Search

Background: Traditional initial management of proximal humerus fractures (PHF) involves arm immobilisation in a simple sling (SS) in an internally rotated position. We believe this risks fracture displacement and imbalance of soft tissues, encouraging malunion and stiffness. A neutral-rotation brace (NRB) maintains an arm position which may prevent this, leading to quicker and superior recovery. Methods: We randomised patients with two- to four-part PHF into 4 weeks of immobilisation with either a SS or NRB, independent of surgery. Range of motion (ROM), subjective shoulder value (SSV), DASH, Constant–Murley (CMS) and Oxford Shoulder (OSS) scores were assessed at 6-weeks, 3-months and 1-year post-injury. Results: The SS group included 11 patients vs 9 in the NRB group. At final follow-up, the SS and NRB groups had mean DASH scores of 42 vs 35, OSS 42 vs 46, CMS 71 vs 86, SSV 84% vs 92%, respectively. ROM was superior with the NRB (elevation 159°, ER 47° and IR score 8 vs 140°, 37° and 7 with SS). Conclusions: Despite being a small series, our results demonstrate a trend towards NRB providing better outcomes. This feasibility study supports the need for a larger multi-centre randomised controlled trial comparing these immobilisation methods for PHF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A number of radiographic signs have been previously demonstrated to be associated with degenerative rotator cuff tears. An ability to predict the presence of a tear by radiography would permit the early commencement of appropriate treatment and the avoidance of unnecessary invasive investigations. The aim of the present study was to determine the accuracy of using radiographic signs to predict the presence of a cuff tear on arthroscopy. Methods Fifty consecutive patients who had undergone shoulder arthroscopy and had pre-operative plain radiographs were included. Pre-operative radiographs were reviewed by a consultant shoulder surgeon, a consultant radiologist and a senior clinical fellow for the following signs: acromial spur; subjective reduction of subacromial space; sourcil sign; acromial acetabularization; os acromiale; greater tuberosity cortical irregularity; greater tuberosity sclerosis; humeral head rounding; cyst; and reduction in acromiohumeral head distance. Results The presence of tuberosity sclerosis (p < 0.0001), tuberosity irregularities (p < 0.0001), tuberosity cyst (p = 0.004) and sourcil sign (p = 0.019) was associated with the presence of a rotator cuff tear. The combined sensitivity of prediction of tear by the observers following radiographic review was 91.7%, with a combined negative predictive value of 80%. Conclusions The assessment of radiographs by senior clinicians is a useful tool for confirming the absence of a rotator cuff tear. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial.Methods: We undertook a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare effectiveness and safety between nonoperative management and ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation) for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Three hundred and one eligible adult patients were randomized to 1 of the 2 treatment groups and followed at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months after recruitment. The primary outcome was the rate of radiographically evident nonunion at 3 months following treatment. Secondary outcomes were the rate of radiographically evident nonunion at 9 months, limb function measured using the Constant-Murley Score and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) score, and patient satisfaction.Results: There was no difference in the proportion of patients with radiographic evidence of nonunion at 3 months between the operative (28%) and nonoperative (27%) groups, whereas at 9 months the proportion with nonunion was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in the operative group (0.8%) than in the nonoperative group (11%). The DASH and Constant-Murley scores and patient satisfaction were all significantly better in the operative group than in the nonoperative group at 6 weeks and 3 months.Conclusions: Although at 3 months there was no evidence that surgery had reduced the rate of nonunion of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, at 9 months nonoperative treatment had led to a significantly higher nonunion rate (11% compared with <1%). The rate of secondary surgical intervention during the trial period was 12 (11%) of the 147 patients in the nonoperative group. ORIF is a safe and reliable intervention with superior early functional outcomes and should be considered for patients who sustain this common injury.Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the early and midterm outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for posterior shoulder instability., Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for related articles published in the English language. The 2 authors selected studies for inclusion or exclusion. The inclusion criteria included a minimum of 1 year of follow-up, with at least 20 patients in the study population., Results: We included 6 studies, with a total of 387 patients (396 shoulders). All studies were retrospective, Level IV studies, except for 1 prospective study (Level II). In 81.06% of cases, patients reported a significant traumatic episode. The mean follow-up period was 44.4 months, and the mean recurrence rate was 5.37%. Most of the patients were able to return to sport (mean, 92.5%)., Conclusions: The early and midterm results of arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder for posterior instability are promising. Most of the patients were satisfied with the results of surgery and were able to return to sport. Larger studies and more prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings., Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of 1 Level II study and 5 Level IV studies., (Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)