Search

Disease-related milk losses directly affect dairy herds' profitability and the production efficiency of the dairy industry. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify phenotypic variability in milk fluctuation periods related to diseases and to explore milk fluctuation traits as indicators of disease resilience. By combining high-frequency daily milk yield data with disease records of cows that were treated and recovered from the disease, we estimated milk variability trends within a fixed period around the treatment day of each record for 5 diseases: udder health, reproductive disorders, metabolic disorders, digestive disorders, and hoof health. The average milk yield decreased rapidly from 6 to 8 d before the treatment day for all diseases, with the largest milk reduction observed on the treatment day. Additionally, we assessed the significance of milk fluctuation periods highly related to diseases by defining milk fluctuations as a period of at least 10 consecutive days in which milk yield fell below 90% of the expected milk production values at least once. We defined the development and recovery phases of milk fluctuations using 3,847 milk fluctuation periods related to disease incidences, and estimated genetic parameters of milk fluctuation traits, including milk losses, duration of the fluctuation, variation rate in daily milk yield, and standard deviation of milk deviations for each phase and their genetic correlation with several important traits. In general, the disease-related milk fluctuation periods lasted 21.19 ± 10.36 d with a milk loss of 115.54 ± 92.49 kg per lactation. Compared with the development phase, the recovery phase lasted an average of 3.3 d longer, in which cows produced 11.04 kg less milk and exhibited a slower variation rate in daily milk yield of 0.35 kg/d. There were notable differences in milk fluctuation traits depending on the disease, and greater milk losses were observed when multiple diseases occurred simultaneously. All milk fluctuation traits evaluated were heritable with heritability estimates ranging from 0.01 to 0.10, and moderate to high genetic correlations with milk yield (0.34 to 0.64), milk loss throughout the lactation (0.22 to 0.97), and resilience indicator (0.39 to 0.95). These results indicate that cows with lower milk losses and higher resilience tend to have more stable milk fluctuations, which supports the potential for breeding for more disease-resilient cows based on milk fluctuation traits. Overall, this study confirms the high effect of diseases on milk yield variability and provides insightful information about their relationship with relevant traits in Holstein cattle. Furthermore, this study shows the potential of using high-frequency automatic monitoring of milk yield to assist on breeding practices and health management in dairy cows. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study investigated the reliability of genomic prediction (GP) using breed origin of alleles (BOA) approach in the Nordic Red (RDC) population, which has an admixed population structure. The RDC population consists of animals with varying degrees of genetic materials from the Danish Red (RDM), Swedish Red (SRB), Finnish Ayrshire (FAY), and Holstein (HOL) because bulls have been used across the breeds. The BOA approach was tested using 39,550 RDC animals in the reference population and 11,786 in the validation population. Deregressed proofs (DRP) of milk, fat and protein were used as response variable for GP. Direct genomic breeding values (DGV) for animals in the validation population were calculated with (BOA model) or without (joint model) considering breed origin of alleles. The joint model assumed homogeneous marker effects and a single set of marker effects were estimated, whereas BOA model assumed heterogeneous marker effects, and different sets of marker effects were estimated across the breeds. For the BOA approach, we tested scenarios assuming both correlated (BOA_cor) and uncorrelated (BOA_uncor) marker effects between the breeds. Additionally, we investigated GP using a standard Illumina 50K chip and including SNP selected from imputed whole-genome sequencing (50K+WGS). We also studied the effect of estimating (co)variances for genome regions of different sizes to exploit the information of the genome regions contributing to the (co)variance between the breeds. Region sizes were set as 1 SNP, a group of 30 or 100 adjacent SNP, or the whole genome. Reliability of DGV was measured as squared correlations between DGV and DRP divided by the reliability of DRP. Across the 3 traits, in general, RS30 and RS100 SNP yielded the highest reliabilities. Including WGS SNP improved reliabilities in almost all scenarios (0.297 on average for 50K and 0.307 on average for 50K+WGS). The BOA_uncor (0.233 on average) was inferior to the joint model (0.339 on average), but the reliabilities obtained using BOA_cor (0.334 on average) in most cases were not significantly different from those obtained using the joint model. The results indicate that both including additional whole-genome sequencing SNP and dividing the genome into fixed regions improve GP in the RDC. The BOA models have the potential to increase the reliability of GP, but the benefit is limited in populations with a high exchange of genetic material for a long time, as is the case for RDC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Icelandic Cattle is a local dairy cattle breed in Iceland. With about 26,000 breeding females, it is by far the largest among the indigenous Nordic cattle breeds. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of genomic selection in Icelandic Cattle. Pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) were compared. Accuracy, bias, and dispersion of estimated breeding values (EBV) for milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY), and somatic cell score (SCS) were estimated in a cross validation-based design. Accuracy (⁠ r ^ ⁠) was estimated by the correlation between EBV and corrected phenotype in a validation set. The accuracy (⁠ r ^ ⁠) of predictions using ssGBLUP increased by 13, 23, 19, and 20 percentage points for MY, FY, PY, and SCS for genotyped animals, compared with PBLUP. The accuracy of nongenotyped animals was not improved for MY and PY, but increased by 0.9 and 3.5 percentage points for FY and SCS. We used the linear regression (LR) method to quantify relative improvements in accuracy, bias (⁠ Δ ^ ⁠), and dispersion (⁠ b ^ ⁠) of EBV. Using the LR method, the relative improvements in accuracy of validation from PBLUP to ssGBLUP were 43%, 60%, 50%, and 48% for genotyped animals for MY, FY, PY, and SCS. Single-step GBLUP EBV were less underestimated (⁠ Δ ^ ⁠), and less overdispersed (⁠ b ^ ⁠) than PBLUP EBV for FY and PY. Pedigree-based BLUP EBV were close to unbiased for MY and SCS. Single-step GBLUP underestimated MY EBV but overestimated SCS EBV. Based on the average accuracy of 0.45 for ssGBLUP EBV obtained in this study, selection intensities according to the breeding scheme of Icelandic Cattle, and assuming a generation interval of 2.0 yr for sires of bulls, sires of dams and dams of bulls, genetic gain in Icelandic Cattle could be increased by about 50% relative to the current breeding scheme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic predictions have been applied for dairy cattle for more than a decade with great success, but genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) are not widely available for crossbred dairy cows. The large reference populations already in place for genomic evaluations of many pure breeds makes it interesting to use the accurate solutions, in particular the estimated marker effects, from these evaluations for calculation of GEBV for crossbred heifers and cows. Effects of marker alleles in crossbred animals can depend on breed origin of the alleles (BOA). Therefore, our aim was to investigate if reliable GEBV for crossbred dairy cows can be obtained by combining estimated marker effects from purebred evaluations based on BOA. We used data on 5,467 Danish crossbred dairy cows with contributions from Holstein, Jersey, and Red Dairy Cattle breeds. We assessed BOA assignment on their genotypes and found that we could assign 99.3% of the alleles to a definite breed of origin. We compared GEBV for 2 traits, protein yield and interval between first and last insemination of cows, with 2 models that both combine estimated marker effects from the genomic evaluations of the pure breeds: a breed of origin model that accounts for BOA and a breed proportion model that only accounts for genomic breed proportions in the crossbred animals. We accounted for the difference in level between the purebred evaluations by including intercepts in the models based on phenotypic averages. The predictive ability for protein yield was significantly higher from the breed of origin model, 0.45 compared with 0.43 from the breed proportion model. Furthermore, for the breed proportion model, the GEBVs had level bias, which made comparison across groups with different breed composition skewed. We therefore concluded that reliable genomic predictions for crossbred dairy cows can be obtained by combining estimated marker effects from the genomic evaluations of purebreds using a model that accounts for BOA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]