Search

Background and Aim: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) present increased cardiovascular mortality compared to the general population. Few studies have assessed the long-term development and progression of carotid atherosclerotic plaque in SLE patients. Our aim was to investigate the association of clinical and laboratory markers of disease activity and classical cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) with carotid atherosclerosis development in SLE patients in a prospective 5-year study.Methods and Results: Clinical history and information on principal CVRFs were collected at baseline and after 5 years in 40 SLE patients (36 women, mean age 42 ± 9 years; 14.4 ± 7 years of mean disease duration) and 50 age-matched controls. Carotid Doppler ultrasonography was employed to quantify the atherosclerotic burden at baseline and at follow up. Clinimetrics were applied to assess SLE activity over time (SLEDAI). The association between basal circulating T cell subsets (including CD4+CCR5+; CD4+CXCR3+; CD4+HLADR+; CD4+CD45RA+RO-, CD4+CD45RO+RA- and their subsets) and atherosclerosis development was evaluated. During the 5-year follow up, 32% of SLE patients, developed carotid atherosclerosis compared to 4% of controls. Furthermore, considering SLEDAI changes over time, patients within the highest tertile were those with increased incidence of carotid atherosclerosis independently of CVRF. In addition, increased levels of CD4+CCR5+ T cells were independently associated with the development of carotid atherosclerosis in SLE patients.Conclusion: Serial clinical evaluations over time, rather than a single point estimation of disease activity or CVRF burden, are required to define the risk of carotid atherosclerosis development in SLE patients. Specific T cell subsets are associated with long-term atherosclerotic progression and may further be of help in predicting vascular disease progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Semaglutide has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in non-diabetic patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease and overweight/obesity in the SELECT trial. Data on the applicability of these results to clinical practice are limited. We evaluated the eligibility for and practical implications of semaglutide in overweight/obese non-diabetic patients with recent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) from a contemporary real-world registry., Methods: Patients from the multicenter START-ANTIPLATELET registry (NCT02219984) were stratified to investigate the proportion of patients eligible for semaglutide >60 days after discharge for ACS (post-acute phase), according to the SELECT trial eligibility criteria: age ≥ 45 years; body mass index ≥27 kg/m 2 ; history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, or peripheral artery disease; no diabetes. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, target vessel revascularization, or stroke, and net adverse clinical events (NACE), a composite of all-cause death, MI, stroke, or major bleeding, were assessed at 1-year follow-up., Results: The study population comprised 2940 consecutive ACS patients. At 60 days after discharge, 807 patients (27.4 %) met the SELECT eligibility criteria (SELECT-like group) and 2133 patients were ineligible (not-eligible group). At 1 year, incidence of MACE (4.6 % vs. 8.2 %; p = 0.004) and NACE (3.6 % vs. 7.6 %; p < 0.001) was lower in the SELECT-like group compared to the not-eligible group., Conclusions: In a contemporary real-world registry, a significant proportion of post-ACS patients were eligible for semaglutide according to the SELECT trial criteria. Future studies are needed to evaluate the potential implications of semaglutide for secondary prevention., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Corsini has received consulting fees and lecture fees from Algorithm, Amarin, Amgen, DOC, Fidia, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Recordati Spa, Sanofi, Servier, and Viatris; and has received grant support from Daiichi-Sankyo. The other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Andreotti has received speaker or consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Servier, outside the present work. Dr Capodanno has received personal honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Terumo; payment her the institution from Meditronic, outside the present work. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Terumo, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel/Department Klinische Forschung, Bristol Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work; and grants from Terumo. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc., Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta, MedAlliance, Medscape, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Affluent Medical, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Daiichi-Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, Europa Group/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, J-CalC, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Vectura, VoxMedia, IQVIA, McVeigh Global, Overcome, Primer Healthcare of New Jersey, Radcliffe, SL Solutions, TARSUS Cardiology, and WebMD, outside the submitted work; owns equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, and ControlRad (via spouse); has received no fees for roles served with the American Medical Association (Scientific Advisory Board), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member); has served on the faculty of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation; and has received honoraria: JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor), American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees Member, Steering Committee Member Clinical Trials Research Program). Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura, outside the submitted work; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Antithrombotic therapy after cardiac percutaneous interventions is key for the prevention of thrombotic events but is inevitably associated with increased bleeding, proportional to the number, duration, and potency of the antithrombotic agents used. Bleeding complications have important clinical implications, which in some cases may outweigh the expected benefit of reducing thrombotic events. Because the response to antithrombotic agents varies widely among patients, there has been a relentless effort toward the identification of patients at high bleeding risk (HBR), in whom modulation of antithrombotic therapy may be needed to optimize the balance between safety and efficacy. Among patients undergoing cardiac percutaneous interventions, recent advances in technology have allowed for strategies of de-escalation to reduce bleeding without compromising efficacy, and HBR patients are expected to benefit the most from such approaches. Guidelines do not extensively expand upon the topic of de-escalation strategies of antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients. In this review, we discuss the evidence and provide practical recommendations on optimal antithrombotic therapy in HBR patients undergoing various cardiac percutaneous interventions., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Galli has received consulting fees or honoraria from Terumo, outside the present work. Dr Andreotti has received speaker or consultancy fees from Amgen, Bayer, BMS/Pfizer, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Servier, outside the present work. Dr Capodanno has received personal honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Terumo; and payment to his institution from Medtronic, outside the present work. Dr Valgimigli has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Alvimedica/CID, Abbott Vascular, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, CoreFLOW, Idorsia Pharmaceuticals, Universität Basel | Dept. Klinische Forschung, Bristol-Myers Squibb SA, Medscape, Biotronik, and Novartis, outside the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Terumo. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Affluent Medical, Alleviant Medical, Amgen, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, AtriCure Inc., Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CeloNova, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, I-Laser, Janssen, Magenta, MedAlliance, Medscape, Mediasphere, Medtelligence, Medtronic, MJH Healthcare, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Penumbra, PhaseBio, Philips, Pi-Cardia, PLx Pharma, Protembis, RenalPro, RM Global, Shockwave, Transverse Medical, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Affluent Medical, the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Daiichi-Sankyo Brasil, E.R. Squibb & Sons, Esperion Science/Innovative Biopharma, Europa Group/Boston Scientific, Gaffney Events, Educational Trust, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, J-CalC, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Vectura, VoxMedia, IQVIA, McVeigh Global, Overcome, Primer Healthcare of New Jersey, Radcliffe, SL Solutions, TARSUS Cardiology, and WebMD, outside the submitted work; owns equity (<1%) in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, Stel, ControlRad (via her spouse); and has received no fees from the American Medical Association (Scientific Advisory Board) and the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (Women in Innovations Committee Member); has served on the faculty of the Cardiovascular Research Foundation; and has received honoraria from JAMA Cardiology (Associate Editor) and the American College of Cardiology (Board of Trustees Member, Member Clinical Trials Research Program). Dr Angiolillo has received consulting fees or honoraria from Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chiesi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Haemonetics, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Vectura, outside the submitted work; and his institution has received research grants from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biosensors, CeloNova, CSL Behring, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Faraday, Gilead, Idorsia, Janssen, Matsutani Chemical Industry Co., Merck, Novartis, and the Scott R. MacKenzie Foundation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objectives: In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), left ventricular systolic dysfunction is one of the main predictors of adverse events after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). However, more patients undergo surgery earlier, often with preserved systolic function. In these cases, global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been proposed as a marker of ventricular remodeling post-surgery. This study aims to evaluate GLS variation in patients undergoing SAVR and explore differences across the diastolic dysfunction classes., Methods: From June 2020 to March 2023, patients with AS and preserved ejection fraction (EF) requiring SAVR were enrolled. Echocardiographic evaluations were conducted preoperatively, seven days post-surgery, and twelve months after surgery. Patients were divided into two groups based on the severity of diastolic dysfunction: Group A (grade I) and Group B (grades II-III)., Results: The final analysis included 108 patients (mean age 71.3 ± 7.2 years). Twenty-two patients (20.4%) also underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The preoperative EF averaged 61.6 ± 6.03%, with no significant differences between groups. Preoperative GLS was 16 ± 4.3%, decreasing to 12.8 ± 3.4% postoperatively ( p < 0.0001). GLS was comparable between the groups preoperatively ( p = 0.185) and postoperatively (0.854). After twelve months, GLS improved in both groups (Group A: 17.7 ± 3.4%, Group B: 15.7 ± 3.2%, p < 0.0001), but only Group A showed significant improvement from preoperative values ( p = 0.018). SAVR improved GLS regardless of CABG intervention., Conclusions: SAVR in patients with preserved LVEF results in an early reduction in GLS, regardless of diastolic dysfunction. After twelve months, GLS improved significantly, with significant recovery only in patients with mild dysfunction.

Aims: Long-term oral anticoagulation is the primary therapy for preventing ischemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Different types of oral anticoagulant drugs can have specific effects on the metabolism of patients. Here we characterize, for the first time, the serum metabolomic and lipoproteomic profiles of AF patients treated with anticoagulants: vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)., Materials and Methods: Serum samples of 167 AF patients (median age 78 years, 62 % males, 70 % on DOACs treatment) were analyzed via high resolution 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Data on 25 metabolites and 112 lipoprotein-related fractions were quantified and analyzed with multivariate and univariate statistical approaches., Key Findings: Our data provide evidence that patients treated with VKAs and DOACs present significant differences in their profiles: lower levels of alanine and lactate (odds ratio: 1.72 and 1.84), free cholesterol VLDL-4 subfraction (OR: 1.75), triglycerides LDL-1 subfraction (OR: 1.80) and 4 IDL cholesterol fractions (ORs ∼ 1.80), as well as higher levels of HDL cholesterol (OR: 0.48), apolipoprotein A1 (OR: 0.42) and 7 HDL cholesterol fractions/subfractions (ORs: 0.40-0.51) are characteristic of serum profile of patients on DOACs' therapy., Significance: Our results support the usefulness of NMR-based metabolomics for the description of the effects of oral anticoagulants on AF patient circulating metabolites and lipoproteins. The higher serum levels of HDL cholesterol observed in patients on DOACs could contribute to explaining their reduced cardiovascular risk, suggesting the need of further studies in this direction to fully understand possible clinical implications., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Real-world data on the use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in clinical practice show that about 80% of (very) high-cardiovascular (CV)-risk patients disregard the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Guidelines' recommendations on dyslipidemias. The availability of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9mAb) should reduce this gap. Our aim was to provide data on PCSK9mAb use in clinical practice, investigating the achievement of the ESC Guidelines' recommendations in the real world. Methods: Between April 2018 and December 2022, patients who started on PCSK9mAb therapy (140 mg of evolocumab or 75 mg or 150 mg of alirocumab, subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks) were included in a prospective registry. Our cohort consisted of 256 patients: 95 (37.1%) were women (mean age: 65.43 ± 11.12 yrs), 53 (20.7%) were at high CV risk, and 203 (79.3%) were at very high CV risk. Results: After one year of PCSK9mAb treatment, nearly 60% of patients demonstrated full adherence to the ESC Guidelines' recommendations, defined as achieving at least a 50% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels along with reaching LDL-C target levels (≤55 and ≤70 mg/dL for very high and high risk, respectively). Concomitant high-dose statin therapy emerged as the primary predictor of LDL-C target attainment. Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), statin intolerance, and female gender were associated with a significant lower probability of achieving LDL-C target levels. Conclusions: Our analysis confirms that PCSK9mAb treatment is safe and effective, enabling 60% of our cohort to fully achieve the LDL-C guideline recommendations. The use of high-intensity statins emerged as a significant predictor of efficacy. Conversely, familial hypercholesterolemia and female gender were identified as predictors of therapeutic failure. Hence, it is crucial to address disparities in cardiovascular disease prevention between genders and to enhance strategies for managing elevated LDL-C in HeFH patients.

Background: The accuracy of available prediction tools for clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains modest. Machine Learning (ML) has been used to predict outcomes in the AF population, but not in a population entirely on anticoagulant therapy., Methods and Aims: Different supervised ML models were applied to predict all-cause death, cardiovascular (CV) death, major bleeding and stroke in anticoagulated patients with AF, processing data from the multicenter START-2 Register., Results: 11078 AF patients (male n = 6029, 54.3%) were enrolled with a median follow-up period of 1.5 years [IQR 1.0-2.6]. Patients on Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) were 5135 (46.4%) and 5943 (53.6%) were on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOAC). Using Multi-Gate Mixture of Experts, a cross-validated AUC of 0.779 ± 0.016 and 0.745 ± 0.022 were obtained, respectively, for the prediction of all-cause death and CV-death in the overall population. The best ML model outperformed CHA 2 DSVA 2 SC and HAS-BLED for all-cause death prediction (p < 0.001 for both). When compared to HAS-BLED, Gradient Boosting improved major bleeding prediction in DOACs patients (0.711 vs. 0.586, p < 0.001). A very low number of events during follow-up (52) resulted in a suboptimal ischemic stroke prediction (best AUC of 0.606 ± 0.117 in overall population). Body mass index, age, renal function, platelet count and hemoglobin levels resulted the most important variables for ML prediction., Conclusions: In AF patients, ML models showed good discriminative ability to predict all-cause death, regardless of the type of anticoagulation strategy, and major bleeding on DOAC therapy, outperforming CHA 2 DS 2 VASC and the HAS-BLED scores for risk prediction in these populations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Prof. Rossella Marcucci: lecture fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Daiichi-Sankyo, Bayer, Pfizer, Viatris, Werfen, Sandoz. Dr. Daniela Poli: lecture fees from Bristol Meyers Squibb, Pfizer, Boheringer Ingelhein, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo. Other authors: nothing to declare regarding this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: In February 2021, a few cases of unusual, severe thrombotic events associated with thrombocytopenia reported after vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Vaxzevria) or with Johnson & Johnson's Janssen vaccine raise concern about safety. The vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been related to the presence of platelet-activating antibodies directed against platelet Factor 4. Objectives: We investigated VITT subject genetic background by a high-throughput whole exome sequencing (WES) approach in order to investigate VITT genetic predisposition. Methods: Six consecutive patients (females of Caucasian origin with a mean age of 64 years) were referred to the Atherothrombotic Diseases Center (Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence) with a diagnosis of definite VITT underwent WES analysis. WES analysis was performed on the Illumina NextSeq500 platform. Results: WES analysis revealed a total of 140,563 genetic variants. Due to VITT's rare occurrence, we focused attention on rare variants. The global analysis of all high-quality rare variants did not reveal a significant enrichment of mutated genes in biological/functional pathways common to patients analyzed. Afterwards, we focused on rare variants in genes associated with blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, platelet activation and aggregation, integrin-mediated signaling pathway, and inflammation with particular attention to those involved in vascular damage, as well as autoimmune thrombocytopenia. According to ACMG criteria, 47/194 (24.2%) rare variants were classified as uncertain significance variants (VUS), whereas the remaining were likely benign/benign. Conclusion: WES analysis identifies rare variants possibly favoring the prothrombotic state triggered by the exposure to the vaccine. Functional studies and/or extensions to a larger number of patients might allow a more comprehensive definition of these molecular pathways., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Betti Giusti et al.)

Background: Cardiac surgery is a high-risk setting for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). However, large differences in its incidence, rate of thrombotic complications, and mortality have been reported in this context. Few studies address the pharmacologic management of HIT specifically in this setting., Objectives: To describe the incidence, outcomes, and management of patients with HIT in our cohort and to compare them with patients presenting platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies but without platelet-activating capacity., Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted over a period of 10 years and 6 months on 13,178 cardiac operations in a single high-volume cardiac surgery center., Results: HIT was diagnosed in 0.22% of patients. HIT with associated thromboembolic complications occurred in 0.04% of cases. Two deaths at 30 days were registered, both in patients with associated thrombosis. The 4T score showed a 99.9% negative predictive value. The immunoglobulin G-specific chemiluminescence test positivity rate was highly predictive of HIT. Warfarin was often started early after surgery, and although it was rarely stopped when the diagnosis of HIT was made, no new thromboembolic complications subsequently occurred. Thrombocytopenia appeared to be a poor prognostic sign, whatever the cause., Conclusion: Although rare, HIT is characterized by high mortality in this setting, especially if thrombotic complications occur. Large multicentric studies or an international registry should be created to enhance the scientific evidence on HIT diagnosis and management in this context., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

This review article focuses on the role of adenosine in coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis and treatment. Adenosine, an endogenous purine nucleoside, plays crucial roles in cardiovascular physiology and pathology. Its release and effects, mediated by specific receptors, influence vasomotor function, blood pressure regulation, heart rate, and platelet activity. Adenosine therapeutic effects include treatment of the no-reflow phenomenon and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. The production of adenosine involves complex cellular pathways, with extracellular and intracellular synthesis mechanisms. Adenosine's rapid metabolism underscores its short half-life and physiological turnover. Furthermore, adenosine's involvement in side effects of antiplatelet therapy, particularly ticagrelor and cangrelor, highlights its clinical significance. Moreover, adenosine serves as a valuable tool in CAD diagnosis, aiding stress testing modalities and guiding intracoronary physiological assessments. Its use in assessing epicardial stenosis and microvascular dysfunction is pivotal for treatment decisions. Overall, understanding adenosine's mechanisms and clinical implications is essential for optimizing CAD management strategies, encompassing both therapeutic interventions and diagnostic approaches.

Background: The impact of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on platelet function is still unclear. We conducted a comprehensive ex vivo study aimed at assessing the effect of the four currently marketed NOACs on platelet function., Methods: We incubated blood samples from healthy donors with concentrations of NOACs (50, 150 and 250 ng/mL), in the range of those achieved in the plasma of patients during therapy. We evaluated generation of thrombin; light transmittance platelet aggregation (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP), thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), human γ-thrombin (THR) and tissue factor (TF); generation of thromboxane (TX)B 2 ; and expression of protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and P-selectin on the platelet surface., Results: All NOACs concentration-dependently reduced thrombin generation compared with control. THR-induced LTA was suppressed by the addition of dabigatran at any concentration, while TF-induced LTA was reduced by factor-Xa inhibitors. ADP- and TRAP-induced LTA was not modified by NOACs. TXB 2 generation was reduced by all NOACs, particularly at the highest concentrations. We found a concentration-dependent increase in PAR-1 expression after incubation with dabigatran, mainly at the highest concentrations, but not with FXa inhibitors; P-selectin expression was not changed by any drugs., Conclusions: Treatment with the NOACs is associated with measurable ex vivo changes in platelet function, arguing for antiplatelet effects beyond the well-known anticoagulant activities of these drugs. There are differences, however, among the NOACs, especially between dabigatran and the FXa inhibitors.

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. We aimed to describe the prevalence of inappropriate DOACs dose prescription in the START2-AF Registry, the outcomes according to the appropriateness of the dosage, and the factors associated with inappropriate dose prescription. Methods: Patients' demographics and clinical data were prospectively collected as electronic files in an anonymous form on the website of the START2-Registry; DOACs dosage was determined to be appropriate when prescribed according to the European Heart Rhythm Association Guidelines. Results: We included 5943 NVAF patients on DOACs; 2572 (46.3%) were female patients. The standard dose (SD) was prescribed to 56.9% of patients and the low dose (LD) was prescribed to 43.1% of patients; 38.9% of all NVAF patients received an inappropriate LD DOAC and 0.3% received inappropriate SD. Patients treated with LD DOAC had a significantly higher rate of all bleedings (RR 1.5; 95% CI 1.2-2.0), major bleedings (RR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-1.7), and mortality (RR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9-4.1) with respect to patients treated with SD DOAC. No difference was found among patients treated with appropriate and inappropriate LD regarding bleeding, thrombotic, and mortality rates. Age, body weight <60 kg, and renal failure were significantly associated with inappropriate LD DOAC prescription. Conclusions: Inappropriate LD DOACs in NVAF patients is not associated with a reduction in bleeding risk, nor with an increased thrombotic risk. Instead, it is associated with higher mortality rate, suggesting that, in clinical practice, underdosing is preferred for patients at particularly high risk for adverse events.

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level variability, related to atherothrombotic risk increase, is mainly attributed to LPA gene, encoding apolipoprotein(a), with kringle IV type 2 (KIV2) copy number variation (CNV) acting as the primary genetic determinant. Genetic characterization of Lp(a) is in continuous growth; nevertheless, the peculiar structural characteristics of this variant constitute a significant challenge to the development of effective detection methods. The aim of the study was to compare quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) in the evaluation of KIV2 repeat polymorphism., Methods: We analysed 100 subjects tested for cardiovascular risk in which Lp(a) plasma levels were assessed., Results: Correlation analysis between CNV values obtained with the two methods was slightly significant (R = 0.413, p = 0.00002), because of the wider data dispersion in qPCR compared with ddPCR. Internal controls C1, C2 and C3 measurements throughout different experimental sessions revealed the superior stability of ddPCR, which was supported by a reduced intra/inter-assay coefficient of variation determined in this method compared to qPCR. A significant inverse correlation between Lp(a) levels and CNV values was confirmed for both techniques, but it was higher when evaluated by ddPCR than qPCR (R = -0.393, p = 0.000053 vs R = -0.220, p = 0.028, respectively). When dividing subjects into two groups according to 500 mg/L Lp(a) cut-off value, a significantly lower number of KIV2 repeats emerged among subjects with greater Lp(a) levels, with stronger evidence in ddPCR than in qPCR (p = 0.000013 and p = 0.001, respectively)., Conclusions: Data obtained support a better performance of ddPCR in the evaluation of KIV2 repeat polymorphism., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Aims: Whether pregnancy is a modifier of the long-term course and outcome of women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is unknown. We assessed the association of pregnancy with long-term outcomes in HCM women., Methods and Results: Retrospective evaluation of women with HCM from 1970 to 2021. Only women with pregnancy-related information (pregnancy present or absent) and a follow-up period lasting ≥1 year were included. The peri-partum period was defined as -1 to 6 months after delivery. The primary endpoint was a composite for major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE: cardiovascular death, sudden cardiac death, appropriate defibrillator shock and heart failure (HF) progression]. Overall, 379 (58%) women were included. There were 432 pregnancies in 242 (63%) patients. In 29 (7.6%) cases, pregnancies (n = 39) occurred after HCM diagnosis. Among these, three carrying likely pathogenic sarcomeric variants suffered MACEs in the peri-partum period. At 10 ± 9 years of follow-up, age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.034, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.018-1.050, P < 0.001] and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class (II vs. I: HR 1.944, 95% CI 0.896-4.218; III vs. I: HR 5.291, 95% CI 2.392-11.705, P < 0.001) were associated with MACE. Conversely, pregnancy was associated with reduced risk (HR 0.605; 95% CI 0.380-0.963, P = 0.034). Among women with pregnancy, multiple occurrences did not modify risk., Conclusions: Pregnancy is not a modifier of long-term outcome in women with HCM and mostly occurs before a cardiac diagnosis. Most patients tolerate pregnancy well and do not show a survival disadvantage compared to women without. Pregnancy should not be discouraged, except in the presence of severe HF symptoms or high-risk features., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The Authors report no conflict of interest for the present work., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)