Search

A 49-year-old woman underwent anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring tendon. Due to knee osteoarthritis progression, total knee arthroplasty was performed 13 years after the surgery. The anteromedial (AM) bundle was composed partly of tendon-like tissue and partly of scar-like tissue. In the tendon-like part of the AM bundle, the collagen fibers were slightly loose and showed a low-frequency crimp structure with an ovoid cell shape. In contrast, the collagen arrangement in the scar-like part was irregular, edematous, and sparsely cell-dense, with an ovoid cell shape. The posterolateral bundles were generally composed of spindle-shaped cells, and the collagen was arranged in tight cohesion and had well-demarcated bundles with normal crimping. Within the tibial tunnel, the graft was mainly connected to the surrounding lamellar bone on the posterior sides, with sparser connections on the anterior and medial/lateral side. The findings of this long-term case provide valuable information to enable understanding of multiple-folded hamstring tendons. Level of evidence V. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the effects of a new remnant-preserving double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique, focused on avoiding remnant damage and preserving continuity of remnants, on graft maturity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 169 patients were divided into three groups: 41 in the preservation group, 70 in the resection group, and 58 in the absent group. In the preservation group, rather than passing the graft through the remnant tissue, the graft was reconstructed such that the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles sandwiched the remnant to avoid damage to the remnant and maintain its continuity. Based on 1-year postoperative MRI, the grafts were divided into three regions: distal, middle, and proximal. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of each region of interest was calculated to evaluate the signal intensity of the graft and was compared among the three groups. Additionally, to identify factors influencing graft maturity, a multiple regression analysis was performed with SNQ as the dependent variable and patient demographics, bone morphology, and surgical factors as independent variables. Results: In a three-group comparison of mean SNQs, the distal region was 3.3 ± 3.4, 8.9 ± 8.3, and 9.0 ± 8.6 (p < 0.001), the middle region was 5.3 ± 3.7, 10.9 ± 11.1, and 11.3 ± 10.2 (p < 0.001), and the proximal region was 6.8 ± 4.5, 11.1 ± 8.8, and 11.7 ± 10.8 (p = 0.017), in order of the preservation, resection, and absent groups, respectively. That indicated that the remnant-preserving ACLR was more hypointense than ACLR with remnant resection or absent in all three regions. Multiple regression analysis showed that remnant preservation remained the relevant factor affecting SNQ of the graft at the distal and middle levels. Conclusion: The new remnant-preserving anatomic double-bundle ACLR had significantly better graft maturity, measured by SNQ on MRI, than the remnant resection and absent groups. The remnant procedure was the relevant factor affecting graft maturity. Level of evidence: Level III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]