Search

Identifying peptide substrates that are efficiently cleaved by proteases gives insights into substrate recognition and specificity, guides development of inhibitors, and improves assay sensitivity. Peptide arrays and SAMDI mass spectrometry were used to identify a tetrapeptide substrate exhibiting high activity for the bacterial outer-membrane protease (OmpT). Analysis of protease activity for the preferred residues at the cleavage site (P1, P1′) and nearest-neighbor positions (P2, P2′) and their positional interdependence revealed FRRV as the optimal peptide with the highest OmpT activity. Substituting FRRV into a fragment of LL37, a natural substrate of OmpT, led to a greater than 400-fold improvement in OmpT catalytic efficiency, with a kcat/ Km value of 6.1×106 L mol−1 s−1. Wild-type and mutant OmpT displayed significant differences in their substrate specificities, demonstrating that even modest mutants may not be suitable substitutes for the native enzyme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Outer membrane protease (OmpT) is a 33.5 kDa aspartyl protease that cleaves at dibasic sites and is thought to function as a defense mechanism for E. coli against cationic antimicrobial peptides secreted by the host immune system. Despite carrying three dibasic sites in its own sequence, there is no report of OmpT autoproteolysis in vivo. However, recombinant OmpT expressed in vitro as inclusion bodies has been reported to undergo autoproteolysis during the refolding step, thus resulting in an inactive protease. In this study, we monitor and compare levels of in vitro autoproteolysis of folded and unfolded OmpT and examine the role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in autoproteolysis. SDS-PAGE data indicate that it is only the unfolded OmpT that undergoes autoproteolysis while the folded OmpT remains protected and resistant to autoproteolysis. This selective susceptibility to autoproteolysis is intriguing. Previous studies suggest that LPS, a co-factor necessary for OmpT activity, may play a protective role in preventing autoproteolysis. However, data presented here confirm that LPS plays no such protective role in the case of unfolded OmpT. Furthermore, OmpT mutants designed to prevent LPS from binding to its putative LPS-binding motif still exhibited excellent protease activity, suggesting that the putative LPS-binding motif is of less importance for OmpT's activity than previously proposed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Peptide arrays are used to identify highly active substrates for the OmpT protease, as described by M. Mrksich, B. Liedberg, et al. in their Communication on page 16531 ff. By preparing the peptide arrays on self‐assembled monolayers, mass spectrometry (the SAMDI method) was used to characterize the extent of cleavage of each peptide. A commonly used mutant form of the protease, although regarded as having identical activity, instead had an altered specificity for its substrates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]