Search

An intercomparison between 10 single-column (SCM) and 5 large-eddy simulation (LES) models is presented for a radiation fog case study inspired by the Local and Non-local Fog Experiment (LANFEX) field campaign. Seven of the SCMs represent single-column equivalents of operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, whilst three are research-grade SCMs designed for fog simulation, and the LESs are designed to reproduce in the best manner currently possible the underlying physical processes governing fog formation. The LES model results are of variable quality and do not provide a consistent baseline against which to compare the NWP models, particularly under high aerosol or cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) conditions. The main SCM bias appears to be toward the overdevelopment of fog, i.e. fog which is too thick, although the inter-model variability is large. In reality there is a subtle balance between water lost to the surface and water condensed into fog, and the ability of a model to accurately simulate this process strongly determines the quality of its forecast. Some NWP SCMs do not represent fundamental components of this process (e.g. cloud droplet sedimentation) and therefore are naturally hampered in their ability to deliver accurate simulations. Finally, we show that modelled fog development is as sensitive to the shape of the cloud droplet size distribution, a rarely studied or modified part of the microphysical parameterisation, as it is to the underlying aerosol or CDNC.

An intercomparison between 10 single-column (SCM) and 5 large-eddy simulation (LES) models is presented for a radiation fog case study inspired by the LANFEX field campaign. 7 of the SCMs represent single-column equivalents of operational numerical weather prediction (NWP) models, whilst 3 are research-grade SCMs designed for fog simulation, and the LES are designed to reproduce in the best manner currently possible the underlying physical processes governing fog formation. The LES model results are of variable quality, and do not provide a consistent baseline against which to compare the NWP models, particularly under high aerosol or cloud droplet number (CDNC) conditions. The main SCM bias appears to be toward over-development of fog, i.e. fog which is too thick, although the inter-model variability is large. In reality there is a subtle balance between water lost to the surface and water condensed into fog, and the ability of a model to accurately simulate this process strongly determines the quality of its forecast. Some NWP-SCMs do not represent fundamental components of this process (e.g. cloud droplet sedimentation) and therefore are naturally hampered in their ability to deliver accurate simulations. Finally, we show that modelled fog development is as sensitive to the shape of the cloud droplet size distribution, a rarely studied or modified part of the microphysical parametrization, as it is to the underlying aerosol or CDNC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present MISTRA-v9.0, a one dimensional (1D) atmospheric chemistry model. The model includes a detailed particle description with regards to the microphysics, gas-particle interactions, and liquid phase chemistry within particles. Version 9.0 is the first release of MISTRA as an open-source community model. A major review of the code has been performed along with this public version release to improve the user-friendliness and platform-independence of the model. In the past 20 years, MISTRA has been used in over 25 studies to address a wide range of scientific questions. The purpose of this public release is to maximise the benefit of MISTRA to the community by making the model freely available and easier to use and develop. This paper presents a thorough description of the model characteristics and components. We show some examples of simulations reproducing previous studies with MISTRA, finding that version 9.0 is consistent with previous versions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precipitation forms in warm clouds via collision-coalescence. This process is difficult to observe directly in situ and its implementation in numerical models is uncertain. We use aircraft observations of the drop-size distribution (DSD) near marine stratocumulus tops to estimate collision-coalescence rates. Marine stratocumulus is a useful system to study collisional growth because it is initiated near the cloud top and the clouds evolve slowly enough to obtain statistically useful data from aircraft. We compare rate constants estimated from observations with reference rate constants derived from a collision-coalescence box model, the result of which is termed the enhancement factor (EF). We evaluate two hydrodynamic collision-coalescence kernels, one quiescent and one including the effects of small-scale turbulence. Due to sampling volume limitations, DSDs must be averaged over length-scales much greater than those relevant to the underlying physics, such that we also examine the role of averaging length-scale with respect to process representation. Averaging length-scales of 1.5 and 30 km are used, corresponding roughly to the horizontal grid lengths of cloud-resolving models and high-resolution climate models, respectively. EF values range from 0.1 to 40, with the greatest EFs associated with small mode diameter cases and a generally decreasing trend with drop size. For any given drop size or averaging length-scale, there is about an order of magnitude variability in EFs. These results suggest that spatial variability on length-scales smaller than 1.5 km prevents accurate retrieval of rate constants from large-scale average DSDs. Large-scale models must therefore account for small-scale variability to represent cloud microphysical processes accurately. The turbulent kernel reduces EFs for all drop sizes, but can only account for at most half of the calculated EFs in marine stratocumulus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]