Search

Objectives: To determine whether extending anti-CGRP mAb treatment beyond 3 years influences migraine course, we analyzed migraine frequency during the first month of treatment discontinuation following three 12-month treatment cycles (Ts)., Methods: This multicenter, prospective, real-world study enrolled 212 patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) who completed three consecutive Ts of subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs. Discontinuation periods (D1, D2, D3) were defined as the first month after T1, T2, and T3, respectively. The primary endpoint was the ≥ 50% response rate at D3 compared to D2. Secondary endpoints included changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), monthly headache days (MHD), monthly analgesic intake (MAI), numerical rating scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), ≥ 50% response rate at D3 versus D1 and D2, and relapse rates to CM or medication overuse., Results: At D3 vs. D2, significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed in the ≥ 50% response rate (77.8% vs. 53.8%), MMD (- 2.1 ± 1.7), MHD (- 2.9 ± 2.4), MAI (- 2.6 ± 2.4), NRS (- 0.7 ± 1.3), and HIT-6 (- 7.2 ± 5.9), with lower relapse rates to CM (2.3% vs. 18%) and medication overuse (1.3% vs. 10.1%). Compared to D1, D3 demonstrated greater benefits (p < 0.001) in MMD (- 2.6 ± 1.9), MHD (- 5.8 ± 3.3), MAI (- 4.9 ± 3.4), NRS (- 1 ± 1.6), and HIT- 6 (- 9.4 ± 7), alongside higher ≥ 50% response rates (77.8% vs. 25%) and reduced relapses to CM (2.3% vs. 67.7%) and medication overuse (1.3% vs. 34.2%)., Discussion: Three years of anti-CGRP mAb treatment revealed a progressive increase in the proportion of ≥ 50% responders (D1: 25%; D2: 53.8%; D3: 77.8%) and substantial reductions in migraine burden, suggesting that prolonged treatment may favorably modify migraine course., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: Piero Barbanti reports personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, research support, collaborated for clinical trials, or other activities with Abbvie, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Angelini, Assosalute, Bayer, Biohaven, DOC Pharma, Eli-Lilly, Fondazione Ricerca e Salute, GSK, Lundbeck, Noema Pharma, Organon, Pfizer, Teva, Viatris, Visufarma, and Zambon, and serves as President with Italian Association of Headache Sufferers. Cinzia Aurilia received travel grants from Eli-Lilly, FB-Health, Lusofarmaco, and Teva, and honoraria from Novartis, Eli-Lilly, and Teva; Paola Torelli received travel grant, honoraria as a speaker, or for participating in advisory boards from Novartis, Teva, Eli Lilly, and Allergan; Gabriella Egeo received travel grants and honoraria from Eli-Lilly, Novartis, New Penta, and Ecupharma; Florindo d’Onofrio received travel grant, honoraria as a speaker or for partecipating in advisory boards from Novartis, Teva, Neopharmed Gentili, Qbgroup srl, K link srl, and Eli-Lilly; Cinzia Finocchi received grants and honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, TEVA, and AIM group; Giovanna Viticchi received honoraria for speaker activities and participating in advisory boards from Eli-lilly, AbbVie, Teva, and Boehringer Ingelheim; Marco Russo received travel grants and honoraria as a speaker or for participating in expert panels from Eli Lilly, Abbvie, and Lundbeck; Simone Quintana received travel grants and honoraria as a speaker or for participating in expert panels from Eli Lilly, Abbvie, and Pfizer; Roberta Messina received honoraria for speaker activities and participating in advisory boards from Abbvie, Biomedia, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Organon, Pfizer, and Teva; Marco Bartolini received honoraria for speaker activities from Lusofarmaco and Neopharmed; Massimo Filippi is the Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Neurology, Associate Editor of Human Brain Mapping, Neurological Sciences, and Radiology; received compensation for consulting services from Alexion, Almirall, Biogen, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Roche, and Sanofi; speaking activities from Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Chiesi Italia SpA, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Horizon, Janssen, Merck-Serono, Neopharmed Gentili, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and TEVA; participation in Advisory Boards for Alexion, Biogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Horizon, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Takeda; scientific direction of educational events for Biogen, Merck, Roche, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, and Sanofi-Genzyme; he receives research support from Biogen Idec, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Roche, Italian Ministry of Health, Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla, and ARiSLA (Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la SLA); Sabina Cevoli received honoraria for speaker panels from Teva and Novartis; Antonio Carnevale, Bianca Orlando, Giulia Fiorentini, Francesca Pistoia, Stefano Bonassi, and Alice Mannocci have no disclosures to declare., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Current models for the study of neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are severely limited. While in vitro (e.g. cell lines), ex vivo (e.g. organoids) and in vivo (e.g. mice) models all exist, each has limitations. To address these limitations and collectively identify strategies to move the NET models field forward, we held an inaugural NET models meeting, hosted by our founding group: Dr Lines (Oxford), Prof. Quelle (Iowa), Dr Dayton (Barcelona), Dr Ear (Iowa), Dr Marinoni (Bern) and Dr Guenter (Alabama). This two-day meeting in Oxford (UK) was organised and supported by Bioscientifica Ltd and was solely dedicated to the discussion of NET models. The meeting was attended by ∼30 international researchers (from the UK, EU, Israel, USA and Canada). Plenary talks were given by Prof. Thakker, who summarised NET research over the past few decades, and Dr Schrader, who described the process and pitfalls of generating new cell lines. Eight researchers also presented their work on topics ranging from human cell 3D bioprinting to zebrafish models and included novel ideas and improvements on current concepts. This was followed by an interactive workshop, where discussion topics included a summary of currently available NET models, limitations of these models, barriers to developing new models, and how we can address these issues going forward. This white paper summarises the key points raised in these discussions and the future aspirations of the NET Models Consortium. The next meeting will take place in Oxford (UK) in 2025; contact contact@netcancerfoundation.com for more information., Competing Interests: K E Lines is an Associate Editor of Endocrine Oncology. K E Lines was not involved in the review or editorial process for this paper, on which she is listed as an author., (© the author(s).)

Background: The advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway has transformed the management of migraine, offering newfound optimism for clinicians and individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have provided crucial insights into the effectiveness and safety profiles of these treatments, their translation into real-world clinical practice remains a challenge., Objective: This review aims to conduct a comprehensive assessment of real-world studies, offering valuable insights tailored for practical application in clinical settings., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, SCOPUS, and MEDLINE for real-life studies on erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. Abstracts underwent rigorous screening by two reviewers for relevance. Data extraction from selected articles was performed using a standardized form, with verification by a second reviewer. Data synthesis was narrative, following PRISMA guidelines., Results: Our search included 61 pertinent studies conducted between 2019 and 1 March 2024. Real-world study designs demonstrated notable variability in the selection and inclusion of migraine patients, influenced by factors such as attack frequency, data collection criteria, and primary/secondary objectives. Key findings commonly reported considerable improvements in efficacy outcomes (migraine frequency, analgesic use, pain severity, and disability), high responder rates, and optimal safety and tolerability profiles., Conclusions: Real-world evidence underscores the role of anti-CGRP mAbs as targeted therapies for both CM and EM patients. The overall results indicate that the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs in real-world applications may exceed those observed in RCTs, an extraordinary finding in clinical neurology.

Background: Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP MAbs) are approved and available treatments for migraine prevention. Patients do not respond alike and many countries have reimbursement policies, which hinder treatments to those who might respond. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with good and excellent response to anti-CGRP MAbs at 6 months., Methods: European multicentre, prospective, real-world study, including high-frequency episodic or chronic migraine (CM) patients treated since March 2018 with anti-CGRP MAbs. We defined good and excellent responses as ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD) at 6 months, respectively. Generalised mixed-effect regression models (GLMMs) were used to identify variables independently associated with treatment response., Results: Of the 5818 included patients, 82.3% were females and the median age was 48.0 (40.0-55.0) years. At baseline, the median of MHD was 20.0 (14.0-28.0) days/months and 72.2% had a diagnosis of CM. At 6 months (n=4963), 56.5% (2804/4963) were good responders and 26.7% (1324/4963) were excellent responders. In the GLMM model, older age (1.08 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.15), p=0.016), the presence of unilateral pain (1.39 (95% CI 1.21 to 1.60), p<0.001), the absence of depression (0.840 (95% CI 0.731 to 0.966), p=0.014), less monthly migraine days (0.923 (95% CI 0.862 to 0.989), p=0.023) and lower Migraine Disability Assessment at baseline (0.874 (95% CI 0.819 to 0.932), p<0.001) were predictors of good response (AUC of 0.648 (95% CI 0.616 to 0.680)). These variables were also significant predictors of excellent response (AUC of 0.691 (95% CI 0.651 to 0.731)). Sex was not significant in the GLMM models., Conclusions: This is the largest real-world study of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. It provides evidence that higher migraine frequency and greater disability at baseline reduce the likelihood of responding to anti-CGRP MAbs, informing physicians and policy-makers on the need for an earlier treatment in order to offer the best chance of treatment success., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: EC has received honoraria from Novartis, Chiesi, Lundbeck, MedScape; his salary has been partially funded by Río Hortega grant Acción Estratégica en Salud 2017–2020, Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CM20/00217). He is a junior editor for Cephalalgia. GE received travel grants and honoraria from Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Lusofarmaco, New Penta and Ecupharma. CNC has received honoraria for advisories, educational or commercial symposia from: Abbvie-Allergan, Kern Pharma, Chiesi, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals And has participated as subinvestigator in Clinical Trials for: Abbvie-Allergan, Amgen, Biohaven, Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Teva Pharmaceuticals. JAM has received honoraria as consultant and/or speaker for Lilly, Novartis, Teva. FS-C received honoraria from Novartis, Lilly, TEVA, Abbvie. AM has received honoraria from Teva, Lilly, Roche, UCB, Bial, Chiesi, Allergan, Esai, Zambon, Kern Pharma, Pfizer, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA, Merck, Janssen, Neuraxpharm, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall and/or Celgene. JS received honoraria from Allergan, Lilly, Teva, Novartis. IBB received honoraria for presentations from Novartis, Lilly, Teva, Lundbeck and Abbvie. MW-P received honoraria from Pfizer, Allergan-Abbvie, TEVA, Polpharma. MW-P is member of Editorial Board: The Journal of Headache and Pain. LP received honoraria from Pfizer, Lilly, Abbvie, TEVA, Novartis. AL-R received honoraria for Abbvie, Lilly, Novartis and Teva. IL received honoraria from Novartis, Abbvie, Teva, Eisai, Tecnifar and Bial. LD received honoraria as a speaker for Allergan, Lilly, Teva and Lundbeck. MRA-E, received honoraria from ABBVIE, Lilly, and Novartis. AM has no COI to declare. The University Clinic Hamburg got an unrestricted scientific grant from Novartis (2019-2023). IPM has received honoraria from Allergan Teva, Novartis, Lundbeck and Eli Lilly for lecturing or participating in advisory boards; is principal investigator for phase IV trials sponsored by Novartis, Lundbeck and Teva. CS has received personal fees for lectures/ advisory boards: Novartis, Abbvie and TEVA. PI received honoraria from TEVA, Novartis, Lilly, Abbvie, Lundbeck, Exeltis. ALR received honoraria from TEVA. ABG-V has received speaker honoraria and/or clinical advisor from Novartis, Lilly, TEVA, Exeltis, Chiesi, Abbvie, Pfizer and Lundbeck. RR has received travel grants and/or honoraria for lectures or advisory boards from Allergan/AbbVie, Hormosan, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer and Teva. SS reports consultant, speaker or advisory board fees from Abbott, Allergan/Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Medscape, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, Starmed, Teva and Uriach. EC-G received honoraria from TEVA. DGA has received personal compensation for consulting/advising from the WHO. Non-profit board membership in the Spanish Society of Neurology, and the European Union of Medical Specialist section of Neurology. Research funding from the Regional Health Administration (Gerencia Regional de Salud SACYL) in Castilla y Leon, Spain and Carlos III institute, Madrid, Spain. Speaker/travel grants/ clinical trials from Teva, Allergan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis and Biohaven. JP has received honoraria from Abbvie, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis and Teva. RG-G received honoraria from Allergan/ Abbvie, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer, Tecnifar, Teva. MH-V has received honoraria for participating on advisory boards and for collaborations as consultant, scientific communications, speaker, research support as well as funding for travel and congress-attending expenses for Abbie-Allergan, Novartis, Lundbeck, Lilly, Almirall, Chiesi, Esai, Exeltis, Kern Pharma, Menarini, TEVA and Zambon. His research group has received research grants from Abbie-Allergan and has received funding for clinical trials from Lilly, Novartis, TEVA. JVR received honoraria from Novartis, Abbvie, Lilly, TEVA, Lundbeck. SS-L received honoraria from Allergan, Almirall, Amgen, Chiesi, Eisai, Exeltis, Lilly, Lündbeck, Novartis, Pfizer y Teva. MG-S has received honoraria and been involved in research, education and advisory boards with Teva, Lily, Novartis and Abbvie. CT received personal fees for participating in advisory or for speaking at scientific events from AbbVie, Allergan, Biohaven, Dompé, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis and Teva. CT has received research funding from the European Commission, the Italian Ministry of Health and Migraine Research Foundation. JDdT has received honoraria as consultant and/or speaker for Lilly, Novartis, Teva. SDI has received honoraria for advisories, educational or commercial symposia from: Abbvie-Allergan, Fundació Universitat-Empresa, Ipsen Pharma, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Lundbeck, MSD-Organon, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals And has participated as PI in Clinical Trials for: Abbvie-Allergan, Alder, Amgen, Biohaven, Ipsen Pharma, Lilly, Lundbeck, Pfizer and Teva Pharmaceuticals. CGO participated in clinical trials from Novartis, St Jude Medical, Lilly, Lundbeck; TEVA, Biohaven, Pfizer. CGO received honoraria as consultant for Novartis, Lilly, Allergan-abbvie, Lundbeck, TEVA, Pfizer. CGO received honoraria as speaker for Allergan-Abbvie, TEVA, Novartis,Lilly, Chiesi, MSD, Almirall. PB reports personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, research support, collaborated for clinical trials or other activities with Abbvie, Alder, Allergan, Amgen, Angelini, Assosalute, Bayer, Biohaven, ElectroCore, Eli-Lilly, Fondazione Ricerca e Salute, GSK, Lundbeck, Lusofarmaco, 1MED, MSD, New Penta, Noema Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Stx-Med, Teva, Visufarma, Zambon and serves as President with Italian Association of Headache Sufferers. PP-R has received, in the last 3 years, honoraria as a consultant and speaker for: AbbVie, Biohaven, Chiesi, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Medscape, Novartis, Pfizer and Teva. Her research group has received research grants from AbbVie, Novartis and Teva; as well as, Instituto Salud Carlos III, EraNet Neuron, European Regional Development Fund (001-P-001682) under the framework of the FEDER Operative Programme for Catalunya 2014-2020 - RIS3CAT; has received funding for clinical trials from AbbVie, Amgen, Biohaven, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva. She is the Honorary Secretary of the International Headache Society. She is in the editorial board of Revista de Neurologia. She is an associate editor for Cephalalgia, Headache, Neurologia, The Journal of Headache and Pain and Frontiers of Neurology. She is a member of the Clinical Trials Guidelines Committee of the International Headache Society. She has edited the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Headache of the Spanish Neurological Society. She is the founder of www.midolordecabeza.org. PP-R does not own stocks from any pharmaceutical company. VJG, MMV, GV, JR-M, NFF, AJS, RO, GG, YG-O, GC, AL-B, FVJ, JR-V and VO reports no disclosures. RO reports personal fees from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva, and Pfizer, and non-financial support from Novartis, Teva, and Allergan/AbbVie. CT has received honoraria for lectures from TEVA, Lundbeck and for advisory boards from TEVA. He has received travel support from TEVA and Lundbeck. SS received honoraria from TEVA. AH declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. HB received honoraria from Novartis, Teva and Lundbeck. NPRP received honoraria from ABBVIE, Lilly and Novartis. CF received honoraria from Novartis and Abbvie. AAL received honoraria for Abbvie, Lilly, Novartis and Teva. EMS received a grant from the Portuguese Headache Society, supported by Teva. MTF has received honoraria from Allergan-AbbVie, Novartis, Chiesi and Teva. AA has received honoraria from Allergan-AbbVie, Novartis, Chiesi. PT received grants and honoria from Novartis, Teva, Eli-Lilly and Allergan. CA received travel grants from FB-Health, Lusofarmaco, Almirall, Eli-Lilly Novartis and Teva. RDI received speaker honoraria from Eli-Lilly, TEVA and Lundbeck. GS received personal fees as speaker or advisory board from Eli Lilly, Novartis, Teva, Lundbeck, Pfizer. SB has received honoraria from Teva. SC has received honoraria from Teva, Lilly, Roche, UCB, Bial, Chiesi, Allergan, Esai, Zambon, Kern Pharma, Pfizer, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA, Merck, Janssen, Neuraxpharm, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall and/or Celgene. EP reports personal fees from Novartis, Teva and Lilly. ALGP Research funding from the Regional Health Administration (Gerencia Regional de Salud SACYL) in Castilla y Leon, Spain. Speaker/travel grants/ clinical trials from Teva, Allergan, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Pfizer and Biohaven. AS has received honoraria for advisory boards and lectures from Allergan/AbbVie, Hormosan, Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, Sanofi, Teva. AGM has received speaker honoraria from TEVA. SQ has received speaker honoraria from Novartis, Lilly and Exeltis. MSR has received consulting fees and honoraria for lectures/presentations from Eli Lily, Lundbeck, Novartis, Teva and Pfizer. Intellectual as Secretary of the European Headache Federation, Review Editor on the Editorial Board of Headache and Neurogenic Pain (specialty section of Frontiers in Neurology). Margarita Sanchez-del-Rio serves as a member of the Board of Directors in the European Headache Federation. ET has received personal fees for lectures/ advisory boards: Novartis, Eli Lilly, Abbvie, TEVA, Roche, Lundbeck, Pfizer, Biogen. Consultant for and owner of stocks and IP in Man & Science. Stocks and IP in Nordic Brain Tech and Keimon Medical. Non-personal research grants from EU, Norwegian Research Council, Dam foundation, KlinBeForsk. Commissioned research (non-personal): Lundbeck, Pfizer. BVP received honoraria from ABBVIE. AOD received honoraria from ABBVIE, Lilly, Teva, Novartis. MR received honoraria from Lilly, Novartis. BC received grants and honoria from Eli-Lilly, Novartis, Teva; SC received travel grants, honoraria for advisory boards, speaker panels or clinical investigation studies from Novartis, Teva, Lilly, Allergan, Abvie, Ibsa, Amgen, Angelini and Lundbeck; FF has received fees for participation on advisory boards, speaker honoraria or consulting activities from Angelini, Cristalfarma, Ecupharma, IBSA, Lundbeck, Novartis, PIAM, Teva; FdO received travel grant, honoraria as a speaker or for partecipating in advisory boards from Novartis, Teva, Neopharmed Gentili, Qbgroup srl, K link srl and Eli-Lilly; MA received grants from Novartis and Lilly; RR received honoraria for speaker panels from Teva, Lilly, Novartis, Allergan, Lundbeck; MZ received travel grants and honoraria from Novartis; MA received travel grants and honoraria from Novartis, Teva, Eli-Lilly and Lundbeck; CF received grants and honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, TEVA, AIM group; AR received travel grants and honoraria from Teva and Eli-Lilly; SZ, RLP, MJRC, VGQ, HCO, SA, IKZ, DGA, IFL, BFP, SB, PRA, AC, AEU, AGG, IM, JPS, VC, AFR, YVE, MT, AS, AC, FZ and MA has no disclosures to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Importance: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (RCT) showed a lung recruitment maneuver using high-frequency oscillatory ventilation just before surfactant administration (ie, intubate-recruit-surfactant-extubate [IN-REC-SUR-E]) improved the efficacy of treatment compared with the standard intubate-surfactant-extubate (IN-SUR-E) technique without increasing the risk of adverse neonatal outcomes., Objective: To examine follow-up outcomes at corrected postnatal age (cPNA) 2 years of preterm infants previously enrolled in an RCT and treated with IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E in 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a follow-up study of infants recruited into the primary RCT from 2015 to 2018 at 35 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Italy. Follow-up examinations included neurodevelopmental, growth, and respiratory outcomes of these children at cPNA 2 years. Participants included spontaneously breathing extremely preterm neonates (24 0/7 to 27 6/7 weeks' gestation) reaching failure criteria for continuous positive airway pressure within the first 24 hours of life. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to January 2024., Intervention: Infants were randomly assigned (1:1) to IN-REC-SUR-E or IN-SUR-E and then followed up., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the occurrence of death after discharge or major disability at cPNA 2 years. Secondary outcomes were neurodevelopmental outcomes (major disability, cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, visual deficit, or auditory deficit), anthropometric measurements (weight, length, and head circumference), and recurrent respiratory infections and hospitalizations because of respiratory causes at 2y cPNA., Results: A total of 137 extremely preterm infants (median [IQR] gestational age, 26.5 [25.3-27.5] weeks and 75 [54.7%] female), initially enrolled in the original RCT, were followed up at cPNA 2 years, including 64 infants in the IN-SUR-E group and 73 infants in the IN-REC-SUR-E group. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of death after discharge or major disability at cPNA 2 years (IN-SUR-E: 13 children [20.3%] vs IN-REC-SUR-E: 10 children [13.7%]; P = .36). There were no significant differences in incidence of disability, cerebral palsy, or cognitive impairment in the IN-REC-SUR-E group compared with the IN-SUR-E group. There were no significant differences in anthropometric measurements (weight, length, and head circumference) between groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent respiratory infections or in hospitalizations because of respiratory causes between groups., Conclusions and Relevance: In this RCT of lung recruitment before surfactant vs standard care there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in death, neurodevelopmental outcomes, anthropometric measurements, or recurrent respiratory infections at the 2-year follow-up. These findings can aid clinicians in decision-making for the best strategy to administer surfactant, considering long-term outcomes.

We conducted a multicenter, prospective study (EMBRACE) evaluating the real-life effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of eptinezumab (100 mg/300 mg)-a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin-gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP mAb)-in high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM). The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD) for CM at weeks 9-12 compared to baseline. The secondary endpoints included changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS), Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), and responder rates. The safety analysis involved 44 subjects; the effectiveness analysis included 26 individuals. Eptinezumab was well-tolerated. In CM patients, eptinezumab significantly reduced MHD (-16.1 ± 9.9, p < 0.001), MAI, NRS, HIT-6, MIDAS, and MIBS-4. In HFEM patients, it significantly reduced NRS, HIT-6, MIDAS, and MIBS-4, though reductions in MMD (-3.3 ± 4.5) and MAI were not statistically significant. Overall, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 61.5% and 30.8%, respectively (60% and 30% in non-responders to subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs). The clinical change was rated as much or very much improved by 61.0% of the patients. Eptinezumab demonstrated high effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in real-life among hard-to-treat migraine patients with multiple treatment failures, including anti-CGRP mAbs.

Introduction: Long-term (1-year) fremanezumab treatment proved to be effective, safe, and well tolerated in individuals with migraine and < 2 medication clusters in a randomized controlled trial (RCT). We aimed to assess real-world evidence (RWE), long-term effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of fremanezumab in people with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) with > 3 treatment failures and various comorbidities., Methods: A 48-week, prospective, multicenter (n = 26), cohort study assessed fremanezumab's effectiveness, safety, and tolerability in consecutive adults with HFEM or CM with > 3 treatment failures. Primary endpoint was variation from baseline in monthly migraine days (MMD) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHD) in CM at weeks 45-48. Secondary endpoints were changes in monthly analgesic medications, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and the Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) scores and ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responder rates., Results: Of 533 participants who had received ≥ 1 fremanezumab dose, 130 were treated for ≥ 48 weeks and considered for effectiveness analysis. No participant missed any treatment dosage every other consecutive month during the 12-month period., Primary Endpoint: fremanezumab significantly (p < 0.001) reduced both MMD (- 6.4) in HFEM and MHD (- 14.5) in CM. Secondary endpoints: a significant reduction (p < 0.001) was observed in monthly analgesic medications (HFEM - 6.0; CM -16.5), NRS (HFEM - 3.4; CM - 3.4), HIT-6 (HFEM - 16.9; CM - 17.9) and MIDAS score (HFEM - 50.4; CM - 76.6). The ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates to fremanezumab were 75.5%, 36.7%, and 2% in HFEM and 71.6%, 44.4%, and 3.7% in CM. Corresponding response rates were 60.5%, 37.2%, and 2.3% in individuals with psychiatric comorbidities, 74.2%, 50%, and 4.8% in CM with medication overuse, and 60.9%, 39.1%, and 4.3% in CM with medication overuse and psychiatric comorbidities. Mild and transient treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 7.8% of the participants. No subject discontinued the treatment for any reason., Conclusion: This RWE study documents that long-term fremanezumab treatment is highly effective and remarkably well tolerated in subjects with HFEM or CM with multiple (> 3) therapeutic failures, even in the presence of concomitant medication overuse, psychiatric comorbidities, or both. The effectiveness-to-tolerability ratio appears to be better in RWE than in RCTs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: Nearly 60% of migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway experience a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at 12 weeks compared to baseline (responders). However, approximately half of the patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 12 weeks do respond ≤ 24 weeks (late responders). We assessed frequency and characteristics of patients responding to anti-CGRP mAbs only > 24 weeks (ultra-late responders)., Methods: In this multicenter (n = 16), prospective, observational, real-life study, we enrolled all consecutive adults affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM), with ≥ 3 prior therapeutic failures, treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 48 weeks. We defined responders patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 12 weeks, late responders those with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 24 weeks, and ultra-late responders those achieving a ≥ 50% response only > 24 weeks., Results: A total of 572 migraine patients completed ≥ 48 weeks of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Responders accounted for 60.5% (346/572), late responders for 15% (86/572), and ultra-late responders for 15.7% (90/572). Among ultra-late responders, 7.3% (42/572) maintained the ≥ 50% response rate across all subsequent time intervals (weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48) and were considered persistent ultra-late responders, while 8.4% (48/572) missed the ≥ 50% response rate at ≥ 1 subsequent time interval and were classified as fluctuating ultra-late responders. Fifty patients (8.7%) did not respond at any time interval ≤ 48 weeks. Ultra-late responders differed from responders for higher BMI (p = 0.033), longer duration of medication overuse (p < 0.001), lower NRS (p = 0.017) and HIT-6 scores (p = 0.002), higher frequency of dopaminergic symptoms (p = 0.002), less common unilateral pain-either alone (p = 0.010) or in combination with UAS (p = 0.023), allodynia (p = 0.043), or UAS and allodynia (p = 0.012)-a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.012), psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.010) and a higher proportion of patients with ≥ 1 comorbidity (p = 0.020)., Conclusion: Two-thirds of patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 24 weeks do respond later, while non-responders ≤ 48 weeks are quite rare (8.7%). These findings suggest to rethink the duration of migraine prophylaxis and the definition of resistant and refractory migraine, currently based on the response after 2-3 months of treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: While a single 12-month treatment cycle (TrC) with anti-CGRP mAbs is not disease-modifying for most patients, there is limited understanding of the effects of multiple TrCs on migraine course. We evaluated whether a second TrC might modify the migraine course by comparing the occurrence of migraine relapse after discontinuation of the second TrC to that following the cessation of the first TrC., Methods: In a real-life, multicenter, prospective study we considered all consecutive patients diagnosed with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) or chronic migraine (CM) with > 3 treatment failures and treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 2 consecutive 12-month TrCs who were responders at week 12. The primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM or monthly headache days (MHD) for CM at the first month of treatment discontinuation after the second TrC (D2) compared to the first TrC (D1). Secondary endpoints included variations in monthly analgesic medications (MAM), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) scores, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% response rates, and relapse from episodic migraine to CM and from no-medication overuse (MO) to MO at D2 vs. D1., Results: One-hundred-seventy-eight patients completed two 12-month TrCs with anti-CGRP mAbs. At D2, patients experienced a significant reduction in MMD (- 0.6, p = 0.028), MHD (- 2.6, p < 0.001), monthly analgesic medications (- 2.0, p < 0.001), and HIT-6 score (- 2.2, p < 0.001) compared to D1, indicating improved effectiveness. The ≥ 50% response rate at weeks 45-48 during the first TrC was 95.5%, while at weeks 45-48 of the second TrC was 99.4%. Corresponding rates at D1 was 20.2% whereas at D2 was 51.6% (p < 0.0001). No statistical difference emerged in ≥ 75% and 100% responders. The relapse rate from episodic migraine to CM at D2 was lower than at D1 (12.3% vs 30.4%; p = 0.0002) Fewer patients experienced relapse from no-MO to MO at D2 compared to D1 (29.5% vs 68.7%; p = 0.00001)., Discussion: A second TrC with anti-CGRP mAbs demonstrated clinical improvements compared to the first one, as indicated by a milder migraine relapse at D2 compared to D1. Multiple TrCs with anti-CGRP mAbs could progressively modify migraine evolution by reducing CGRP-dependent neuroinflammatory nociceptive inputs to the brain., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Menopause, an extremely delicate phase in a woman's life, is characterized by a drop in estrogen levels. This decrease has been associated with the onset of several diseases, including postmenopausal osteoporosis and sarcopenia, which often coexist in the same person, leading to an increased risk of fractures, morbidity, and mortality. To date, there are no approved pharmacological treatments for sarcopenia, while not all of those approved for postmenopausal osteoporosis are beneficial to muscles. In recent years, research has focused on the field of myokines, cytokines, or peptides secreted by skeletal muscle fibers following exercise. Among these, irisin has attracted great interest as it possesses myogenic properties but at the same time exerts anabolic effects on bone and could therefore represent the link between muscle and bone. Therefore, irisin could represent a new therapeutic strategy for the treatment of osteoporosis and also serve as a new biomarker of sarcopenia, thus facilitating diagnosis and pharmacological intervention. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated summary of what we know about the role of irisin in postmenopausal osteoporosis and sarcopenia.

Background: Tactile stimulation manoeuvres stimulate spontaneous breathing in preterm newborns. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of early respiratory physiotherapy on the need for mechanical ventilation during the first week of life in preterm infants with respiratory failure., Methods: This is a monocentric, randomised controlled trial. Preterm infants (gestational age ≤ 30 weeks) not intubated in the delivery room and requiring non-invasive respiratory support at birth were eligible for the study. The intervention group received early respiratory physiotherapy, while the control group received only a daily physiotherapy program (i.e., modifying the infant's posture in accordance with the patient's needs)., Results: between October 2019 and March 2021, 133 preterm infants were studied, 68 infants in the study group and 65 in routine care. The study group showed a reduction in the need for mechanical ventilation (not statistically significant) and a statistically significant reduction in hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus with respect to the control group (19/68 (28%) vs. 35/65 (54%), respectively, p = 0.03)., Conclusions: early respiratory physiotherapy in preterm infants requiring non-invasive respiratory support at birth is safe and has proven to be protective against haemodynamically significant PDA.

Due to its essential role in calcium and phosphate homeostasis, the secosteroid hormone calcitriol has received growing attention over the last few years. Calcitriol, like other steroid hormones, may function through both genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. In the traditional function, the interaction between the biologically active form of vitamin D and the vitamin D receptor (VDR) affects the transcription of thousands of genes by binding to repeated sequences present in their promoter region, named vitamin D-responsive elements (VDREs). Non-transcriptional effects, on the other hand, occur quickly and are unaffected by inhibitors of transcription and protein synthesis. Recently, calcifediol, the immediate precursor metabolite of calcitriol, has also been shown to bind to the VDR with weaker affinity than calcitriol, thus exerting gene-regulatory properties. Moreover, calcifediol may also trigger rapid non-genomic responses through its interaction with specific membrane vitamin D receptors. Membrane-associated VDR (mVDR) and protein disulfide isomerase family A member 3 (Pdia3) are the best-studied candidates for mediating these rapid responses to vitamin D metabolites. This paper provides an overview of the calcifediol-related mechanisms of action, which may help to better understand the vitamin D endocrine system and to identify new therapeutic targets that could be important for treating diseases closely associated with vitamin D deficiency.

Background: Migraine is the second world's cause of disability. Among non-pharmacological treatments, nutritional intervention, particularly ketogenic diet, represents one of the most promising approaches., Methods: This a prospective, single center, randomized, controlled study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a very low-calorie ketogenic diet (VLCKD) compared to a hypocaloric balanced diet (HBD) in migraine prophylaxis in patients affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) with a Body Mass Index (BMI) > 27 kg/m 2 . Fifty-seven patients were randomly assigned to a VLCKD (group 1) or HBD (group 2). Group 1 patients followed a VLCKD for 8 weeks, followed by a low calorie diet (LCD, weeks 9-12), and a HBD (weeks 13-24), whereas group 2 patients followed a HBD from week 0 to 24. Anthropometric indexes, urine and blood chemistry were assessed at enrollment, baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and 24. Migraine characteristics were evaluated at baseline, weeks 8, 12 and 24. Change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) at weeks 5-8 compared to baseline was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints encompassed changes in visual analogue scale (VAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) scores. We also studied effects on circulating lymphocytes and markers of inflammation, changes in plasma aldosterone and renin levels before and after VLCKD or HBD treatment., Results: Reduction from baseline in MMDs was greater in VLCKD compared to HBD group at week 8 (p = 0.008), at week 12 (p = 0.007), when ketosis had been interrupted by carbohydrates reintroduction, and at week 24 (p = 0.042), when all patients were following the same dietary regimen. Quality of life scores (SF-36) were improved in VLCKD group at week 8 and 12, and were also improved in HBD group, but only at week 12. Weight-loss was significantly higher in VLCKD group at week 8 (p = 0.002) and week 12 (p = 0.020). At the end of the study weight loss was maintained in VLCKD group whereas a slight weight regain was observed in HBD group. Inflammatory indexes, namely C reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and total white blood cell count (WBC) were significantly reduced (p < 0.05) in VLCKD group at week 12. Aldosterone plasma level were significantly increased in both groups at week 8, particularly in VLCKD group. However, electrolytes and renin plasma levels were never altered throughout the study in both groups., Conclusions: VLCKD is more effective than HBD in reducing MMD in patients with HFEM and represents an effective prophylaxis in patients with overweight/obesity. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04360148., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To assess the frequency and characteristics of late responders (>12 weeks) to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)., Methods: This is a multicenter (n = 16) prospective real-life study considering all consecutive adults with high-frequency or chronic migraine treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥24 weeks. We defined responder patients with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine/headache days at weeks 9-12 and late responders as those achieving a ≥50% reduction only afterward., Results: A total of 771 people with migraine completed ≥24 weeks of anti-CGRP mAb treatment. Responders at 12 weeks were 65.6% (506/771) of the patients, while nonresponders were 34.4% (265/771). A total of 146 of the 265 nonresponders (55.1%) at 12 weeks responded afterward (late responders): they differed from responders for a higher BMI (+0.78, 95% CI [0.10; 1.45]; p = 0.024), more frequent treatment failures (+0.52, 95% CI [0.09; 0.95]; p = 0.017) and psychiatric comorbidities (+10.1%, 95% CI [0.1; 0.20]; p = 0.041), and less common unilateral pain, alone (-10,9%, 95% CI [-20.5; -1.2]; p = 0.025) or in combination with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms (-12.3%, 95% CI [-20.2;-3.9]; p = 0.006) or allodynia (-10.7, 95% CI [-18.2; -3.2]; p = 0.01)., Discussion: Half of nonresponders to anti-CGRP mAbs at 12 weeks are indeed late responders. Efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs should be assessed at 24 weeks while treatment duration should be extended beyond 12 months., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Parathyroid carcinoma (PC) is an extremely rare malignant tumor of the parathyroid glands, accounting for less than 1% of primary hyperparathyroidism, commonly characterized by severe and unmanageable hypercalcemia, aggressive behavior, high metastatic potential, and poor prognosis. PC manifests prevalently as a sporadic tumor and only occasionally it is part of congenital syndromic and non-syndromic endocrine diseases. Molecular pathogenesis of this form of parathyroid tumor is not fully elucidated and it appears to be caused by multiple genetic and epigenetic drivers, differing among affected patients and not yet clearly stated in distinguishing PC from the benign parathyroid adenoma (PA). Congenital forms of PC have been prevalently associated with germline heterozygous loss-of-function mutations of the CDC73 tumor suppressor gene, both in the context of the hyperparathyroidism jaw-tumor syndrome (HPT-JT) and of the isolated familial hyperparathyroidism (FIPH). Currently, surgical en bloc resection of affected gland(s) and other involved structures is the elective therapy for both primary and recurrent PC. However, it usually results ineffective for advance and metastatic disease, and a high percentage of post-operative recurrence is reported. Targeted medical therapies for surgically untreatable PC, based on the molecular profile of PC samples, are, therefore, needed. The characterization of genetic and epigenetic alterations and deregulated pathways in PC samples will be of fundamental importance to tailor treatment for each patient. Here, we reviewed main findings on molecular pathogenetic aspects of PC, and the current state of the art of therapies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Vitamin D deficiency is a constantly growing health problem worldwide. Adults affected with hypovitaminosis D could experience negative consequences on their musculoskeletal system and extra-skeletal health. In fact, an optimal vitamin D status is essential to ensure the correct bone, calcium, and phosphate homeostasis. To improve vitamin D status, it is important to not only increase the intake of food fortified with vitamin D, but also to administer vitamin D supplementation when required. Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) is the most widely used supplement. In recent years, the administration of calcifediol (25(OH)D3), the direct precursor of the biologically active form of vitamin D3, as oral vitamin D supplementation has progressively grown. Here, we report the potential medical benefits of some peculiar biological actions of calcifediol, discussing the possible specific clinical scenarios in which the oral intake of calcifediol could be most effective to restore the correct serum levels of 25(OH)D3. In summary, the aim of this review is to provide insights into calcifediol-related rapid non-genomic responses and the possible use of this vitamin D metabolite as a supplement for the treatment of people with a higher risk of hypovitaminosis D.

Background: To verify the long-term (24-week) efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fremanezumab in real-life patients with high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM: ≥ 15 days/month), and multiple preventive treatment failures., Methods: This is a prospective, cohort, real-life study at 28 headache centers on consecutive patients affected by HFEM or CM with multiple preventive treatment failures who were prescribed subcutaneous fremanezumab (225 mg monthly/675 mg quarterly) for ≥ 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) in HFEM and monthly headache days (MHDs) in CM at weeks 21-24 compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints encompassed changes in monthly analgesic medications, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responder rates, and variation in NRS, HIT-6 and MIDAS scores at the same time interval. Changes in MMDs/MHDs, monthly analgesic medications, ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responder rates, and variation in NRS and HIT-6 scores at week 4 were also monitored., Results: Four hundred ten patients who had received ≥ 1 dose of fremanezumab were considered for safety analysis while 148 patients treated for ≥ 24 weeks were included in the efficacy analysis. At weeks 21-24, fremanezumab significantly (p < 0.001) reduced MMDs, MHDs, monthly analgesic medications and NRS, HIT-6, and MIDAS scores in both HFEM and CM compared to baseline. The proportions of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75% and 100% responders at weeks 21-24were 75.0%, 30.8%, 9.6% (HFEM), and 72.9, 44.8 and 1% (CM). A significant (p < 0.001) decrease in MMDs, MHDs, monthly analgesic medications and NRS, HIT-6, and MIDAS scores in both HFEM and CM was already present at week 4. The proportions of ≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, and 100% responders at week 4 were 67.6%, 32.4%, 11.8% (HFEM) and 67.3%, 40%, 1.8% (CM). CM remitted to episodic migraine and medication overuse to no-medication overuse in 83.3 and 75% of patients at week 24, and in 80 and 72.4% at week 4. Adverse events were rare (2.4%), mild and transient. No patient discontinued treatment for any reason., Conclusions: Fremanezumab is characterized by an early and sustained efficacy in HFEM and CM patients with multiple preventive treatment failures in real-life, revealing an optimal safety and tolerability profile., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Extremely preterm infants frequently require some form of respiratory assistance to facilitate the cardiopulmonary transition that occurs in the first hours of life. Current resuscitation guidelines identify as a primary determinant of overall newborn survival the establishment, immediately after birth, of adequate lung inflation and ventilation to ensure an adequate functional residual capacity. Any respiratory support provided, however, is an important contributing factor to the development of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. The risks correlated to invasive ventilatory techniques increase inversely with gestational age. Preterm infants are born at an early stage of lung development and are more susceptible to lung injury deriving from mechanical ventilation. Any approach aiming to reduce the global burden of preterm lung disease must implement lung-protective ventilation strategies that begin from the newborn's first breaths in the delivery room. Neonatologists today must be able to manage both invasive and noninvasive forms of respiratory assistance to treat a spectrum of lung diseases ranging from acute to chronic conditions. We searched PubMed for articles on preterm infant respiratory assistance. Our narrative review provides an evidence-based overview on the respiratory management of preterm infants, especially in the acute phase of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, starting from the delivery room and continuing in the neonatal intensive care unit, including a section regarding exogenous surfactant therapy.

Osteoporosis is characterized by the alteration of bone homeostasis due to an imbalance between osteoclastic bone resorption and osteoblastic bone formation. Estrogen deficiency causes bone loss and postmenopausal osteoporosis, the pathogenesis of which also involves oxidative stress, inflammatory processes, and the dysregulation of the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs) that control gene expression at post-transcriptional levels. Oxidative stress, due to an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), proinflammatory mediators and altered levels of miRNAs enhance osteoclastogenesis and reduce osteoblastogenesis through mechanisms involving the activation of MAPK and transcription factors. The present review summarizes the principal molecular mechanisms involved in the role of ROS and proinflammatory cytokines on osteoporosis. Moreover, it highlights the interplay among altered miRNA levels, oxidative stress, and an inflammatory state. In fact, ROS, by activating the transcriptional factors, can affect miRNA expression, and miRNAs can regulate ROS production and inflammatory processes. Therefore, the present review should help in identifying targets for the development of new therapeutic approaches to osteoporotic treatment and improve the quality of life of patients.

Background and Purpose: To evaluate the 1-year effectiveness and tolerability of galcanezumab in real life and the prognostic indicators of persistent response., Methods: High-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients treated with galcanezumab who completed a 1-year observation were enrolled. The primary outcomes assessed during the 12 months (V1-V12) were the change in monthly migraine days (MMDs) from baseline and the response rates ≥50% in MMDs (MMD ≥50% RR). The secondary outcomes were changes in pain intensity (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and in monthly acute medication intake (MAMI)., Results: We enrolled 191 patients (77.5% CM). Twenty-three patients (12%) dropped out, two for nonserious adverse events. At least 40% of patients took add-on standard preventives from baseline to V12. At V12, MMDs were reduced by 6.0 days in HFEM and by 11.9 days in CM patients (both p < 0.00001); NRS and MAMI were also decreased in both groups (p < 0.00001). One-hundred eight (56.5%) patients presented MMD ≥50% RR for 9 cumulative months (interquartile range=8): we defined this value as the cutoff for a persistent response. Persistent responders were less likely to have a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.007) but more frequently had a good response to triptans (p = 0.005) and MMD ≥50% RR at V1 (p < 0.0000001). Patients without a persistent response were on add-on therapy for longer periods of time (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Galcanezumab was effective and well-tolerated in the 1-year term, with most patients presenting MMD ≥50% RR for at least 9 months. Triptan response, lower BMI, and MMD ≥50% RR in the first month emerged as predictive factors for a persistent response., (© 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.)

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a malignancy accounting for only 3% of total cancers, but with a low 5-year relative survival rate. Approximately 80% of PC patients are diagnosed at a late stage when the disease has already spread from the primary site. Despite advances in PC treatment, there is an urgently needed for the identification of novel therapeutic strategies for PC, particularly for patients who cannot undergo classical surgery. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved process used by cells to adapt to metabolic stress via the degrading or recycling of damaged or unnecessary organelles and cellular components. This process is elevated in PC and, thus, it contributes to the onset, progression, and cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy in pancreatic tumors. Autophagy inhibition has been shown to lead to cancer regression and to increase the sensitivity of pancreatic cells to radiation and chemotherapy. Emerging studies have focused on the roles of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as miRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and circular RNAs, in PC development and progression. Furthermore, ncRNAs have been reported as crucial regulators of many biological processes, including autophagy, suggesting that ncRNA-based autophagy targeting methods could be promising novel molecular approaches for specifically reducing autophagic flux, thus improving the management of PC patients. In this review, we briefly summarize the existing studies regarding the role and the regulatory mechanisms of autophagy-related ncRNAs in the context of this cancer.