Search

Your search keyword '"Anna Van 'T Veer"' showing total 14 results
Start Over Author "Anna Van 'T Veer" Publication Year Range Last 10 years
14 results on '"Anna Van 'T Veer"'

1. Deciding What to Replicate

Author

Daniel Lakens, Ivan Ropovik, Marco Perugini, Joachim I. Krueger, Marek A. Vranka, Anna van 't Veer, K. Andrew DeSoto, Peder M. Isager, Robbie C. M. van Aert, Roger Giner-Sorolla, Mark J. Brandt, Štěpán Bahník, Human Technology Interaction, and Department of Methodology and Statistics

Subjects
bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, MetaArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Statistics and Probability|Design of Experiments and Sample Surveys, Expected utility, Computer science, Decision theory, media_common.quotation_subject, Replication, Replication value, Replication (computing), MetaArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Resource (project management), Risk analysis (engineering), Study selection, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Statistics and Probability, MetaArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Statistics and Probability, Psychology (miscellaneous), Function (engineering), Decision model, bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Statistics and Probability|Design of Experiments and Sample Surveys, Selection (genetic algorithm), Expected utility hypothesis, media_common, Causal model
Abstract

Robust scientific knowledge is contingent upon replication of original findings. However, replicating researchers are constrained by resources, and will almost always have to choose one replication effort to focus on from a set of potential candidates. To select a candidate efficiently in these cases, we need methods for deciding which out of all candidates considered would be the most useful to replicate, given some overall goal researchers wish to achieve. In this article we assume that the overall goal researchers wish to achieve is to maximize the utility gained by conducting the replication study. We then propose a general rule for study selection in replication research based on the replication value of the set of claims considered for replication. The replication value of a claim is defined as the maximum expected utility we could gain by conducting a replication of the claim, and is a function of (a) the value of being certain about the claim, and (b) uncertainty about the claim based on current evidence. We formalize this definition in terms of a causal decision model, utilizing concepts from decision theory and causal graph modeling. We discuss the validity of using replication value as a measure of expected utility gain, and we suggest approaches for deriving quantitative estimates of replication value. Our goal in this article is not to define concrete guidelines for study selection, but to provide the necessary theoretical foundations on which such concrete guidelines could be built.Translational Abstract Replication-redoing a study using the same procedures-is an important part of checking the robustness of claims in the psychological literature. The practice of replicating original studies has been woefully devalued for many years, but this is now changing. Recent calls for improving the quality of research in psychology has generated a surge of interest in funding, conducting, and publishing replication studies. Because many studies have never been replicated, and researchers have limited time and money to perform replication studies, researchers must decide which studies are the most important to replicate. This way scientists learn the most, given limited resources. In this article, we lay out what it means to think about what is the most important thing to replicate, and we propose a general decision rule for picking a study to replicate. That rule depends on a concept we call replication value. Replication value is a function of the importance of the study, and how uncertain we are about the findings. In this article we explain how researchers can think precisely about the value of replication studies. We then discuss when and how it makes sense to use replication value as a measure of how valuable a replication study would be, and we discuss factors that funders, journals, or scientists could consider when determining how valuable a replication study is.

Published
2023

2. Selecting Studies for Replication in Social Neuroscience: Exploring a Formal Approach

Author

Isager, Peder M., Anna Van 'T Veer, Lakens, Daniel, and Van Leeuwen, Thed N

Subjects
replication, MetaArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, fMRI, social neuroscience, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, study selection, replication value
Abstract

Replication of published results is crucial for ensuring the robustness and self-correction of research, yet replications are scarce in many fields. Replicating researchers will therefore often have to decide which of several relevant candidates to target for replication. Formal strategies for efficient study selection have been proposed, but none have been explored for practical feasibility–a prerequisite for validation. Here we move one step closer to efficient replication study selection by exploring the feasibility of a particular selection strategy that estimates replication value as a function of citation impact and sample size (Isager, van ’t Veer, & Lakens, 2021) in the field of social neuroscience, where replication seems especially important. We first report our efforts to generate a representative candidate set of replication targets in social fMRI research. We then explore the feasibility and reliability of estimating replication value for the targets in our set, resulting in a dataset of 1358 studies ranked on their value of prioritising them for replication. In addition, we carefully examine possible measures, test auxiliary assumptions, and identify boundary conditions of measuring value and uncertainty. Our exploratory report demonstrates the importance of how to implement study selection strategies in practice, and provides a general framework for exploring the feasibility of formal study selection strategies. We end our report by discussing how future validation studies might be designed.

Published
2023

3. Preregistration of secondary data analysis

Author

Anna van 't Veer, Jerome Olsen, Olmo van den Akker, Andrew N. Hall, Rodica Ioana Damian, Bill Chopik, Elliott Kruse, KD Valentine, Stuart J. Ritchie, Marjan Bakker, Sara J. Weston, Jessica E. Kosie, Pamela E. Davis-Kean, Lorne Campbell, and Department of Methodology and Statistics

Subjects
bepress|Life Sciences|Research Methods in Life Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Computer science, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Meta-science, Secondary data, Data science, Popularity, Data selection
Abstract

Preregistration has been lauded as one of the solutions to the so-called ‘crisis of confidence’ in the social sciences and has therefore gained popularity in recent years. However, the current guidelines for preregistration have been developed primarily for studies where new data will be collected. Yet, preregistering secondary data analyses--- where new analyses are proposed for existing data---is just as important, given that researchers’ hypotheses and analyses may be biased by their prior knowledge of the data. The need for proper guidance in this area is especially desirable now that data is increasingly shared publicly. In this tutorial, we present a template specifically designed for the preregistration of secondary data analyses and provide comments and a worked example that may help with using the template effectively. Through this illustration, we show that completing such a template is feasible, helps limit researcher degrees of freedom, and may make researchers more deliberate in their data selection and analysis efforts.

Published
2021

4. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

Author

Richard C. Reynolds, Jeremy Hogeveen, Joseph T. McGuire, Vittorio Iacovella, Gregory R. Samanez-Larkin, Cemal Koba, Paolo Avesani, Mikella A. Green, Margaret L. Schlichting, Claudio Toro-Serey, Tristan Glatard, Phui Cheng Lim, Emily A. Yearling, Simon B. Eickhoff, Katherine L. Bottenhorn, Susanne Weis, Andrew Erhart, Doris Pischedda, Mauricio R. Delgado, William A. Cunningham, Robert Langner, Matthew B. Wall, Amr Eed, Jorge Moll, Jeffrey B. Dennison, Wouter D. Weeda, Annabel B. Losecaat Vermeer, Anthony C. Juliano, Felix Hoffstaedter, Julia A. Camilleri, Nadège Bault, Cristian Buc Calderon, Xu Zhang, Gustav Tinghög, Vuong Truong, Leah Bakst, Stephan Heunis, Bertrand Thirion, Colin F. Camerer, Bradley C. Love, Tom Verguts, Luca Cecchetti, Patricia A. Reuter-Lorenz, Camille Maumet, Gabrielle Herman, Giacomo Handjaras, Michalis Kassinopoulos, Anthony Romyn, Xiangzhen Kong, Michael Notter, Nina Lauharatanahirun, Claire Donnat, Norberto Malpica, Jelle J. Goeman, Kamalaker Dadi, Michael Mack, Joke Durnez, Alberto De Luca, Margaret A. Sheridan, Shruti Ray, Colin Hawco, Enrico Glerean, J. Paul Hamilton, Qiang Shen, Sebastian Bobadilla-Suarez, Andrea Leo, David Wisniewski, Ayse Ilkay Isik, Lei Zhang, Bharat B. Biswal, Rotem Botvinik-Nezer, Flora Li, Bronson Harry, Andrew Jahn, Elise Lesage, Jean M. Vettel, Marco Barilari, Adrian I. Onicas, Susan Holmes, Khoi Vo, Aahana Bajracharya, Matthew Hughes, Rui Yuan, Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci, Remi Gau, Sangsuk Yoon, Hongmi Lee, Alexandru D. Iordan, John Thorp, Russell A. Poldrack, Anna Dreber, Joshua E. Zosky, Dylan M. Nielson, Adriana S. Méndez Leal, Erin W. Dickie, Roeland Hancock, Tiago Bortolini, Kaustubh R. Patil, Monica Y.C. Li, Kristin N. Meyer, Fu Shiguang, Kenny Skagerlund, Juan Carlos de la Torre, Jennifer A. Silvers, R. Alison Adcock, Gustav Nilsonne, Zachary J. Cole, Emilio Sanz-Morales, Charles P. Davis, Michael Joseph, Sangil Lee, Tom Johnstone, Peder M. Isager, Jonathan E. Peelle, Emiliano Ricciardi, Scott A. Huettel, G. Matthew Fricke, Leonardo Tozzi, Brice A. Kuhl, Sagana Vijayarajah, Alexander Bowring, Jeanette A. Mumford, Blazej M. Baczkowski, Shabnam Hakimi, Sebastian Kupek, Michael Kirchler, Yanina Prystauka, Niall W. Duncan, Anna van 't Veer, Emily G. Brudner, Jamil P. Bhanji, Sarah M. Tashjian, Senne Braem, Paolo Papale, Simon R. Steinkamp, Georgios D. Mitsis, Kenneth S. L. Yuen, Magnus Johannesson, David J. White, Alec Smith, Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski, Alexander Leemans, Robert W. Cox, Emanuele Olivetti, Luca Turella, Juergen Huber, Tom Schonberg, David V. Smith, Lysia Demetriou, Peter Sokol-Hessner, Juergen Dukart, Glad Mihai, Taylor Salo, Jean-Baptiste Poline, Angela R. Laird, Sergej A.E. Golowin, Sarah Genon, Adriana Galván, Claus Lamm, Joseph W. Kable, Roni Iwanir, Theo Marins, Matthew R. Johnson, Anais Rodriguez-Thompson, Benjamin Meyer, Stefan Czoschke, Loreen Tisdall, Douglas H. Schultz, Evan N. Lintz, Derek Beaton, Peer Herholz, Olivia Guest, Jenny R. Rieck, Laura Fontanesi, Ekaterina Dobryakova, Alexandre Pérez, Olivier Collignon, Xin Di, Ruud Berkers, Sheryl B. Ball, Carlos González-García, Schuyler W. Liphardt, Edna C. Cieslik, Roland G. Benoit, João F. Guassi Moreira, Helena Melero, Jaime J. Castrellon, Hayley R. Brooks, Chuan-Peng Hu, Felix Holzmeister, Cheryl L. Grady, Thomas E. Nichols, Alba Xifra-Porxas, Steven H. Tompson, Kelsey McDonald, Julia Beitner, Timothy R. Koscik, Tel Aviv University (TAU), Dartmouth College [Hanover], Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck - University of Innsbruck, California Institute of Technology (CALTECH), Stockholm School of Economics (SSE), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Duke University [Durham], Fondazione Bruno Kessler [Trento, Italy] (FBK), University of Trento [Trento], Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences [Leipzig] (IMPNSC), Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Washington University in Saint Louis (WUSTL), Boston University [Boston] (BU), Virginia Tech [Blacksburg], Université Catholique de Louvain = Catholic University of Louvain (UCL), Plymouth University, Rotman Research Institute at the Baycrest Centre (RRI), University of Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (UvA), Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main, Rutgers University [Newark], Rutgers University System (Rutgers), New Jersey Institute of Technology [Newark] (NJIT), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China [Chengdu] (UESTC), University College of London [London] (UCL), D'Or Institute for Research and Education [Rio de Janeiro], Florida International University [Miami] (FIU), University of Oxford, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT), University of Denver, Heinrich Heine Universität Düsseldorf = Heinrich Heine University [Düsseldorf], Jülich Research Centre, School for Advanced Studies Lucca (IMT), University of Nebraska–Lincoln, University of Nebraska System, National Institutes of Health [Bethesda] (NIH), University of Toronto, Modelling brain structure, function and variability based on high-field MRI data (PARIETAL), Service NEUROSPIN (NEUROSPIN), Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay-Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Inria Saclay - Ile de France, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria), Lancashire Teaching Hospital, University of Connecticut (UCONN), University Medical Center [Utrecht], Imperial College London, Temple University [Philadelphia], Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE), Kessler Foundation [East Hanover], Stanford University, Taipei Medical University, TMU-ShuangHo Hospital [New Taipei City], Instituto de Neurociencias de Alicante, University of Basel (Unibas), The University of New Mexico [Albuquerque], Zhejiang University of Technology, University of California [Los Angeles] (UCLA), University of California (UC), Université catholique de Lille (UCL), Concordia University [Montreal], Aalto University, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Universiteit Leiden, Linköping University (LIU), Western Sydney University, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health [Toronto] (CAMH), McGill University = Université McGill [Montréal, Canada], Eindhoven University of Technology [Eindhoven] (TU/e), Epilepsy Centre Kempenhaeghe [Heeze], Leibniz-Institut für Resilienzforschung [Mainz] (LIR), Swinburne University of Technology (Hawthorn campus), University of Michigan [Ann Arbor], University of Michigan System, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics [Frankfurt am Main], University of Pennsylvania, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (NJMS), University of Oregon [Eugene], University of Vienna [Vienna], Johns Hopkins University (JHU), Nanjing University (NJU), Haskins Laboratories, The Alan Turing Institute, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos [Madrid] (URJC), Neuroimagerie: méthodes et applications (Empenn), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Inria Rennes – Bretagne Atlantique, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-SIGNAUX ET IMAGES NUMÉRIQUES, ROBOTIQUE (IRISA-D5), Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (IRISA), Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes (INSA Rennes), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS)-École normale supérieure - Rennes (ENS Rennes)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-CentraleSupélec-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-IMT Atlantique (IMT Atlantique), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Université de Rennes (UR)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes (INSA Rennes), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires (IRISA), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS)-École normale supérieure - Rennes (ENS Rennes)-CentraleSupélec-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-IMT Atlantique (IMT Atlantique), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT), University of North Carolina [Chapel Hill] (UNC), University of North Carolina System (UNC), Technische Universität Dresden = Dresden University of Technology (TU Dresden), Karolinska Institutet [Stockholm], Stockholm University, Université de Lausanne = University of Lausanne (UNIL), Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NIN), Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW), Charité - UniversitätsMedizin = Charité - University Hospital [Berlin], Humboldt University Of Berlin, Technical University of Berlin / Technische Universität Berlin (TU), University of California [Berkeley] (UC Berkeley), Columbia University [New York], Human Research and Engineering Directorate [Aberdeen Proving Ground], Stanford School of Medicine [Stanford], Stanford Medicine, Stanford University-Stanford University, University of California [Santa Barbara] (UC Santa Barbara), University of Dayton, Maumet, Camille, Technische Universität Berlin (TU), Leiden University, European Commission, Fundación 'la Caixa', Tel Aviv University [Tel Aviv], University of Innsbruck, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), University of Oxford [Oxford], Universiteit Gent = Ghent University [Belgium] (UGENT), University of Nebraska [Lincoln], Inria Saclay - Ile de France, Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-Service NEUROSPIN (NEUROSPIN), Direction de Recherche Fondamentale (CEA) (DRF (CEA)), Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université Paris-Saclay, University of California, University of Pennsylvania [Philadelphia], Empenn, Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes (INSA Rennes), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique (Inria)-École normale supérieure - Rennes (ENS Rennes)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-CentraleSupélec-IMT Atlantique Bretagne-Pays de la Loire (IMT Atlantique), Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Institut Mines-Télécom [Paris] (IMT)-Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées - Rennes (INSA Rennes), Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-Institut National des Sciences Appliquées (INSA)-Université de Rennes (UNIV-RENNES)-École normale supérieure - Rennes (ENS Rennes)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Rennes 1 (UR1), Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, University of California [Berkeley], University of California [Santa Barbara] (UCSB), Signal Processing Systems, and Human Technology Interaction

Subjects
Data Analysis, Male, Scientific community, Computer science, Decision, Datasets as Topic, Variation (game tree), Field (computer science), 0302 clinical medicine, Multidisciplinary approach, Data Science/methods, Models, Meta-Analysis as Topic, 0303 health sciences, Multidisciplinary, medicine.diagnostic_test, Brain, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Research Personnel, Datasets as Topic/statistics & numerical data, Neurological, Female, ddc:500, Research Personnel/organization & administration, Models, Neurological, BF, Article, 03 medical and health sciences, Neuroimaging, Functional neuroimaging, Human behaviour, medicine, Humans, 030304 developmental biology, Statistical hypothesis testing, Flexibility (engineering), [SCCO.NEUR]Cognitive science/Neuroscience, Functional Neuroimaging, [SCCO.NEUR] Cognitive science/Neuroscience, Data Science, Reproducibility of Results, Brain/diagnostic imaging, Pipeline (software), Data science, Workflow, Logistic Models, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Decision making, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Software
Abstract

Botvinik-Nezer, Rotem et al., Data analysis workflows in many scientific domains have become increasingly complex and flexible. Here we assess the effect of this flexibility on the results of functional magnetic resonance imaging by asking 70 independent teams to analyse the same dataset, testing the same 9 ex-ante hypotheses. The flexibility of analytical approaches is exemplified by the fact that no two teams chose identical workflows to analyse the data. This flexibility resulted in sizeable variation in the results of hypothesis tests, even for teams whose statistical maps were highly correlated at intermediate stages of the analysis pipeline. Variation in reported results was related to several aspects of analysis methodology. Notably, a meta-analytical approach that aggregated information across teams yielded a significant consensus in activated regions. Furthermore, prediction markets of researchers in the field revealed an overestimation of the likelihood of significant findings, even by researchers with direct knowledge of the dataset. Our findings show that analytical flexibility can have substantial effects on scientific conclusions, and identify factors that may be related to variability in the analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging. The results emphasize the importance of validating and sharing complex analysis workflows, and demonstrate the need for performing and reporting multiple analyses of the same data. Potential approaches that could be used to mitigate issues related to analytical variability are discussed., European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en) under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 665501. A. Eed was supported by a predoctoral fellowship La Caixa-Severo Ochoa from Obra Social La Caixa. S.B.E. was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 785907 (HBP SGA2).

Published
2020

5. Vasopressin Differentially Affects Handgrip Force of Expectant Fathers in Reaction to Own and Unknown Infant Faces

Author

Anna van 't Veer, Jolien Rijlaarsdam, Anna M. Lotz, Kim Alyousefi-van Dijk, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Jurriaan Witteman, Willemijn M. Meijer, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry / Psychology, Clinical Child and Family Studies, APH - Global Health, APH - Mental Health, LEARN! - Brain, learning and development, and LEARN! - Child rearing

Subjects
Vasopressin, medicine.medical_specialty, Handgrip paradigm, Cognitive Neuroscience, Audiology, Behavioral neuroscience, Cognitive neuroscience, Affect (psychology), Placebo, lcsh:RC321-571, 03 medical and health sciences, Behavioral Neuroscience, 0302 clinical medicine, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, medicine, Facial resemblance, Infant crying, lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry, 030304 developmental biology, Original Research, 0303 health sciences, business.industry, Matched control, Paternal care, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, business, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery, Neuroscience
Abstract

The underlying mechanisms of paternal responses to infant signals are poorly understood. Vasopressin has previously been proposed to affect these responses. Using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject design (N = 25 expectant fathers), we examined the effect of vasopressin administration on the use of excessive handgrip force during exposure to infant crying versus matched control sounds, while participants saw morphed images representing their own infant versus an unknown infant. We found that, compared to placebo, AVP administration elicited more excessive force while viewing an unknown infant image compared to viewing the image representing one’s own infant, while the reverse was true under placebo. The results are discussed in light of vasopressin’s role in parenting and parental protection among human fathers.

Published
2019

6. Preregistration is hard, and worthwhile

Author

Anna van 't Veer, Simine Vazire, Tom E Hardwicke, Jessica Kay Flake, David Thomas Mellor, Lorne Campbell, Emorie D Beck, and Brian A. Nosek

Subjects
Report writing, Cognitive Neuroscience, media_common.quotation_subject, Exploratory research, Behavioural sciences, PsyArXiv|Meta-science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Humility, 050105 experimental psychology, 03 medical and health sciences, bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology, 0302 clinical medicine, bepress|Life Sciences, Credibility, Humans, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Registries, media_common, Flexibility (engineering), bepress|Life Sciences|Research Methods in Life Sciences, PsyArXiv|Life Sciences, Research, 05 social sciences, Reproducibility of Results, Transparency (behavior), PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Incentive, PsyArXiv|Neuroscience, Research Design, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, Engineering ethics, Psychology, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Abstract

Preregistration clarifies the distinction between planned and unplanned research by reducing unnoticed flexibility. This improves credibility of findings and calibration of uncertainty. However, making decisions before conducting analyses requires practice. During report writing, respecting both what was planned and what actually happened requires good judgment and humility in making claims.

Published
2018

7. Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings

Author

Jesse Chandler, Charles R. Ebersole, Marek A. Vranka, Sharon Coen, David Sirlopú, David Torres, Eva E. Chen, Joshua C. Gandi, Anthony J. Nelson, Robbie C. M. van Aert, Eva G. T. Green, Jeroen Stouten, Elsie Ong, Cheryl Alyssa Welch, Anja Eller, Jen-Ho Chang, Catherine Verniers, Liane Young, Canay Doğulu, Joshua M. Tybur, Jon Grahe, Michelangelo Vianello, German Kurapov, Ingrid P. J. Voermans, Maaike J. de Bruijn, Karin C.H.J. Smolders, William E. Davis, Felix D. Schönbrodt, Stephanie Szeto, Katherine S. Corker, Paul G. Curran, Fernando Mena-pacheco, Julie A. Woodzicka, Leander De Schutter, Ángel Gómez, Elisa Maria Galliani, Mike Friedman, Huajian Cai, Agata Sobkow, Joy E. Losee, Kevin Durrheim, Manuela Thomae, Jennifer A. Coleman, Tanuka Ghoshal, Serdar Karabati, Vanessa Smith-Castro, Konrad Bocian, Hans IJzerman, Mark Aveyard, Janko Međedović, Marta Wrońska, Mark Verschoor, Ho Phi Huynh, Félix Neto, Joshua A. Hicks, Alexandra Vázquez, John E. Edlund, Anna van 't Veer, Zubairu K. Dagona, Thierry Devos, Oskar K. Sundfelt, Philipp Spachtholz, Tripat Gill, Maciej Sekerdej, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba, Masanori Oikawa, Aaron Ocampo, Sean C. Murphy, Haruna Karick, Kathleen Schmidt, Goran Knežević, Ivan Grahek, Nicolas Kervyn, Grant Packard, Fred Hasselman, Byron G. Adams, Satia A. Marotta, Aaron L. Wichman, Olga Bialobrzeska, Manini Srivastava, Mark J. Brandt, Nikolette P. Lipsey, Carmel A. Levitan, Ewa Szumowska, Gábor Orosz, Michael J. Bernstein, Morgan Conway, Timo Gnambs, Koen Ilja Neijenhuijs, John M. Zelenski, Lysandra Podesta, Esther Maassen, Sinan Alper, Ilker Dalgar, Chris N. H. Street, Alexander K. Saeri, Anna Dalla Rosa, Reginald B. Adams, Ljiljana B. Lazarević, Marcel A.L.M. van Assen, Brian Collisson, Mayowa T. Babalola, Daniel Lakens, Cheryl L. Carmichael, Carrie Kovacs, Yarrow Dunham, Yoel Inbar, Patricio Saavedra, Natalia Frankowska, Austin Lee Nichols, Evans Dami Binan, Samuel Lincoln Bezerra Lins, Marije van der Hulst, Jamie Kurtz, Morgan J. Tear, Brad Pinter, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger, Åse Innes-Ker, Steffen R. Giessner, Kakul Hai, Boban Petrović, Elizabeth L. Haines, Francisco Ceric, Andriy Myachykov, Wendy L. Morris, Jordan Axt, Marieke de Vries, Lacy E. Krueger, Erika Salomon, Heather Barry Kappes, Anna Cabak Rédei, Armand Chatard, Matthew Haigh, Haruka Oikawa, Nick Neave, Monique Pollmann, Daniel R. Berry, Abraham M. Rutchick, Fiery Cushman, David C. Cicero, Brian A. Nosek, Ronaldo Pilati, Zeng Zhijia, Jakub Traczyk, Mihály Berkics, Michael P. Hall, Luis Diego Vega, Nerisa Dozo, Roberto González, Paul A. M. Van Lange, William Jiménez-Leal, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Winnee Cheong, Rolando Pérez-Sánchez, Rishtee Batra, Michael A. Smith, Andrew C. W. Tang, Štěpán Bahník, Małgorzata Osowiecka, Gabrielle Pogge, Lisa A. Williams, Alexander S. English, Robert Busching, Melissa-Sue John, Taciano L. Milfont, Fanny Cambier, Alejandro Vásquez Echeverría, Carolyn Finck, Richard A. Klein, Anna Kende, Norbert K. Tanzer, Victor N. Keller, Marie E. Heffernan, Neil A. Lewis, Jordan Theriault, Walter Sowden, Troy G. Steiner, Kristin Nicole Dukes, Adrienn Ujhelyi, Susan L. O'Donnell, Angela T. Maitner, Michael Wood, Jesse Graham, Winfrida Malingumu, Petr Houdek, Katarzyna Cantarero, Miguel-Ángel Freyre, Jeanine L. M. Skorinko, Roza G. Kamiloğlu, Robyn K. Mallett, Sociale Psychologie (Psychologie, FMG), Amsterdam Interdisciplinary Centre for Emotion (AICE, Psychology, FMG), Laboratoire Inter-universitaire de Psychologie : Personnalité, Cognition, Changement Social (LIP-PC2S ), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Université Grenoble Alpes [2016-2019] (UGA [2016-2019]), Florida International University [Miami] (FIU), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), EDF (EDF), Biozentrum [Basel, Suisse], University of Basel (Unibas), Tilburg University [Netherlands], Performance Engineering Laboratory [Dublin] (PEL), Dublin City University [Dublin] (DCU), Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Université Clermont Auvergne [2017-2020] (UCA [2017-2020])-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), School of Information Technology [Kharagpur], Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT Kharagpur), Human Technology Interaction, UCL - SSH/LouRIM - Louvain Research Institute in Management and Organizations, Tilburg University, Social Psychology, IBBA, A-LAB, Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação, Department of Social Psychology, Department of Methodology and Statistics, Department Communication and Cognition, Language, Communication and Cognition, Department of Business-Society Management, Department of Organisation and Personnel Management, Erasmus MC other, Research Methods and Techniques, and IJzerman, Hans

Subjects
Sampling effects, H Social Sciences (General), Culture, Open materials, Learning and Plasticity, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, Replication, Situational effects, 050109 social psychology, Context (language use), Social psychology, Preregistered, 050105 experimental psychology, [SHS.PSY] Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, social psychology, cognitive psychology, replication, culture, individual differences, sampling effects, situational effects, meta-analysis, Registered Report, open data, open materials, preregistered, [STAT.ML]Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], Statistical significance, Cognitive psychology, Statistics, Replication (statistics), Medicine and Health Sciences, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, General Psychology, ComputingMilieux_MISCELLANEOUS, [STAT.ME] Statistics [stat]/Methodology [stat.ME], Behaviour Change and Well-being, Data Science, 05 social sciences, Open data, [STAT.ML] Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], C800, Meta-analysis, Registered Report, Individual differences, Developmental Psychopathology, [STAT.ME]Statistics [stat]/Methodology [stat.ME]
Abstract

We conducted preregistered replications of 28 classic and contemporary published findings, with protocols that were peer reviewed in advance, to examine variation in effect magnitudes across samples and settings. Each protocol was administered to approximately half of 125 samples that comprised 15,305 participants from 36 countries and territories. Using the conventional criterion of statistical significance (p < .05), we found that 15 (54%) of the replications provided evidence of a statistically significant effect in the same direction as the original finding. With a strict significance criterion (p < .0001), 14 (50%) of the replications still provided such evidence, a reflection of the extremely highpowered design. Seven (25%) of the replications yielded effect sizes larger than the original ones, and 21 (75%) yielded effect sizes smaller than the original ones. The median comparable Cohen’s ds were 0.60 for the original findings and 0.15 for the replications. The effect sizes were small (< 0.20) in 16 of the replications (57%), and 9 effects (32%) were in the direction opposite the direction of the original effect. Across settings, the Q statistic indicated significant heterogeneity in 11 (39%) of the replication effects, and most of those were among the findings with the largest overall effect sizes; only 1 effect that was near zero in the aggregate showed significant heterogeneity according to this measure. Only 1 effect had a tau value greater than .20, an indication of moderate heterogeneity. Eight others had tau values near or slightly above .10, an indication of slight heterogeneity. Moderation tests indicated that very little heterogeneity was attributable to the order in which the tasks were performed or whether the tasks were administered in lab versus online. Exploratory comparisons revealed little heterogeneity between Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) cultures and less WEIRD cultures (i.e., cultures with relatively high and low WEIRDness scores, respectively). Cumulatively, variability in the observed effect sizes was attributable more to the effect being studied than to the sample or setting in which it was studied. UCR::Vicerrectoría de Investigación::Unidades de Investigación::Ciencias Sociales::Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas (IIP)

Published
2018

8. Effects of vasopressin on neural processing of infant crying in expectant fathers

Author

Jurriaan Witteman, Willemijn M. Meijer, Anna van 't Veer, Sandra Thijssen, Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Research Methods and Techniques, and Clinical Child and Family Studies

Subjects
Adult, Male, Vasopressin, medicine.medical_specialty, endocrine system, Medial cortex, Vasopressins, Emotions, Hippocampus, Crying, Audiology, Auditory cortex, 050105 experimental psychology, Placebos, 03 medical and health sciences, Behavioral Neuroscience, Fathers, Young Adult, 0302 clinical medicine, Endocrinology, Gyrus, Double-Blind Method, Pregnancy, medicine, Humans, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Anterior cingulate cortex, Administration, Intranasal, Brain Mapping, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, business.industry, Putamen, 05 social sciences, Brain, Infant, Nasal Sprays, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, medicine.anatomical_structure, Auditory Perception, Female, business, Insula, 030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Abstract

In a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject magnetic resonance imaging study, we examined the effect of 20 IU intranasal vasopressin on the neural processing of infant crying in 25 fathers-to-be. We explored whether familial background modulates vasopressin effects, and whether vasopressin differentially affects cry processing coupled with neutral or emotional contextual information. Participants listened to cries accompanied by neutral (‘this is an infant’) or emotional (‘this infant is sick/bored’) contextual information, and neutral control sounds (‘this is a saw’). Additionally, participants reported on their childhood experiences of parental love-withdrawal and abuse. Infant crying (vs control sounds) was associated with increased activation in the bilateral auditory cortex and posterior medial cortex. No effects of vasopressin were found in this ‘cry network’. Exploratory whole-brain analyses suggested that effects of vasopressin in the anterior cingulate cortex, paracingulate gyrus and supplemental motor area were stronger in fathers who experienced lower (vs higher) levels of love-withdrawal. No interaction was observed for abuse. Vasopressin increased activation in response to cries accompanied by emotional vs neutral contextual information in several brain regions, e.g. the cerebellum, brainstem (midbrain), posterior medial cortex, hippocampus, putamen, and insula. Our results suggest that the experience of love-withdrawal may modulate the vasopressin system, influencing effects of vasopressin administration on cry processing. Results further suggest a role for vasopressin in the processing of cry sounds with emotional contextual information.

Published
2018

9. Data and Results (per site, etc.)

Author

Huajian Cai, Vázquez, Alexandra, Voermans, Ingrid, Spachtholz, Philipp, English, Alexander Scott, Adams, Byron Gregory, Conway, Morgan, Stouten, Jeroen, Ruggs, Enrica N., Bocian, Konrad, Cicero, David C, Pinter, Brad, Štěpán Bahník, Van Aert, Robbie C. M., Chatard, Armand, Sacco, Airi, Kende, Anna, Aveyard, Mark, Vranka, Marek A., Ujhelyi, Adrienn, Zelenski, John M., Patricio Saavedra, M., Young, Liane, Bernstein, Michael Jason, Theriault, Jordan, Neto, Felix, De Bruijn, Maaike, Lewis, Neil, Berry, Daniel R., Gnambs, Timo, Busching, Robert, Tanuka Ghoshal, Houdek, Petr, Kappes, Andreas, Kakul Hai, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Pilati, Ronaldo, Giessner, Steffen Robert, Green, Eva, Malgorzata Osowiecka, Mayowa Babaloia, Mihaly Berkics, Krueger, Lacy Elise, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Melissa-Sue John, Verniers, Catherine, Yarrow Dunham, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Winfrida Malingumu, Coen, Sharon, Woodzicka, Julie A., Morris, Wendy, Ilker Dalgar, Van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., Tanzer, Norbert K., Collisson, Brian, Dukes, Kristin, Bialobrzeska, Olga, Durrheim, Kevin, Jen-Ho Chang, Welch, Cheryl, Orosz, Gabor, Huynh, Ho Phi, Thomae, Manuela, Friedman, Mike, Kappes, Heather, Jimenez-Leal, William, CHEN, Eva, Karabati, Serdar, Corker, Katherine S., Grahe, Jon, Pérez, Rolando, Alper, Sinan, Haines, Elizabeth L., Sundfelt, Oskar, De Vries, Marieke, Innes-Ker, Åse, Međedović, Janko, Eller, Anja, Curran, Paul G, Nerisa Dozo, Steiner, Troy G., Tanzer, Norbert, Karick, Haruna, Schmidt, Kathleen, Maitner, Angela, Davis, William E., Sowden, Walter J., Tripat Gill, Gonzalez, Roberto, Murphy, Sean, Doğulu, Canay, Wronska, Marta Katarzyna, Huntsinger, Jeffrey R., Lakens, Daniel, Graham, Jesse, Carmichael, Cheryl L, Kovacs, Carrie, IJzerman, Hans, Cemalcilar, Zeynep, O'Donnell, Susan L., Maciek Sekerdej, Maassen, Esther, Traczyk, Jakub, Tang, Andrew, Rosa, Anna Dalla, Smith-Castro, Vanessa, Tybur, Joshua M., Vega, Diego, Sobkow, Agata, Kervyn, Nicolas, Easterbrook, Matthew, Wichman, Aaron, Nosek, Brian A., Hall, Michael P., Nelson, Anthony J., Edlund, John, Williams, Lisa A., Finck, Carolyn, Myachykov, Andriy, Brandt, Mark, Heffernan, Marie E., Verschoor, Mark, Nichols, Austin Lee, Coleman, Jennifer A., Winnee Cheong, Petrovic, Boban, Inbar, Yoel, Van Der Hulst, Marije, Levitan, Carmel, Lazarevic, Lili, Galliani, Elisa Maria, Packard, Grant, McIntyre, Jason, Haigh, Matthew, Skorinko, Jeanine, Frankowska, Natalia, Szumowska, Ewa, Keller, Victor N., Podesta, Lysandra, Adams, Reginald B., Klein, Richard A., Knezevic, Goran, Saeri, Alexander K, Torres, David, Sirlopu, David Ricardo, Salomon, Erika, Anna Van 'T Veer, Tear, Morgan, Lins, Samuel, Neijenhuijs, Koen Ilja, Vianello, Michelangelo, Marotta, Satia, Street, Chris N. H., Mallett, Robyn, Kurapov, German, Pollmann, Monique, Kamiloglu, Roza, Ebersole, Charles R., Cambier, Fanny, Gomez, Angel, Smith, Michael A., Chandler, Jesse J., Kurtz, Jaime, Oikawa, Masanori, Devos, Thierry, Schönbrodt, Felix, Milfont, Taciano L., Miguel-Ángel Freyre, Rutchick, Abraham M., Axt, Jordan, Hasselman, Fred, Hicks, Joshua A., Grahek, Ivan, Cantarero, Katarzyna, and Cushman, Fiery

Abstract

Data from Many Labs 2 Replication Project

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. Analysis Scripts

Author

Bernstein, Michael Jason, De Bruijn, Maaike, Huntsinger, Jeffrey R., Young, Liane, Lazarevic, Lili, Milfont, Taciano L., Nerisa Dozo, Heffernan, Marie E., Alper, Sinan, Jimenez-Leal, William, Torres, David, Vásquez-Echeverría, Alejandro, Keller, Victor N., Friedman, Mike, Corker, Katherine S., Verniers, Catherine, Cushman, Fiery, Pinter, Brad, Collisson, Brian, Sacco, Airi, Maassen, Esther, Pilati, Ronaldo, Carmichael, Cheryl L, Haigh, Matthew, Chatard, Armand, Durrheim, Kevin, Verschoor, Mark, Traczyk, Jakub, Innes-Ker, Åse, Sowden, Walter J., Yarrow Dunham, Huajian Cai, Winnee Cheong, Nosek, Brian A., English, Alexander Scott, Schmidt, Kathleen, Inbar, Yoel, Ujhelyi, Adrienn, Kovacs, Carrie, Vranka, Marek A., Tanzer, Norbert K., Kende, Anna, Podesta, Lysandra, Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Tanzer, Norbert, Houdek, Petr, Curran, Paul G, Haines, Elizabeth L., Rosa, Anna Dalla, Nelson, Anthony J., Vega, Diego, Maciek Sekerdej, Kurtz, Jaime, Williams, Lisa A., Cemalcilar, Zeynep, CHEN, Eva, Skorinko, Jeanine, Grahe, Jon, Murphy, Sean, Sirlopu, David Ricardo, Kervyn, Nicolas, Smith-Castro, Vanessa, Karabati, Serdar, Patricio Saavedra, M., Van Der Hulst, Marije, Coen, Sharon, Miguel-Ángel Freyre, Graham, Jesse, Neijenhuijs, Koen Ilja, Winfrida Malingumu, Maitner, Angela, Adams, Byron Gregory, Morris, Wendy, IJzerman, Hans, Smith, Michael A., Vianello, Michelangelo, Bialobrzeska, Olga, Davis, William E., Tripat Gill, Huynh, Ho Phi, Orosz, Gabor, Tybur, Joshua M., Gnambs, Timo, Myachykov, Andriy, Lakens, Daniel, Van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., Cantarero, Katarzyna, Brandt, Mark, Oikawa, Masanori, Tang, Andrew, Finck, Carolyn, Gonzalez, Roberto, Stouten, Jeroen, Ebersole, Charles R., Cambier, Fanny, Klein, Richard A., Galliani, Elisa Maria, Štěpán Bahník, Ruggs, Enrica N., Adams, Reginald B., Aveyard, Mark, Petrovic, Boban, Conway, Morgan, McIntyre, Jason, Giessner, Steffen Robert, Rutchick, Abraham M., Axt, Jordan, Levitan, Carmel, Međedović, Janko, Packard, Grant, Hall, Michael P., Wichman, Aaron, Mayowa Babaloia, Woodzicka, Julie A., Busching, Robert, Theriault, Jordan, Kurapov, German, Berry, Daniel R., Frankowska, Natalia, Chandler, Jesse J., Kakul Hai, Szumowska, Ewa, Marotta, Satia, Pollmann, Monique, Mallett, Robyn, Vázquez, Alexandra, Salomon, Erika, Knezevic, Goran, Kamiloglu, Roza, Dukes, Kristin, Devos, Thierry, Zelenski, John M., Lins, Samuel, Green, Eva, Anna Van 'T Veer, Cicero, David C, Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Sobkow, Agata, Doğulu, Canay, Sundfelt, Oskar, Ilker Dalgar, Wronska, Marta Katarzyna, Malgorzata Osowiecka, Schönbrodt, Felix, Gomez, Angel, O'Donnell, Susan L., Tear, Morgan, Spachtholz, Philipp, Eller, Anja, Voermans, Ingrid, Tanuka Ghoshal, Mihaly Berkics, Melissa-Sue John, Easterbrook, Matthew, Saeri, Alexander K, Edlund, John, Kappes, Heather, Neto, Felix, Welch, Cheryl, Steiner, Troy G., Karick, Haruna, Lewis, Neil, Street, Chris N. H., Hicks, Joshua A., Pérez, Rolando, Krueger, Lacy Elise, Kappes, Andreas, Thomae, Manuela, De Vries, Marieke, Grahek, Ivan, Bocian, Konrad, Nichols, Austin Lee, Hasselman, Fred, Coleman, Jennifer A., and Jen-Ho Chang

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

11. Data

Author

Cemalcilar, Zeynep, Klein, Richard A., Kurtz, Jaime, Huntsinger, Jeffrey R., Melissa-Sue John, Eisner, Matthew, Rutchick, Abraham M., Frankowska, Natalia, Galliani, Elisa Maria, Woodzicka, Julie A., Wichman, Aaron, Bernstein, Michael Jason, Kappes, Heather, Mallett, Robyn, Hasselman, Fred, Levitan, Carmel, Chandler, Jesse J., Nosek, Brian A., Van Swol, Lyn, Beach Brooks, Adams, Reginald B., Skorinko, Jeanine, Nelson, Anthony J., Packard, Grant, Vranka, Marek A., Bocian, Konrad, Davis, William E., Devos, Thierry, Smith, Robert W., Vaughn, Leigh Ann, Brumbaugh, Claudia, Winnee Cheong, Nier, Jason A., Vianello, Michelangelo, Pilati, Ronaldo, Thompson, Donna, Morris, Wendy, Ratliff, Kate, Krueger, Lacy Elise, Anna Van 'T Veer, Hicks, Joshua A., Schmidt, Kathleen, S. Jane Hunt, Hovermale, James F., Joy-Gaba, Jennifer, Brandt, Mark, Storbeck, Justin, IJzerman, Hans, Furrow, David, Štěpán Bahník, and Steiner, Troy G.

Abstract

Dataset and codebook from the project are available for download below, under "files". Datasets.zip contains the data files in both .csv and .sav (SPSS) format. For any issues, please contact Rick Klein (raklein@ufl.edu).

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template

Author

Roger Giner-Sorolla and Anna van 't Veer

Subjects
Social psychology (sociology), Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Process (engineering), Psychological research, 05 social sciences, Behavioural sciences, BF, 050109 social psychology, 050105 experimental psychology, Formative assessment, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, Psychology, Robustness (economics), Social psychology, Scientific communication, Pre-Registration
Abstract

Pre-registration of studies before they are conducted has recently become more feasible for researchers, and is encouraged by an increasing number of journals. However, because the practice of pre-registration is relatively new to psychological science, specific guidelines for the content of registrations are still in a formative stage. After giving a brief history of pre-registration in medical and psychological research, we outline two different models that can be applied—reviewed and unreviewed pre-registration—and discuss the advantages of each model to science as a whole and to the individual scientist, as well as some of their drawbacks and limitations. Finally, we present and justify a proposed standard template that can facilitate pre-registration. Researchers can use the template before and during the editorial process to meet article requirements and enhance the robustness of their scholarly efforts.

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Unconscious deception detection measured by finger skin temperature and indirect veracity judgmentsâ€'results of a registered report

Author

Marcello Gallucci, Ilja van Beest, Anna van 't Veer, M. Stel, Department of Social Psychology, Psychology of Conflict, Risk and Safety, van 't Veer, A, Gallucci, M, Stel, M, and van Beest, I

Subjects
Unconscious mind, media_common.quotation_subject, lcsh:BF1-990, Work related, Social cognition, physiological marker, Psychology, psychophysiology, General Psychology, interpersonal relations, media_common, Original Research, skin temperature, interpersonal relation, Skin temperature, physiological markers, Deception, deception detection, humanities, Psychophysiology, Trustworthiness, lcsh:Psychology, indirect deception detection, Lying, Social psychology
Abstract

A pre-registered experiment was conducted to examine psychophysiological responses to being lied to. Bridging research on social cognition and deception detection, we hypothesized that observing a liar compared to a truth-teller would decrease finger skin temperature of observers. Participants first watched two targets while not forewarned that they would later be asked to judge (direct and indirect) veracity, and then watched another two targets while forewarned about this. During both these phases finger skin temperature was measured. Findings pertaining to temperature partly confirmed our main hypothesis. When participants were observing a liar, irrespective of being forewarned, on average finger skin temperature declined over time. In the forewarned phase, temperature trajectories of truth-tellers were higher than those of liars, however, in the not forewarned phase, this pattern was reversed. Results confirmed our further hypotheses that participants judge liars as less likeable and less trustworthy than truth-tellers—an indication of indirect deception detection. Our hypothesis that the effect size for trustworthiness would be bigger than that of liking was not supported by the data. Additionally, and also confirming our hypothesis, participants performed around chance level when directly judging whether the target person was lying. Exploratory analyses are reported with regard to truth bias and dependency between direct and indirect veracity judgments. Limitations and directions for future work related to the existence of psychophysiological indicators of deception detection are discussed.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. Prenatal testosterone, oxytocin and cortisol levels in relation to prenatal and postnatal paternal involvement

Author

Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Anna van 't Veer, and Willemijn M. Meijer

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, business.industry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Testosterone (patch), Psychiatry and Mental health, Endocrinology, Oxytocin, Internal medicine, Medicine, business, Cortisol level, Biological Psychiatry, medicine.drug
Published
2017

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results