Search

Objectives Visceral arterial aneurysms may be treated using open surgery or endovascular repair, but the best approach remains controversial. This was a retrospective study aiming to compare open surgery and endovascular treatment strategies for visceral arterial aneurysms. Methods The study included all 93 patients who were admitted with visceral artery aneurysms between January 2001 and January 2011 at the Department of Vascular Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China. All cases underwent either open or endovascular procedures. Overall survival and adverse events were compared between the groups. Success rate, blood loss, length of surgery, and length of hospital stay were also compared. The patients were followed up at three, six, and 12 months then every year until April 2014. Results Open surgery was performed on 34 patients and endovascular procedures on 59. There were no differences in characteristics of the patients between the open surgery and endovascular groups. The perioperative complication rate was 52.9 and 13.6% in the open surgery and endovascular groups, respectively. Mean follow-up was 36.8 months (range: 11 months to 10 years). The one- and five-year survival rates were 100 and 60.6%, respectively, in the open surgery group, compared to 100 and 84.5% in the endovascular group. Multivariate analysis for factors related to overall survival showed that there was a significant relationship with the treatment approach (HR = 0.479, 95%CI: 0.278-0.825; P = 0.008) and the presence of false aneurysm (HR = 2.929, 95%CI: 1.388-6.180, P = 0.005). Conclusions Endovascular repair could be considered as an effective method for visceral artery aneurysm. Endovascular repair showed lower perioperative complication rates and better long-term survival.