Search

The aim of this study was to attract attention of researchers to the problem of contamination of exosome preparations. Using a transmission electron microscope JEM-1400 (JEOL, Japan) we have examined exosome preparations, isolated according to the conventional scheme of sequential centrifugation from different biological fluids: blood plasma and urine of healthy persons and patients with oncologic diseases, bovine serum, and conditioned cell culture medium (MDCK, MDA-MB, and MCF-7 cells). All examined preparations (over 200) contained exosomes, which were identified by immuno-electron microscopy using antibodies to tetraspanins CD63 or CD9. Besides exosomes, all the studied preparations were characterized by the presence of contaminating structures: low electron density particles without limiting membrane and therefore could not be attributed to exosomes ('non-vesicles'). Two main types of the 'non-vesicles' were found in the exosome preparations: particles of 20-40 nm in size, representing 10-40% of all structures in the exosome preparations; and particles of 40-100 nm in size (identical to exosomes by size). Morphology of the 'non-vesicles' corresponded to that of intermediate and low density lipoproteins (20-40 nm), and very low density lipoproteins (40-100 nm), which were identical to exosomes in their size. The highest level of the contamination was detected in exosome preparations, isolated from blood samples. The results of our study indicate the need to control the composition of exosome preparations by electron microscopy and to take into consideration the presence of contaminating structures in the analysis of experimental data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Cancer statistics demonstrate leading growth of prostate cancer. As a rule, radical prostatectomy (RP) is a mandatory option in the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). Over 30% of patients develop biochemical resistance after the surgery and over 30% of these patients experience prostate cancer recurrence and metastasis. Currently used PCa patient's diagnostic features fail to identify PCa recurrence. To identify the risk group of PCa patients after RP we attempt to apply miRNAs which were shown as promising liquid biopsy markers for PCa diagnosis and prognosis., Materials and Methods: Expression of 14 miRNAs closely involved in the development of prostate cancer from urine extracellular vesicles (uEV) of PCa patients before as well as 3, 6 and 12 months after radical prostatectomy was assessed using RT PCR and compared with their expression from uEV of healthy donors in the current study., Results: It was shown that 22 miRNA pairs prognostic ratios (MPPRs) significantly changed after radical prostatectomy. MPPRs the most promising in terms of evaluating the effectiveness of radical prostatectomy have been identified. These include two groups: MPPRs significantly changed after surgery towards that in healthy donors; and MPPRs, which divided PCa patients into two significantly different subgroups 3 or 6 months after radical prostatectomy., Conclusions: The obtained data indicate that urine EVs represent a valuable source of both MPDR and MPPR for prostate cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and androgen-deprivation therapy are among the most common treatment options for different forms of prostate cancer (PCa). However, making therapeutic decisions is difficult due to the lack of reliable prediction markers indicating therapy outcomes in clinical practice. The involvement of miRNAs in all mechanisms of the PCa development and their easy detection characterize them as attractive PCa biomarkers. Although there are extensive data on the role of miRNAs in PCa therapy resistance and sensitivity development, the issues of whether they could be used as a guide for therapy choice and, if so, how we can progress toward this goal, remain unclear. Thus, generalizable reviews and studies which summarize, compare, and analyze data on miRNA involvement in responses to different types of PCa therapies are required., Objectives: Data on the involvement of miRNAs in therapy responses, on the role of cross-miRNA expression in different therapies, and on miRNA targets were analyzed in order to determine the miRNA-related factors which can lend perspective to the future development of personalized predictors of PCa sensitivity/resistance to therapies., Materials and Methods: The data available on the miRNAs associated with different PCa therapies (resistance and sensitivity therapies) are summarized and analyzed in this study, including analyses using bioinformatics resources. Special attention was dedicated to the mechanisms of the development of therapy resistance., Results and Discussion: A comprehensive combined analysis of the current data revealed a panel of miRNAs that were shown to be most closely associated with the PCa therapy response and were found to regulate the genes involved in PCa development via cell proliferation regulation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), apoptosis, cell-cycle progression, angiogenesis, metastasis and invasion regulation, androgen-independent development, and colony formation., Conclusion: The selected miRNA-based panel has the potential to be a guide for therapeutic decision making in the effective treatment of PCa., (© 2023 American Society of Andrology and European Academy of Andrology.)

The locus-specific methylation of three genes (GSTP1, RNF219, and KIAA1539, also known as FAM214B) in the total pool of blood cell-free DNA, including cell-free DNA from plasma and cell-surface-bound DNA, of patients with prostate cancer and healthy donors was studied on the MiSeq platform. Our study found a higher methylation index of loci for total cell-free DNA compared with cell-free DNA. For total cell-free DNA, the methylation of GSTP1 in each of the 11 positions provided a complete separation of cancer patients from healthy donors, whereas for cell-free DNA, there were no positions in the three genes allowing for such separation. Among the prostate cancer patients, the minimum proportion of GSTP1 genes methylated in any of the 17 positions was 12.1% of the total circulated DNA fragments, and the minimum proportion of GSTP1 genes methylated in any of the 11 diagnostically specific positions was 8.4%. Total cell-free DNA was shown to be more convenient and informative as a source of methylated DNA molecules circulating in the blood than cell-free DNA.

The locus-specific methylation of three genes (GSTP1, RNF219, and KIAA1539 (also known as FAM214B)) in the blood plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of 20 patients with prostate cancer (PCa), 18 healthy donors (HDs), and 17 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) was studied via the MiSeq platform. The methylation status of two CpGs within the same loci were used as the diagnostic feature for discriminating the patient groups. Many variables had good diagnostic characteristics, e.g., each of the variables GSTP1.C3.C9, GSTP1.C9, and GSTP1.C9.T17 demonstrated an 80% sensitivity at a 100% specificity for PCa patients vs. the others comparison. The analysis of RNF219 gene loci methylation allowed discriminating BPH patients with absolute sensitivity and specificity. The data on the methylation of the genes GSTP1 and RNF219 allowed discriminating PCa patients, as well as HDs, with absolute sensitivity and specificity. Thus, the data on the locus-specific methylation of cfDNA (with single-molecule resolution) combined with a diagnostic approach considering the simultaneous methylation of several CpGs in one locus enabled the discrimination of HD, BPH, and PCa patients.

A vast wealth of recent research has seen attempts of using microRNA (miRNA) found in biological fluids in clinical research and medicine. One of the reasons behind this trend is the apparent their high stability of cell-free miRNA conferred by small size and packaging in supramolecular complexes. However, researchers in both basic and clinical settings often face the problem of selecting adequate methods to extract appropriate quality miRNA preparations for use in specific downstream analysis pipelines. This review outlines the variety of different methods of miRNA isolation from biofluids and examines the key determinants of their efficiency, including, but not limited to, the structural properties of miRNA and factors defining their stability in the extracellular environment.

Introduction : Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) circulates in the blood for a long time. The levels of cfDNA in the blood are assayed in cancer diagnostics because they are closely related to the tumor burden of patients. Areas covered : cfDNA escapes the action of DNA-hydrolyzing enzymes, being a part of supramolecular complexes or interacting with the plasma membrane of blood cells. cfDNA has heterogeneous size and composition, which impose various restrictions on both isolation methods and subsequent analysis. cfDNA concentration and structural changes with the development of diseases highlight the high potential of cfDNA as a diagnostic and prognostic marker. The concentration of cfDNA released in the blood by tumor cells determines the specificity of such diagnostics and the required blood volume. The present review aimed to synthesize the available data on cfDNA concentration in the cancer patient's blood as well as pre-analytical, analytical, and biological factors, which interfere with cfDNA concentration. Expert opinion : The concentration of cfDNA and tumor cell DNA (ctDNA), and the over-presentation of DNA loci in cfDNA must be considered when looking for tumor markers. Some inconsistent data on cfDNA concentrations (like those obtained by different methods) suggest that the study of cfDNA should be continued.

Urine of prostate cancer patients contains tumor-specific biopolymers, including protein- and microvesiclesassociated miRNAs that can potentially be used as oncomarkers. Previously we have characterized urine extracellular vesicles and demonstrated diagnostic potential of their miRNA cargo. In this study, we have performed a comparative analysis of the expression of 84 miRNA in paired samples of urine microvesicles and clarified urine from healthy men, patients with benign hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate using miRCURY LNA miRNA qPCR Panels. Subsets of miRNAs with differences in expression between the fractions of the urine were found in all three groups. Two groups of miRNA were identified based on the patterns of their differential expression. They regulate several key signaling pathways associated with prostate cancer development.

The aim of our study was to attract the attention of researchers at the problem of contamination of exosome preparations. Using a transmission electron microscope JEM-1400 ("JEOL", Japan) we have examined exosome preparations, isolated according to the conventional scheme of sequential centrifugation from different biological fluids: plasma and urine of healthy persons and patients with oncologic diseases, bovine serum, and culture fluid (MDCK, MDA-MB и MCF-7 cells). All exosome preparations (over 200) contained exosomes, which were identified by immuno-electron microscopy using antibodies to tetraspanins CD63 or CD9. Besides exosomes, all the studied preparations contained contaminating structures: distinct particles of low electron density without limiting membrane ("non-vesicles"). Two main kinds of the "non-vesicles" species were found in exosome preparations: 20-40 nm in size, representing 10-40% of all structures in the preparations; and 40-100 nm in size (identical to exosomes by size). Morphology of the "non-vesicles" allowed to identify them as lipoproteins of intermediate and low density (20-40 nm), and very low density (40-100 nm). The highest level of the contamination was detected in exosome preparations, isolated from blood samples. The results of our study indicate the need to control the composition of exosome preparation by electron microscopy and take into account the presence of contaminating structures in analysis of experimental data.

Tumor development is generally accompanied by increased protease activity and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels in the blood. An immunoassay for protease activity was developed based on the binding of anti-peptide antibodies onto polystyrene plates, followed by incubation with peptides and protein hydrolyzing enzymes. The data obtained demonstrate the peptide CD34-1 composed of uncharged amino acids was the best substrate for the estimation of plasma protease activity in breast cancer patients and healthy donors. Anti-CD34-1 peptide protease activity was shown to correlate with circulating DNA concentrations in cancer patients and healthy subjects (P = 0.001, r = 0.676), demonstrating the role of protease activity in the regulation of cfDNA levels.

Extracellular nucleic acids (exNA) were described in blood of both healthy and illness people as early as in 1948, but staied overlooked until middle 60th. Starting from the beginning of new millennium and mainly in the last 5 years exNA are intensively studied. Main attention is directed to investigation of exNA as the source of diagnostic material whereas the mechanisms of their generation, as well as mechanisms to providing long-term circulation of exNA in the bloodstream are not established unambiguously. According to some authors, the main source of circulating nucleic acids in blood are the processes of apoptosis and necrosis, while others refer to the possible nucleic acid secretion by healthy and tumor cells. Circulating DNA were found to be stable in the blood for a long time, escaping from the action of DNA hydrolyzing enzymes and are apparently packed in different supramolecular complexes. This review presents the opinions of various authors and evidence in favor of all the theories describingappearance of extracellular DNA, the features of the circulation and structure of the extracellular DNA and factors affecting the time of DNA circulation in blood.