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Cancer, Uterine Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Biotechnology, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract

Abstract: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer. For example, endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer share epidemiological risk factors and molecular features observed across histotypes are held in common (e.g. serous, endometrioid and clear cell). Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. Using GWAS summary statistics, we explored the shared genetic etiology between endometrial cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer. Genetic correlation analysis using LD Score regression revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e. inverse-variance meta-analysis, co-localization, and M-values), and performed analyses by stratified by subtype. We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni < 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12 and 11q13.3 were identified at a sub-genome wide threshold (P < 5 × 10−7). Integration with promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and epithelial ovarian cell lines, and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation.

Published
2020

11. Population based targeted sequencing of 54 candidate genes identifies PALB2 as a susceptibility gene for high grade serous ovarian cancer

Author

Song, Honglin, Dicks, Ed, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Intermaggio, Maria, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Bowtell, David D, Traficante, Nadia, Group, AOCS, Brenton, James D, Goranova, Teodora, Hosking, Karen, Piskorz, Anna, Van Oudenhove, Elke, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Harris, Holly R, Rossing, Mary Anne, Dürst, Matthias, Dörk, Thilo, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Odunsi, Kunle, Ness, Roberta B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Jensen, Allan, Kjaer, Susanne K, Høgdall, Estrid, Campbell, Ian, Lazaro, Conxi, Pujana, Miquel Angel, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Winham, Stacey J, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Huff, Chad, Li, Donghui, Wu, Xifeng, Yu, Yao, Permuth, Jennifer B, Levine, Douglas A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Riggan, Marjorie J, Berchuck, Andrew, Webb, Penelope M, Group, OPAL Study, Cybulski, Cezary, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Alsop, Jennifer, Harrington, Patricia A, Chan, Isaac, Menon, Usha, Pearce, Celeste L, Wu, Anna H, de Fazio, Anna, Kennedy, Catherine J, Goode, Ellen L, Ramus, Susan J, Gayther, Simon A, and Pharoah, Paul DP

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Genetics, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Orphan Drug, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Prevention, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology
Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The known EOC susceptibility genes account for less than 50% of the heritable risk of ovarian cancer suggesting other susceptibility genes exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contribution to ovarian cancer susceptibility of rare deleterious germline variants in a set of candidate genes. Methods: We sequenced the coding region of 54 candidate genes in 6385 invasive EOC cases and 6115 controls of broad European ancestry. Genes with an increased frequency of putative deleterious variants in cases verses controls were further examined in an independent set of 14,146 EOC cases and 28,661 controls from the ovarian cancer association consortium and the UK Biobank. For each gene, we estimated the EOC risks and evaluated associations between germline variant status and clinical characteristics. Results: The odds ratios (OR) associated for high-grade serous ovarian cancer were 3.01 for PALB2 (95% CI 1.59 – 5.68; P = 0.00068), 1.99 for POLK (95% CI 1.15 – 3.43; P = 0.014), and 4.07 for SLX4 (95% CI 1.34-12.4; P = 0.013). Deleterious mutations in FBXO10 were associated with a reduced risk of disease (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.07 −1.00, P=0.049). However, based on the Bayes false discovery probability, only the association for PALB2 in high-grade serous ovarian cancer is likely to represent a true positive. Conclusions: We have found strong evidence that carriers of PALB2 deleterious mutations are at increased risk of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Whether the magnitude of risk is sufficiently high to warrant the inclusion of PALB2 in cancer gene panels for ovarian cancer risk testing is unclear; much larger sample sizes will be needed to provide sufficiently precise estimates for clinical counselling.

Published
2019

12. Publisher Correction: Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers.

Author

Jiang, Xia, Finucane, Hilary K, Schumacher, Fredrick R, Schmit, Stephanie L, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Han, Younghun, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lesseur, Corina, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Dennis, Joe, Conti, David V, Casey, Graham, Gaudet, Mia M, Huyghe, Jeroen R, Albanes, Demetrius, Aldrich, Melinda C, Andrew, Angeline S, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arnold, Susanne M, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barnes, Daniel R, Batra, Jyotsna, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Benlloch, Sara, Berchuck, Andrew, Berndt, Sonja I, Bickeböller, Heike, Bien, Stephanie A, Blomqvist, Carl, Boccia, Stefania, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brenton, James D, Brook, Mark N, Brunet, Joan, Brunnström, Hans, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Cadoni, Gabriella, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Campbell, Peter T, Cancel-Tassin, Géraldine, Cannon-Albright, Lisa, Campa, Daniele, Caporaso, Neil, Carvalho, André L, Chan, Andrew T, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Christiani, David C, Claes, Kathleen BM, Claessens, Frank, Clements, Judith, Collée, J Margriet, Correa, Marcia Cruz, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, deFazio, Anna, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Donovan, Jenny L, Dörk, Thilo, Duell, Eric J, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Edlund, Christopher K, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Ellberg, Carolina, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Ferris, Robert L, Liloglou, Triantafillos, Figueiredo, Jane C, Fletcher, Olivia, Fortner, Renée T, Fostira, Florentia, Franceschi, Silvia, Friedman, Eitan, Gallinger, Steven J, and Ganz, Patricia A

Subjects
MD Multidisciplinary
Abstract

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

Published
2019

13. Associations of obesity and circulating insulin and glucose with breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization analysis.

Author

Shu, Xiang, Wu, Lang, Khankari, Nikhil K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Wang, Thomas J, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Milne, Roger L, Schmidt, Marjanka K, Pharoah, Paul DP, Andrulis, Irene L, Hunter, David J, Simard, Jacques, Easton, Douglas F, Zheng, Wei, Alicia, Beeghly-Fadiel J, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beane Freeman, Laura E, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Cai, Qiuyin, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, David Cheng, Ting-Yuan, Clarke, Christine L, Conroy, Don M, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, David G, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Earp, H Shelton, Eccles, Diana M, Heather Eliassen, A, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Gareth Evans, D, Fachal, Laura, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, He, Wei, Hein, Alexander, Hicks, Belynda, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogervorst, Frans B, Hollestelle, Antoinette, and Hoover, Robert N

Subjects
Clinical Research, Diabetes, Prevention, Nutrition, Obesity, Cancer, Aging, Breast Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Metabolic and endocrine, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Body Mass Index, Breast Neoplasms, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Obesity, Abdominal, Waist-Hip Ratio, Breast cancer, insulin, glucose, obesity, genetics, Mendelian randomization analysis, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract

BackgroundIn addition to the established association between general obesity and breast cancer risk, central obesity and circulating fasting insulin and glucose have been linked to the development of this common malignancy. Findings from previous studies, however, have been inconsistent, and the nature of the associations is unclear.MethodsWe conducted Mendelian randomization analyses to evaluate the association of breast cancer risk, using genetic instruments, with fasting insulin, fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, body mass index (BMI) and BMI-adjusted waist-hip-ratio (WHRadj BMI). We first confirmed the association of these instruments with type 2 diabetes risk in a large diabetes genome-wide association study consortium. We then investigated their associations with breast cancer risk using individual-level data obtained from 98 842 cases and 83 464 controls of European descent in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium.ResultsAll sets of instruments were associated with risk of type 2 diabetes. Associations with breast cancer risk were found for genetically predicted fasting insulin [odds ratio (OR) = 1.71 per standard deviation (SD) increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-2.31, p  =  5.09  ×  10-4], 2-h glucose (OR = 1.80 per SD increase, 95% CI = 1.3 0-2.49, p  =  4.02  ×  10-4), BMI (OR = 0.70 per 5-unit increase, 95% CI = 0.65-0.76, p  =  5.05  ×  10-19) and WHRadj BMI (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.79-0.91, p  =  9.22  ×  10-6). Stratified analyses showed that genetically predicted fasting insulin was more closely related to risk of estrogen-receptor [ER]-positive cancer, whereas the associations with instruments of 2-h glucose, BMI and WHRadj BMI were consistent regardless of age, menopausal status, estrogen receptor status and family history of breast cancer.ConclusionsWe confirmed the previously reported inverse association of genetically predicted BMI with breast cancer risk, and showed a positive association of genetically predicted fasting insulin and 2-h glucose and an inverse association of WHRadj BMI with breast cancer risk. Our study suggests that genetically determined obesity and glucose/insulin-related traits have an important role in the aetiology of breast cancer.

Published
2019

14. Shared heritability and functional enrichment across six solid cancers.

Author

Jiang, Xia, Finucane, Hilary K, Schumacher, Fredrick R, Schmit, Stephanie L, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Han, Younghun, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lesseur, Corina, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Dennis, Joe, Conti, David V, Casey, Graham, Gaudet, Mia M, Huyghe, Jeroen R, Albanes, Demetrius, Aldrich, Melinda C, Andrew, Angeline S, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antoniou, Antonis C, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arnold, Susanne M, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu K, Bandera, Elisa V, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barnes, Daniel R, Batra, Jyotsna, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Benlloch, Sara, Berchuck, Andrew, Berndt, Sonja I, Bickeböller, Heike, Bien, Stephanie A, Blomqvist, Carl, Boccia, Stefania, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brenton, James D, Brook, Mark N, Brunet, Joan, Brunnström, Hans, Buchanan, Daniel D, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Cadoni, Gabriella, Caldés, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Campbell, Peter T, Cancel-Tassin, Géraldine, Cannon-Albright, Lisa, Campa, Daniele, Caporaso, Neil, Carvalho, André L, Chan, Andrew T, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chen, Chu, Christiani, David C, Claes, Kathleen BM, Claessens, Frank, Clements, Judith, Collée, J Margriet, Correa, Marcia Cruz, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, deFazio, Anna, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Donovan, Jenny L, Dörk, Thilo, Duell, Eric J, Dunning, Alison M, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Edlund, Christopher K, Edwards, Digna R Velez, Ellberg, Carolina, Evans, D Gareth, Fasching, Peter A, Ferris, Robert L, Liloglou, Triantafillos, Figueiredo, Jane C, Fletcher, Olivia, Fortner, Renée T, Fostira, Florentia, Franceschi, Silvia, Friedman, Eitan, Gallinger, Steven J, and Ganz, Patricia A

Subjects
Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms, Ovarian Neoplasms, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Prostatic Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Neoplasm Proteins, Case-Control Studies, Smoking, Mental Disorders, Inheritance Patterns, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Male, Genome-Wide Association Study, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prevention, Cancer, Breast Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Lung Cancer, Human Genome, Colo-Rectal Cancer, Digestive Diseases, Lung, MD Multidisciplinary
Abstract

Quantifying the genetic correlation between cancers can provide important insights into the mechanisms driving cancer etiology. Using genome-wide association study summary statistics across six cancer types based on a total of 296,215 cases and 301,319 controls of European ancestry, here we estimate the pair-wise genetic correlations between breast, colorectal, head/neck, lung, ovary and prostate cancer, and between cancers and 38 other diseases. We observed statistically significant genetic correlations between lung and head/neck cancer (rg = 0.57, p = 4.6 × 10-8), breast and ovarian cancer (rg = 0.24, p = 7 × 10-5), breast and lung cancer (rg = 0.18, p =1.5 × 10-6) and breast and colorectal cancer (rg = 0.15, p = 1.1 × 10-4). We also found that multiple cancers are genetically correlated with non-cancer traits including smoking, psychiatric diseases and metabolic characteristics. Functional enrichment analysis revealed a significant excess contribution of conserved and regulatory regions to cancer heritability. Our comprehensive analysis of cross-cancer heritability suggests that solid tumors arising across tissues share in part a common germline genetic basis.

Published
2019

15. Quality control recommendations for RNASeq using FFPE samples based on pre-sequencing lab metrics and post-sequencing bioinformatics metrics

Author

Liu, Yuanhang, Bhagwate, Aditya, Winham, Stacey J., Stephens, Melissa T., Harker, Brent W., McDonough, Samantha J., Stallings-Mann, Melody L., Heinzen, Ethan P., Vierkant, Robert A., Hoskin, Tanya L., Frost, Marlene H., Carter, Jodi M., Pfrender, Michael E., Littlepage, Laurie, Radisky, Derek C., Cunningham, Julie M., Degnim, Amy C., and Wang, Chen

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology.

Author

Kelemen, Linda E, Earp, Madalene, Fridley, Brooke L, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif B, Hein, Alexander, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Behrens, Sabine, Moysich, Kirsten B, Cannioto, Rikki, Lele, Shashikant, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Thompson, Pamela J, Wilkens, Lynne R, Dörk, Thilo, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bogdanova, Natalia, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Heitz, Florian, Schwaab, Ira, Butzow, Ralf, Pelttari, Liisa M, Nevanlinna, Heli, Modugno, Francesmary, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Ness, Roberta B, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Walsh, Christine, Kjaer, Susanne K, Jensen, Allan, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen, Wu, Xifeng, Sellers, Thomas A, Levine, Douglas A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Iversen, Edwin S, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Tworoger, Shelley S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Vestrheim Thomsen, Liv Cecilie, Bjorge, Line, Krakstad, Camilla, Tangen, Ingvild L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, Massuger, Leon FAG, van Altena, Anne M, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Kellar, Melissa, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Gronwald, Jacek, Cybulski, Cezary, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Hogdall, Estrid, Engelholm, Svend Aage, Hogdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, Nedergaard, Lotte, Pharoah, Paul DP, Dicks, Ed, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, McNeish, Iain, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Carty, Karen

Subjects
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Humans, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Hydro-Lyases, Thymidylate Synthase, Proteins, RNA, Antisense, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Risk, Case-Control Studies, Signal Transduction, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Middle Aged, Female, Genetic Association Studies, consortia, enolase superfamily member 1, expression quantitative trait locus, genetics, gynecology, ovarian neoplasms, single-nucleotide polymorphism, thymidylate synthase, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Biotechnology, Cancer, Digestive Diseases, Genetics, Chemical Physics, Other Chemical Sciences, Other Biological Sciences
Abstract

Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3' gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97⁻1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03⁻1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10-28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.

Published
2018

18. A transcriptome-wide association study of 229,000 women identifies new candidate susceptibility genes for breast cancer

Author

Wu, Lang, Shi, Wei, Long, Jirong, Guo, Xingyi, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Beesley, Jonathan, Bolla, Manjeet K, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Lu, Yingchang, Cai, Qiuyin, Al-Ejeh, Fares, Rozali, Esdy, Wang, Qin, Dennis, Joe, Li, Bingshan, Zeng, Chenjie, Feng, Helian, Gusev, Alexander, Barfield, Richard T, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Auer, Paul L, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brucker, Sara Y, Burwinkel, Barbara, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, J Esteban, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Xiaoqing, Cheng, Ting-Yuan David, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, NBCS Collaborators, Collée, Margriet, Cornelissen, Sten, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, David, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Eilber, Ursula, Eliassen, A Heather, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fachal, Laura, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Fletcher, Olivia, Flyger, Henrik, Fritschi, Lin, Gabrielson, Marike, Gago-Dominguez, Manuela, Gapstur, Susan M, García-Closas, Montserrat, Gaudet, Mia M, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Guénel, Pascal, Hahnen, Eric, Haiman, Christopher A, Håkansson, Niclas, Hall, Per, Hallberg, Emily, Hamann, Ute, Harrington, Patricia, Hein, Alexander, Hicks, Belynda, Hillemanns, Peter, Hollestelle, Antoinette, Hoover, Robert N, Hopper, John L, and Huang, Guanmengqian

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Genetics, Human Genome, Biotechnology, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Generic health relevance, Breast Neoplasms, Case-Control Studies, Female, Gene Expression, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk, Transcriptome, NBCS Collaborators, kConFab/AOCS Investigators, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology, Agricultural biotechnology, Bioinformatics and computational biology
Abstract

The breast cancer risk variants identified in genome-wide association studies explain only a small fraction of the familial relative risk, and the genes responsible for these associations remain largely unknown. To identify novel risk loci and likely causal genes, we performed a transcriptome-wide association study evaluating associations of genetically predicted gene expression with breast cancer risk in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry. We used data from the Genotype-Tissue Expression Project to establish genetic models to predict gene expression in breast tissue and evaluated model performance using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Of the 8,597 genes evaluated, significant associations were identified for 48 at a Bonferroni-corrected threshold of P

Published
2018

19. Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study

Author

Dixon-Suen, Suzanne C, Nagle, Christina M, Thrift, Aaron P, Pharoah, Paul DP, Ewing, Ailith, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Zheng, Wei, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Wicklund, Kristine G, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Jung, Audrey Y, Moysich, Kirsten B, Odunsi, Kunle, Goodman, Marc T, Wilkens, Lynne R, Thompson, Pamela J, Shvetsov, Yurii B, Dörk, Thilo, Park-Simon, Tjoung-Won, Hillemanns, Peter, Bogdanova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Leminen, Arto, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Harter, Philipp, Schwaab, Ira, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Rimel, Bobbie J, Kjær, Susanne K, Høgdall, Estrid, Jensen, Allan, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Milne, Roger L, Southey, Melissa C, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Wu, Xifeng, Lu, Karen H, Liang, Dong, Levine, Douglas A, Bisogna, Maria, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Bandera, Elisa V, Olson, Sara H, Salvesen, Helga B, Thomsen, Liv Cecilie Vestrheim, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bjorge, Line, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pejovic, Tanja, Bruegl, Amanda, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Swenerton, Kenneth D, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Kelemen, Linda E, Lubiński, Jan, Huzarski, Tomasz, Gronwald, Jacek, Menkiszak, Janusz, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Yang, Hannah, Lissowska, Jolanta, Høgdall, Claus K, Lundvall, Lene, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, Paul, James, Glasspool, Rosalind, Siddiqui, Nadeem, and Whittemore, Alice S

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Height, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Geography, Humans, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Young Adult, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Public Health and Health Services, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundObservational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias.MethodsWe pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.ResultsGreater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours.ConclusionsWomen with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.

Published
2018

20. Variants in genes encoding small GTPases and association with epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Author

Earp, Madalene, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Winham, Stacey J, Lin, Hui-Yi, Chornokur, Ganna, Dennis, Joe, Aben, Katja KH, Anton‐Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Despierre, Evelyn, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Høgdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Jung, Audrey Y, Karlan, Beth Y, Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Lim, Boon Kiong, Kjaer, Susanne K, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lele, Shashi, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Li, Zheng, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Orsulic, Sandra, Paul, James, Pejovic, Tanja, Pelttari, Liisa M, Permuth, Jenny B, Pike, Malcolm C, Poole, Elizabeth M, Rosen, Barry, Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H, and Runnebaum, Ingo B

Subjects
Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Biological Sciences, Genetics, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Biotechnology, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, A Kinase Anchor Proteins, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Monomeric GTP-Binding Proteins, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Rho Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors, Risk Factors, General Science & Technology
Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in American women. Normal ovarian physiology is intricately connected to small GTP binding proteins of the Ras superfamily (Ras, Rho, Rab, Arf, and Ran) which govern processes such as signal transduction, cell proliferation, cell motility, and vesicle transport. We hypothesized that common germline variation in genes encoding small GTPases is associated with EOC risk. We investigated 322 variants in 88 small GTPase genes in germline DNA of 18,736 EOC patients and 26,138 controls of European ancestry using a custom genotype array and logistic regression fitting log-additive models. Functional annotation was used to identify biofeatures and expression quantitative trait loci that intersect with risk variants. One variant, ARHGEF10L (Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor 10 like) rs2256787, was associated with increased endometrioid EOC risk (OR = 1.33, p = 4.46 x 10-6). Other variants of interest included another in ARHGEF10L, rs10788679, which was associated with invasive serous EOC risk (OR = 1.07, p = 0.00026) and two variants in AKAP6 (A-kinase anchoring protein 6) which were associated with risk of invasive EOC (rs1955513, OR = 0.90, p = 0.00033; rs927062, OR = 0.94, p = 0.00059). Functional annotation revealed that the two ARHGEF10L variants were located in super-enhancer regions and that AKAP6 rs927062 was associated with expression of GTPase gene ARHGAP5 (Rho GTPase activating protein 5). Inherited variants in ARHGEF10L and AKAP6, with potential transcriptional regulatory function and association with EOC risk, warrant investigation in independent EOC study populations.

Published
2018

26. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci

Author

Michailidou, Kyriaki, Lindström, Sara, Dennis, Joe, Beesley, Jonathan, Hui, Shirley, Kar, Siddhartha, Lemaçon, Audrey, Soucy, Penny, Glubb, Dylan, Rostamianfar, Asha, Bolla, Manjeet K, Wang, Qin, Tyrer, Jonathan, Dicks, Ed, Lee, Andrew, Wang, Zhaoming, Allen, Jamie, Keeman, Renske, Eilber, Ursula, French, Juliet D, Qing Chen, Xiao, Fachal, Laura, McCue, Karen, McCart Reed, Amy E, Ghoussaini, Maya, Carroll, Jason S, Jiang, Xia, Finucane, Hilary, Adams, Marcia, Adank, Muriel A, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Arndt, Volker, Aronson, Kristan J, Arun, Banu, Auer, Paul L, Bacot, François, Barrdahl, Myrto, Baynes, Caroline, Beckmann, Matthias W, Behrens, Sabine, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernstein, Leslie, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bonanni, Bernardo, Børresen-Dale, Anne-Lise, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brennan, Paul, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brock, Ian W, Broeks, Annegien, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Brucker, Sara Y, Brüning, Thomas, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butterbach, Katja, Cai, Qiuyin, Cai, Hui, Caldés, Trinidad, Canzian, Federico, Carracedo, Angel, Carter, Brian D, Castelao, Jose E, Chan, Tsun L, David Cheng, Ting-Yuan, Seng Chia, Kee, Choi, Ji-Yeob, Christiansen, Hans, Clarke, Christine L, Collée, Margriet, Conroy, Don M, Cordina-Duverger, Emilie, Cornelissen, Sten, Cox, David G, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Devilee, Peter, Doheny, Kimberly F, Dörk, Thilo, dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Durcan, Lorraine, Dwek, Miriam, Eccles, Diana M, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, A Heather, Ellberg, Carolina, Elvira, Mingajeva, and Engel, Christoph

Subjects
Cancer, Asia, Asian People, Binding Sites, Breast Neoplasms, Computer Simulation, Europe, Female, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Risk Assessment, Transcription Factors, White People, NBCS Collaborators, ABCTB Investigators, ConFab/AOCS Investigators, General Science & Technology
Abstract

Breast cancer risk is influenced by rare coding variants in susceptibility genes, such as BRCA1, and many common, mostly non-coding variants. However, much of the genetic contribution to breast cancer risk remains unknown. Here we report the results of a genome-wide association study of breast cancer in 122,977 cases and 105,974 controls of European ancestry and 14,068 cases and 13,104 controls of East Asian ancestry. We identified 65 new loci that are associated with overall breast cancer risk at P

Published
2017

27. Analyses of germline variants associated with ovarian cancer survival identify functional candidates at the 1q22 and 19p12 outcome loci

Author

Glubb, Dylan M, Johnatty, Sharon E, Quinn, Michael CJ, O’Mara, Tracy A, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Gao, Bo, Fasching, Peter A, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Vergote, Ignace, Velez Edwards, Digna R, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Garcia, Maria J, Goodman, Marc T, Thompson, Pamela J, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Modungo, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Pfisterer, Jacobus, Hillemanns, Peter, Karlan, Beth Y, Lester, Jenny, Goode, Ellen L, Cunningham, Julie M, Winham, Stacey J, Larson, Melissa C, McCauley, Bryan M, Kjær, Susanne Krüger, Jensen, Allan, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Salvesen, Helga B, Bjorge, Line, Webb, Penny M, Grant, Peter, Pejovic, Tanja, Moffitt, Melissa, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Paul, James, Glasspool, Rosalind, Bernardini, Marcus, Tone, Alicia, Huntsman, David, Woo, Michelle, Group, AOCS, deFazio, Anna, Kennedy, Catherine J, Pharoah, Paul DP, MacGregor, Stuart, and Chenevix-Trench, Georgia

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Orphan Drug, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, ovarian cancer outcome, genetic association, gene regulation, meta-analysis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

We previously identified associations with ovarian cancer outcome at five genetic loci. To identify putatively causal genetic variants and target genes, we prioritized two ovarian outcome loci (1q22 and 19p12) for further study. Bioinformatic and functional genetic analyses indicated that MEF2D and ZNF100 are targets of candidate outcome variants at 1q22 and 19p12, respectively. At 19p12, the chromatin interaction of a putative regulatory element with the ZNF100 promoter region correlated with candidate outcome variants. At 1q22, putative regulatory elements enhanced MEF2D promoter activity and haplotypes containing candidate outcome variants modulated these effects. In a public dataset, MEF2D and ZNF100 expression were both associated with ovarian cancer progression-free or overall survival time. In an extended set of 6,162 epithelial ovarian cancer patients, we found that functional candidates at the 1q22 and 19p12 loci, as well as other regional variants, were nominally associated with patient outcome; however, no associations reached our threshold for statistical significance (p

Published
2017

28. Germline whole exome sequencing and large-scale replication identifies FANCM as a likely high grade serous ovarian cancer susceptibility gene

Author

Dicks, Ed, Song, Honglin, Ramus, Susan J, Van Oudenhove, Elke, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Intermaggio, Maria P, Kar, Siddhartha, Harrington, Patricia, Bowtell, David D, Group, AOCS Study, Cicek, Mine S, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Alsop, Jennifer, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Piskorz, Anna, Goranova, Teodora, Kent, Emma, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Paul, James, Crawford, Robin, Poblete, Samantha, Lele, Shashi, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Moysich, Kirsten B, Sieh, Weiva, McGuire, Valerie, Lester, Jenny, Odunsi, Kunle, Whittemore, Alice S, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Karlan, Beth Y, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Tischkowitz, Marc, Levine, Douglas, Brenton, James D, Dörk, Thilo, Goode, Ellen L, Gayther, Simon A, and Pharoah, Paul DP

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Genetic Testing, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Cancer, Prevention, Human Genome, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Good Health and Well Being, ovarian cancer, susceptibility genes, DNA repair, next generation sequencing, Next generation sequencing, Susceptibility Genes, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

We analyzed whole exome sequencing data in germline DNA from 412 high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project and identified 5,517 genes harboring a predicted deleterious germline coding mutation in at least one HGSOC case. Gene-set enrichment analysis showed enrichment for genes involved in DNA repair (p = 1.8x10-3). Twelve DNA repair genes - APEX1, APLF, ATX, EME1, FANCL, FANCM, MAD2L2, PARP2, PARP3, POLN, RAD54L and SMUG1 - were prioritized for targeted sequencing in up to 3,107 HGSOC cases, 1,491 cases of other epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) subtypes and 3,368 unaffected controls of European origin. We estimated mutation prevalence for each gene and tested for associations with disease risk. Mutations were identified in both cases and controls in all genes except MAD2L2, where we found no evidence of mutations in controls. In FANCM we observed a higher mutation frequency in HGSOC cases compared to controls (29/3,107 cases, 0.96 percent; 13/3,368 controls, 0.38 percent; P=0.008) with little evidence for association with other subtypes (6/1,491, 0.40 percent; P=0.82). The relative risk of HGSOC associated with deleterious FANCM mutations was estimated to be 2.5 (95% CI 1.3 - 5.0; P=0.006). In summary, whole exome sequencing of EOC cases with large-scale replication in case-control studies has identified FANCM as a likely novel susceptibility gene for HGSOC, with mutations associated with a moderate increase in risk. These data may have clinical implications for risk prediction and prevention approaches for high-grade serous ovarian cancer in the future and a significant impact on reducing disease mortality.

Published
2017

29. RE: "RISK PREDICTION FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER IN 11 UNITED STATES-BASED CASE-CONTROL STUDIES: INCORPORATION OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC RISK FACTORS AND 17 CONFIRMED GENETIC LOCI".

Author

Clyde, Merlise A, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Iversen, Edwin S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goodman, Marc T, Ness, Roberta B, Risch, Harvey A, Rossing, Mary Anne, Terry, Kathryn L, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Berchuck, Andrew, Carney, Michael E, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Edwards, Robert P, Fridley, Brooke L, Goode, Ellen L, Lurie, Galina, McGuire, Valerie, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Olson, Sara H, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sellers, Thomas A, Sieh, Weiva, Stram, Daniel, Thompson, Pamela J, Vierkant, RobertA, Wicklund, KristineG, Wu, Anna H, Ziogas, Argyrios, Pharoah, Paul D, Tworoger, Shelley S, Schildkraut, Joellen M, and Consortium, Ovarian Canc Assoc

Subjects
Epidemiology, Medical and Health Sciences, Mathematical Sciences
Published
2017

30. Identification of 12 new susceptibility loci for different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Author

Phelan, Catherine M, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kar, Siddhartha P, Lawrenson, Kate, Winham, Stacey J, Dennis, Joe, Pirie, Ailith, Riggan, Marjorie J, Chornokur, Ganna, Earp, Madalene A, Lyra, Paulo C, Lee, Janet M, Coetzee, Simon, Beesley, Jonathan, McGuffog, Lesley, Soucy, Penny, Dicks, Ed, Lee, Andrew, Barrowdale, Daniel, Lecarpentier, Julie, Leslie, Goska, Aalfs, Cora M, Aben, Katja KH, Adams, Marcia, Adlard, Julian, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, AOCS study group, Aravantinos, Gerasimos, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Azzollini, Jacopo, Balmaña, Judith, Banerjee, Susana N, Barjhoux, Laure, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Beeghly-Fadiel, Alicia, Benitez, Javier, Bermisheva, Marina, Bernardini, Marcus Q, Birrer, Michael J, Bjorge, Line, Black, Amanda, Blankstein, Kenneth, Blok, Marinus J, Bodelon, Clara, Bogdanova, Natalia, Bojesen, Anders, Bonanni, Bernardo, Borg, Åke, Bradbury, Angela R, Brenton, James D, Brewer, Carole, Brinton, Louise, Broberg, Per, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Buecher, Bruno, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Cannioto, Rikki, Carney, Michael E, Cescon, Terence, Chan, Salina B, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen, Chen, Xiao Qing, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Chiquette, Jocelyne, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Conner, Thomas, Cook, Linda S, Cook, Jackie, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, D'Aloisio, Aimee A, Daly, Mary B, Damiola, Francesca, Damirovna, Sakaeva Dina, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dao, Fanny, Davidson, Rosemarie, DeFazio, Anna, Delnatte, Capucine, Doheny, Kimberly F, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan Chun, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Domchek, Susan M, and Dorfling, Cecilia M

Subjects
AOCS study group, EMBRACE Study, GEMO Study Collaborators, HEBON Study, KConFab Investigators, OPAL study group, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Telomere-Binding Proteins, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Risk Factors, Genotype, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Alleles, Female, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Genetics, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Ovarian Cancer, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Abstract

To identify common alleles associated with different histotypes of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), we pooled data from multiple genome-wide genotyping projects totaling 25,509 EOC cases and 40,941 controls. We identified nine new susceptibility loci for different EOC histotypes: six for serous EOC histotypes (3q28, 4q32.3, 8q21.11, 10q24.33, 18q11.2 and 22q12.1), two for mucinous EOC (3q22.3 and 9q31.1) and one for endometrioid EOC (5q12.3). We then performed meta-analysis on the results for high-grade serous ovarian cancer with the results from analysis of 31,448 BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, including 3,887 mutation carriers with EOC. This identified three additional susceptibility loci at 2q13, 8q24.1 and 12q24.31. Integrated analyses of genes and regulatory biofeatures at each locus predicted candidate susceptibility genes, including OBFC1, a new candidate susceptibility gene for low-grade and borderline serous EOC.

Published
2017

31. Risk Prediction for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in 11 United States–Based Case-Control Studies: Incorporation of Epidemiologic Risk Factors and 17 Confirmed Genetic Loci

Author

Clyde, Merlise A, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Iversen, Edwin S, Poole, Elizabeth M, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goodman, Marc T, Ness, Roberta B, Risch, Harvey A, Rossing, Mary Anne, Terry, Kathryn L, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Berchuck, Andrew, Carney, Michael E, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Edwards, Robert P, Fridley, Brooke L, Goode, Ellen L, Lurie, Galina, McGuire, Valerie, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Olson, Sara H, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pike, Malcolm C, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sellers, Thomas A, Sieh, Weiva, Stram, Daniel, Thompson, Pamela J, Vierkant, Robert A, Wicklund, Kristine G, Wu, Anna H, Ziogas, Argyrios, Tworoger, Shelley S, and Schildkraut, Joellen M

Subjects
Epidemiology, Health Sciences, Ovarian Cancer, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Cancer, Adult, Aged, Area Under Curve, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Humans, Logistic Models, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, United States, genetic risk polymorphisms, model evaluation, ovarian cancer, risk model, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Mathematical Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract

Previously developed models for predicting absolute risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer have included a limited number of risk factors and have had low discriminatory power (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) < 0.60). Because of this, we developed and internally validated a relative risk prediction model that incorporates 17 established epidemiologic risk factors and 17 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using data from 11 case-control studies in the United States (5,793 cases; 9,512 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (data accrued from 1992 to 2010). We developed a hierarchical logistic regression model for predicting case-control status that included imputation of missing data. We randomly divided the data into an 80% training sample and used the remaining 20% for model evaluation. The AUC for the full model was 0.664. A reduced model without SNPs performed similarly (AUC = 0.649). Both models performed better than a baseline model that included age and study site only (AUC = 0.563). The best predictive power was obtained in the full model among women younger than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.714); however, the addition of SNPs increased the AUC the most for women older than 50 years of age (AUC = 0.638 vs. 0.616). Adapting this improved model to estimate absolute risk and evaluating it in prospective data sets is warranted.

Published
2016

32. Association of vitamin D levels and risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Author

Ong, Jue-Sheng, Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Lu, Yi, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Anne Doherty, Jennifer, Anne Rossing, Mary, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Eilber, Ursula, Rudolph, Anja, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Leminen, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus K, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hildebrandt, Michelle At, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Aben, Katja Kh, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon Fag, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Gilks, C Blake, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, Lissowska, Jolanta, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Eccles, Diana, Campbell, Ian, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Wu, Anna H, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Timorek, Agnieszka, Szafron, Lukasz, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Winham, Stacey J, Bandera, Elisa V, and Poole, Elizabeth M

Subjects
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Vitamin D, Odds Ratio, Risk Factors, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Mendelian Randomization Analysis, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Nutrition, Clinical Research, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Statistics, Public Health and Health Services, Epidemiology
Abstract

BackgroundIn vitro and observational epidemiological studies suggest that vitamin D may play a role in cancer prevention. However, the relationship between vitamin D and ovarian cancer is uncertain, with observational studies generating conflicting findings. A potential limitation of observational studies is inadequate control of confounding. To overcome this problem, we used Mendelian randomization (MR) to evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration and risk of ovarian cancer.MethodsWe employed SNPs with well-established associations with 25(OH)D concentration as instrumental variables for MR: rs7944926 (DHCR7), rs12794714 (CYP2R1) and rs2282679 (GC). We included 31 719 women of European ancestry (10 065 cases, 21 654 controls) from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, who were genotyped using customized Illumina Infinium iSelect (iCOGS) arrays. A two-sample (summary data) MR approach was used and analyses were performed separately for all ovarian cancer (10 065 cases) and for high-grade serous ovarian cancer (4121 cases).ResultsThe odds ratio for epithelial ovarian cancer risk (10 065 cases) estimated by combining the individual SNP associations using inverse variance weighting was 1.27 (95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.51) per 20 nmol/L decrease in 25(OH)D concentration. The estimated odds ratio for high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (4121 cases) was 1.54 (1.19, 2.01).ConclusionsGenetically lowered 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations were associated with higher ovarian cancer susceptibility in Europeans. These findings suggest that increasing plasma vitamin D levels may reduce risk of ovarian cancer.

Published
2016

33. Exome genotyping arrays to identify rare and low frequency variants associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk

Author

Permuth, Jennifer B, Pirie, Ailith, Chen, Y Ann, Lin, Hui-Yi, Reid, Brett M, Chen, Zhihua, Monteiro, Alvaro, Dennis, Joe, Mendoza-Fandino, Gustavo, Group, AOCS Study, Study, Australian Cancer, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, D’Aloisio, Aimee A, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Earp, Madalene, Edwards, Robert P, Fridley, Brooke L, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Hogdall, Estrid, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Kelemen, Linda E, Kjaer, Suzanne K, Kraft, Peter, Le, Nhu D, Levine, Douglas A, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lubinski, Jan, Matsuo, Keitaro, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Rosemary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Nakanishi, Toru, Ness, Roberta B, Olson, Sara, Orlow, Irene, Pearce, Celeste L, Pejovic, Tanja, Poole, Elizabeth M, Ramus, Susan J, Rossing, Mary Anne, Sandler, Dale P, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Song, Honglin, Taylor, Jack A, Teo, Soo-Hwang, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Tworoger, Shelley S, Webb, Penelope M, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Wilkens, Lynne R, Winham, Stacey, Woo, Yin-Ling, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah, Zheng, Wei, Ziogas, Argyrios, Phelan, Catherine M, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Berchuck, Andrew, Goode, Ellen L, Pharoah, Paul DP, Sellers, Thomas A, and Consortium, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Human Genome, Prevention, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Actins, Biotinidase, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Exome, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Keratin-13, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 2, AOCS Study Group, Australian Cancer Study, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Medical and Health Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
Abstract

Rare and low frequency variants are not well covered in most germline genotyping arrays and are understudied in relation to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. To address this gap, we used genotyping arrays targeting rarer protein-coding variation in 8,165 EOC cases and 11,619 controls from the international Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Pooled association analyses were conducted at the variant and gene level for 98,543 variants directly genotyped through two exome genotyping projects. Only common variants that represent or are in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with previously-identified signals at established loci reached traditional thresholds for exome-wide significance (P  P≥5.0 ×10 -  7) were detected for rare and low-frequency variants at 16 novel loci. Four rare missense variants were identified (ACTBL2 rs73757391 (5q11.2), BTD rs200337373 (3p25.1), KRT13 rs150321809 (17q21.2) and MC2R rs104894658 (18p11.21)), but only MC2R rs104894668 had a large effect size (OR = 9.66). Genes most strongly associated with EOC risk included ACTBL2 (PAML = 3.23 × 10 -  5; PSKAT-o = 9.23 × 10 -  4) and KRT13 (PAML = 1.67 × 10 -  4; PSKAT-o = 1.07 × 10 -  5), reaffirming variant-level analysis. In summary, this large study identified several rare and low-frequency variants and genes that may contribute to EOC susceptibility, albeit with possible small effects. Future studies that integrate epidemiology, sequencing, and functional assays are needed to further unravel the unexplained heritability and biology of this disease.

Published
2016

34. Assessing the genetic architecture of epithelial ovarian cancer histological subtypes

Author

Cuellar-Partida, Gabriel, Lu, Yi, Dixon, Suzanne C, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Burghaus, Stefanie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Vanderstichele, Adriaan, Doherty, Jennifer Anne, Rossing, Mary Anne, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Goodman, Marc T, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Antonenkova, Natalia, Butzow, Ralf, Leminen, Arto, Nevanlinna, Heli, Pelttari, Liisa M, Edwards, Robert P, Kelley, Joseph L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Cannioto, Rikki, Høgdall, Estrid, Høgdall, Claus, Jensen, Allan, Giles, Graham G, Bruinsma, Fiona, Kjaer, Susanne K, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Liang, Dong, Lu, Karen H, Wu, Xifeng, Bisogna, Maria, Dao, Fanny, Levine, Douglas A, Cramer, Daniel W, Terry, Kathryn L, Tworoger, Shelley S, Stampfer, Meir, Missmer, Stacey, Bjorge, Line, Salvesen, Helga B, Kopperud, Reidun K, Bischof, Katharina, Aben, Katja KH, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Olson, Sara H, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, Cook, Linda S, Le, Nhu D, Blake Gilks, C, Gronwald, Jacek, Jakubowska, Anna, Lubiński, Jan, Kluz, Tomasz, Song, Honglin, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Brinton, Louise, Trabert, Britton, Lissowska, Jolanta, McLaughlin, John R, Narod, Steven A, Phelan, Catherine, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Eccles, Diana, Campbell, Ian, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Wu, Anna H, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Timorek, Agnieszka, Szafron, Lukasz, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Winham, Stacey J, Bandera, Elisa V, Poole, Elizabeth M, and Morgan, Terry K

Subjects
Biological Sciences, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Genetics, Obesity, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Genotype, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Pathology, Molecular, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Genetics & Heredity, Reproductive medicine
Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is one of the deadliest common cancers. The five most common types of disease are high-grade and low-grade serous, endometrioid, mucinous and clear cell carcinoma. Each of these subtypes present distinct molecular pathogeneses and sensitivities to treatments. Recent studies show that certain genetic variants confer susceptibility to all subtypes while other variants are subtype-specific. Here, we perform an extensive analysis of the genetic architecture of EOC subtypes. To this end, we used data of 10,014 invasive EOC patients and 21,233 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium genotyped in the iCOGS array (211,155 SNPs). We estimate the array heritability (attributable to variants tagged on arrays) of each subtype and their genetic correlations. We also look for genetic overlaps with factors such as obesity, smoking behaviors, diabetes, age at menarche and height. We estimated the array heritabilities of high-grade serous disease ([Formula: see text] = 8.8 ± 1.1 %), endometrioid ([Formula: see text] = 3.2 ± 1.6 %), clear cell ([Formula: see text] = 6.7 ± 3.3 %) and all EOC ([Formula: see text] = 5.6 ± 0.6 %). Known associated loci contributed approximately 40 % of the total array heritability for each subtype. The contribution of each chromosome to the total heritability was not proportional to chromosome size. Through bivariate and cross-trait LD score regression, we found evidence of shared genetic backgrounds between the three high-grade subtypes: serous, endometrioid and undifferentiated. Finally, we found significant genetic correlations of all EOC with diabetes and obesity using a polygenic prediction approach.

Published
2016

35. Assessment of Multifactor Gene–Environment Interactions and Ovarian Cancer Risk: Candidate Genes, Obesity, and Hormone-Related Risk Factors

Author

Usset, Joseph L, Raghavan, Rama, Tyrer, Jonathan P, McGuire, Valerie, Sieh, Weiva, Webb, Penelope, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rudolph, Anja, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Berchuck, Andrew, Brinton, Louise, Cunningham, Julie M, DeFazio, Anna, Doherty, Jennifer A, Edwards, Robert P, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Goodman, Marc T, Høgdall, Estrid, Jensen, Allan, Johnatty, Sharon E, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Kjaer, Susanne K, Larson, Melissa C, Lurie, Galina, Massuger, Leon, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Pike, Malcolm C, Ramus, Susan J, Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph, Song, Honglin, Thompson, Pamela J, van den Berg, David J, Vierkant, Robert A, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S, Wilkens, Lynne R, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Pharoah, Paul, Goode, Ellen L, and Fridley, Brooke L

Subjects
Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Prevention, Genetics, Contraception/Reproduction, Obesity, Estrogen, Ovarian Cancer, Nutrition, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Clinical Research, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Female, Gene-Environment Interaction, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Factors, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium and the Australian Cancer Study, Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundMany epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk factors relate to hormone exposure and elevated estrogen levels are associated with obesity in postmenopausal women. Therefore, we hypothesized that gene-environment interactions related to hormone-related risk factors could differ between obese and non-obese women.MethodsWe considered interactions between 11,441 SNPs within 80 candidate genes related to hormone biosynthesis and metabolism and insulin-like growth factors with six hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, parity, endometriosis, tubal ligation, hormone replacement therapy, and estrogen use) and assessed whether these interactions differed between obese and non-obese women. Interactions were assessed using logistic regression models and data from 14 case-control studies (6,247 cases; 10,379 controls). Histotype-specific analyses were also completed.ResultsSNPs in the following candidate genes showed notable interaction: IGF1R (rs41497346, estrogen plus progesterone hormone therapy, histology = all, P = 4.9 × 10(-6)) and ESR1 (rs12661437, endometriosis, histology = all, P = 1.5 × 10(-5)). The most notable obesity-gene-hormone risk factor interaction was within INSR (rs113759408, parity, histology = endometrioid, P = 8.8 × 10(-6)).ConclusionsWe have demonstrated the feasibility of assessing multifactor interactions in large genetic epidemiology studies. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess the robustness of our findings for ESR1, CYP11A1, IGF1R, CYP11B1, INSR, and IGFBP2 Future work is needed to develop powerful statistical methods able to detect these complex interactions.ImpactAssessment of multifactor interaction is feasible, and, here, suggests that the relationship between genetic variants within candidate genes and hormone-related risk factors may vary EOC susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5); 780-90. ©2016 AACR.

Published
2016

36. No clinical utility of KRAS variant rs61764370 for ovarian or breast cancer

Author

Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, Hollestelle, Antoinette, van der Baan, Frederieke H, Berchuck, Andrew, Johnatty, Sharon E, Aben, Katja K, Agnarsson, Bjarni A, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Alducci, Elisa, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia N, Antoniou, Antonis C, Apicella, Carmel, Arndt, Volker, Arnold, Norbert, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Ashworth, Alan, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Baglietto, Laura, Balleine, Rosemary, Bandera, Elisa V, Barrowdale, Daniel, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Berger, Andreas, Berger, Raanan, Beuselinck, Benoit, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Anders, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brand, Judith S, Brauch, Hiltrud, Register, Breast Cancer Family, Brenner, Hermann, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Brunet, Joan, Brüning, Thomas, Budzilowska, Agnieszka, Bunker, Clareann H, Burwinkel, Barbara, Butzow, Ralf, Buys, Saundra S, Caligo, Maria A, Campbell, Ian, Carter, Jonathan, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Claes, Kathleen BM, Collée, J Margriet, Cook, Linda S, Couch, Fergus J, Cox, Angela, Cramer, Daniel, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Czene, Kamila, Damiola, Francesca, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, deFazio, Anna, Dennis, Joseph, Devilee, Peter, Dicks, Ed M, Diez, Orland, Doherty, Jennifer A, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dörk, Thilo, Dos Santos Silva, Isabel, du Bois, Andreas, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Duran, Mercedes, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana, Edwards, Robert P, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ejlertsen, Bent, Ekici, Arif B, Ellis, Steve D, EMBRACE, Engel, Christoph, Eriksson, Mikael, Fasching, Peter A, Feliubadalo, Lidia, Figueroa, Jonine, and Flesch-Janys, Dieter

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Prevention, Breast Cancer, Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities, Genetic Testing, Ovarian Cancer, Women's Health, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Genetics, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Female, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), KRAS variant, Breast cancer, Ovarian cancer, Genetic association, Clinical outcome, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Breast Cancer Association Consortium, and Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Breast Cancer Family Register, EMBRACE, GEMO Study Collaborators, GENICA Network, HEBON, KConFab Investigators, SWE-BRCA, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis, Reproductive medicine
Abstract

ObjectiveClinical genetic testing is commercially available for rs61764370, an inherited variant residing in a KRAS 3' UTR microRNA binding site, based on suggested associations with increased ovarian and breast cancer risk as well as with survival time. However, prior studies, emphasizing particular subgroups, were relatively small. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated ovarian and breast cancer risks as well as clinical outcome associated with rs61764370.MethodsCentralized genotyping and analysis were performed for 140,012 women enrolled in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (15,357 ovarian cancer patients; 30,816 controls), the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (33,530 breast cancer patients; 37,640 controls), and the Consortium of Modifiers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 (14,765 BRCA1 and 7904 BRCA2 mutation carriers).ResultsWe found no association with risk of ovarian cancer (OR=0.99, 95% CI 0.94-1.04, p=0.74) or breast cancer (OR=0.98, 95% CI 0.94-1.01, p=0.19) and results were consistent among mutation carriers (BRCA1, ovarian cancer HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.97-1.23, p=0.14, breast cancer HR=1.04, 95% CI 0.97-1.12, p=0.27; BRCA2, ovarian cancer HR=0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.13, p=0.34, breast cancer HR=1.06, 95% CI 0.94-1.19, p=0.35). Null results were also obtained for associations with overall survival following ovarian cancer (HR=0.94, 95% CI 0.83-1.07, p=0.38), breast cancer (HR=0.96, 95% CI 0.87-1.06, p=0.38), and all other previously-reported associations.Conclusionsrs61764370 is not associated with risk of ovarian or breast cancer nor with clinical outcome for patients with these cancers. Therefore, genotyping this variant has no clinical utility related to the prediction or management of these cancers.

Published
2016

37. Identification of four novel susceptibility loci for oestrogen receptor negative breast cancer.

Author

Couch, Fergus J, Kuchenbaecker, Karoline B, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Mendoza-Fandino, Gustavo A, Nord, Silje, Lilyquist, Janna, Olswold, Curtis, Hallberg, Emily, Agata, Simona, Ahsan, Habibul, Aittomäki, Kristiina, Ambrosone, Christine, Andrulis, Irene L, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Arndt, Volker, Arun, Banu K, Arver, Brita, Barile, Monica, Barkardottir, Rosa B, Barrowdale, Daniel, Beckmann, Lars, Beckmann, Matthias W, Benitez, Javier, Blank, Stephanie V, Blomqvist, Carl, Bogdanova, Natalia V, Bojesen, Stig E, Bolla, Manjeet K, Bonanni, Bernardo, Brauch, Hiltrud, Brenner, Hermann, Burwinkel, Barbara, Buys, Saundra S, Caldes, Trinidad, Caligo, Maria A, Canzian, Federico, Carpenter, Jane, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chanock, Stephen J, Chung, Wendy K, Claes, Kathleen BM, Cox, Angela, Cross, Simon S, Cunningham, Julie M, Czene, Kamila, Daly, Mary B, Damiola, Francesca, Darabi, Hatef, de la Hoya, Miguel, Devilee, Peter, Diez, Orland, Ding, Yuan C, Dolcetti, Riccardo, Domchek, Susan M, Dorfling, Cecilia M, Dos-Santos-Silva, Isabel, Dumont, Martine, Dunning, Alison M, Eccles, Diana M, Ehrencrona, Hans, Ekici, Arif B, Eliassen, Heather, Ellis, Steve, Fasching, Peter A, Figueroa, Jonine, Flesch-Janys, Dieter, Försti, Asta, Fostira, Florentia, Foulkes, William D, Friebel, Tara, Friedman, Eitan, Frost, Debra, Gabrielson, Marike, Gammon, Marilie D, Ganz, Patricia A, Gapstur, Susan M, Garber, Judy, Gaudet, Mia M, Gayther, Simon A, Gerdes, Anne-Marie, Ghoussaini, Maya, Giles, Graham G, Glendon, Gord, Godwin, Andrew K, Goldberg, Mark S, Goldgar, David E, González-Neira, Anna, Greene, Mark H, Gronwald, Jacek, Guénel, Pascal, Gunter, Marc, Haeberle, Lothar, Haiman, Christopher A, Hamann, Ute, Hansen, Thomas VO, Hart, Steven, Healey, Sue, Heikkinen, Tuomas, Henderson, Brian E, and Herzog, Josef

Subjects
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Humans, Breast Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Cyclophilins, tRNA Methyltransferases, BRCA1 Protein, Receptors, Estrogen, Risk Factors, Genotype, Heterozygote, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 2, Receptors, Estrogen, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Breast Cancer, Cancer, Prevention, Genetics, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors
Abstract

Common variants in 94 loci have been associated with breast cancer including 15 loci with genome-wide significant associations (P

Published
2016

38. PPM1D Mosaic Truncating Variants in Ovarian Cancer Cases May Be Treatment-Related Somatic Mutations

Author

Pharoah, Paul DP, Song, Honglin, Dicks, Ed, Intermaggio, Maria P, Harrington, Patricia, Baynes, Caroline, Alsop, Kathryn, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Bogdanova, Natalia, Cicek, Mine S, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Hillemanns, Peter, Lele, Shashi, Lester, Jenny, McGuire, Valerie, Moysich, Kirsten B, Poblete, Samantha, Sieh, Weiva, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Widschwendter, Martin, Consortium, Ovarian Cancer Association, Whittemore, Alice S, Dörk, Thilo, Menon, Usha, Odunsi, Kunle, Goode, Ellen L, Karlan, Beth Y, Bowtell, David D, Gayther, Simon A, and Ramus, Susan J

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Genetics, Ovarian Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Clinical Research, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Case-Control Studies, Female, Gene Frequency, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Middle Aged, Mosaicism, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Phosphoprotein Phosphatases, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Protein Phosphatase 2C, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

Mosaic truncating mutations in the protein phosphatase, Mg(2+)/Mn(2+)-dependent, 1D (PPM1D) gene have recently been reported with a statistically significantly greater frequency in lymphocyte DNA from ovarian cancer case patients compared with unaffected control patients. Using massively parallel sequencing (MPS) we identified truncating PPM1D mutations in 12 of 3236 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) case patients (0.37%) but in only one of 3431 unaffected control patients (0.03%) (P = .001). All statistical tests were two-sided. A combination of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and MPS data suggested that 12 of the 13 mutations were mosaic. All mutations were identified in post-chemotherapy treatment blood samples from case patients (n = 1827) (average 1234 days post-treatment in carriers) rather than from cases collected pretreatment (less than 14 days after diagnosis, n = 1384) (P = .002). These data suggest that PPM1D variants in EOC cases are primarily somatic mosaic mutations caused by treatment and are not associated with germline predisposition to EOC.

Published
2016

39. Investigation of Exomic Variants Associated with Overall Survival in Ovarian Cancer

Author

Winham, Stacey J, Pirie, Ailith, Chen, Yian Ann, Larson, Melissa C, Fogarty, Zachary C, Earp, Madalene A, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Cramer, Daniel, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Karlan, Beth Y, Kjaer, Susanne K, Levine, Douglas A, Menon, Usha, Ness, Roberta B, Pearce, Celeste L, Pejovic, Tanja, Rossing, Mary Anne, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Bean, Yukie T, Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise A, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, deFazio, Anna, Dicks, Ed M, Edwards, Robert P, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Gore, Martin, Iversen, Edwin S, Jensen, Allan, Johnatty, Sharon E, Lester, Jenny, Lin, Hui-Yi, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lubinski, Jan, Menkiszak, Janusz, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Orlow, Irene, Pike, Malcolm C, Ramus, Susan J, Song, Honglin, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, Tyrer, Jonathan P, van den Berg, David J, Vierkant, Robert A, Vitonis, Allison F, Walsh, Christine, Wilkens, Lynne R, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah, Ziogas, Argyrios, Berchuck, Andrew, Group, Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Permuth-Wey, Jennifer, Phelan, Catherine M, Pharoah, Paul DP, Fridley, Brooke L, Sellers, Thomas A, and Goode, Ellen L

Subjects
Epidemiology, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Health Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Cancer, Genetics, Prevention, Clinical Research, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Exome, Female, Genotype, Humans, Middle Aged, Ovarian Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical and clinical sciences, Health sciences
Abstract

BackgroundWhile numerous susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been identified, few associations have been reported with overall survival. In the absence of common prognostic genetic markers, we hypothesize that rare coding variants may be associated with overall EOC survival and assessed their contribution in two exome-based genotyping projects of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC).MethodsThe primary patient set (Set 1) included 14 independent EOC studies (4,293 patients) and 227,892 variants, and a secondary patient set (Set 2) included six additional EOC studies (1,744 patients) and 114,620 variants. Because power to detect rare variants individually is reduced, gene-level tests were conducted. Sets were analyzed separately at individual variants and by gene, and then combined with meta-analyses (73,203 variants and 13,163 genes overlapped).ResultsNo individual variant reached genome-wide statistical significance. A SNP previously implicated to be associated with EOC risk and, to a lesser extent, survival, rs8170, showed the strongest evidence of association with survival and similar effect size estimates across sets (Pmeta = 1.1E-6, HRSet1 = 1.17, HRSet2 = 1.14). Rare variants in ATG2B, an autophagy gene important for apoptosis, were significantly associated with survival after multiple testing correction (Pmeta = 1.1E-6; Pcorrected = 0.01).ConclusionsCommon variant rs8170 and rare variants in ATG2B may be associated with EOC overall survival, although further study is needed.ImpactThis study represents the first exome-wide association study of EOC survival to include rare variant analyses, and suggests that complementary single variant and gene-level analyses in large studies are needed to identify rare variants that warrant follow-up study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(3); 446-54. ©2016 AACR.

Published
2016

40. A targeted genetic association study of epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility

Author

Earp, Madalene, Winham, Stacey J, Larson, Nicholas, Permuth, Jennifer B, Sicotte, Hugues, Chien, Jeremy, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Bandera, Elisa V, Berchuck, Andrew, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel, Doherty, Jennifer A, Goodman, Marc T, Levine, Douglas A, Monteiro, Alvaro NA, Ness, Roberta B, Pearce, Celeste L, Rossing, Mary Anne, Tworoger, Shelley S, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Bisogna, Maria, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Carney, Michael E, Cunningham, Julie M, Edwards, Robert P, Fogarty, Zachary C, Iversen, Edwin S, Kraft, Peter, Larson, Melissa C, Le, Nhu D, Lin, Hui-Yi, Lissowska, Jolanta, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Olson, Sara H, Pike, Malcolm C, Poole, Elizabeth M, Rider, David N, Terry, Kathryn L, Thompson, Pamela J, van den Berg, David, Vierkant, Robert A, Vitonis, Allison F, Wilkens, Lynne R, Wu, Anna H, Yang, Hannah P, Ziogas, Argyrios, Phelan, Catherine M, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Chen, Yian Ann, Sellers, Thomas A, Fridley, Brooke L, and Goode, Ellen L

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Cancer, Human Genome, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Clinical Research, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Biomarkers, Tumor, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Female, Gene Expression Profiling, Genetic Association Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Risk Factors, ovarian cancer, high-grade serous carcinoma, genetic association, susceptibility loci, NF-kappa B, NF-κB, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide association studies have identified several common susceptibility alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To further understand EOC susceptibility, we examined previously ungenotyped candidate variants, including uncommon variants and those residing within known susceptibility loci.ResultsAt nine of eleven previously published EOC susceptibility regions (2q31, 3q25, 5p15, 8q21, 8q24, 10p12, 17q12, 17q21.31, and 19p13), novel variants were identified that were more strongly associated with risk than previously reported variants. Beyond known susceptibility regions, no variants were found to be associated with EOC risk at genome-wide statistical significance (p

Published
2016

41. Evidence of a genetic link between endometriosis and ovarian cancer

Author

Lee, Alice W, Templeman, Claire, Stram, Douglas A, Beesley, Jonathan, Tyrer, Jonathan, Berchuck, Andrew, Pharoah, Paul P, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Consortium, Ovarian Cancer Association, Ness, Roberta B, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Hein, Alexander, Whittemore, Alice S, Jensen, Allan, du Bois, Andreas, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Rudolph, Anja, Jakubowska, Anna, Wu, Anna H, Ziogas, Argyrios, Ekici, Arif B, Leminen, Arto, Study, Australian Cancer, Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Rosen, Barry, Spiewankiewicz, Beata, Karlan, Beth Y, Trabert, Britton, Fridley, Brooke L, Gilks, C Blake, Krakstad, Camilla, Phelan, Catherine M, Cybulski, Cezary, Walsh, Christine, Hogdall, Claus, Cramer, Daniel W, Huntsman, David G, Eccles, Diana, Lambrechts, Diether, Liang, Dong, Levine, Douglas A, Iversen, Edwin S, Bandera, Elisa V, Poole, Elizabeth M, Goode, Ellen L, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Hogdall, Estrid, Bruinsma, Fiona, Heitz, Florian, Modugno, Francesmary, Giles, Graham G, Risch, Harvey A, Baker, Helen, Salvesen, Helga B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Song, Honglin, McNeish, Iain, Campbell, Ian G, Vergote, Ignace, Runnebaum, Ingo B, Tangen, Ingvild L, Schwaab, Ira, Gronwald, Jacek, Paul, James, Lubinski, Jan, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Lester, Jenny, Schildkraut, Joellen M, McLaughlin, John R, Lissowska, Jolanta, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Kelley, Joseph L, Rothstein, Joseph H, Cunningham, Julie M, Lu, Karen, Carty, Karen, Terry, Kathryn L, Aben, Katja KH, Moysich, Kirsten B, Wicklund, Kristine G, Odunsi, Kunle, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Pelttari, Liisa M, Kelemen, Linda E, Cook, Linda S, Bjorge, Line, Nedergaard, Lotte, Brinton, Louise A, Wilkens, Lynne R, Pike, Malcolm C, Goodman, Marc T, and Bisogna, Maria

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Prevention, Cancer, Rare Diseases, Ovarian Cancer, Genetics, Genetic Testing, Clinical Research, Endometriosis, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Case-Control Studies, Computational Biology, Databases, Genetic, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Neoplasm Grading, Ovarian Neoplasms, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, SNPs, genetic variation, ovarian cancer, Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Public Health and Health Services, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, Reproductive medicine
Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether endometriosis-associated genetic variation affects risk of ovarian cancer.DesignPooled genetic analysis.SettingUniversity hospital.Patient(s)Genetic data from 46,176 participants (15,361 ovarian cancer cases and 30,815 controls) from 41 ovarian cancer studies.Intervention(s)None.Main outcome measure(s)Endometriosis-associated genetic variation and ovarian cancer.Result(s)There was significant evidence of an association between endometriosis-related genetic variation and ovarian cancer risk, especially for the high-grade serous and clear cell histotypes. Overall we observed 15 significant burden statistics, which was three times more than expected.Conclusion(s)By focusing on candidate regions from a phenotype associated with ovarian cancer, we have shown a clear genetic link between endometriosis and ovarian cancer that warrants further follow-up. The functional significance of the identified regions and SNPs is presently uncertain, though future fine mapping and histotype-specific functional analyses may shed light on the etiologies of both gynecologic conditions.

Published
2016

42. Common variants at 19p13 are associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer (vol 42, pg 880, 2010)

Author

Bolton, Kelly L, Tyrer, Jonathan, Song, Honglin, Ramus, Susan J, Notaridou, Maria, Jones, Chris, Sher, Tanya, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Wozniak, Eva, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Weidhaas, Joanne, Paik, Daniel, Van den Berg, David J, Stram, Daniel O, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Brewster, Wendy, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Narod, Steven A, Levine, Douglas A, Kaye, Stanley B, Brown, Robert, Paul, Jim, Flanagan, James, Sieh, Weiva, McGuire, Valerie, Whittemore, Alice S, Campbell, Ian, Gore, Martin E, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hanna P, Medrek, Krzysztof, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, Jakubowska, Anna, Le, Nhu D, Cook, Linda S, Kelemen, Linda E, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Massuger, Leon FAG, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, van Altena, Anne M, Houlston, Richard, Tomlinson, Ian, Palmieri, Rachel T, Moorman, Patricia G, Schildkraut, Joellen, Iversen, Edwin S, Phelan, Catherine, Vierkant, Robert A, Cunningham, Julie M, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Kruger-Kjaer, Susan, Blaeker, Jan, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Gross, Jenny, Karlan, Beth Y, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Odunsi, Kunle, Moyisch, Kirsten B, Baker, Julie A, Modugno, Francesmary, Heikkinenen, Tuomas, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Leminen, Arto, Bogdanova, Natalia, Antonenkova, Natalia, Doerk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Duerst, Matthias, Runnebaum, Ingo, Thompson, Pamela J, Carney, Michael E, Goodman, Marc T, Lurie, Galina, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Hein, Rebecca, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rossing, Mary Anne, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Doherty, Jennifer, Chen, Chu, Rafnar, Thorunn, Besenbacher, Soren, Sulem, Patrick, Stefansson, Kari, Birrer, Michael J, Terry, Kathryn L, Hernandez, Dena, Cramer, Daniel W, Vergote, Ignace, Amant, Frederic, Lambrechts, Diether, and Despierre, Evelyn

Subjects
Developmental Biology, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences
Published
2016

43. Corrigendum: Common variants at 19p13 are associated with susceptibility to ovarian cancer.

Author

Bolton, Kelly L, Tyrer, Jonathan, Song, Honglin, Ramus, Susan J, Notaridou, Maria, Jones, Chris, Sher, Tanya, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Wozniak, Eva, Tsai, Ya-Yu, Weidhaas, Joanne, Paik, Daniel, Van Den Berg, David J, Stram, Daniel O, Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Wu, Anna H, Brewster, Wendy, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Narod, Steven A, Levine, Douglas A, Kaye, Stanley B, Brown, Robert, Paul, Jim, Flanagan, James, Sieh, Weiva, McGuire, Valerie, Whittemore, Alice S, Campbell, Ian, Gore, Martin E, Lissowska, Jolanta, Yang, Hanna P, Medrek, Krzysztof, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubinski, Jan, Jakubowska, Anna, Le, Nhu D, Cook, Linda S, Kelemen, Linda E, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Massuger, Leon FAG, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Aben, Katja KH, van Altena, Anne M, Houlston, Richard, Tomlinson, Ian, Palmieri, Rachel T, Moorman, Patricia G, Schildkraut, Joellen, Iversen, Edwin S, Phelan, Catherine, Vierkant, Robert A, Cunningham, Julie M, Goode, Ellen L, Fridley, Brooke L, Kruger-Kjaer, Susan, Blaeker, Jan, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Gross, Jenny, Karlan, Beth Y, Ness, Roberta B, Edwards, Robert P, Odunsi, Kunle, Moyisch, Kirsten B, Baker, Julie A, Modugno, Francesmary, Heikkinenen, Tuomas, Butzow, Ralf, Nevanlinna, Heli, Leminen, Arto, Bogdanova, Natalia, Antonenkova, Natalia, Doerk, Thilo, Hillemanns, Peter, Dürst, Matthias, Runnebaum, Ingo, Thompson, Pamela J, Carney, Michael E, Goodman, Marc T, Lurie, Galina, Wang-Gohrke, Shan, Hein, Rebecca, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Rossing, Mary Anne, Cushing-Haugen, Kara L, Doherty, Jennifer, Chen, Chu, Rafnar, Thorunn, Besenbacher, Soren, Sulem, Patrick, Stefansson, Kari, Birrer, Michael J, Terry, Kathryn L, Hernandez, Dena, Cramer, Daniel W, Vergote, Ignace, Amant, Frederic, Lambrechts, Diether, and Despierre, Evelyn

Subjects
Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Rare Diseases, Cancer, Ovarian Cancer, Biological Sciences, Medical and Health Sciences, Developmental Biology
Published
2016

44. Genome-wide Analysis Identifies Novel Loci Associated with Ovarian Cancer Outcomes: Findings from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Author

Johnatty, Sharon E, Group, on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Kar, Siddhartha, Beesley, Jonathan, Lu, Yi, Gao, Bo, Fasching, Peter A, Hein, Alexander, Ekici, Arif B, Beckmann, Matthias W, Lambrechts, Diether, Van Nieuwenhuysen, Els, Vergote, Ignace, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Rossing, Mary Anne, Doherty, Jennifer A, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Modugno, Francesmary, Ness, Roberta B, Moysich, Kirsten B, Levine, Douglas A, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Massuger, Leon FAG, Gronwald, Jacek, Lubiński, Jan, Jakubowska, Anna, Cybulski, Cezary, Brinton, Louise, Lissowska, Jolanta, Wentzensen, Nicolas, Song, Honglin, Rhenius, Valerie, Campbell, Ian, Eccles, Diana, Sieh, Weiva, Whittemore, Alice S, McGuire, Valerie, Rothstein, Joseph H, Sutphen, Rebecca, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Ziogas, Argyrios, Gayther, Simon A, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Menon, Usha, Ramus, Susan J, Pearce, Celeste L, Pike, Malcolm C, Stram, Daniel O, Wu, Anna H, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Rzepecka, Iwona K, Spiewankiewicz, Beata, Goodman, Marc T, Wilkens, Lynne R, Carney, Michael E, Thompson, Pamela J, Heitz, Florian, du Bois, Andreas, Schwaab, Ira, Harter, Philipp, Pisterer, Jacobus, Hillemanns, Peter, Group, on behalf of the AGO Study, Karlan, Beth Y, Walsh, Christine, Lester, Jenny, Orsulic, Sandra, Winham, Stacey J, Earp, Madalene, Larson, Melissa C, Fogarty, Zachary C, Høgdall, Estrid, Jensen, Allan, Kjaer, Susanne Kruger, Fridley, Brooke L, Cunningham, Julie M, Vierkant, Robert A, Schildkraut, Joellen M, Iversen, Edwin S, Terry, Kathryn L, Cramer, Daniel W, Bandera, Elisa V, Orlow, Irene, Pejovic, Tanja, Bean, Yukie, Høgdall, Claus, Lundvall, Lene, McNeish, Ian, Paul, James, Carty, Karen, Siddiqui, Nadeem, Glasspool, Rosalind, Sellers, Thomas, Kennedy, Catherine, Chiew, Yoke-Eng, Berchuck, Andrew, MacGregor, Stuart, and Pharoah, Paul DP

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Orphan Drug, Genetics, Human Genome, Precision Medicine, Rare Diseases, Women's Health, Cancer Genomics, Ovarian Cancer, Cancer, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Aetiology, Alleles, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Computational Biology, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genotype, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Patient Outcome Assessment, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Prognosis, Quantitative Trait Loci, AGO Study Group, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Clinical sciences, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

PurposeChemotherapy resistance remains a major challenge in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We hypothesize that germline polymorphisms might be associated with clinical outcome.Experimental designWe analyzed approximately 2.8 million genotyped and imputed SNPs from the iCOGS experiment for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in 2,901 European epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients who underwent first-line treatment of cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy regardless of regimen, and in a subset of 1,098 patients treated with ≥ 4 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin at standard doses. We evaluated the top SNPs in 4,434 EOC patients, including patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas. In addition, we conducted pathway analysis of all intragenic SNPs and tested their association with PFS and OS using gene set enrichment analysis.ResultsFive SNPs were significantly associated (P ≤ 1.0 × 10(-5)) with poorer outcomes in at least one of the four analyses, three of which, rs4910232 (11p15.3), rs2549714 (16q23), and rs6674079 (1q22), were located in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) RP11-179A10.1, RP11-314O13.1, and RP11-284F21.8, respectively (P ≤ 7.1 × 10(-6)). ENCODE ChIP-seq data at 1q22 for normal ovary show evidence of histone modification around RP11-284F21.8, and rs6674079 is perfectly correlated with another SNP within the super-enhancer MEF2D, expression levels of which were reportedly associated with prognosis in another solid tumor. YAP1- and WWTR1 (TAZ)-stimulated gene expression and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-mediated lipid transport pathways were associated with PFS and OS, respectively, in the cohort who had standard chemotherapy (pGSEA ≤ 6 × 10(-3)).ConclusionsWe have identified SNPs in three lncRNAs that might be important targets for novel EOC therapies.

Published
2015

45. Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies common susceptibility polymorphisms for colorectal and endometrial cancer near SH2B3 and TSHZ1.

Author

Cheng, Timothy HT, Thompson, Deborah, Painter, Jodie, O'Mara, Tracy, Gorman, Maggie, Martin, Lynn, Palles, Claire, Jones, Angela, Buchanan, Daniel D, Win, Aung Ko, Hopper, John, Jenkins, Mark, Lindor, Noralane M, Newcomb, Polly A, Gallinger, Steve, Conti, David, Schumacher, Fred, Casey, Graham, Giles, Graham G, Pharoah, Paul, Peto, Julian, Cox, Angela, Swerdlow, Anthony, Couch, Fergus, Cunningham, Julie M, Goode, Ellen L, Winham, Stacey J, Lambrechts, Diether, Fasching, Peter, Burwinkel, Barbara, Brenner, Hermann, Brauch, Hiltrud, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Salvesen, Helga B, Kristensen, Vessela, Darabi, Hatef, Li, Jingmei, Liu, Tao, Lindblom, Annika, Hall, Per, de Polanco, Magdalena Echeverry, Sans, Monica, Carracedo, Angel, Castellvi-Bel, Sergi, Rojas-Martinez, Augusto, Aguiar Jnr, Samuel, Teixeira, Manuel R, Dunning, Alison M, Dennis, Joe, Otton, Geoffrey, Proietto, Tony, Holliday, Elizabeth, Attia, John, Ashton, Katie, Scott, Rodney J, McEvoy, Mark, Dowdy, Sean C, Fridley, Brooke L, Werner, Henrica MJ, Trovik, Jone, Njolstad, Tormund S, Tham, Emma, Mints, Miriam, Runnebaum, Ingo, Hillemanns, Peter, Dörk, Thilo, Amant, Frederic, Schrauwen, Stefanie, Hein, Alexander, Beckmann, Matthias W, Ekici, Arif, Czene, Kamila, Meindl, Alfons, Bolla, Manjeet K, Michailidou, Kyriaki, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Wang, Qin, Ahmed, Shahana, Healey, Catherine S, Shah, Mitul, Annibali, Daniela, Depreeuw, Jeroen, Al-Tassan, Nada A, Harris, Rebecca, Meyer, Brian F, Whiffin, Nicola, Hosking, Fay J, Kinnersley, Ben, Farrington, Susan M, Timofeeva, Maria, Tenesa, Albert, Campbell, Harry, Haile, Robert W, Hodgson, Shirley, Carvajal-Carmona, Luis, Cheadle, Jeremy P, Easton, Douglas, Dunlop, Malcolm, Houlston, Richard, and Spurdle, Amanda

Subjects
Humans, Colorectal Neoplasms, Endometrial Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Proteins, Homeodomain Proteins, Neoplasm Proteins, Polymorphism, Genetic, Alleles, Female, Male, Genome-Wide Association Study, Polymorphism, Genetic
Abstract

High-risk mutations in several genes predispose to both colorectal cancer (CRC) and endometrial cancer (EC). We therefore hypothesised that some lower-risk genetic variants might also predispose to both CRC and EC. Using CRC and EC genome-wide association series, totalling 13,265 cancer cases and 40,245 controls, we found that the protective allele [G] at one previously-identified CRC polymorphism, rs2736100 near TERT, was associated with EC risk (odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, P = 0.000167); this polymorphism influences the risk of several other cancers. A further CRC polymorphism near TERC also showed evidence of association with EC (OR = 0.92; P = 0.03). Overall, however, there was no good evidence that the set of CRC polymorphisms was associated with EC risk, and neither of two previously-reported EC polymorphisms was associated with CRC risk. A combined analysis revealed one genome-wide significant polymorphism, rs3184504, on chromosome 12q24 (OR = 1.10, P = 7.23 × 10(-9)) with shared effects on CRC and EC risk. This polymorphism, a missense variant in the gene SH2B3, is also associated with haematological and autoimmune disorders, suggesting that it influences cancer risk through the immune response. Another polymorphism, rs12970291 near gene TSHZ1, was associated with both CRC and EC (OR = 1.26, P = 4.82 × 10(-8)), with the alleles showing opposite effects on the risks of the two cancers.

Published
2015

46. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Gene Variants and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk.

Author

Amankwah, Ernest K, Lin, Hui-Yi, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Lawrenson, Kate, Dennis, Joe, Chornokur, Ganna, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bruinsma, Fiona, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bunker, Clareann H, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chen, Zhihua, Chen, Y Ann, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, du Bois, Andreas, Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, Dürst, Matthias, Easton, Douglas F, Eccles, Diana M, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis N, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Claus K, Hogdall, Estrid, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Jim, Heather, Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lim, Boon Kiong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Ian, Menon, Usha, Milne, Roger L, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Eilber, Ursula, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, Orlow, Irene, Orsulic, Sandra, and Weber, Rachel Palmieri

Subjects
Georgia Chenevix-Trench on behalf of the AOCS management group, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Odds Ratio, Risk, Genotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, European Continental Ancestry Group, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ovarian cancer, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Epidemiology, Public Health and Health Services, Genetics
Abstract

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome-wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT-related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive-cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P-value

Published
2015

48. Common variants at the CHEK2 gene locus and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer

Author

Lawrenson, Kate, Iversen, Edwin S, Tyrer, Jonathan, Weber, Rachel Palmieri, Concannon, Patrick, Hazelett, Dennis J, Li, Qiyuan, Marks, Jeffrey R, Berchuck, Andrew, Lee, Janet M, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie, Beckmann, Matthias W, Bisogna, Maria, Bjorge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise A, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Bruinsma, Fiona, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian G, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Chen, Ann, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel W, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Plisiecka-Halasa, Joanna, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas T, Edwards, Robert P, Eilber, Ursula, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Gronwald, Jacek, Harter, Philipp, Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus, Hosono, Satoyo, Jakubowska, Anna, Paul, James, Jensen, Allan, Karlan, Beth Y, Kjaer, Susanne Kruger, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Cannioto, Rikki, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon FAG, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, Nevanlinna, Heli, McNeish, Iain, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Narod, Steven A, Nedergaard, Lotte, Ness, Roberta B, Azmi, Mat Adenan Noor, Odunsi, Kunle, and Olson, Sara H

Subjects
Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Clinical Research, Biotechnology, Cancer, Human Genome, Ovarian Cancer, Prevention, Rare Diseases, Genetic Testing, Genetics, Aetiology, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Case-Control Studies, Checkpoint Kinase 2, Female, Genetic Loci, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genome-Wide Association Study, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Risk Factors, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and carcinogenesis
Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified 20 genomic regions associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but many additional risk variants may exist. Here, we evaluated associations between common genetic variants [single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and indels] in DNA repair genes and EOC risk. We genotyped 2896 common variants at 143 gene loci in DNA samples from 15 397 patients with invasive EOC and controls. We found evidence of associations with EOC risk for variants at FANCA, EXO1, E2F4, E2F2, CREB5 and CHEK2 genes (P ≤ 0.001). The strongest risk association was for CHEK2 SNP rs17507066 with serous EOC (P = 4.74 x 10(-7)). Additional genotyping and imputation of genotypes from the 1000 genomes project identified a slightly more significant association for CHEK2 SNP rs6005807 (r (2) with rs17507066 = 0.84, odds ratio (OR) 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24, P = 1.1×10(-7)). We identified 293 variants in the region with likelihood ratios of less than 1:100 for representing the causal variant. Functional annotation identified 25 candidate SNPs that alter transcription factor binding sites within regulatory elements active in EOC precursor tissues. In The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset, CHEK2 gene expression was significantly higher in primary EOCs compared to normal fallopian tube tissues (P = 3.72×10(-8)). We also identified an association between genotypes of the candidate causal SNP rs12166475 (r (2) = 0.99 with rs6005807) and CHEK2 expression (P = 2.70×10(-8)). These data suggest that common variants at 22q12.1 are associated with risk of serous EOC and CHEK2 as a plausible target susceptibility gene.

Published
2015

49. Germline Mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN Genes in Women With Ovarian Cancer.

Author

Ramus, Susan J, Song, Honglin, Dicks, Ed, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Rosenthal, Adam N, Intermaggio, Maria P, Fraser, Lindsay, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Hayward, Jane, Philpott, Susan, Anderson, Christopher, Edlund, Christopher K, Conti, David, Harrington, Patricia, Barrowdale, Daniel, Bowtell, David D, Alsop, Kathryn, Mitchell, Gillian, AOCS Study Group, Cicek, Mine S, Cunningham, Julie M, Fridley, Brooke L, Alsop, Jennifer, Jimenez-Linan, Mercedes, Poblete, Samantha, Lele, Shashi, Sucheston-Campbell, Lara, Moysich, Kirsten B, Sieh, Weiva, McGuire, Valerie, Lester, Jenny, Bogdanova, Natalia, Dürst, Matthias, Hillemanns, Peter, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Odunsi, Kunle, Whittemore, Alice S, Karlan, Beth Y, Dörk, Thilo, Goode, Ellen L, Menon, Usha, Jacobs, Ian J, Antoniou, Antonis C, Pharoah, Paul DP, and Gayther, Simon A

Subjects
AOCS Study Group, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Humans, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, RNA Helicases, Cell Cycle Proteins, DNA-Binding Proteins, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Risk, Predictive Value of Tests, Germ-Line Mutation, Mutation, Missense, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, European Continental Ancestry Group, United States, Female, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group Proteins, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N Protein, Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, Oncology and Carcinogenesis
Abstract

BACKGROUND:Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, responsible for 13 000 deaths per year in the United States. Risk prediction based on identifying germline mutations in ovarian cancer susceptibility genes could have a clinically significant impact on reducing disease mortality. METHODS:Next generation sequencing was used to identify germline mutations in the coding regions of four candidate susceptibility genes-BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2 and NBN-in 3236 invasive EOC case patients and 3431 control patients of European origin, and in 2000 unaffected high-risk women from a clinical screening trial of ovarian cancer (UKFOCSS). For each gene, we estimated the prevalence and EOC risks and evaluated associations between germline variant status and clinical and epidemiological risk factor information. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS:We found an increased frequency of deleterious mutations in BRIP1 in case patients (0.9%) and in the UKFOCSS participants (0.6%) compared with control patients (0.09%) (P = 1 x 10(-4) and 8 x 10(-4), respectively), but no differences for BARD1 (P = .39), NBN1 ( P = .61), or PALB2 (P = .08). There was also a difference in the frequency of rare missense variants in BRIP1 between case patients and control patients (P = 5.5 x 10(-4)). The relative risks associated with BRIP1 mutations were 11.22 for invasive EOC (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.22 to 34.10, P = 1 x 10(-4)) and 14.09 for high-grade serous disease (95% CI = 4.04 to 45.02, P = 2 x 10(-5)). Segregation analysis in families estimated the average relative risks in BRIP1 mutation carriers compared with the general population to be 3.41 (95% CI = 2.12 to 5.54, P = 7×10(-7)). CONCLUSIONS:Deleterious germline mutations in BRIP1 are associated with a moderate increase in EOC risk. These data have clinical implications for risk prediction and prevention approaches for ovarian cancer and emphasize the critical need for risk estimates based on very large sample sizes before genes of moderate penetrance have clinical utility in cancer prevention.

Published
2015

50. Network-Based Integration of GWAS and Gene Expression Identifies a HOX-Centric Network Associated with Serous Ovarian Cancer Risk.

Author

Kar, Siddhartha P, Tyrer, Jonathan P, Li, Qiyuan, Lawrenson, Kate, Aben, Katja KH, Anton-Culver, Hoda, Antonenkova, Natalia, Chenevix-Trench, Georgia, Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Baker, Helen, Bandera, Elisa V, Bean, Yukie T, Beckmann, Matthias W, Berchuck, Andrew, Bisogna, Maria, Bjørge, Line, Bogdanova, Natalia, Brinton, Louise, Brooks-Wilson, Angela, Butzow, Ralf, Campbell, Ian, Carty, Karen, Chang-Claude, Jenny, Chen, Yian Ann, Chen, Zhihua, Cook, Linda S, Cramer, Daniel, Cunningham, Julie M, Cybulski, Cezary, Dansonka-Mieszkowska, Agnieszka, Dennis, Joe, Dicks, Ed, Doherty, Jennifer A, Dörk, Thilo, du Bois, Andreas, Dürst, Matthias, Eccles, Diana, Easton, Douglas F, Edwards, Robert P, Ekici, Arif B, Fasching, Peter A, Fridley, Brooke L, Gao, Yu-Tang, Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra, Giles, Graham G, Glasspool, Rosalind, Goode, Ellen L, Goodman, Marc T, Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp, Hein, Alexander, Heitz, Florian, Hildebrandt, Michelle AT, Hillemanns, Peter, Hogdall, Estrid, Hogdall, Claus K, Hosono, Satoyo, Iversen, Edwin S, Jakubowska, Anna, Paul, James, Jensen, Allan, Ji, Bu-Tian, Karlan, Beth Y, Kjaer, Susanne K, Kelemen, Linda E, Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph, Kiemeney, Lambertus A, Krakstad, Camilla, Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta, Lambrechts, Diether, Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D, Lee, Alice W, Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A, Liang, Dong, Lissowska, Jolanta, Lu, Karen, Lubinski, Jan, Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon, Matsuo, Keitaro, McGuire, Valerie, McLaughlin, John R, McNeish, Iain A, Menon, Usha, Modugno, Francesmary, Moysich, Kirsten B, Narod, Steven A, Nedergaard, Lotte, Ness, Roberta B, Nevanlinna, Heli, Odunsi, Kunle, Olson, Sara H, and Orlow, Irene

Subjects
Australian Cancer Study, Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group, Humans, Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous, Ovarian Neoplasms, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Nuclear Proteins, Transcription Factors, DNA, Neoplasm, Morbidity, Risk Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genotype, Female, Genome-Wide Association Study, Global Health, Ovarian Cancer, Biotechnology, Cancer, Genetics, Rare Diseases, Prevention, Human Genome, 2.1 Biological and endogenous factors, Epidemiology, Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract

BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have so far reported 12 loci associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. We hypothesized that some of these loci function through nearby transcription factor (TF) genes and that putative target genes of these TFs as identified by coexpression may also be enriched for additional EOC risk associations.MethodsWe selected TF genes within 1 Mb of the top signal at the 12 genome-wide significant risk loci. Mutual information, a form of correlation, was used to build networks of genes strongly coexpressed with each selected TF gene in the unified microarray dataset of 489 serous EOC tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genes represented in this dataset were subsequently ranked using a gene-level test based on results for germline SNPs from a serous EOC GWAS meta-analysis (2,196 cases/4,396 controls).ResultsGene set enrichment analysis identified six networks centered on TF genes (HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7 at 17q21.32 and HOXD1, HOXD3 at 2q31) that were significantly enriched for genes from the risk-associated end of the ranked list (P < 0.05 and FDR < 0.05). These results were replicated (P < 0.05) using an independent association study (7,035 cases/21,693 controls). Genes underlying enrichment in the six networks were pooled into a combined network.ConclusionWe identified a HOX-centric network associated with serous EOC risk containing several genes with known or emerging roles in serous EOC development.ImpactNetwork analysis integrating large, context-specific datasets has the potential to offer mechanistic insights into cancer susceptibility and prioritize genes for experimental characterization.

Published
2015

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results