Search

Introduction: Phosphate binders are commonly used in patients receiving kidney replacement therapy (KRT), aiming to reduce and maintain serum phosphorus. Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder has been linked to reduced lifespan and worsened quality of life. This study aims to examine the efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate in patients receiving KRT., Methods: The data sources examined were MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials with a search deadline of October 2023. We examined randomized controlled trials that compared sucroferric oxyhydroxide versus sevelamer carbonate in the adult population receiving KRT. We performed a meta-analysis combining the data from trials, using R-studio., Findings: Inclusion criteria were met by five randomized trials. There was no statistically significant difference in the reduction of serum phosphorus between the two groups (MD: -0.07 mmol/L, 95% CI-random effects: -0.15 to 0.02). In the same line, a non-statistically significant difference was observed in serum i-PTH reduction between the two drugs (MD = -1.53 mg/dL, 95% CI = (-4.45, 1.4), p = 0.26, random effects model). No statistically significant difference was observed in all adverse events between the two groups (odds ratio: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.65-1.88, random effects model). Further analysis of gastrointestinal adverse events revealed that sevelamer carbonate increases gastrointestinal adverse events by up to 60% (odds ratio: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.31-1.97, common (fixed) effect model)., Discussion: This meta-analysis of randomized trials showed that both drugs, sucroferric oxyhydroxide and sevelamer equally and effectively controlled serum phosphorus levels, whereas sucroferric oxyhydroxide revealed a better profile in terms of gastrointestinal adverse events. Sucroferric oxyhydroxide is a valuable option for patients receiving KRT when sevelamer carbonate is more difficult to tolerate., (© 2024 The Author(s). Hemodialysis International published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Hemodialysis.)

Introduction: Coronary vascular dysfunction, as assessed by coronary flow reserve (CFR) in the left anterior descending coronary artery, is found in various conditions including end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Currently, we investigated the associations of CFR with echocardiographic indices of systolic and diastolic cardiac function and identified independent predictors of CFR in hemodialysis patients., Methods: End-stage CKD patients treated with hemodialysis (n = 29) without known cardiovascular disease were recruited from a Hemodialysis Unit in Northwestern Greece. A thorough echocardiographic evaluation including CFR measurement following dipyridamole infusion was performed in all participants. Arterial stiffness was assessed by measurement of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and aortic augmentation index., Results: The mean age of the patients was 63 years, and mean duration of hemodialysis was 2.9 years. CFR was 1.60 ± 0.37 while dipyridamole caused a significant increase in E' sep , S lat , E' lat , and Stroke volume (P < .05 for all). Independent predictors of CFR were posterior wall thickness (B -0.408, P = .013) and dipyridamole-induced changes in Tei index (B -0.425, P = .007). A severely decreased CFR < 1.5 was observed in 52% of the patients. E/E' ratio (B 10.84, P = .014) was the single independent predictor of severely decreased CFR., Conclusions: In end-stage CKD patients on hemodialysis without known cardiovascular disease, impaired coronary vascular function was prevalent and related to increased left ventricular wall thickness, increased filling pressures, and dipyridamole-induced deteriorated myocardial function independently of the presence of wall-motion abnormalities. Further studies are required to clarify the prognostic role of dipyridamole-induced cardiac changes in hemodialysis patients., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)