Search

Purpose: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy according to the chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer followed by surgery study (CROSS) has become a standard of care for patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal or junctional cancer. We aimed to assess long-term outcome of this regimen., Methods: From 2004 through 2008, we randomly assigned 366 patients to either five weekly cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions, 5 days per week) followed by surgery, or surgery alone. Follow-up data were collected through 2018. Cox regression analyses were performed to compare overall survival, cause-specific survival, and risks of locoregional and distant relapse. The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy beyond 5 years of follow-up was tested with time-dependent Cox regression and landmark analyses., Results: The median follow-up was 147 months (interquartile range, 134-157). Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy had better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.89). The effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on overall survival was not time-dependent ( P value for interaction, P = .73), and landmark analyses suggested a stable effect on overall survival up to 10 years of follow-up. The absolute 10-year overall survival benefit was 13% (38% v 25%). Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy reduced risk of death from esophageal cancer (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.80). Death from other causes was similar between study arms (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.99). Although a clear effect on isolated locoregional (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.72) and synchronous locoregional plus distant relapse (HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.72) persisted, isolated distant relapse was comparable (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.13)., Conclusion: The overall survival benefit of patients with locally advanced resectable esophageal or junctional cancer who receive preoperative chemoradiotherapy according to CROSS persists for at least 10 years., Competing Interests: Mark I. Van Berge HenegouwenConsulting or Advisory Role: Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, Mylan, Alesi SurgicalResearch Funding: Olympus, StrykerTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Johnson & Johnson Hanneke W. M. Van LaarhovenConsulting or Advisory Role: Lilly/ImClone, Nordic Group, Bristol Myers Squibb, ServierResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Bayer Schering Pharma, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, Nordic Group, Philips Healthcare, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Servier, Merck KGaATravel, Accommodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca Grard A. P. NieuwenhuijzenHonoraria: Medtronic, LillyConsulting or Advisory Role: MedtronicResearch Funding: Medtronic Geke A. P. HospersConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, MSD, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, NovartisResearch Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Seerave Foundation Cornelis J. A. PuntConsulting or Advisory Role: Nordic Bioscience Henk M. W. VerheulConsulting or Advisory Role: Glycostem Ewout W. SteyerbergPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Royalties from Springer for a book “Clinical Prediction Models”No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Metastatic rectal cancer patients could benefit from novel therapeutic approaches. The signaling network formed by chemokines and their receptors can promote metastasis and resistance to current anticancer treatments. This study assessed the expression of chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and its ligand CXCL12 immuhistochemically in stage IV rectal tumors. Paraffin-embedded primary tumor collected before and after local radiotherapy and systemic treatment with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin and capecitabine was analyzed. Receptor and ligand expression was assessed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of tumor, stromal and normal rectal crypt cells. Baseline expression of CXCR4 and CXCL12 was correlated with patients' pathologic response to treatment. At diagnosis (n=46), 89% of the rectal tumors expressed cytoplasmic CXCR4 and 81% CXCL12. Nuclear CXCR4 expression in tumor cells was present in 30% and nuclear CXCL12 expression in 35% of the tumors. After radiochemotherapy and administration of bevacizumab, nuclear CXCL12 expression was observed in 79% of residual tumors, as compared to 31% of the paired tumor samples expressing nuclear CXCL12 before treatment (P=0.001). There were no differences in CXCR4 or CXCL12 expression at baseline between the patients who had (n=9) and did not have (n=30) a pathologic complete response. Our results show that CXCR4 and CXCL12 are extensively expressed in primary rectal tumors of patients presenting with metastatic disease, while radiochemotherapy and bevacizumab further upregulate CXCL12 expression. These data indicate the importance of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in rectal tumor biology, and may suggest the CXCR4/CXCL12 receptor-ligand pair as a potential therapeutic target in metastatic rectal cancer.

Objectives: We aimed to examine the association between total number of resected nodes and survival in patients after esophagectomy with and without nCRT., Background: Most studies concerning the potentially positive effect of extended lymphadenectomy on survival have been performed in patients who underwent surgery alone. As nCRT is known to frequently "sterilize" regional nodes, it is unclear whether extended lymphadenectomy after nCRT is still useful., Methods: Patients from the randomized CROSS-trial who completed the entire protocol (ie, surgery alone or chemoradiotherapy + surgery) were included. With Cox regression models, we compared the impact of number of resected nodes as well as resected positive nodes on survival in both groups., Results: One hundred sixty-one patients underwent surgery alone, and 159 patients received multimodality treatment. The median (interquartile range) number of resected nodes was 18 (12-27) and 14 (9-21), with 2 (1-6) and 0 (0-1) resected positive nodes, respectively. Persistent lymph node positivity after nCRT had a greater negative prognostic impact on survival as compared with lymph node positivity after surgery alone. The total number of resected nodes was significantly associated with survival for patients in the surgery-alone arm (hazard ratio per 10 additionally resected nodes, 0.76; P=0.007), but not in the multimodality arm (hazard ratio 1.00; P=0.98)., Conclusions: The number of resected nodes had a prognostic impact on survival in patients after surgery alone, but its therapeutic value is still controversial. After nCRT, the number of resected nodes was not associated with survival. These data question the indication for maximization of lymphadenectomy after nCRT.