Search

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate whether prophylactic administration of nafamostat mesilate reduces the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP), its efficacy, and risk factors for PEP., Methods: Potential subjects comprised 876 patients who underwent ERCP between September 2008 and February 2011. Of these, 58 patients were excluded after meeting exclusion criteria, and 818 patients were randomized. Patients in the nafamostat mesilate group were administered 20 mg of nafamostat mesilate dissolved in 500 mL of 5% glucose solution, whereas the control group received 500 mL of 5% glucose solution alone, over 2 hours from the start of ERCP., Results: Post-ERCP pancreatitis occurred in 5.1% (41 patients) overall, with a significantly lower frequency in the nafamostat mesilate group (3.5%) than in the control group (6.7%; P = 0.0349). Analysis of the 322 patients who had undergone ERCP for the first time (n = 158 in the nafamostat mesilate group; n = 164 in the control group) found that PEP again significantly less frequently occurred in the nafamostat mesilate group (5.7%) than in the control group (13.4%; P = 0.0172)., Conclusions: Our randomized controlled study suggested that short-term administration of nafamostat mesilate 20 mg may reduce the incidence of PEP.

Background: The Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery launched the clinical practice guidelines for the management of biliary tract and ampullary carcinomas in 2008. Novel treatment modalities and handling of clinical issues have been proposed after the publication. New approaches for editing clinical guidelines, such as the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, also have been introduced for better and clearer grading of recommendations., Methods: Clinical questions (CQs) were proposed in seven topics. Recommendation, grade of recommendation and statement for each CQ were discussed and finalized by evidence-based approach. Recommendation was graded to grade 1 (strong) and 2 (weak) according to the concept of GRADE system., Results: The 29 CQs covered seven topics: (1) prophylactic treatment, (2) diagnosis, (3) biliary drainage, (4) surgical treatment, (5) chemotherapy, (6) radiation therapy, and (7) pathology. In 27 CQs, 19 recommendations were rated strong and 11 recommendations weak. Each CQ included the statement of how the recommendation was graded., Conclusions: This guideline provides recommendation for important clinical aspects based on evidence. Future collaboration with cancer registry will be a key for assessment of the guidelines and establishment of new evidence. Free full-text articles and a mobile application of this guideline are available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/guideline/biliary-tract2.html., (© 2015 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

The 3(rd) English edition of the Japanese classification of biliary tract cancers was released approximately 10 years after the 5(th) Japanese edition and the 2(nd) English edition. Since the first Japanese edition was published in 1981, the Japanese classification has been in extensive use, particularly among Japanese surgeons and pathologists, because the cancer status and clinical outcomes in surgically resected cases have been the main objects of interest. However, recent advances in the diagnosis, management and research of the disease prompted the revision of the classification that can be used by not only surgeons and pathologists but also by all clinicians and researchers, for the evaluation of current disease status, the determination of current appropriate treatment, and the future development of medical practice for biliary tract cancers. Furthermore, during the past 10 years, globalization has advanced rapidly, and therefore, internationalization of the classification was an important issue to revise the Japanese original staging system, which would facilitate to compare the disease information among institutions worldwide. In order to achieve these objectives, the new Japanese classification of the biliary tract cancers principally adopted the 7(th) edition of staging system developed by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). However, because there are some points pending in these systems, several distinctive points were also included for the purpose of collection of information for the future optimization of the staging system. Free mobile application of the new Japanese classification of the biliary tract cancers is available via http://www.jshbps.jp/en/classification/cbt15.html., (© 2015 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Purpose: To investigate the clinicopathological features and postoperative survival of patients with mucinous colorectal carcinoma (MC) and to identify the factors related to long-term survival., Methods: Twenty-three patients who had undergone resection for MC at Miyazaki University Hospital from 1991 to 2006 were followed up for at least 5 years or until death. The effects of the clinicopathological variables on the 5-year cancer-specific survival were assessed by the univariate analyses. These patients' clinicopathological data were compared with those of 403 non-mucinous carcinoma (NMC) patients (102 well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, 301 moderately differentiated adenocarcinomas)., Results: The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was significantly worse in MC (56.2 %) than in NMC (73.8 %; p = 0.008) cases. Univariate analyses showed the T factor, lymph node metastases, liver metastases, metastases to the distant peritoneum, remote metastases and curative resection to be significant factors predicting the survival. However, there were no significant differences in the postoperative survival in patients with stage II-IV disease. The rates of metastases to the distant peritoneum, M1, T4, a tumor size ≥5 cm and non-curative resection were higher in MC than in NMC patients., Conclusions: Patients with MC had advanced stage cancer, especially with metastases to the distant peritoneum, more frequently than did the patients with NMC. To improve the survival of these patients, it is therefore important to detect MC at an early stage and to perform curative resection.