Search

Evolutionary arms races can lead to extremely specific and effective defense mechanisms, including venoms that deter predators by targeting nociceptive (pain-sensing) pathways. The venom of velvet ants (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) is notoriously painful. It has been described as "Explosive and long lasting, you sound insane as you scream. Hot oil from the deep fryer spilling over your entire hand." 1 The effectiveness of the velvet ant sting against potential predators has been shown across vertebrate orders, including mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and birds. 2 , 3 , 4 This leads to the hypothesis that velvet ant venom targets a conserved nociception mechanism, which we sought to uncover using Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Drosophila larvae have peripheral sensory neurons that sense potentially damaging (noxious) stimuli such as high temperature, harsh mechanical touch, and noxious chemicals. 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 They share features with vertebrate nociceptors, including conserved sensory receptor channels. 9 , 10 We found that velvet ant venom strongly activated Drosophila nociceptors through heteromeric Pickpocket/Balboa (Ppk/Bba) ion channels, through a single venom peptide, Do6a. Drosophila Ppk/Bba is homologous to mammalian acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs). 11 However, Do6a did not produce behavioral signs of nociception in mice, which was instead triggered by other venom peptides that are non-specific and less potent on Drosophila nociceptors. This suggests that Do6a has an insect-specific function. In fact, we further demonstrated that the velvet ant's sting produced aversive behavior in a predatory praying mantis. Together, our results indicate that velvet ant venom acts through different molecular mechanisms in vertebrates and invertebrates., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Evolutionary arms races between predator and prey can lead to extremely specific and effective defense mechanisms. Such defenses include venoms that deter predators by targeting nociceptive (pain-sensing) pathways. Through co-evolution, venom toxins can become extremely efficient modulators of their molecular targets. The venom of velvet ants (Hymenoptera: Mutillidae) is notoriously painful. The intensity of a velvet ant sting has been described as "Explosive and long lasting, you sound insane as you scream. Hot oil from the deep fryer spilling over your entire hand." [1] The effectiveness of the velvet ant sting as a deterrent against potential predators has been shown across vertebrate orders, including mammals, amphibians, reptiles, and birds [2-4]. The venom's low toxicity suggests it has a targeted effect on nociceptive sensory mechanisms [5]. This leads to the hypothesis that velvet ant venom targets a conserved nociception mechanism, which we sought to uncover using Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Drosophila larvae have peripheral sensory neurons that sense potentially damaging (noxious) stimuli such as high temperature, harsh mechanical touch, and noxious chemicals [6-9]. These polymodal nociceptors are called class IV multidendritic dendritic arborizing (cIV da) neurons, and they share many features with vertebrate nociceptors, including conserved sensory receptor channels [10,11]. We found that velvet ant venom strongly activated Drosophila nociceptors through heteromeric Pickpocket/Balboa (Ppk/Bba) ion channels. Furthermore, we found a single venom peptide (Do6a) that activated larval nociceptors at nanomolar concentrations through Ppk/Bba. Drosophila Ppk/Bba is homologous to mammalian Acid Sensing Ion Channels (ASICs) [12]. However, the Do6a peptide did not produce behavioral signs of nociception in mice, which was instead triggered by other non-specific, less potent, peptides within the venom. This suggests that Do6a is an insect-specific venom component that potently activates insect nociceptors. Consistent with this, we showed that the velvet ant's defensive sting produced aversive behavior in a predatory praying mantis. Together, our results indicate that velvet ant venom evolved to target nociceptive systems of both vertebrates and invertebrates, but through different molecular mechanisms.

Nociception is the sensory modality by which animals sense stimuli associated with injury or potential tissue damage. When Drosophila larvae encounter a noxious thermal, chemical, or mechanical stimulus, they perform a stereotyped rolling behavior. These noxious stimuli are detected by polymodal nociceptor neurons that tile the larval epidermis. Although several types of sensory neurons feed into the nociceptive behavioral output, the highly branched class IV multidendritic arborization neurons are the most critical. At the molecular level, Drosophila nociception shares many conserved features with vertebrate nociception, making it a useful organism for medically relevant research in this area. Here, we review three larval assays for nociceptive behavior using mechanical stimuli, optogenetic activation, and the naturalistic stimuli of parasitoid wasp attacks. Together, the assays described have been successfully used by many laboratories in studies of the molecular, cellular, and circuit mechanisms of nociception. In addition, the simple nature of the assays we describe can be useful in teaching laboratories for undergraduate students., (© 2024 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.)

Nociception in fruit fly ( Drosophila melanogaster ) larvae is characterized by a stereotyped escape behavior. When a larva encounters a noxious (potentially harmful) stimulus, it responds by curving its body into a c-shape and rolling in a corkscrew-like manner around its long-body axis. This rolling behavior may serve to quickly remove the larva from the source of the noxious stimulus, and is particularly adaptive to escape from a common natural predator of fruit fly larvae: parasitoid wasps ( Leptopilina boulardi ). L. boulardi completes its life cycle by using fruit fly larvae as hosts for its offspring. Female wasps sting fly larvae with an ovipositor and lay an egg within the larva. The wasp offspring hatches inside the fly larva, consumes the fly tissues during pupation, and eventually emerges from the pupal case as an adult wasp. Fruit fly larvae respond to oviposition attacks by rolling, which causes the long flexible ovipositor to be wound around the larval body like a spool. This dislodges the wasp and allows the larva to attempt to escape by crawling. Rolling behavior is triggered by the activation of sensory neurons (nociceptors) whose function can inform our understanding of the mechanisms of nociception. In this protocol, we describe a simple behavioral assay to test and measure nociceptive responses in Drosophila larvae during oviposition attacks by female parasitoid wasps. First, we discuss parasitoid wasp husbandry and culturing methods in the laboratory. We then describe how to perform the wasp nociception assay on third-instar fruit fly larvae., (© 2024 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.)