Search

The sky-radiometer/sun-photometer is the most widely used instrument for obtaining aerosol optical depth (AOD) or aerosol optical properties worldwide. Due to the existence of field of view (FOV, 1°), the radiation received by the sky-radiometer includes the forward scattering in addition to direct solar irradiance. This leads to more diffuse light errors of retrieved AODs, especially for shorter wavelength and heavily polluted weather conditions. Using simulation data of three typical aerosol particles (dust, soot, water-soluble), we first verified the accuracy of the Monte Carlo method for calculating the forward scattering effect. Based on the sky-radiometer data collected in Xi'an (2015–2020) where heavy pollution weather is common, the relative errors and correction factors of the AOD were obtained under different conditions, including various short wavelengths (≤400 nm), solar zenith angles (SZAs) and AODs. Our analysis indicates the close dependence of AOD correction factors on wavelength, SZA, AOD and the optical properties of aerosol particles. The mean relative error in Xi'an increases with the decrease of wavelength (~16.1% at 315 nm) and decreases first and then increases with the increase of the SZA. The relative errors caused by forward scattering can exceed 10% when the AOD is greater than 1 and 25% when the AOD is larger than 2 in the ultraviolet (UV) band. The errors with a wavelength greater than 400 nm and an AOD below 1.0 can be within 5%, which can be ignored. The correlation coefficients of AODs before and after a correction from 315 nm to 400 nm are greater than 0.96, which basically increase with the increase of the wavelength. This indicates that the significance of the forward scattering effect in the Xi'an area with heavy pollution cannot be ignored for short wavelengths. However, such effect is negligible at the longer wavelengths and lower AODs (<1.0) of a sky-radiometer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lidar at 1064 nm and Ka-band millimetre-wave cloud radar (MMCR) are powerful tools for detecting the height distribution of cloud boundaries and can monitor the entire life cycle of cloud layers. In this study, lidar and MMCR are employed to jointly detect cloud boundaries under different conditions. By enhancing the echo signal of lidar at 1064 nm and combining its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), the cloud signal can be accurately extracted from the aerosol signals and background noise. The interference signal is eliminated from Doppler spectra of the MMCR by using the noise ratio of the smallest measurable cloud signal (SNR min⁡) and the spectral point continuous threshold (Nts). Moreover, the quality control of the reflectivity factor of MMCR obtained by the inversion is conducted, which improves the detection accuracy of the cloud signal. We analysed three typical cases studies; case one presents two interesting phenomena: (a) at 19:00–20:00 CST (China standard time), the ice crystal particles at the cloud top boundary are too small to be detected by MMCR, but they are well detected by lidar. (b) At 19:00–00:00 CST, the cirrus cloud changes to altostratus where the cloud particles eventually grow into large sizes, producing precipitation. Further, MMCR has more advantages than lidar in detection of the cloud top boundary within this period. Considering the advantages of the two devices, the change characteristics of the cloud boundary in Xi'an from December 2020 to November 2021 were analysed, with MMCR detection data as the main data and lidar data as the assistant data. The seasonal variation characteristics of clouds show that, in most cases, high clouds often occur in summer and autumn, and the low clouds are usually in winter. The normalized cloud cover shows that the maximum and minimum cloud cover occur in summer and winter, respectively. Furthermore, the cloud boundary frequency distribution results for the whole of the observation period show that the cloud bottom boundary below 1.5 km is more than 1 %, the frequency within the height range of 3.06–3.6 km is approximately 0.38 %, and the frequency above 8 km is less than 0.2 %. The cloud top boundary frequency distribution exhibits the characteristics of a bimodal distribution. The first narrow peak lies at approximately 1.0–3.1 km, and the second peak appears at 6.4–9.8 km. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A macro-vertical structure is closely related to weather evolution and the energy budget balance of the atmospheric system of the Earth. In this study, radiosonde data were used to identify a cloud vertical structure (CVS) using the adjusted relative humidity threshold method. To evaluate the reliability and stability of this method, the results obtained based on the spatiotemporal matching criteria established in this study were compared with Ka-band millimetre-wave cloud radar (MMCR) observation data. This comparison showed that both devices exhibit high consistency in low-level cloud detection. With the increase in the cloud height, the frequency of the cloud appearance detection by the radiosonde became higher than that by the MMCR. In spring, the results of the CVS detection by the two devices were in good agreement. Specifically, the determination coefficients of the modified degrees of freedom (adjusted R-square) of the cloud base height (CBH) and cloud top height (CTH) detected by the two devices were 0.934 and 0.879, respectively. The horizontal drift of the radiosonde was the smallest in summer, and the adj. R-square values of the CBH and CTH were 0.814 and 0.852, respectively. The CVS observation results by the radiosonde and the MMCR were significantly different in autumn (the adj. R-Square values of the CBH and CTH were 0.715 and 0.629, respectively). In winter, the adj. R-Square values of the CBH and CTH observed by the radiosonde and the MMCR were 0.958 and 0.710, respectively. The statistics and analysis of the results of the distribution characteristics of the CVSs using radiosonde data from 2019 to 2021 from Xi'an showed that the average CTH and CBH were at 7–10 km and 3–5 km, respectively. The frequencies of the cloud absence, rainfall, and two- and three-layer clouds were the highest in the winter (34.36%), autumn (12.99%), and summer, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]