Search

Tree cores are a highly valuable scientific resource. Annual growth ring data can, for example, improve our understanding of climate change impacts and effects of environmental pollution, allow for better annual estimations of tree growth patterns and carbon storage, and help quantify dynamics and changes in forest ecosystems. The value of coring trees for research has been weighted against concerns around the potential harm coring might cause to trees. To date, there is indeed limited research accurately quantifying the potential effects of coring on tree growth and only a handful of studies assessing its influence on mortality. Consequently, many European long-term forest inventorying and monitoring programs are concerned that tree coring might bias the repeated tree measurements in permanent plots, which they rely on for assessments of states and changes of forests. In this study, we assessed the effects of tree coring on the growth and mortality of three widespread European tree species approximately 10 years after they were cored. We used repeated tree measurements from permanent research sites in Switzerland and Ukraine. In Switzerland, we assessed 35 cored and 159 uncored Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees as well as 147 cored and 332 uncored silver fir (Abies alba) trees. In Ukraine, we assessed 348 cored and 6′611 uncored European beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees. We found no statistical evidence that coring negatively affected the growth or mortality of the three tree species assessed. Although we cannot rule out subtle effects on tree health and wood quality, our findings do not provide any evidence that coring affects or biases repeated measurements (such as DBH measures and recording of mortality) performed on the investigated tree species. Tree coring could therefore be considered more often for routine incorporation, particularly in long-term forest inventorying and monitoring programs and initiatives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patellar tendinopathy (PT) mainly affects athletes who use the tendon for repeated energy storage and release activities. It can have a striking impact on athletes' careers, although data on its real prevalence and incidence are sparse. Research efforts should start from the results of reliable and updated epidemiological research to help better understand the impact of PT and underpin preventative measures. Purpose: To determine the prevalence and incidence of PT in athletes and the general population. Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed on January 17, 2022, and conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Wiley Cochrane Library databases were searched for epidemiological reports of any evidence level and clinical studies reporting data on the incidence or prevalence of PT for the 11,488 retrieved records. The primary endpoint was the prevalence and incidence of PT in sport-active patients. The secondary endpoints were PT prevalence and incidence in subgroups of athletes based on sex, age, sport type, and sport level played, as well as the same epidemiological measures in the general population. Results: A total of 28 studies, with 28,171 participants, were selected and used for the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The general and athletes' populations reported an overall PT prevalence of 0.1% and 18.3%, respectively. In athletes, the prevalence of PT was 11.2% in women and 17% in men (P =.070). The prevalence of PT in athletes <18 years was 10.1%, while it was 21.3% in athletes ≥18 years (P =.004). The prevalence of PT was 6.1% in soccer players, 20.8% in basketball players, and 24.8% in volleyball players. Heterogeneous PT diagnostic approaches were observed. Higher prevalence values were found when PT diagnoses were made using patient-reported outcomes versus clinical evaluations (P =.004). Conclusion: This review demonstrated that PT is a common problem in the male and female sport-active populations. There are twice as many athletes aged ≥18 years than there are <18 years. Volleyball and basketball players are most affected by PT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]