1. Gradient-based delineation of the primary GTV on FLT PET in squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and impact on radiotherapy planning
- Author
-
Jingwei Zhou, Tonghai Liu, Jian Zhu, Yong Yin, Guifang Zhang, Jie Lu, Changsheng Ma, Dali Han, and Tao Sun
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Fluorine Radioisotopes ,Esophageal Neoplasms ,medicine.medical_treatment ,GTV delineation ,medicine ,Carcinoma ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Tissue Distribution ,Esophagus ,Radical surgery ,Radiation treatment planning ,Aged ,Squamous cell cancer ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Radiotherapy ,business.industry ,Research ,Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ,Middle Aged ,Thoracic Neoplasms ,medicine.disease ,Dideoxynucleosides ,Radiation therapy ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Oncology ,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Positron emission tomography ,Esophageal carcinoma ,Positron-Emission Tomography ,Carcinoma, Squamous Cell ,Female ,Radiology ,Tomography ,Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated ,Radiopharmaceuticals ,business ,Nuclear medicine ,FLT-PET - Abstract
Background To validate a gradient-based segmentation method for gross tumor volume(GTV) delineation on 8F-fluorothymidine (FLT)positron emission tomography (PET)/ computer tomography (CT) in esophageal squamous cell cancer through pathologic specimen, in comparison with standardized uptake values (SUV) threshold-based methods and CT. The corresponding impact of this GTV delineation method on treatment planning was evaluated. Methods and materials Ten patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer were enrolled. Before radical surgery, all patients underwent FLT-PET/CT. GTVs were delineated by using four methods. GTVGRAD, GTV1.4 and GTV30%max were segmented on FLT PET using a gradient-based method, a fixed threshold of 1.4 SUV and 30% of SUVmax, respectively. GTVCT was based on CT data alone. The maximum longitudinal tumor length of each segmented GTV was compared with the measured tumor length of the pathologic gross tumor length (LPath). GTVGRAD, GTV1.4 and GTV30%max were compared with GTVCT by overlap index. Two radiotherapy plannings (planGRAD) and (planCT) were designed for each patient based on GTVGRAD and GTVCT. The dose-volume parameters for target volume and normal tissues, CI and HI of planGRAD and planCT were compared. Results The mean ± standard deviation of LPath was 6.47 ± 2.70 cm. The mean ± standard deviation of LGRAD,L1.4, L30%max and LCT were 6.22 ± 2.61, 6.23 ± 2.80, 5.95 ± 2.50,7.17 ± 2.28 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficients between LPath and each segmentation method were 0.989, 0.920, 0.920 and 0.862, respectively. The overlap indices of GTVGRAD, GTV1.4, GTV30%max when compared with GTVCT were 0.75 ± 0.12, 0.71 ± 0.12, 0.57 ± 0.10, respectively. The V5, V10, V20, V30 and mean dose of total-lung,V30 and mean dose of heart of planGRAD were significantly lower than planCT. Conclusions The gradient-based method provided the closest estimation of target length. The radiotherapy plannings based on the gradient-based segmentation method reduced the irradiated volume of lung, heart in comparison to CT.
- Published
- 2015