Search

In comparison with seasonal sea ice (first-year ice, FY ice), multiyear (MY) sea ice is thicker and has more opportunity to survive through the summer melting seasons. Therefore, the variability of wintertime MY ice plays a vital role in modulating the variations in the Arctic sea ice minimum extent during the following summer. As a response, the ice-ocean-atmosphere interactions may be significantly affected by the variations in the MY ice cover. Satellite observations are characterized by their capability to capture the spatiotemporal changes of Arctic sea ice. During the recent decades, many active and passive sensors onboard a variety of satellites (QuikSCAT, ASCAT, SSMIS, ICESat, CryoSat-2, etc.) have been used to monitor the dramatic loss of Arctic MY ice. The main objective of this study is to outline the advances and remaining challenges in monitoring the MY ice changes through the utilization of multiple satellite observations. We summarize the primary satellite data sources that are used to identify MY ice. The methodology to classify MY ice and derive MY ice concentration is reviewed. The interannual variability and trends in the MY ice time series in terms of coverage, thickness, volume, and age composition are evaluated. The potential causes associated with the observed Arctic MY ice loss are outlined, which are primarily related to the export and melting mechanisms. In addition, the causes to the MY ice depletion from the perspective of the oceanic water inflow from Pacific and Atlantic Oceans and the water vapor intrusion, as well as the roles of synoptic weather, are analyzed. The remaining challenges and possible upcoming research subjects in detecting the rapidly changing Arctic MY ice using the combined application of multisource remote sensing techniques are discussed. Moreover, some suggestions for the future application of satellite observations on the investigations of MY ice cover changes are proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sea ice data assimilation can greatly improve forecasts of Arctic sea ice evolution. Many previous sea ice data assimilation studies were conducted without assimilating ocean state variables, even though the sea ice evolution is closely linked to the oceanic conditions, both dynamically and thermodynamically. Based on the method of a localized ensemble error subspace transform Kalman filter, satellite‐retrieved sea ice concentration and sea ice thickness are assimilated into an Arctic sea ice‐ocean model. As a new addition, sea surface temperature (SST) data are also assimilated. The additional assimilation of SST improves not only the simulated ocean temperature in the mixed layer of the ocean substantially but also the accuracy of sea ice edge position, sea ice extent, and sea ice thickness in the marginal sea ice zone. The improvement in the simulated potential temperature in the upper 1,000 m can be attributed to the enhanced vertical convection processes in the regions where the assimilated observational SST is colder than the simulated SST without assimilation. The improvements in the sea ice edge position and sea ice thickness simulations are primarily caused by the SST data assimilation reducing biases in the simulated SST and the associated coupled ocean‐sea ice processes. Our investigation suggests that, due to the complex interaction between the sea ice and ocean, assimilating ocean data should be an indispensable component of numerical polar sea ice forecasting systems. Key Points: Sea surface temperature assimilation improves upper ocean temperature, sea ice edge, and marginal sea ice thickness simulationsSimulated upper ocean temperatures improve more where vertical convection processes are more importantSea ice edge and thickness simulations are improved due to the correction of the SST bias [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sea surface temperature (SST) data from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service are assimilated into a pan-Arctic ice-ocean coupled model using the ensemble-based local singular evolutive interpolated Kalman (LSEIK) filter. This study found that the SST deviation between model hindcasts and independent SST observations is reduced by the assimilation. Compared with model results without data assimilation, the deviation between the model hindcasts and independent SST observations has decreased by up to 0.2°C at the end of summer. The strongest SST improvements are located in the Greenland Sea, the Beaufort Sea, and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. The SST assimilation also changes the sea ice concentration (SIC). Improvements of the ice concentrations are found in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago, the Beaufort Sea, and the central Arctic basin, while negative effects occur in the west area of the eastern Siberian Sea and the Laptev Sea. Also, sea ice thickness (SIT) benefits from ensemble SST assimilation. A comparison with upward-looking sonar observations reveals that hindcasts of SIT are improved in the Beaufort Sea by assimilating reliable SST observations into light ice areas. This study illustrates the advantages of assimilating SST observations into an ice-ocean coupled model system and suggests that SST assimilation can improve SIT hindcasts regionally during the melting season. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]