Search

Background: Currently, the standard therapy for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) consists of a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. However, 15% of patients are intolerant to azathioprine which necessitates cessation of azathioprine or changes in therapy. In addition, not all patients achieve complete biochemical response (CR). Uncontrolled data indicate that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can induce CR in a majority of patients. Better understanding of first-line treatment and robust evidence from randomised clinical trials are needed. The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefits of MMF as compared to azathioprine, both combined with prednisolone, as induction therapy in a randomised controlled trial in patients with treatment-naive AIH. Methods: CAMARO is a randomised (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, multicentre superiority trial. All patients with AIH are screened for eligibility. Seventy adult patients with AIH from fourteen centres in the Netherlands and Belgium will be randomised to receive MMF or azathioprine. Both treatment arms will start with prednisolone as induction therapy. The primary outcome is biochemical remission, defined as serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and immunoglobulin G below the upper limit of normal. Secondary outcomes include safety and tolerability of MMF and azathioprine, time to remission, changes in Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-score, adverse events, and aspects of quality of life. The study period will last for 24 weeks. Discussion: The CAMARO trial investigates whether treatment with MMF and prednisolone increases the proportion of patients in remission compared with azathioprine and prednisolone as the current standard treatment strategy. In addition, we reflect on the challenges of conducting a randomized trial in rare diseases. Trial registration: EudraCT 2016-001038-91. Prospectively registered on 18 April 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Azathioprine (AZA) and mercaptopurine (MP) are the cornerstone of steroid‐sparing strategies in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Up to 20% of patients do not tolerate or respond to these regimens. Aim: To evaluate retrospectively the tolerability and efficacy of tioguanine (thioguanine) (TG) therapy in selected patients with AIH and AIH variant syndromes. Methods: Records of 52 patients who received TG therapy were retrieved from nine hospitals in the Netherlands. Indications for TG treatment were intolerable side effects on AZA or MP (n = 38), insufficient response (n = 11) or first‐line treatment (n = 3). Treatment efficacy was defined as normalisation of serum aminotransferases and serum immunoglobulin G. Results: No serious adverse events occurred in patients treated with TG during a median follow‐up of 18 months (range 1‐194). Treatment was well tolerated in 41 patients (79%), whereas four had tolerable (8%) and seven (13%) intolerable side effects. Thirty‐eight patients were treated with TG after intolerable side effects on AZA or MP; 29 patients continued TG therapy of whom 24 (83%) achieved complete biochemical remission, four (14%) had incomplete and one (3%) had no response; nine discontinued treatment. Seven of 11 patients with insufficient response to AZA or MP were responsive to TG, three with complete and four with incomplete biochemical remission; four discontinued due to intolerance (n = 2) and non‐response (n = 2). TG was effective in all AIH patients as first‐line maintenance treatment. Conclusion: In our retrospective review of TG therapy in selected patients with AIH or AIH variants who previously failed on AZA or MP, TG appeared tolerable with biochemical efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: There have been few reproducible studies of mortality in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and its variants. We calculated mortality in a large national cohort of patients with AIH, with vs without cirrhosis, in the Netherlands., Methods: We collected data from 449 patients with established AIH (77% female), from 6 academic and 10 non-academic hospitals in the Netherlands. We identified 29 patients with AIH and primary biliary cholangitis and 35 patients with AIH and primary sclerosing cholangitis (AIH-PSC). Mortality and liver transplantation data were assessed from August 1, 2006 through July 31, 2016. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated using age-, sex-, and calendar year-matched mortality for the general Dutch population., Results: During the 10-year follow-up period, 60 patients (13%) died (mean age, 71 years; range, 33-94 years). Twenty-six causes of death were liver related (43%), whereas the others could not be attributed to liver disease. Patients with AIH and cirrhosis had significantly higher mortality than the general population (SMR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.4), whereas patients without cirrhosis did not (SMR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.8). Patients with AIH-PSC had the largest increase in mortality, compared to the general population (SMR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.5-14.6), of all groups analyzed. Mortality in patients with AIH and primary biliary cholangitis was not greater than the general population. Four or more relapses per decade or not achieving remission was associated with an increase in liver-related death or liver transplantation. Nine patients underwent liver transplantation; 2 died from non-liver related causes. Four of 9 patients on the waitlist for transplantation died before receiving a donated liver., Conclusion: In an analysis of data from a large national cohort of patients with AIH, we found increased mortality of patients with cirrhosis, but not of patients without cirrhosis, compared to the general Dutch population. Survival was significantly reduced in patients with AIH and features of concurrent PSC., (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)