Search

Objectives: The primary objectives of this meta-analysis in critically ill adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were to analyse whether erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) reduced the number of patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and resulted in a change in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration. Our secondary objectives were adverse events and mortality., Background: Anaemia is common in ICU patients, and currently, the standard therapy is RBC transfusion, which is known to be associated with adverse events. ESA could potentially reduce the need for RBC transfusion., Methods: EMBASE, Cochrane and PubMed were searched up to January 2020., Results: A total of 1357 articles were identified, of which 18 articles met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis. Eight of these studies were used in the meta-analyses. Comparing ESA vs control group, there was a small reduction in the proportion of patients who received one or more RBC transfusions (relative risk [RR] 0.88; confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.00, moderate certainty). The change in Hb concentration was trivial (mean difference -0.31 g/dL; CI -0.51 to -0.05, high certainty). The number of serious adverse events (RR 1.02; 0.90-1.15, low certainty) and the overall short-term mortality were similar (RR 0.80; CI 0.61-1.05, low certainty) between the groups., Conclusion: ESA resulted in a small reduction in the proportion of patients transfused and a trivial increase in haemoglobin concentration, both of questionable clinical relevance, without impacting adverse events or mortality. These results do not support the routine use of ESA to treat anaemia in critically ill adults., (© 2020 British Blood Transfusion Society.)

Background: The mean unbound vancomycin fraction and whether the unbound vancomycin level could be predicted from the total vancomycin level are still controversial, especially for patients in different groups, such as intensive care unit (ICU) versus non-ICU patients. Other relevant potential patient characteristics that may predict unbound vancomycin levels have yet to be clearly determined. Methods: We enrolled a relatively large study population and included widely comprehensive potential covariates to evaluate the unbound vancomycin fractions in a cohort of ICU (n=117 samples) and non-ICU patients (n=73 samples) by using a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method. Results: The mean unbound vancomycin fraction was 45.80% ± 18.69% (median, 46.01%; range: 2.13– 99.45%) in the samples from the total population. No significant differences in the unbound vancomycin fraction were found between the ICU patients and the non-ICU patients (P=0.359). A significant correlation was established between the unbound and total vancomycin levels. The unbound vancomycin level can be predicted with the following equations: unbound vancomycin level=0.395×total vancomycin level+0.019×total bilirubin level+0.468 (R2=0.771) for the ICU patients and unbound vancomycin level=0.526×total vancomycin level-0.527 (R2=0.749) for the non-ICU patients. Overall, the observed-versus-predicted plots were acceptable. Conclusion: A significant correlation between the total and unbound vancomycin levels was found, and measurement of the unbound vancomycin level seems to have no added value over measurement of the total vancomycin level. The study developed parsimonious equations for predicting the unbound vancomycin level and provides a reference for clinicians to predict the unbound vancomycin level in adult populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapidly, establishing a difficult intravenous access in a dangerously agitated patient is a real challenge. Intranasal midazolam has been shown to be effective and safe for rapidly sedating patients before anesthesia, for procedural sedation and for control of seizure. Here, we report a patient in intensive care unit who was on mechanical ventilation and on inotropic support for management of septic shock and who turned out extremely agitated after accidental catheter removal. Intravenous access was successfully established following sedation with intranasal midazolam, using ultrasound guidance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]