Search

Context Although percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been performed for decades and has gone through many refinements, there are still concerns regarding its more widespread utilization because of the long learning curve and the potential risk of severe complications. Many technical details are not included in the guidelines because of their nature and research protocol. Objective To achieve an expert consensus viewpoint on PCNL indications, preoperative patient preparation, surgical strategy, management and prevention of severe complications, postoperative management, and follow-up. Evidence acquisition An international panel of experts from the Urolithiasis Section of the European Association of Urology, International Alliance of Urolithiasis, and other urology associations was enrolled, and a prospectively conducted study, incorporating literature review, discussion on research gaps (RGs), and questionnaires and following data analysis, was performed to reach a consensus on PCNL. Evidence synthesis The expert panel consisted of 36 specialists in PCNL from 20 countries all around the world. A consensus on PCNL was developed. The expert panel was not as large as expected, and the discussion on RGs did not bring in more supportive evidence in the present consensus. Conclusions Adequate preoperative preparation, especially elimination of urinary tract infection prior to PCNL, accurate puncture with guidance of fluoroscopy and/or ultrasonography or a combination, keeping a low intrarenal pressure, and shortening of operation time during PCNL are important technical requirements to ensure safety and efficiency in PCNL. Patient summary Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) has been a well-established procedure for the management of upper urinary tract stones. However, according to an expert panel consensus, core technical aspects, as well as the urologist’s experience, are critical to the safety and effectiveness of PCNL.

Aging is a complex process best characterized as the chronic dysregulation of cellular processes leading to deteriorated tissue and organ function. While aging cannot currently be prevented, its impact on lifespan and healthspan in the elderly can potentially be minimized by interventions that aim to return these cellular processes to optimal function. Recent studies have demonstrated that partial reprogramming using the Yamanaka factors (or a subset;OCT4, SOX2, andKLF4; OSK)can reverse age-related changesin vitroandin vivo. However, it is still unknown whether the Yamanaka factors (or a subset) are capable of extending the lifespan of aged wild type mice. Here, we show that systemically delivered AAVs, encoding an inducible OSK system, in 124-week-old mice extends the median remaining lifespan by 109% over wild-type controls and enhances several health parameters. Importantly, we observed a significant improvement in frailty scores indicating that we were able to improve the healthspan along with increasing the lifespan. Furthermore, in human keratinocytes expressing exogenous OSK, we observed significant epigenetic markers of age-reversal, suggesting a potential reregulation of genetic networks to a younger, potentially healthier state. Together, these results may have important implications for the development of partial reprogramming interventions to reverse age-associated diseases in the elderly.

Introduction Urethro-vesical anastomosis stenosis following radical prostatectomy is a rare complication but represents a challenging situation. While the first-line treatment is endoscopic, recurrences after urethrotomies require a radical approach. We present the updated results of our patient's cohort treated by pure robotic anastomosis refection. Material and methods This is a retrospective, single-center study focusing on one surgeon's experience. Patients presented an urethro-vesical stricture following a radical prostatectomy. Each patient received at least one endoscopic treatment. The procedure consisted of a circumferential resection of the stenosis, followed by a re-anastomosis with well-vascularized tissue. We reviewed the outcomes in terms of symptomatic recurrences and continence after the reconstructive surgery. Results From April 2013 to May 2020, 8 patients underwent this procedure. Half of the patients had previously been treated with salvage radio-hormonotherapy. The median age was 70 years (64-76). The mean operative time was 109minutes (60-180) and blood loss was 120cc (50-250). One patient had an early postoperative complication, with vesico-pubic fistula. The average length of stay was 4.6 days (3-8). Mean follow-up was 24.25 months (1-66). Half of the patients experienced a recurrence at a median time of 8.25 months (6-11) after surgery. Five patients experienced incontinence of which 3 required an artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Conclusion Extra-peritoneal robot-assisted urethro-vesical reconstruction is feasible and safe to manage bladder neck stricture after radical prostatectomy. The risk of postoperative incontinence is high, justifying preoperative information. Level of evidence III.

To compare different extractions routes for robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy in terms of post-operative pain and renal function recovery. Live donor kidney transplantation data from our institution were reviewed from November 2011 to March 2017. Postoperative pain was estimated using cumulative painkillers consumption. Variables were compared between the 3 groups with ANOVA for continuous data, χ2 test for categorial data. A survival analysis with Kaplan–Meier curve assessing time to transplant recipient nadir was performed to compare the renal function recovery. Sixty-three RLDN were performed (23 iliac, 23 vaginal and 17 umbilical extractions). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of operative time, blood lost, warm ischemia time, cumulative painkiller consumption and renal function recovery time. Postoperative complications for Umbilical, Vaginal and Iliac were, respectively, of 0, 3 and 1. No major difference was found between the 3 groups beside a slightly longer hospital stay in the iliac group. Iliac incision might impact post-operative pain with a moderate but significant longer hospital stay. Vaginal extraction is an option when cosmetic outcomes present a real demand. The three options appeared to be safe and should be discussed with the patient in regard of the surgeon experience.

Objectives To evaluate the risk of contracting severe COVID‐19, defined as COVID‐19 specific intensive care unit (ICU) admission or death, for patients undergoing urological surgery during the epidemic. To define consequences of receiving surgery for COVID‐19 patients. Patients and Methods This is a multicenter observational cohort study. Every patient receiving a urological procedure in Paris academic urological centers during the 4 initial weeks of surgical restrictions were included. Their status was updated minimum 3 weeks after the procedure. The main outcomes were the COVID‐19 specific ICU admission and death. Statistics were mostly descriptive. The Post‐operative COVID‐19 confirmed group was compared with non‐COVID patients using Chi‐square tests for categorical and Wilcoxon test tests for continuous variables. Results During the 4‐week period, 552 patients received surgery within 8 centers. At follow‐up, 57 (10%) patients were lost. Among the 11 preoperative COVID‐19 cases, one remained in ICU, no new admission, and no death. For the non‐COVID patients, 57 (12%) developed COVID‐related symptoms; only one case (0.2%) required COVID‐19 specific ICU and 3 (0.6%) patients died of COVID‐19 after surgery. Conclusions Performing urological surgery during the COVID‐19 epidemic peak has a limited impact on ICU admissions but presents a real (0.6%) risk of specific mortality. Surgical activities should be maintained according to this risk.

Knowing the treatment's time of a complex stone is important for operating programming. It depends on the installation time, renal access time and the rate of fragmentation. The main objective of the study is to calculate the processing speed of complex stones by the percutaneous mini-nephrolithotomy (mini-NLPC) technique.A prospective single-center study was carried out between November 2019 and October 2020. Patients treated with mini-NLPC and with a result without fragment were included. The stone volume was measured using 3D reconstruction software and the operating time was differentiated into installation time, renal access time and fragmentation time.Of the 36 patients treated by the percutaneous technique, 20 patients were included. The median 3D volume of the stones was 4145 mmThe fragmentation speed for complex stones was 48.2 mmC.

Introduction Kidney transplantation is championed as the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. According to the biomedical agency, there is an increasing number of patients waiting for kidney transplantation. Faced with organ shortage, the use of marginal grafts may well increase the number of available kidney grafts. Occasionally, during dual kidney graft transplantation, the poor quality of one of the two grafts, or other specific circumstances, may lead to transplantation of only one of the two grafts. We have compared patient outcome concerning single kidney transplantation from an initial dual kidney graft with respect to dual kidney graft transplantation. Material Among 67 patients enrolled for a dual kidney graft, 39 dual kidney grafts (group 1) were compared with 12 grafts performed with only one of the two kidneys of a dual kidney graft (group 2) as well as 15 grafts performed following a classic kidney graft protocol (group 3). Results The survival of grafts was respectively for groups 1, 2 and 3 of 100%, 72,5% and 75,4% (P=0.17). The survival of patients was respectively for groups 1, 2 and 3 of 78.3%, 89.9% and 87.8% (P=0.47). Conclusion Our study suggests that transplantation of a single kidney, initially proposed as dual kidney graft candidate, has satisfying results in terms of graft survival and patient mortality at the expense of poorer renal function in comparison to dual kidney graft. Indeed, there was no significant difference in the survival of patients and grafts. This seems promising taking into consideration that the aim of transplantation in elderly recipients is primarily to avoid dialysis, rather than having optimal post-transplantation kidney function. Level of evidence 4.

Urethro-vesical anastomosis stenosis following radical prostatectomy is a rare complication but represents a challenging situation. While the first-line treatment is endoscopic, recurrences after urethrotomies require a radical approach. We present the updated results of our patient's cohort treated by pure robotic anastomosis refection.This is a retrospective, single-center study focusing on one surgeon's experience. Patients presented an urethro-vesical stricture following a radical prostatectomy. Each patient received at least one endoscopic treatment. The procedure consisted of a circumferential resection of the stenosis, followed by a re-anastomosis with well-vascularized tissue. We reviewed the outcomes in terms of symptomatic recurrences and continence after the reconstructive surgery.From April 2013 to May 2020, 8 patients underwent this procedure. Half of the patients had previously been treated with salvage radio-hormonotherapy. The median age was 70 years (64-76). The mean operative time was 109minutes (60-180) and blood loss was 120cc (50-250). One patient had an early postoperative complication, with vesico-pubic fistula. The average length of stay was 4.6 days (3-8). Mean follow-up was 24.25 months (1-66). Half of the patients experienced a recurrence at a median time of 8.25 months (6-11) after surgery. Five patients experienced incontinence of which 3 required an artificial urinary sphincter implantation.Extra-peritoneal robot-assisted urethro-vesical reconstruction is feasible and safe to manage bladder neck stricture after radical prostatectomy. The risk of postoperative incontinence is high, justifying preoperative information.III.

To compare different extractions routes for robot-assisted living donor nephrectomy in terms of post-operative pain and renal function recovery.Live donor kidney transplantation data from our institution were reviewed from November 2011 to March 2017. Postoperative pain was estimated using cumulative painkillers consumption. Variables were compared between the 3 groups with ANOVA for continuous data, χSixty-three RLDN were performed (23 iliac, 23 vaginal and 17 umbilical extractions). There was no significant difference between the three groups in terms of operative time, blood lost, warm ischemia time, cumulative painkiller consumption and renal function recovery time. Postoperative complications for Umbilical, Vaginal and Iliac were, respectively, of 0, 3 and 1. No major difference was found between the 3 groups beside a slightly longer hospital stay in the iliac group.Iliac incision might impact post-operative pain with a moderate but significant longer hospital stay. Vaginal extraction is an option when cosmetic outcomes present a real demand. The three options appeared to be safe and should be discussed with the patient in regard of the surgeon experience.

Resumen Confrontés à une crise d’une ampleur exceptionnelle liée à la pandémie à coronavirus COVID-19 responsable d’une saturation selon les régions des urgences et des places en réanimation, le Comité Lithiase de l’Association Française d’Urologie (CLAFU) a élaboré pour la première fois les recommandations de prise en charge des calculs urinaires durant cette crise sanitaire.Recommendations of the Urolithiasis Committee of the French Urology Association for the management and the treatment of the stone formers patients during the COVID-19 pandemic crisis.

Classical percutaneous nephrolithotomy consists of several steps executed in a sequence beginning in the lithotomy position followed by a second one in the prone position. For many years, this represented the standard technique. A number of limitations like patient obesity and the necessity of puncturing the upper pole led to several modifications. The lateral position and Bart’s position were recommended for obese patients. Prone flexed position shifts the kidney downward, facilitating access to the upper pole. With the advent of miniaturized flexible instruments, simultaneous antegrade and retrograde access to the kidney became possible. Split leg prone position was proposed for such a dual access. But the main change of paradigm was the arrival of the supine Valdivia position with its variants, especially the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. The latter is a modification of the lithotomy position with the patient slightly tilted toward the site opposite to the stone and the ipsilateral arm crossing the chest.

Resume Objectif La pose d’une nephrostomie est l’un des gestes elementaires en urologie. Souvent realise dans le cadre de l’urgence pour une indication vitale, ce geste doit etre maitrise par tout urologue. Au cours des dernieres annees, cette technique a evolue. L’objectif de cet article didactique est de fournir des details utiles pour sa realisation, a travers l’experience de notre equipe chirurgicale. Materiel et methodes Le patient est installe en position de Valdivia, en decubitus dorsal. La region lombaire est surelevee de 20° du cote a operer a l’aide d’un coussin gonflable (Pelvic Tilt®). La ponction se fait sous double reperage par echographie et amplificateur d’image. Nous utilisons le kit Kolibri®, qui comporte une aiguille de ponction type Chiba de 18 gauge, un guide teflonne de 70 cm et une nephrostomie equipee d’un mandrin metallique creux. La ponction se fait le plus souvent par le calice inferieur posterieur, mais dans certains cas particuliers par le calice moyen ou superieur. Resultats La position en decubitus dorsal simplifie et securise la pose de la nephrostomie. Des precisions techniques et des astuces sont detaillees. Conclusions L’apprentissage de la pose d’une nephrostomie est fondamental pour les futurs urologues. En dehors de son utilite pour prendre en charge les patients dans le cadre de l’urgence, la nephrostomie est une etape incontournable pour ceux qui veulent se former a la chirurgie percutanee.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered to be the first line of treatment for large renal stones. Though PCNL comes with higher morbidity, its efficacy is unbeaten by other minimally invasive modalities. However, potential complications, such as bleeding, occur. Improved skills and modifications of the procedure may reduce the probability of adverse outcomes. This article discusses the current trends and standards in PCNL technique with special focus on all important steps as positioning, access, instruments, dilation, disintegration, and exit, including outcomes, complication management, and training modalities.

Green tea is widely used as a &lsquo, &rsquo, healthy&rsquo, beverage due to its high level of antioxidant polyphenol compounds. However tea is also known to contain significant amount of oxalate. The objective was to determine, in a cross-sectional observational study among a population of 273 hypercalciuric stone-formers referred to our center for metabolic evaluation, whether daily green tea drinkers (n = 41) experienced increased stone risk factors (especially for oxalate) compared to non-drinkers. Stone risk factors and stone composition were analyzed according to green tea status and sex. In 24-h urine collection, the comparison between green tea drinkers and non-drinkers showed no difference for stone risk factors such as urine oxalate, calcium, urate, citrate, and pH. In females, the prevalence of calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD) and calcium phosphate stones, assessed by infrared analysis (IRS) was similar between green tea drinkers and non-drinkers, whereas prevalence of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones was strikingly decreased in green tea drinkers (0% vs. 42%, p = 0.04), with data in accordance with a decreased oxalate supersaturation index. In males, stone composition and supersaturation indexes were similar between the two groups. Our data show no evidence for increased stone risk factors or oxalate-dependent stones in daily green tea drinkers.

Kidney transplantation is championed as the gold standard treatment for patients with end-stage kidney disease. According to the biomedical agency, there is an increasing number of patients waiting for kidney transplantation. Faced with organ shortage, the use of marginal grafts may well increase the number of available kidney grafts. Occasionally, during dual kidney graft transplantation, the poor quality of one of the two grafts, or other specific circumstances, may lead to transplantation of only one of the two grafts. We have compared patient outcome concerning single kidney transplantation from an initial dual kidney graft with respect to dual kidney graft transplantation.Among 67 patients enrolled for a dual kidney graft, 39 dual kidney grafts (group 1) were compared with 12 grafts performed with only one of the two kidneys of a dual kidney graft (group 2) as well as 15 grafts performed following a classic kidney graft protocol (group 3).The survival of grafts was respectively for groups 1, 2 and 3 of 100%, 72,5% and 75,4% (P=0.17). The survival of patients was respectively for groups 1, 2 and 3 of 78.3%, 89.9% and 87.8% (P=0.47).Our study suggests that transplantation of a single kidney, initially proposed as dual kidney graft candidate, has satisfying results in terms of graft survival and patient mortality at the expense of poorer renal function in comparison to dual kidney graft. Indeed, there was no significant difference in the survival of patients and grafts. This seems promising taking into consideration that the aim of transplantation in elderly recipients is primarily to avoid dialysis, rather than having optimal post-transplantation kidney function.4.

Objectifs L’alteration de la qualite de vie est la plainte principale des patients presentant une lithiase urinaire. Plusieurs etudes ont compare URSS et NLPC pour le taux de stone free, les complications, les durees operatoires et d’hospitalisaton, etc. Mais aucune ne compare la qualite de vie (QDV) postoperatoire pour des calculs de taille importante. Nous avons donc cherche a evaluer la faisabilite d’une telle etude au niveau national. Methodes Il s’agissait d’une etude prospective, nationale, realisee en partenariat avec le comite lithiase de l’AFU. Les patients devaient presenter un calcul de plus de 15 mm et parler francais. Un questionnaire de QDV multidimensionnel (symptomes urinaires, douleur, etat general, exercice professionnel, sexualite, plus le score etait eleve plus la QDV etait alteree) valide (l’USS-q) etait distribue en preoperatoire, apres recueil du consentement et etait envoye par courrier, ou courriel, ou realise au telephone a j7, m1, m3 et la difference entre le score preoperatoire et chaque temps postoperatoire etait calculee. Etaient aussi analysees la difference d’echelle numerique (en), le taux de reintervention et le nombre de jours d’arret de travail. Resultats Du 01/12/17 au 16/04/18, 19 NLPC et 25 URSS ont ete incluses dans l’etude dans 8 centres differents. La taille moyenne des calculs etait de 25 mm pour les nlpc et 20,5 mm pour les URSS. Les taux de reponses etaient respectivement de 100 %, 88 % et 100 % a j7, m1, m3 (NLPC) versus 70 %, 72 % et 74 % (URSS). Le taux de reintervention etait de 36 versus 44 %. La duree moyenne d’arret de travail etait de 32 jours versus 29,5 jours La difference de score total etait respectivement de −8,06, 1,5 et 6,72 a j7, m1 et m3 (NLPC) versus 1,94, 4,36 et 28,1 (URSS). La difference de score d’en etait de 0,58, 1,29 et 1,38 (NLPC) versus 0,51, 0,57 et 2,9 (URSS) ( Figure 1 , Figure 2 , Figure 3 ). Conclusion Cette evaluation montre que l’etude est donc faisable a une echelle nationale avec un taux de reponse acceptable. La puissance de l’etude avec un nombre faible de patients n’est pas suffisante car les scores sont eleves (total sur 180). A ce stade, les resultats montrent une amelioration de la qualite de vie significativement superieure au 3e mois pour les URSS.