Search

We characterised the bioavailability, safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam 100 mg intravenous bolus and 15-min infusion versus oral reference tablet in 24 healthy Japanese participants.In this randomised, open-label, three-period crossover study, participants received three 100 mg single doses of brivaracetam, intravenous bolus, infusion, and oral tablets. Maximum plasma concentration (C

11C-UCB-J is a positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand that has been used in humans for synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) imaging and as a potential synaptic density marker. The centrum semiovale (CS) is a proposed reference region for noninvasive quantification of11C-UCB-J, due to negligible concentrations of SV2A in this region in baboon brain assessed by in vitro methods. However, in displacement scans with SV2A-specific drug levetiracetam in humans, a decrease in11C-UCB-J concentration was observed in the CS, consistent with some degree of specific binding. The current study aims to validate the CS as a reference region by (1) optimizing CS region of interest (ROI) to minimize spill-in from gray matter with high radioactivity concentrations; (2) investigating convergence of CS ROI values using ordered subset expectation maximization (OS-EM) reconstruction, and (3) comparing baseline CS volume of distribution ( VT) to nondisplaceable uptake in gray matter, VND. Improving ROI definition and increasing OS-EM iterations during reconstruction decreased the difference between CS VTand VND. However, even with these corrections, CS VToverestimated VNDby ∼35–40%. These measures showed significant correlation, suggesting that, though biased, the CS may be a useful estimate of nondisplaceable uptake, allowing for noninvasive quantification for SV2A PET.

Objective This trial evaluated the short-term safety and tolerability, steady-state pharmacokinetics, and preliminary efficacy of brivaracetam oral solution in children aged 1 month to

Summary Objective Brivaracetam (BRV) and levetiracetam (LEV) are antiepileptic drugs that bind synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A). In vitro and in vivo animal studies suggest faster brain penetration and SV2A occupancy (SO) after dosing with BRV than LEV. We evaluated human brain penetration and SO time course of BRV and LEV at therapeutically relevant doses using the SV2A positron emission tomography (PET) tracer 11C‐UCB‐J (EP0074; NCT02602860). Methods Healthy volunteers were recruited into three cohorts. Cohort 1 (n = 4) was examined with PET at baseline and during displacement after intravenous BRV (100 mg) or LEV (1500 mg). Cohort 2 (n = 5) was studied during displacement and 4 hours postdose (BRV 50‐200 mg or LEV 1500 mg). Cohort 3 (n = 4) was examined at baseline and steady state after 4 days of twice‐daily oral dosing of BRV (50‐100 mg) and 4 hours postdose of LEV (250‐600 mg). Half‐time of 11C‐UCB‐J signal change was computed from displacement measurements. Half‐saturation concentrations (IC 50) were determined from calculated SO. Results Observed tracer displacement half‐times were 18 ± 6 minutes for BRV (100 mg, n = 4), 9.7 and 10.1 minutes for BRV (200 mg, n = 2), and 28 ± 6 minutes for LEV (1500 mg, n = 6). Estimated corrected half‐times were 8 minutes shorter. The SO was 66%‐70% for 100 mg intravenous BRV, 84%‐85% for 200 mg intravenous BRV, and 78%‐84% for intravenous 1500 mg LEV. The IC 50 of BRV (0.46 μg/mL) was 8.7‐fold lower than of LEV (4.02 μg/mL). BRV data fitted a single SO versus plasma concentration relationship. Steady state SO for 100 mg BRV was 86%‐87% (peak) and 76%‐82% (trough). Significance BRV achieves high SO more rapidly than LEV when intravenously administered at therapeutic doses. Thus, BRV may have utility in treating acute seizures; further clinical studies are needed for confirmation.

A combined adult and pediatric population pharmacokinetic model including covariate effects was developed; simulations were subsequently performed to guide intravenous pediatric dosing adaptations. Two pharmacokinetic trials with sparse blood sampling were conducted in children with epilepsy and two trials in healthy adults with serial blood sampling. Lacosamide plasma concentration-time data were available from 43 healthy adults (18-45 years of age; body weight 50-101 kg; n = 1735 concentration vs time records), and from 79 children with epilepsy (6 months-17 years of age; body weight 6-76 kg; n = 402 concentration vs time records), with 14, 22, 25 and 18 participants in age groups2 years, 2 to6 years, 6 to12 years and 12 to18 years, respectively. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Plasma clearance was scaled using a fixed allometric exponent on body weight, while central volume of distribution used a freely estimated allometric exponent. The model-based pharmacokinetic predictions suggested that there is no need to adapt the recommendations regarding intravenous infusion durations in children compared with adults.

A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model including covariate effects was developed using data from 2 clinical trials in pediatric patients with epilepsy (SP0847 and SP1047). Lacosamide plasma concentration-time data (n = 402) were available from 79 children with body weights ranging from 6 to 76 kg, and a balanced age distribution (6 months to

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a new high affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand recently approved for adults with partial-onset seizures. As a support to in vitro metabolism assays, a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method coupled to off-line solid phase extraction (SPE) was developed to quantify BRV acid metabolites, that is, BRV-AC (carboxylic derivative derived from BRV hydrolysis) and BRV-OHAC (corresponding to hydroxylated BRV-AC). The method was validated for various incubates (liver and kidney tissue homogenates and blood, all from humans) and applied to in vitro metabolism assays. The analytes were isolated from buffered samples using ISOLUTE C8 96-well SPE plates. Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Waters Atlantis T3 C18 analytical column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 5 μm) with detection accomplished using a Waters Premier tandem mass spectrometer in positive ion electrospray and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The standard curves, which ranged from 1.00 to 200 ng/mL for BRV-AC, BRV-OHAC, were fitted to a 1/x2 weighted linear regression model. The intra-assay precision and inter-assay precision (expressed as coefficient of variation -%CV) were

Brivaracetam is a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, recently approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of focal (partial-onset) seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy. The goal of the present analysis was to determine if the dose-response of brivaracetam as monotherapy would fall within the range associated with brivaracetam efficacy as adjunctive therapy. An existing brivaracetam population pharmacokinetic model consisting of first-order absorption, single compartment distribution, and first-order elimination components was extended by estimating the clearance changes due to co-administration of 12 widely prescribed AEDs. Data for the population pharmacokinetic analysis originated from three Phase III add-on trials and two terminated Phase III monotherapy trials. An existing population model of daily seizure rate versus brivaracetam daily average concentration was applied to the data from the three add-on trials. Simulations allowed the assessment of the combined impact of covariate effects on both the pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics of brivaracetam, and indicated that in the absence of other AEDs, only marginal changes in the overall dose-response relationship would be expected. This suggests that brivaracetam can be used as monotherapy without dose modifications.

Introduction Prediction of brivaracetam effects in children was obtained by scaling an existing adult pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for brivaracetam to children, using an existing population PK model for brivaracetam in children. The scaling was supported by estimating the change from adults to children in the concentration–effect relationship parameters for levetiracetam, a compound interacting with the same target protein (synaptic vesicle protein SV2A). Methods The existing adult PK/PD model for brivaracetam was applied to a combined adult–pediatric dataset of levetiracetam. This model was then used to predict the effective oral twice-daily dose of brivaracetam in children aged ≥4 to

Objectives To quantify the relationship between exposure to lacosamide monotherapy and seizure probability, and to simulate the effect of changing the dose regimen. Methods Structural time-to-event models for dropouts (not because of a lack of efficacy) and seizures were developed using data from 883 adult patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy and experiencing focal or generalized tonic–clonic seizures, participating in a trial (SP0993; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01243177) comparing the efficacy of lacosamide and carbamazepine controlled-release monotherapy. Lacosamide dropout and seizure models were used for simulating the effect of changing the initial target dose on seizure freedom. Results Repeated time-to-seizure data were described by a Weibull distribution with parameters estimated separately for the first and subsequent seizures. Daily area under the plasma concentration–time curve was related linearly to the log-hazard. Disease severity, expressed as the number of seizures during the 3 months before the trial (baseline), was a strong predictor of seizure probability: patients with 7–50 seizures at baseline had a 2.6-fold (90% confidence interval 2.01–3.31) higher risk of seizures compared with the reference two to six seizures. Simulations suggested that a 400-mg/day, rather than a 200-mg/day initial target dose for patients with seven or more seizures at baseline could potentially result in an additional 8% of seizure-free patients for 6 months at the last evaluated dose level. Patients receiving lacosamide had a slightly lower dropout risk compared with those receiving carbamazepine. Conclusion Baseline disease severity was the most important predictor of seizure probability. Simulations suggest that an initial target dose >200 mg/day could potentially benefit patients with greater disease severity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-017-0530-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

(11)C-UCB-J is a positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand that has been used in humans for synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) imaging and as a potential synaptic density marker. The centrum semiovale (CS) is a proposed reference region for noninvasive quantification of (11)C-UCB-J, due to negligible concentrations of SV2A in this region in baboon brain assessed by in vitro methods. However, in displacement scans with SV2A-specific drug levetiracetam in humans, a decrease in (11)C-UCB-J concentration was observed in the CS, consistent with some degree of specific binding. The current study aims to validate the CS as a reference region by (1) optimizing CS region of interest (ROI) to minimize spill-in from gray matter with high radioactivity concentrations; (2) investigating convergence of CS ROI values using ordered subset expectation maximization (OS-EM) reconstruction, and (3) comparing baseline CS volume of distribution (V(T)) to nondisplaceable uptake in gray matter, V(ND). Improving ROI definition and increasing OS-EM iterations during reconstruction decreased the difference between CS V(T) and V(ND). However, even with these corrections, CS V(T) overestimated V(ND) by ∼35–40%. These measures showed significant correlation, suggesting that, though biased, the CS may be a useful estimate of nondisplaceable uptake, allowing for noninvasive quantification for SV2A PET.

Objective To assess the effect of brivaracetam (BRV) on steady-state plasma concentrations of commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods Data were pooled from five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy studies (NCT00175929, NCT00175825, NCT00490035, NCT00464269, and NCT01261325) in which adults with refractory epilepsy, and receiving stable doses of 1–2 AEDs, initiated adjunctive treatment with BRV (or placebo) for up to 12 weeks, following a 4–8 week baseline period. Concentrations of carbamazepine, carbamazepine epoxide, clobazam, clonazepam, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine (MHD), phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, topiramate, valproic acid and zonisamide, were measured during baseline and during BRV or placebo evaluation periods. Log-transformed data for patients receiving BRV dosages of 50–200 mg/day (or placebo) were evaluated using repeated measures analysis of covariance. Geometric least-squares means ratios of respective AED concentrations (treatment vs baseline) and their 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Relevant interaction of BRV on the respective AED was inferred if CIs were entirely outside of 0.80–1.25 limits. Results Within the population for analysis (n = 1402), relevant interaction was observed for carbamazepine epoxide alone which increased up to 2-fold from baseline due to inhibition of epoxide hydrolase by BRV, and the effect size was not influenced by concomitant valproic acid. Relevant interaction was not observed for other AEDs. Conclusion In adults with focal seizures, adjunctive BRV treatment does not affect plasma concentrations of the evaluated AEDs but increases carbamazepine epoxide metabolite. Carbamazepine dose reduction should be considered if tolerability issues arise.

Objective This Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study investigated the effects of steady-state brivaracetam on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy, with and without valproate co-administration. Valproate and brivaracetam inhibit epoxide hydrolase and increase carbamazepine epoxide levels. Methods Adult patients with epilepsy being chronically treated with carbamazepine alone (n = 9) or with carbamazepine and valproate (n = 9) received brivaracetam during successive 1-week periods at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, and 100 mg twice daily (bid). Doses of carbamazepine and valproate must have been stable for at least 3 months. Trough plasma concentrations of carbamazepine, carbamazepine epoxide, and diol metabolites were determined on Days 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, and at the end of study visit (ESV, 2–3 weeks later). Results Eighteen patients with median (range) age of 45 (20–62) years and body weight of 74 (59–124) kg were enrolled and completed the study. In patients treated with carbamazepine alone, brivaracetam dose-dependently increased mean trough levels of carbamazepine epoxide from 1.38 μg/mL on Day 1 pre-dose to 2.16 μg/mL (+57%) on Day 8 (50 mg bid), 2.72 μg/mL (+97%) on Day 15 (100 mg bid), 3.02 μg/mL (+119%) on Day 22 (200 mg bid), 2.67 μg/mL (+94%) on Day 29 (100 mg bid), and 1.22 μg/mL (−12%) at ESV, respectively. In patients on carbamazepine and valproate, carbamazepine epoxide increased from 1.98 μg/mL at baseline to 2.72 μg/mL (+37%), 3.70 μg/mL (+87%), 4.43 μg/mL (+124%), 3.11 μg/mL (+57%), and 1.94 μg/mL (−2%), respectively. There was no trend for change in carbamazepine, carbamazepine diol or valproate levels. Brivaracetam levels increased linearly with dose. Brivaracetam was well tolerated. Conclusions Carbamazepine epoxide plasma concentrations were approximately doubled by brivaracetam 100 or 200 mg bid. Data are consistent with a dose-dependent and reversible inhibition of epoxide hydrolase by brivaracetam. Carbamazepine epoxide was approximately 0.7 μg/mL higher in presence of valproate. There is no need to limit brivaracetam dosing when used concomitantly with carbamazepine.

1. This phase-I study (NCT02240290) was designed to investigate the human absorption, disposition and mass balance of 14C-tozadenant, a novel A2a receptor antagonist in clinical development for Parkinson s disease. 2. Six healthy male subjects received a single oral dose of tozadenant (240 mg containing 81.47 KBq of [14C]-tozadenant). Blood, urine and feces were collected over 14 days. Radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting or accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS). Tozadenant and metabolites were characterized using HPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-AMS with fraction collection. 3. At 4 h, the Cmax of tozadenant was 1.74 μg/mL and AUC(0-t) 35.0 h μg/mL, t1/2 15 h, Vz/F 1.82 L/kg and CL/F 1.40 mL/min/kg. For total [14C] radioactivity, the Cmax was 2.29 μg eq/mL at 5 h post-dose and AUC(0-t) 43.9 h μg eq/mL. Unchanged tozadenant amounted to 93% of the radiocarbon AUC(0-48h). At 312 h post-dose, cumulative urinary and fecal excretion of radiocarbon reached 30.5% and 55.1% of the dose, respectively. Unchanged tozadenant reached 11% in urine and 12% of the dose in feces. Tozadenant was excreted as metabolites, including di-and mono-hydroxylated metabolites, N/O dealkylated metabolites, hydrated metabolites. 4. The only identified species circulating in plasma was unchanged tozadenant. Tozadenant was primarily excreted in urine and feces in the form of metabolites.

Brivaracetam is an antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated for the treatment of focal seizures, with improved safety and tolerability vs first-generation AEDs. Brivaracetam binds with high affinity to synaptic vesicle protein 2A in the brain, which confers its antiseizure activity. Brivaracetam is rapidly absorbed and extensively biotransformed, and exhibits linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics at therapeutic doses. Brivaracetam does not interact with most metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters, and therefore does not interfere with drugs that use these metabolic routes. The favorable pharmacokinetic profile of brivaracetam and lack of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with commonly prescribed AEDs or oral contraceptives allows administration without dose adjustment, and avoids potential untoward events from decreased efficacy of an AED or oral contraceptive due to a drug-drug interaction. Few agents have been reported to affect the pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam. The strong enzyme-inducing AEDs carbamazepine, phenytoin and phenobarbital/primidone have been shown to moderately lower brivaracetam plasma concentrations, with no adjustment of brivaracetam dose needed. Dose adjustment should be considered when brivaracetam is coadministered with the more potent CYP inducer, rifampin. Additionally, caution should be used when adding or ending treatment with the strong enzyme inducer, St. John's wort. In summary, brivaracetam (50-200 mg/day) has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and is associated with few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

This phase I, open-label study investigated the effects of steady-state brivaracetam administration on steady-state pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, and steady-state carbamazepine administration on single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam, in 14 healthy participants who received brivaracetam 200mg single doses on days 1 and 22, and 200mg twice daily (bid) on days 24-35; and were titrated to carbamazepine 300mg bid on days 4-35. Brivaracetam did not significantly alter carbamazepine area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over a dosing interval, but resulted in a 2.6-fold increase in carbamazepine-epoxide. Carbamazepine decreased brivaracetam AUC by 29%, while hydroxy-brivaracetam metabolite was increased by 17%. Urinary 6β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio was unchanged by brivaracetam, but was increased 3-fold by carbamazepine. In vitro hydrolysis of carbamazepine-epoxide in human hepatocytes was inhibited by brivaracetam, with an IC50 of 8.2μM. Brivaracetam 200mg bid was predicted to increase carbamazepine-epoxide by 2.3-fold, in close agreement with the observed value. In conclusion, brivaracetam did not modify carbamazepine exposure but increased carbamazepine-epoxide. Carbamazepine modestly decreased brivaracetam exposure and increased oxidative metabolism.

This double-blind, randomized, three-way crossover study explored the potential pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between ethanol and brivaracetam in 18 healthy males, as required for the development of CNS-active drugs. Subjects received (A) ethanol+brivaracetam, (B) ethanol placebo+brivaracetam and (C) ethanol+brivaracetam placebo. Ethanol was infused as a 5.5-hour intravenous clamp with the first 0.5-hour as loading phase to a target level of 0.6 g/L, and brivaracetam was orally administered as a single 200 mg dose. No relevant pharmacokinetic interactions were observed. Co-administration of brivaracetam and ethanol resulted in decreased saccadic peak velocity, smooth pursuit, adaptive tracking and VAS alertness, and increased body sway, saccadic reaction time and VAS score for ethanol effect compared with brivaracetam alone or ethanol alone. Additionally, the immediate word recall scores were generally lower when brivaracetam was co-administered with ethanol, whereas the delayed word test did not show clear additional effects. A post-hoc exploratory analysis for supra-additivity suggested that most pharmacodynamic effects were likely to be additive in nature, except for adaptive tracking, which appeared to be slightly supra-additive. In conclusion, brivaracetam increased ethanol effects on psychomotor function, attention and memory in healthy males. Intake of brivaracetam with alcohol is not recommended.

“No research without trained researchers” has become the mantra of the EU-funded Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) education and training projects. However, it is often hard to determine the type of training required at different stages of a scientist’s career. The situation is further complicated by the constantly changing environment, e.g. the growth of disruptive technologies, societal expectations of biomedical sciences, the greater need for multi-disciplinary collaborations, and conservative or changing regulatory requirements. This article summarises the experience from a series of five EMTRAIN Public Private Partnership PhD workshops that included both scientific and transferrable skill training. This is followed by an example of a recently developed training programme, including a competency profile, for translational research and medicines development; the C-COMEND teaching programme. The emphasis is on competencies as a new currency for continuing professional development. Finally, this paper describes what we consider to be the next steps required by the scientific community to address solutions to the current training challenges so that society can benefit from the innovations that only science can provide.

Purpose The aims of the study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of orally administered brivaracetam in paediatric patients and to provide dosing suggestions. Methods Analysis included 600 brivaracetam plasma concentrations from a phase 2a study (NCT00422422; N01263) in 96 paediatric patients with epilepsy aged 1 month to 16 years, taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using non-linear mixed effects modelling, and a stepwise covariate search was used to determine factors influencing brivaracetam clearance. Simulations were performed to investigate dosing regimens. Results The final model consisted of first-order absorption, single compartment distribution and first-order elimination components with allometric scaling of clearance and volume using lean body weight and fixed allometric exponents. Co-administration with phenobarbital or carbamazepine was associated with a 29% (95%CI 17%/39%) and 32% (22%/42%) decrease in exposure, respectively. Co-administration with valproate was associated with an 11% (1%/23%) increase in exposure. Simulations demonstrated that the majority of children were predicted to have an exposure similar to that in adults, using an age-independent dosing regimen of 2.0 mg/kg bid with a maximum of 100 mg bid for body weight >50 kg. Conclusions A paediatric dose adaptation of 2.0 mg/kg twice daily with a maximum of 100 mg twice daily for body weight >50 kg is predicted to ensure steady-state plasma concentrations in the same range as in adult patients receiving 100 mg twice daily (highest recommended dose). Data suggest no need to change brivaracetam dosing when used concomitantly with carbamazepine, phenobarbital or valproate. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2230-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

1. This phase-I study (NCT02240290) was designed to investigate the human absorption, disposition and mass balance of

Summary Objective To determine the bioequivalence of brivaracetam oral tablet formulations (10, 75, and 100 mg) versus 50 mg oral tablet and to compare the bioavailability of brivaracetam 100 mg intravenous (i.v.) bolus versus 50 and 100 mg tablets, in healthy participants. Methods Phase 1, randomized, open-label, five-period crossover study. Participants received five single doses of brivaracetam: 10, 50 (reference), 75, and 100 mg oral tablets; 100 mg, i.v., bolus injection. Pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration [Cmax], area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of last quantifiable concentration [AUCt], area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity [AUCinf]) were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) following dose normalization and logarithmic transformation. Bioavailability comparisons were based on the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) around the geometric least squares mean ratios (test: reference). Results Twenty-five participants were randomized. The 90% CIs around Cmax, AUCt, and AUCinf ratios for brivaracetam 10, 75, and 100 mg tablets versus 50 mg tablet were entirely contained within the bioequivalence limits (0.8000–1.2500). For brivaracetam 100 mg, i.v., bolus, bioequivalence versus 50 and 100 mg tablets was met for AUCt and AUCinf, but Cmax was partly outside the limits (90% CI: 1.1867–1.3863 and 1.1222–1.3136, respectively). Significance Brivaracetam 10, 75, and 100 mg tablets were bioequivalent to the 50 mg tablet. Brivaracetam 100 mg, i.v., bolus had bioavailability similar to that of 50 and 100 mg tablets.

Brivaracetam is a selective high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, recently approved as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of partial-onset (focal) seizures in patients 16 years of age and older with epilepsy. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model and a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model were developed describing brivaracetam plasma concentration and the relationship with daily seizure counts in adequate well-controlled efficacy trials. The effect of body weight on clearance and volume was implemented using allometric scaling, and a range of covariates were investigated for their influence on brivaracetam clearance. The PKPD model described daily seizure counts using a negative binomial distribution, taking previous day seizures into account, and using a mixture model to separate "placebo-like" and "response" subpopulations. The PK and PKPD models provided a good description of the data, documented using visual predictive checks. Coadministration with carbamazepine, phenytoin, and phenobarbital decreased brivaracetam exposure by 26%, 21%, and 19%, respectively, without significant effects on PD response. Covariate analysis indicated that levetiracetam coadministration reduced the fraction of subjects in the mixture model response population to 4% and identified baseline seizure frequency as a strong predictor for being assigned to the mixture model response population. Simulation allowed characterization of the dose-response curve, suggesting maximum response is obtained at brivaracetam 150-200 mg/day.

Brivaracetam (BRV) is a high-affinity synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand developed for the treatment of uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. The present phase I, open-label, two-way crossover study was designed to assess the effect of rifampin on the pharmacokinetics of BRV and its hydroxy (BRV-OH), acid (BRV-AC), and hydroxy acid (BRV-OHAC) metabolites. Twenty-six healthy subjects received BRV (150-mg single oral dose) either alone or following 5 days of rifampin 600 mg/day. BRV and its metabolites were examined for their plasma profiles and urinary excretion. Pharmacokinetic modeling was developed to estimate the rate constants of the various metabolic routes. Parallel in vitro assays were conducted to characterize the hydrolysis of BRV to BRV-AC as well as to identify any potential effect of rifampin on the hydrolysis reaction. Rifampin did not significantly affect the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of BRV, but decreased its area under the curve (AUC) by 45%. In addition, rifampin significantly increased the AUC of BRV-OH (+109%), decreased the AUC of BRV-AC (-53%), but had little effect on BRV-OHAC (-10%). In vitro assays showed that the major urinary metabolite BRV-AC (33% of the dose) was likely to be formed by amidase EC 3.5.1.4. In vitro data indicated that the enzyme was not significantly inhibited nor induced by rifampin. Modeling confirmed that all of the observed changes in vivo were secondary to the induction of the CYP2C19-mediated hydroxylation of BRV to BRV-OH (3.7-fold increase in the rate constant).

SummaryObjective Rapid distribution to the brain is a prerequisite for antiepileptic drugs used for treatment of acute seizures. The preclinical studies described here investigated the high-affinity synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) antiepileptic drug brivara-cetam (BRV) for its rate of brain penetration and its onset of action. BRV was compared with levetiracetam (LEV). Methods In vitro permeation studies were performed using Caco-2 cells. Plasma and brain levels were measured over time after single oral dosing to audiogenic mice and were correlated with anticonvulsant activity. Tissue distribution was investigated after single dosing to rat (BRV and LEV) and dog (LEV only). Positron emission tomography (PET) displacement studies were performed in rhesus monkeys using the SV2A PET tracer [11C]UCB-J. The time course of PET tracer displacement was measured following single intravenous (IV) dosing with LEV or BRV. Rodent distribution data and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling were used to compute blood–brain barrier permeability (permeability surface area product, PS) values and then predict brain kinetics in man. Results In rodents, BRV consistently showed a faster entry into the brain than LEV; this correlated with a faster onset of action against seizures in audiogenic susceptible mice. The higher permeability of BRV was also demonstrated in human cells in vitro. PBPK modeling predicted that, following IV dosing to human subjects, BRV might distribute to the brain within a few minutes compared with approximately 1 h for LEV (PS of 0.315 and 0.015 ml/min/g for BRV and LEV, respectively). These data were supported by a nonhuman primate PET study showing faster SV2A occupancy by BRV compared with LEV. Significance These preclinical data demonstrate that BRV has rapid brain entry and fast brain SV2A occupancy, consistent with the fast onset of action in the audiogenic seizure mice assay. The potential benefit of BRV for treatment of acute seizures remains to be confirmed in clinical studies.

Levetiracetam is available in China as adjunctive oral therapy for partial-onset seizures. This study was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence between single-dose intravenous infusion and oral levetiracetam 1500 mg (Part A), and to assess the pharmacokinetics of multiple-dose intravenous infusion at the same dose (Part B) in healthy Chinese subjects. Part A was an open-label, crossover comparison (intravenous vs. oral), while Part B was a double-blind, parallel-group study of intravenous levetiracetam versus intravenous placebo administered for 5 days. Bioequivalence was demonstrated between the 45-min intravenous infusion and oral tablets, with geometric mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) from time 0 to infinity (AUC∞) 492.3 and 506.8 μg⋅h/mL, and geometric mean maximum concentration (C max) 65.12 and 55.93 μg/mL for intravenous infusion and oral dosing, respectively. Linear pharmacokinetics were demonstrated (geometric least-squares mean AUC during the dosing interval τ at steady state (AUC τ,ss) 475.6 μg⋅h/mL; geometric least-squares mean AUC∞ after single dose 501.7 μg⋅h/mL; linearity factor = 0.948). Geometric mean C max (77.44 μg/mL) and AUC τ,ss (475.6 μg⋅h/mL) of intravenous infusion levetiracetam 1500 mg after multiple doses were within the expected range, based on their respective single-dose values and the terminal half-life of levetiracetam after a single dose (7.13 h). A theoretical accumulation of approximately 40 % would be expected after multiple doses, which is consistent with the calculated accumulation of 18.0 and 43.5 % (R max and R AUC, respectively). Intravenous infusion of levetiracetam is bioequivalent to oral levetiracetam in healthy Chinese subjects and is a suitable alternative for levetiracetam administration in patients who are temporarily unable to take their medication orally.

The prosperity of a country is closely related to its level of education to fuel research and innovation. Doctoral graduates have attained the highest education level and should be the key players in research and innovation. The number of doctoral graduates is increasing rapidly in most/many countries, but is less well correlated to changes in prosperity of a country.The innovative medicines initiative (IMI) was established to help Europe strengthen its position in biomedical research and development. During its planning stage IMI observed large gaps in the scientific interaction between academia and industry in Europe, and that undergraduate students were not realizing the career opportunities within biomedical R&D. A major objective for the education and training section of IMI, the European Medicines Research Training Network (EMTRAIN, http://www.emtrain.eu), has therefore been to work out a framework for public private partnership PhD (PPP-PhD) and to create a cohort of networking, industry-aware scientists.