Search

An abnormal clinical Allen's test is not a definitive exclusion criterion for free radial forearm flap use. A surgical Allen's test may be useful to determine whether flap harvest is feasible in patients with an abnormal clinical Allen's test.

Digital replantation and revascularization have evolved significantly since the first published reports in the 1960s. Advances in techniques and instruments have made these once formidable procedures a routine part of hand surgery training. Despite this, the frequency of successful outcomes for replantation may be on the decline in the United States. This review summarizes key mechanisms and innovations used to maximize efficiency when presented with a digital replantation, from the moment the patient arrives in the emergency department until the time of discharge.

Objective This study seeks to demonstrate the safety of anastomosing free flaps to the common or proper digital artery, and to the volar or dorsal digital vein in soft tissue reconstruction of the hand; as well, as to discuss the advantages of this technique. Methods Retrospective review of all patients who underwent free flap reconstruction of the hand in two institutions over a period of 5 years. Results A total of 29 free flaps (9 great toe pulp, 7 anterolateral thigh, 6 second toe pulp, 4 radial artery perforator, 2 partial medial rectus, 1 lateral arm) in 28 patients met our inclusion criteria. All recipient vessels were the proper or common digital artery and the volar or dorsal digital vein. There was one case of venous congestion that resolved with leeching. There was no partial or total loss of any of the flaps. Conclusion Anastomosing soft tissue free flaps to the common or proper digital artery, and the volar or dorsal digital vein is a safe and effective approach with numerous advantages that should be considered in the reconstruction of soft tissue defects of the hand. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 38:21-25, 2018.

Purpose Clinical outcomes of nerve repair have not substantially improved over the last several decades. Although clearly a multifactorial problem, basic principles including proper fascicular alignment are not always realized. The use of short conduits as connectors may enhance nerve alignment by entubulating and directing the approximation of nerve ends. Methods Ten hand surgeons (5 experienced and 5 inexperienced) performed a series of in vitro human cadaver nerve repairs. Three small-diameter (2 mm), 3 medium-diameter (3–4 mm), and 3 large-diameter (5–6 mm) nerves were repaired (under 10× magnification) utilizing each of 3 techniques: suture-only, connector-only (sutures placed through the ends of the connector), and connector-assisted (alignment sutures at the nerve interface plus connector). Three judges (blinded to who performed the repairs) assessed each repair for fascicular alignment based on predetermined qualitative scales. Results Across all surgeons, 23 of 30 connector-assisted repairs were judged good or excellent versus 18 of 30 of the suture-only and 13 of 30 of the connector-only repairs. Experienced surgeons in general did better repairs and in particular were more likely to obtain superior alignment for conduit-only repairs (73.3% vs 13.3% good or excellent) and suture-only repairs (73.3% vs 46.7% good or excellent) and were not statistically different for connector-assisted repairs (86.7% vs 66.7% good or excellent) compared with inexperienced surgeons. Conclusions In a cadaver nerve model, there was no significant difference in the technical alignment of conduit-assisted repairs between experienced and inexperienced surgeons whereas inexperienced surgeons were more likely to achieve inadequate alignment with suture-only or conduit-only repairs. Clinical relevance Connector-assisted repairs combining suture-approximation and entubulation may improve the technical alignment of nerve repairs performed, especially by less-experienced surgeons.

Background Short-gap digital nerve injuries are a common surgical problem, but the optimal treatment modality is unknown. A multicenter database was queried and analyzed to determine the outcomes of nerve gap reconstructions between 5 and 15 mm with processed nerve allograft. Methods The current RANGER registry is designed to continuously monitor and compile injury, repair, safety, and outcomes data. Centers followed their own standard of care for treatment and follow-up. The database was queried for digital nerve injuries with a gap between 5 and 15 mm reporting sufficient follow-up data to complete outcomes analysis. Available quantitative outcome measures were reviewed and reported. Meaningful recovery was defined by the Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) scale at S3-S4 for sensory function. Results Sufficient follow-up data were available for 24 subjects (37 repairs) in the prescribed gap range. Mean age was 43 years (range, 23–81). Mean gap was 11 ± 3 (5–15) mm. Time to repair was 13 ± 42 (0–215) days. There were 25 lacerations, 8 avulsion/amputations, 2 gunshots, 1 crush injury, and 1 injury of unknown mechanism. Meaningful recovery, defined as S3-S4 on the MRCC scales, was reported in 92% of repairs. Sensory recovery of S3+ or S4 was observed in 84% of repairs. Static 2PD was 7.1 ± 2.9 mm ( n = 19). Return to light touch was observed in 23 out of 32 repairs reporting Semmes-Weinstein monofilament outcomes (SWMF). There were no reported nerve adverse events. Conclusion Sensory outcomes for processed nerve allografts were equivalent to historical controls for nerve autograft and exceed those of conduit. Processed nerve allografts provide an effective solution for short-gap digital nerve reconstructions.