Search

Background: Accurate and precise diagnosis is central to treating central nervous system (CNS) tumors, yet tissue diagnosis is often a neglected focus in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Since 2016, the WHO classification of CNS tumors has increasingly incorporated molecular biomarkers into the diagnosis of CNS tumors. While this shift to precision diagnostics promises a high degree of diagnostic accuracy and prognostic precision, it has also resulted in increasing divergence in diagnostic and management practices between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs). Pathologists and laboratory professionals in LMICs lack the proper training and tools to join the molecular diagnostic revolution. We describe the impact of a 7-year long twinning program between Canada and Pakistan on pathology services. Methods: During the study period, 141 challenging cases of pediatric CNS tumors initially diagnosed at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Karachi, were sent to the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada (SickKids), for a second opinion. Each case received histologic review and often immunohistochemical staining and relevant molecular testing. A monthly multidisciplinary online tumor board (MDTB) was conducted to discuss the results with pathologists from both institutions in attendance. Results: Diagnostic discordance was seen in 30 cases. Expert review provided subclassification for 53 cases most notably for diffuse gliomas and medulloblastoma. Poorly differentiated tumors benefited the most from second review, mainly because of the resolving power of specialized immunohistochemical stains, NanoString, and targeted gene panel next-generation sequencing. Collaboration with expert neuropathologists led to validation of over half a dozen immunostains at AKUH facilitating diagnosis of CNS tumors. Conclusions: LMIC-HIC Institutional twinning provides much-needed training and mentorship to pathologists and can help in infrastructure development by adopting and validating new immunohistochemical stains. Persistent unresolved cases indicate that molecular techniques are indispensable in for diagnosis in a minority of cases. The development of affordable alternative molecular techniques may help with these histologically unresolved cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Posterior fossa ependymoma (PFE) comprises 2 groups, PF group A (PFA) and PF group B (PFB), with stark differences in outcome. However, to the authors' knowledge, the long‐term outcomes of PFA ependymoma have not been described fully. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of survival and neurocognitive outcome in a large consecutive cohort of subgrouped patients with PFE over 30 years. Methods: Demographic, survival, and neurocognitive data were collected from consecutive patients diagnosed with PFE from 1985 through 2014 at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Subgroup was assigned using genome‐wide methylation array and/or immunoreactivity to histone H3 K27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). Results: A total of 72 PFE cases were identified, 89% of which were PFA. There were no disease recurrences noted among patients with PFB. The 10‐year progression‐free survival rate for all patients with PFA was poor at 37.1% (95% confidence interval, 25.9%‐53.1%). Analysis of consecutive 10‐year epochs revealed significant improvements in progression‐free survival and/or overall survival over time. This pertains to the increase in the rate of gross (macroscopic) total resection from 35% to 77% and the use of upfront radiotherapy increasing from 65% to 96% over the observed period and confirmed in a multivariable model. Using a mixed linear model, analysis of longitudinal neuropsychological outcomes restricted to patients with PFA who were treated with focal irradiation demonstrated significant continuous declines in the full‐scale intelligence quotient over time with upfront conformal radiotherapy, even when correcting for hydrocephalus, number of surgeries, and age at diagnosis (‐1.33 ± 0.42 points/year; P = .0042). Conclusions: Data from a molecularly informed large cohort of patients with PFE clearly indicate improved survival over time, related to more aggressive surgery and upfront radiotherapy. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, the current study is the first, in a subgrouped cohort, to demonstrate that this approach results in reduced neurocognitive outcomes over time. In a subgroup‐specific manner, the results of the current study demonstrate that survival among patients with posterior fossa ependymoma has improved over time, and this improvement clearly is related to a change in practice with regard to pursuing aggressive surgical resections with upfront postoperative radiotherapy in all patients. This significant improvement highlights an urgent need for the implementation of early intervention and neuroprotective strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]