Search

• Precipitation annual maxima estimated from NEXRAD are evaluated over the CONUS. • Accuracy of radar-based estimates varies with magnitude and duration. • Uncertainty in radar-based IDF curves exhibits climate dependence. The lack of knowledge on precipitation frequency over ungauged areas introduces a significant source of uncertainty in relevant engineering designs and risk estimation procedures. Radar-based observations offer precipitation information over ungauged areas and thus have gained increasing attention as a potential solution to this problem. However, due to their relative short data records and inherent uncertainty sources, their ability to provide accurate estimates on the frequency of precipitation extremes requires evaluation. This study involves the evaluation of at-site precipitation frequency estimates from NEXRAD Stage IV radar precipitation dataset. We derive precipitation annual maxima series from the 16yrs record (2002–2017) of NEXRAD and we compare against 539 long-term (50yrs) hourly gauge records. In addition, Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves are estimated from both radar and gauge dataset and compared. IDF estimation is based on fitting the Generalize Extreme Value distribution to annual precipitation maxima. Evaluation is carried out over the contiguous United States and results are grouped and presented for five dominant climate classes and for a range of return period and precipitation durations. NEXRAD was shown to overestimate intensities at shorter durations (1- and 3-h) and low quantiles, while it tends to underestimate higher quantiles at longer durations (24 h). In addition, evaluation of the IDF curves estimated from NEXRAD revealed a distinct geographic dependence with certain regions exhibiting a tendency to overestimation (e.g. east of the Rocky Mountains) or underestimation (Midwest). Overall, this analysis suggests that, while significant discrepancies may exist, there are several cases where NEXRAD provide estimates within the uncertainty bounds of the reference rain gauge dataset. The climate/geographic region and the temporal duration are important aspects to consider. Findings provided in this work on these aspects will hopefully serve as a general guideline for those interested in using NEXRAD estimates for further research or applications on precipitation extremes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study expands the Metastatistical Extreme Value (MEV) framework to sub-daily rainfall frequency analysis and compares it to extreme value theory methods in presence of short records and measurement errors. Ordinary events are identified based on the temporal autocorrelation of hourly data and modeled with a Weibull distribution. MEV is compared to extreme value theory methods in the estimation of long return period quantiles from actual data (160 rain gauges with at least 60-year record in the contiguous United States) and on synthetic data perturbed with measurement errors typical of remote sensing rainfall estimation. MEV tends to underestimate the 100-year return period quantiles of hourly rainfall when 5–20 years of actual data are used, but presents diminished uncertainty. When a good model of the ordinary events and adequate number of events per year are available, MEV is able to provide information on the 100-year return period quantiles from 10–20, or even 5 years of data with significantly reduced uncertainty (<30% uncertainty for 5-year records). MEV estimates of 100-year return period quantiles from short records are much less sensitive than extreme value theory methods to additive/multiplicative errors, presence of cap values in the estimates, and missing of extreme values. Results from this study strongly support the use of MEV for rainfall frequency analyses based on remotely sensed datasets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The Metastatistical Extreme Value Distribution (MEVD) framework applied to four short-record high-resolution quasi-global sub-daily precipitation products.. • MEVD parametric uncertainty and its propagation effect in the quantile is investigated. • Impact of spatial scale mismatch on the frequency analysis of extremes is quantified. • We provide an assessment of satellite-based precipitation products in different hydroclimatic regions. Precipitation extremes and associated hydrological hazards pose a significant global risk to society and economy. To be effective, mitigation strategies require the best possible estimation of the intensity and frequency of precipitation extremes. Traditional approaches to precipitation frequency analysis rely on long-term records from in-situ observations, which are limited in terms of global coverage. Satellite-based precipitation products provide global coverage, but errors in these estimates may lead to large biases in the quantification of extremes. Previous studies have demonstrated the ability of the novel Metastatistical Extreme Value Distribution (MEVD) framework to provide robust estimates of high quantiles in the presence of short-term data records and the uncertainties typical of remote sensing precipitation products. Here, we evaluate MEVD-based precipitation frequency analyses for four widely used quasi-global precipitation products (IMERG-v6, GSMaP-v6, CMORPH-v1.0, and MSWEP-v2) over high-density gauge networks in five hydroclimatic regions (Austria, Italy, Florida, Texas, and Arizona). We show dependence of MEVD-based estimation error on the characteristics of each dataset and the hydroclimatic region. Additionally, we evaluate the sub-grid variability of extreme precipitation and demonstrate the impact of spatial scale mismatch (that is, single in-situ gauge versus satellite pixel) on the frequency analysis of extremes. This work provides an assessment of the use of MEVD for estimating precipitation extremes from globally available datasets and an understanding of the variability of sub-daily precipitation extremes in different hydroclimatic regions of the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• An analytical multifractal (MF) approximation for IDF curve estimation is tested. • The MF model is compared to annual maxima and peaks-over-threshold approaches. • The MF IDF estimates are more accurate, especially for short rainfall records. • The MF parameters resemble the local topography and rainfall climatology. • The MF parameter setting is particularly appealing for ungauged locations. The present study uses hourly rainfall measurements from 36 raingauge stations in the northeastern United States with more than 55 years of recordings, to assess the accuracy and robustness of three conceptually different parametric approaches to produce intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves from rainfall records: (a) the well celebrated parametric IDF model based on annual maxima (AM) series, initially introduced by Rossi and Villani (1994) and later extended by Koutsoyiannis et al. (1998), (b) a peaks-over-threshold (PoT) model based on proper fitting of a reparametrized generalized Pareto (GP) distribution to the scaled excesses of the average rainfall intensity over various durations d , and (c) the analytical approximation introduced by Langousis et al. (2009) for estimation of multifractal (MF) rainfall maxima. Since its development, the third approach has never been tested in real world applications, and/or compared to routinely used approaches for IDF curve estimation. The obtained results show that the MF approach may constitute an important tool for hydrological applications, as it produces more accurate and robust IDF estimates than the other two approaches, irrespective of the duration d and return period T of interest, especially in cases where rainfall records exhibit significant length limitations. In addition, the parameters of the MF analytical approximation are found to be descriptive of the local topography and rainfall climatology of the region, providing a physically meaningful modeling setting that is particularly suited for regional frequency analysis and IDF estimation at ungauged locations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]