Search

At present, the circular economy is emerging as a strategy for sustainable development. What is important in promoting the circular economy is to assess its current level and take measures for assessment. This paper discusses some methodological issues in comparing and assessing the efforts for the circular economy at the international level. To this end, the authors explain the theoretical premise related to the assessment of efforts for the circular economy, establish an indicator system for assessing the efforts for the circular economy, and suggest a method for comprehensively assessing the efforts for the circular economy by country. The conclusions are that (a) the comparative evaluation of activities related to the circular economy by country requires a unified standard or category that can cover these activities, including all factors that meet sustainable development; the outcome, process, and guarantee of the circular economy, and this can be the circular economy effort and (b) the circular economy effort of a given country must synthetically be assessed by using the indicators capable of showing all aspects. These conclusions may contribute to establishing a new theoretical foundation that can include various aspects of the circular economy activities and to setting a practical and methodological foundation for evaluating each country's various activities related to the circular economy at the international level and can serve as a policy basis for identifying the weak and strong aspects of circular economy activities at the domestic or international level and establishing technological and economic measures to strengthen the weak aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Marketing & Management of Innovations / Marketing ì Menedžment Ìnnovacìj is the property of Sumy State University, Department of Marketing & Management of Innovative Activity and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

In order to systematize and organize the information needed to analyze sustainable development problems and also to select the most suggestive indicators, there were developed several model-frameworks, on which to overlay systems of statistical indicators for quantifying sustainability. This article analyzes in a comparative manner four frameworks based on causeeffect relationships, reflecting their advantages and disadvantages: PSR, DSR, DPSIR and DPSEEA. The models are already used by international organizations with responsibilities in official statistics, as well as by numerous national statistical offices of European and Non-European countries. The paper indicates the strengths and weaknesses of each framework, focusing on aspects that can be taken from each modelframework to be combined into a new hybrid model-framework, able to provide a quantitative characterization of sustainability aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]