Search

Purpose: To determine characteristics associated with inappropriate antibiotic use amongst children hospitalised for influenza. Methods: We performed active surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalizations amongst children ≤ 16 years old at the 12 Canadian Immunization Monitoring Program Active hospitals, from September 2010 to August 2021. Antibiotic use was presumed appropriate if any of the following indications were met: age < 1 month, immunocompromised, hemoglobinopathy, laboratory-confirmed bacterial infection, radiographically confirmed pneumonia, admission to an intensive care unit and mechanical ventilation. Regression analyses were used to identify baseline and clinical characteristics associated with antibiotic use amongst patients without an appropriate indication. Results: Amongst 8971 children, 6424 (71.6%) received any antibiotics during their hospitalisation. Amongst the 4429 children without an appropriate indication, 2366 (53.2%) received antibiotics. Antibiotic use amongst children without appropriate indication differed between study centres, ranging from 33.2% to 66.1% (interquartile range [IQR] 50.6–56.3%); it did not change significantly over time (p-value for trend = 0.28). In multivariable analyses, older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–0.99), presence of any high-risk condition (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.92), influenza virus type B (aOR 0.8, 95% CI 0.70–0.91) and croup (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49–0.83) were associated with less, whilst fever ≥ 38.5 °C (aOR 1.82, 95% CI 1.42–2.35) and hospitalisation duration (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09–1.15) were associated with more inappropriate antibiotic use. Conclusions: Over two-third of children hospitalised for influenza received antibiotics, including over half of those without an appropriate indication for antibiotic treatment. Differences amongst study centres suggest the importance of contextual determinants of antibiotic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study investigates how the variables of culture and hearing status might influence the amount of parent-child talk families engage in throughout an average day. Method: Seventeen Vietnamese and 8 Canadian families of children with hearing loss and 17 Vietnamese and 13 Canadian families with typically hearing children between the ages of 18 and 48 months old participated in this cross-comparison design study. Each child wore a Language ENvironment Analysis system digital language processor for 3 days. An automated vocal analysis then calculated an average conversational turn count (CTC) for each participant as the variable of investigation. The CTCs for the 4 groups were compared using a Kruskal-Wallis test and a set of planned pairwise comparisons. Results: The Canadian families participated in significantly more conversational turns than the Vietnamese families. No significant difference was found between the Vietnamese or the Canadian cohorts as a function of hearing status. Conclusions: Culture, but not hearing status, influences CTCs as derived by the Language ENvironment Analysis system. Clinicians should consider how cultural communication practices might influence their suggestions for language stimulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to assess the communicative skills of children and young adults with ring 14 syndrome and linear 14q deletions, investigating the relationships among their language development and their genetic, clinical, psychomotor and behavioural characteristics. Participants were 36 individuals with chromosome 14 aberrations whose parents completed a questionnaire, specifically developed in five languages, to assess their son's/daughter's development. Data analysis showed that chronological age does not account for the high individual variability found in the participants' skills. The comparison between participants with ring 14 syndrome and participants with 14q linear deletions showed that the former were characterised by a higher occurrence of epilepsy, abnormalities of the retina and autism. The participants with smaller amounts of deleted genetic material were those who had a higher level of language development. Because ring 14 syndrome is a rare genetic disease, the collection of data from a large group of individuals could be helpful to create expectations about the possible developmental outcomes of these children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]