Search

Preschool programs for socially vulnerable children are believed to affect school readiness and language development but infrequently include follow-up to adolescence; observational measurement of receptive vocabulary is rare. The purpose of this longitudinal cohort study (55 children and 41 parents) was to report the trajectory of receptive vocabulary development for socially vulnerable children of diverse ethnicities (Indigenous, other Canadian-born, and Immigrant) who participated in a two-generation preschool program. English receptive vocabulary scores were measured at 5-time points: (a) program intake, (b) program exit, (c) age 7 years, (d) age 10 years, and (e) adolescence, using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test – Third Edition (PPVT-III). For all children, PPVT-III scores increased the most between program intake and exit and positive changes were sustained until adolescence. When the sample was examined by gender, PPVT-III scores were higher for boys than girls at all time points. When the sample was examined by ethnicity, other Canadian-born children scored higher than Indigenous and Immigrant children at all time points. Immigrant children scored lowest until age 7 years, and at age 10 years and adolescence scored higher than Indigenous children. Using mixed-effects modeling, PPVT-III scores increased when English was the primary language spoken at home at intake. PPVT-III scores increased slightly as caregiver age and caregiver Adverse Childhood Experiences score increased. PPVT-III scores were lower for Immigrant girls and Indigenous boys than other sub-groups of children. Differential effects of the two-generation preschool program by gender and ethnicity suggest tailoring programming to increase equitability of receptive vocabulary development for immigrant girls and Indigenous boys. Children with intergenerational adversity may require additional support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose:To test a model of child, family and service determinants of participation in family and recreational activities for young children with cerebral palsy (CP). Methods:Participants were a convenience sample of 429 children (242 males) with CP, aged 18 to 60 months, representing all levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). Children were divided into two groups by GMFCS levels, levels I to II and levels III to V. Data on impairments and gross motor function were collected by therapists; parents provided information about children’s health conditions and adaptive behaviour. Seven months later, parents reported on family life and services received. One year after the beginning of the study, parents reported their children’s participation. Data from the two groups of children were analysed separately using structural equation modelling. Results:The model explained 35% and 40% of the variance of frequency of participation in family and recreation and 28% and 38% of enjoyment in participation, for the two groups of children, respectively. Children’s adaptive behaviour, family ecology, and number of community recreational programs were associated with the frequency of participation for both groups. Gross motor function was only associated with the frequency of participation for children in levels III–V. Adaptive behaviour was associated with enjoyment for both groups. The extent services met children’s needs was associated with enjoyment for children in levels I to II and family ecology was a determinant of enjoyment for children in levels III to V. Conclusion:Supporting children’s adaptive behaviour, family ecology, and access to community recreational programmes may foster participation in family and recreational activities for young children with CP.Implications for RehabilitationParticipation in family and recreational activities for young children with CP is complex and influenced by child, family and environmental factors.Practitioners are encouraged to support children’s adaptive behaviour and access to community programs and family relationships, involvement in community activities and expectations of their children.Optimizing gross motor function for children who have limitations in self-mobility may enhance their participation in family and recreational activities.For children with a good prognosis for walking, providing services perceived by parents to meet their children’s needs may enhance children’s enjoyment of participation. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background: There is a paucity of research evidence to guide health care providers' practice in pediatric palliative care. At the same time, some clinicians and Institutional Review Boards are reluctant to approve such studies because of concerns about further burdening families. Yet, there is some evidence that research participation can have positive effects for families. Objective: To obtain parents' perceptions about their experience of participating in one of two research studies. Design: Descriptive, quantitative survey. Setting/Subjects: Caregivers of children with life-threatening conditions ( n=323) who were caring for the child at home. Measurements: Researcher-designed Impact of Participation questionnaire. Results: Few differences between the two groups were found on Impact responses. Not a single parent reported regretting participating in their study and almost all (96.3%) reported that conducting research about family's experiences in pediatric palliative care had value. Just over three-quarters (76.2%) did not find participation at all painful, and 73.7% reported that participation was about as painful as expected, with 23.2% reporting less painful. Approximately half (50.5%) said that participation had at least some positive effect and only three parents reported any negative effect. An overwhelming majority (93.4%) would recommend participation to other parents in a similar situation. Conclusions: Participation in research for families with children who have a life-threatening condition is not only acceptable to parents, but may in fact have a positive effect. Although clinicians and Institutional Review Boards may be hesitant to fully support such research, it is clear that conducting research in the field of pediatric palliative care is important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]