Search

A graph is nonsingular if its adjacency matrix A( G) is nonsingular. The inverse of a nonsingular graph G is a graph whose adjacency matrix is similar to A( G) via a particular type of similarity. Let H denote the class of connected bipartite graphs with unique perfect matchings. Tifenbach and Kirkland (2009) characterized the unicyclic graphs in H which possess unicyclic inverses. We present a characterization of unicyclic graphs in H which possess bicyclic inverses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider only connected bipartite graphs G with a unique perfect matching M . Let G w be the weighted graph obtained from G by giving weights to its edges using the positive weight function w : E ( G ) → ( 0 , ∞ ) such that w ( e ) = 1 for each e ∈ M . An unweighted graph G may be viewed as a weighted graph with the weight function w ≡ 1 . A weighted graph G w is nonsingular if its adjacency matrix A ( G w ) is nonsingular. The inverse of a nonsingular weighted graph G w is the unique weighted graph whose adjacency matrix is similar to the inverse of the adjacency matrix A ( G w ) via a diagonal matrix of ±1s. By G / M we denote the graph obtained from G by contracting each edge of M to a single vertex. It is known that if G / M is bipartite, then G w is invertible for each weight function w. In this article, we consider the converse of this result and show that if G w is invertible for each w, then the graph G / M is bipartite. We also supply exact conditions under which G w is invertible for one w will force that the graph G / M is bipartite. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider only simple graphs. A graph G is said to be nonsingular if its adjacency matrix A ( G ) is nonsingular. The inverse of a nonsingular graph G is the unique weighted graph whose adjacency matrix is similar to the inverse of the adjacency matrix A ( G ) via a diagonal matrix of ±1s. An invertible graph G is said to be a self-inverse graph if G is isomorphic to its inverse. Let H be the class of connected bipartite graphs with unique perfect matchings. We consider the problem of characterizing the graphs in H which are self-inverse graphs. In this article, we answer this problem for the class of unicyclic graphs. The study of the strong reciprocal eigenvalue property is closely related to the study of graphs which are isomorphic to their inverse graphs. A nonsingular graph G is said to satisfy the property (SR) if the reciprocal of each eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix A ( G ) is also an eigenvalue of A ( G ) and they both have the same multiplicities. In this article, we show that if a unicyclic graph G in H has property (SR), then G is invertible and the inverse graph of G is unicyclic. As an application, we show that a noncorona unicyclic graph in H with property (SR) can have one of the five specified structures. Finally, our discussions lead to the following problem. Does there exist a unicyclic graph G ∈ H which has property (SR) but G is not self-inverse? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We consider only simple graphs. Consider connected bipartite graphs with unique perfect matchings such that the graph obtained by contracting all matching edges is also bipartite. On the class H g of such graphs G the equivalence of the following statements are known. i) The reciprocal of the spectral radius of the adjacency matrix A ( G ) is the least positive eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix. ii) The graph is isomorphic to its inverse, where the inverse of a graph G is the unique weighted graph whose adjacency matrix is similar to the inverse of the adjacency matrix A ( G ) via a diagonal matrix of ±1s. iii) The graph has the reciprocal eigenvalue property, that is, the reciprocal of each eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix A ( G ) is also an eigenvalue of A ( G ) . iv) The graph has the strong reciprocal eigenvalue property, that is, the reciprocal of each eigenvalue of the adjacency matrix A ( G ) is also an eigenvalue of A ( G ) and they both have the same multiplicities. v) The graph is a corona graph, that is, it is obtained by taking a bipartite graph and then by inserting a new adjacent vertex of degree one at each vertex. It is known that the statements iii) and iv) are not equivalent, if we allow nonbipartite graphs. However, the equivalence of these two is not yet known for the class of bipartite graphs with unique perfect matchings, where we relax the condition of bipartiteness of the contracted graph. In this article, we establish the equivalence of the first four statements for a class larger than H g . We then supply a constructive structural description of those graphs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]