Search

Molluscan mariculture has become increasingly common in coastal areas of China with production accounting for ∼69% of Chinese total mariculture production. In other international locations, however, a possible underutilization of molluscan mariculture may result from hesitancy based on initial environmental impacts. This study investigated the dynamic relationship between the molluscan mariculture industry (MMI) development and environmental quality (solid waste production, total wastewater emissions, and sulfur dioxide emissions) at the meso level. Their relationship trend followed that described by the environmental Kuznets curve theory in ∼78% of the areas, and ∼89% of the areas were in a coupled coordination state in most periods. This implied that the healthy development of the MMI can reduce environmental stress. These results should help to alleviate the negative perceptions of some researchers and the public regarding mariculture operation. The findings suggest that China, given its substantial contribution to global blue growth, should further support sustainable molluscan production by developing new strategies and policies and reducing potential negative impacts of mariculture on the environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Effective fisheries management is necessary for the long‐term sustainability of fisheries and the economic benefits that they provide, but focusing only on ecological sustainability risks disregarding ultimate goals related to well‐being that must be achieved through broader social policy. An analysis of global landings data shows that average fishing wages in 36%–67% of countries, home to 69%–95% of fishers worldwide, are likely below their nationally determined minimum living wage (which accounts for costs of food, shelter, clothing, health and education). Furthermore, even if all fisheries in every country were perfectly managed to achieve their Maximum Sustainable Yield, a common sustainability target, average incomes of fishers in up to 49 countries—70% of fishers worldwide—would still not meet minimum living wages. Access to decent work and livelihoods are fundamental human rights, including for all fisherfolk around the world, and strategies to support their well‐being must therefore integrate a much wider set of perspectives, disciplines and institutions. Key first steps for fisheries researchers are to more fully recognize and estimate fisheries benefits to households—including income from women and/or alternative employment, unreported landings, or shadow values of subsistence catch—and to help identify and learn from economic equity outcomes in rebuilt fisheries around the world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]