16 results
Search Results
2. Post-Empiricism and Philosophy of Science.
- Author
-
Marsonet, Michele
- Subjects
THEORY of knowledge ,PHILOSOPHY of science ,THOUGHT & thinking ,ANALYTIC philosophy ,HUMANITIES - Abstract
The aim of this paper is to provide some sketchy remarks on the post-empiricist phenomenon in philosophy of science, taking into account the themes of the relationships between language on the one side and reality on the other, and the parallel problem of the alleged elimination of metaphysics. Unlike the logical empiricists, Popper believes that a clear separation between (i) analytic and synthetic sentences, and (ii) between theory and observation, is an impossible task. According to his view, theory and observation are intimately linked to each other, and no pure observation is ever possible. A position very similar to Popper's was endorsed by the American pragmatists in the last two centuries with Charles S. Peirce, William James and John Dewey. There also are important similarities between what Popper says and William James' theses. It is clear that if we recognize that the theoretical dimension precedes observation, and if we claim furthermore that scientific theories have a creative character, then we may explain the "jumps" that often take place in the history of science. Later on Feyerabend and his followers have turned philosophy of science into something mysterious and not easily classifiable in philosophical or scientific terms. The anything goes undermines the meaning itself of the discipline. If science is equated to any other dimension of spirit - art, religion, or even witchcraft - the specific and cognitive character of scientific rationality is eliminated. It follows that philosophy of science loses any meaningful role within the field of human knowledge, while even philosophy as such becomes more similar to a joke than to a serious endeavor. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. O que é comunicação nas revistas acadêmicas de comunicação? Um estudo de 53 periódicos acadêmicos brasileiros.
- Author
-
Sa MARTINO, Luis Mauro
- Subjects
- *
COMMUNICATION , *SCHOLARLY communication , *SCHOLARLY periodicals , *SCHOLARS , *FRAMES (Social sciences) , *HUMANITIES , *HUMANISM , *MEDIA studies , *THEORY of knowledge , *ELECTRONIC journals - Abstract
What is ‘communication’ in communication scholarly journals? This question arises from a practical issue: when one chooses to write about ‘communication’ and submit it to review, what guidelines are provided by the journals? What articles might be placed under this label? This paper examines the editorials, presentation and ‘focus and scope’ section of 53 Brazilian communication journals in order to outline their definition of ‘communication’. Main findings suggest that communication is presented (1) as an interface area, sometimes nearly overlapping the whole of the Humanities; (2) as a field defined by media studies, its production, messages and reception; (3) as a troublesome concept without defined boundaries. These findings are framed on a communication epistemology perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Political Emancipation and the 'Ticklish Subject': Dilemmas of the Lacanian Left.
- Author
-
Morgan, David
- Subjects
THEORY of knowledge ,PSYCHOANALYSIS ,PRAGMATISM ,HERMENEUTICS ,HUMANITIES - Abstract
Copyright of Sociologija: Mintis ir Veiksmas is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Going Deeper or Flatter: Connecting Deep Mapping, Flat Ontologies and the Democratizing of Knowledge.
- Author
-
Springett, Selina
- Subjects
AESTHETICS ,THEORY of knowledge ,HUMANITIES ,THEORISTS ,DATABASES - Abstract
The concept of "deep mapping", as an approach to place, has been deployed as both a descriptor of a specific suite of creative works and as a set of aesthetic practices. While its definition has been amorphous and adaptive, a number of distinct, yet related, manifestations identify as, or have been identified by, the term. In recent times, it has garnered attention beyond literary discourse, particularly within the "spatial" turn of representation in the humanities and as a result of expanded platforms of data presentation. This paper takes a brief look at the practice of "deep mapping", considering it as a consciously performative act and tracing a number of its various manifestations. It explores how deep mapping is a reflection of epistemological trends in ontological practices of connectivity and the "flattening" of knowledge systems. In particular those put forward by post structural and cultural theorists, such as Bruno Latour, Gilles Deleuze, and Felix Guattari, as well as by theorists who associate with speculative realism. The concept of deep mapping as an aesthetic, methodological, and ideological tool, enables an approach to place that democratizes knowledge by crossing temporal, spatial, and disciplinary boundaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. O valor das humanidades em um tempo técnico-científico.
- Author
-
David Stadler, Thiago
- Subjects
- *
HUMANITIES education , *UTILITARIANISM , *THEORY of knowledge , *LAUDATORY poetry , *SCIENCE historiography , *HUMANITIES -- History - Abstract
In this paper, we analyzed some issues about the notion of utility of the humanities. Is the thinking not attached to an immediate utilitarianism synonym of inutility? To answer this question, we present some historical aspects that found the automatic link between utility and sciences and the devaluation of the subjects that do not produce an immediate product. This is not a manifest against the hard sciences or a panegyric to humanities. These are just some reflections that reshape the issue of the humanity studies as an integrant part of the contemporary knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. AS CRÍTICAS DE SOKAL E BRICMONT AO PÓSMODERNISMO: UMA SISTEMATIZAÇÃO.
- Author
-
Napoleão Alves, Henrique
- Subjects
SOCIAL epistemology ,CRITICAL analysis ,ANTHROPOSOPHY ,THEORY of knowledge - Abstract
Copyright of Aufklärung: Revista de Filosofia is the property of Aufklarung: Revista de Filosofia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Formal Communication Studies within Shanghai ranking universities. An epistemology on Communication Sciences proposal
- Author
-
María Soler Campillo, Aarón Rodríguez Serrano, and José Javier Marzal Felici
- Subjects
epistemología ,Epistemología ,Communication ,teoría del conocimiento ,Theory of Knowledge ,ciencias sociales ,Ciencias Sociales ,Humanidades ,Ranking de Shangai ,Shanghai Ranking ,Teoría del conocimiento ,Social Sciences ,comunicación ,Epistemology ,ranking de shangai ,lcsh:P87-96 ,lcsh:Communication. Mass media ,Humanities ,Comunicación ,Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad ,humanidades - Abstract
El presente artículo propone una reflexión crítica sobre el estatuto y naturaleza de los estudios de comunicación en el contexto académico español. En primer lugar, se examina la situación de los estudios de comunicación, que las autoridades académicas españolas han establecido unívocamente en la rama de “ciencias sociales y jurídicas”, más concretamente en el ámbito de las ciencias sociales. En segundo lugar, se aborda el estudio de la ubicación de los estudios de comunicación en las primeras 40 universidades del ranking de Shangai. Para ello, se han estudiado los planes de estudio (grado y postgrado) y la disposición estructural de sus facultades tanto en el campo de la comunicación audiovisual como del periodismo. Los resultados demuestran que, frente a lo que comúnmente se da por sentado, nuestras titulaciones se suelen encontrar mucho más cerca de centros vinculados explícitamente con las “humanidades”. Del mismo modo, mostramos cómo el número de universidades que apuestan por la comunicación es notablemente alto (80% del núcleo del ránking). Finalmente, se debate la posibilidad de definir una nueva epistemología de las ciencias de la comunicación, que asuma su carácter interdisciplinar, esto es, como espacio disciplinar en el que concurren saberes humanísticos y de las ciencias sociales. This paper reflects critically on the status and nature of Communication Studies within the Spanish academic context. First, the situation of Communication Studies, as unequivocally defined by the Spanish academic within the field of “Social and Legal Science”, specifically in the field of social sciences, is examined, followed by an analysis of which of the first 40 universities in the Shanghai ranking offers these studies. To this end, the syllabus (degree and postgraduate) and the structure of their faculties were studied, both in the field of Audiovisual Communication and Journalism. The results reveal that, as opposed to what is commonly assumed, the Spanish degrees are often much closer to academic centres offering studies in the field of Humanities. Similarly, the results reveal that the number of universities offering Communication Studies is remarkably high (80% of the ranking core). Finally, the possibility of defining a new epistemology for Communication Science as an interdisciplinary subject is discussed, i.e., a disciplinary space where humanistic knowledge and social sciences are involved. El presente trabajo ha sido realizado con la ayuda del Proyecto de Investigación “Mapas de la Investigación en Comunicación en las universidades españolas de 2007 a 2018” (código PGC2018-093358-B-100), bajo la dirección de Carmen Caffarel Serra y Carlos Lozano Ascencio, financiado por la Convocatoria 2018 de Proyectos de I+D “Generación de Conocimiento”, del Programa Estatal de Generación de Conocimiento y Fortalecimiento Científico y Tecnológico del Sistema I+D, en el Marco del Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, para el periodo 2019-2021; y en el marco del proyecto de investigación “Análisis de identidades discursivas en la era de la posverdad. Generación de contenidos audiovisuales para una Educomunicación crítica” (AIDEP) (código 18I390.01/1), bajo la dirección de Javier Marzal Felici, financiado por la Universitat Jaume I, a través de la convocatoria competitiva de proyectos de investigación de la UJI, para el periodo 2019-2021.
- Published
- 2020
9. AN ETHICAL EVALUATION METHODOLOGY FOR CLINICAL CASES.
- Author
-
Tambone, Vittoradolfo and Ghilardi, Giampaolo
- Subjects
CASE studies ,ETHICS ,HEALTH care teams ,CLINICAL education ,HUMANITIES ,THEORY of knowledge - Abstract
Copyright of Persona y Bioética is the property of Universidad de la Sabana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. EXPERIENCES IN CLINICAL ETHICS: A PROJECT FOR MEETINGS ON CLINICAL ETHICS IN PALLIATIVE MEDICINE.
- Author
-
Comoretto, Nunziata and Centeno, Carlos
- Subjects
CLINICAL education ,PALLIATIVE treatment ,ANTHROPOLOGY ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,THEORY of knowledge ,HUMANITIES - Abstract
Copyright of Persona y Bioética is the property of Universidad de la Sabana and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Las diversas interpretaciones de la teoría del conocimiento de Giordano Bruno y sus problemas. Hacia una elucidación de los conceptos de phantasia e imago
- Author
-
Juan Carlos Fernández Fernández
- Subjects
Concepto objetivo ,Phantasia ,Immanence ,concepto formal ,BD95-131 ,Giordano Bruno ,Philosophy ,teoría del conocimiento ,concepto objetivo ,Metaphysics ,B1-5802 ,Teoría del conocimiento ,Theory of knowledge ,Formal concept ,Objective concept ,Concepto formal ,phantasia ,imago ,medicine ,Imago ,medicine.symptom ,Philosophy (General) ,Humanities ,Confusion - Abstract
En este trabajo analizo las diversas interpretaciones que ha suscitado la teoría del conocimiento de Giordano Bruno a partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XX. El objetivo principal es destacar una serie de problemas fundamentales que han de ser superados si se quiere esclarecer adecuadamente el conjunto de la propuesta gnoseológica de Bruno, en concreto sus tesis relativas al estatuto y función de la facultad fantástica y sus productos, las imágenes. Son tres los problemas destacados: (1) la confusión terminológica que por parte de los intérpretes se observa en torno al concepto “imago”, en su doble sentido ontológico y gnoseológico; (2) la tesis de que los productos mentales carecen de rasgos lógicos, idea a su vez derivada de una interpretación en exceso idealista de la génesis del conocimiento y (3) la tesis de la “inmanencia fantásica”, consistente en reducir toda actividad gnoseológica al ámbito de la fantasía. Para justificar la problematicidad inherente a estas ideas acudiré tanto al texto bruniano como a la conocida distinción escolástica entre “concepto formal” y “concepto objetivo”., In this paper, I analyze the different interpretations that Giordano Bruno’s theory of knowledge has aroused since the second half of the 20th century. The main objective is to highlight a series of fundamental problems that have to be overcome if the whole of Bruno’s epistemological proposal is to be adequately clarified, in particular his thesis regarding the status and function of the fantastic faculty and its products, images. There are three outstanding problems: (1) the terminological confusion that, on the part of the interpreters, is observed around the concept “imago”, in its double ontological and gnoseological sense; (2) the thesis that mental products lack logical features, an idea derived from an excessively idealistic interpretation of the genesis of knowledge and (3) the thesis of “fantastic immanence”, consisting of reducing all epistemological activity to the field of fantasy. To justify the inherent problematicity of these ideas, I will turn to both the Brunian text and the well-known scholastic distinction between “formal concept” and “objective concept”.
- Published
- 2021
12. Los estudios reglados de comunicación en las universidades del ranking de Shangai. Propuestas para una epistemología de las ciencias de la comunicación
- Author
-
Marzal Felici, Javier, Soler Campillo, María, and Rodríguez Serrano, Aarón
- Subjects
Humanities ,Epistemología ,Communication ,Theory of Knowledge ,Ciencias Sociales ,Humanidades ,Ranking de Shangai ,Shanghai Ranking ,Teoría del conocimiento ,Social Sciences ,Epistemology ,Comunicación - Abstract
El presente artículo propone una reflexión crítica sobre el estatuto y naturaleza de los estudios de comunicación en el contexto académico español. En primer lugar, se examina la situación de los estudios de comunicación, que las autoridades académicas españolas han establecido unívocamente en la rama de “ciencias sociales y jurídicas”, más concretamente en el ámbito de las ciencias sociales. En segundo lugar, se aborda el estudio de la ubicación de los estudios de comunicación en las primeras 40 universidades del ranking de Shangai. Para ello, se han estudiado los planes de estudio (grado y postgrado) y la disposición estructural de sus facultades tanto en el campo de la comunicación audiovisual como del periodismo. Los resultados demuestran que, frente a lo que comúnmente se da por sentado, nuestras titulaciones se suelen encontrar mucho más cerca de centros vinculados explícitamente con las “humanidades”. Del mismo modo, mostramos cómo el número de universidades que apuestan por la comunicación es notablemente alto (80% del núcleo del ránking). Finalmente, se debate la posibilidad de definir una nueva epistemología de las ciencias de la comunicación, que asuma su carácter interdisciplinar, esto es, como espacio disciplinar en el que concurren saberes humanísticos y de las ciencias sociales. This paper reflects critically on the status and nature of Communication Studies within the Spanish academic context. First, the situation of Communication Studies, as unequivocally defined by the Spanish academic within the field of “Social and Legal Science”, specifically in the field of social sciences, is examined, followed by an analysis of which of the first 40 universities in the Shanghai ranking offers these studies. To this end, the syllabus (degree and postgraduate) and the structure of their faculties were studied, both in the field of Audiovisual Communication and Journalism. The results reveal that, as opposed to what is commonly assumed, the Spanish degrees are often much closer to academic centres offering studies in the field of Humanities. Similarly, the results reveal that the number of universities offering Communication Studies is remarkably high (80% of the ranking core). Finally, the possibility of defining a new epistemology for Communication Science as an interdisciplinary subject is discussed, i.e., a disciplinary space where humanistic knowledge and social sciences are involved.
- Published
- 2020
13. Internal Senses in Nicholas of Cusa’ Psychology
- Author
-
Andrea Fiamma
- Subjects
History ,Aristóteles ,History of Psychology ,Nicolás de Cusa ,Theory of Knowledge ,Religious studies ,Teoría del conocimiento ,Historiography ,Percepción ,History of Medieval Philosophy ,Philosophy ,Aristotelismo ,Aristotelianism ,Historia de la Psicología ,Perception ,Historia de la Filosofía medieval ,Humanities - Abstract
En este trabajo se aborda la interpretación de Nicolás de Cusa sobre De anima de Aristóteles, en relación con el funcionamiento de los sentidos internos en el proceso gnoseológico: sensus communis, vis memorialis, vis aestimativa, phantasia y vis imaginativa. Por primera vez en la reciente historiografía sobre la teoría del conocimiento en la Edad Media, las referencias a la doctrina aristotélica de los sentidos internos en la obra de Nicolás de Cusa se organizan dentro de una reconstrucción filosófica sistemática y ordenada; como fuente principal de la doctrina cusana de los sentidos internos, se identifica el Liber de anima de Alberto Magno. This paper considers Nicholas of Cusa’s interpretation of Aristotle’s De anima with regard to the functioning of the internal senses in the gnoseological process: sensus communis, vis memorialis, vis aestimativa, phantasia and vis imaginativa. For the first time in the recent historiography on medieval theory of knowledge, the references to the Aristotelian doctrine of the internal senses in Nicholas of Cusa’s work are organized in a systematic and ordered philosophical reconstruction; as main source of the Cusanian doctrine of internal senses, Albert the Great’s Liber de anima is identified.
- Published
- 2020
14. El doble acceso fenomenológico-ético a la realidad del otro en la filosofía de Paul Ricoeur
- Author
-
Martín Grassi
- Subjects
Ethics ,Intersubjectivity ,lcsh:Philosophy (General) ,Philosophy ,Theory of Knowledge ,Intersubjetividad ,Epistemology ,Fenomenología Hermenéutica ,Gnoseología ,Ricouer ,Ricoeur ,lcsh:B1-5802 ,Humanities ,Hermeneutical phenomenology ,Etica - Abstract
Este trabajo pretende introducir al lector en la problemática de la intersubjetividad desde la perspectiva de Paul Ricoeur, considerando el doble acceso, ético y gnoseológico, a la realidad del otro. Se estudiará en primer lugar cómo, a los ojos de Ricouer, la fenomenología husserliana debe enfrentar su prueba más definitoria, la de la explicitación del fenómeno de la intersubjetividad, y cómo puede superarla. En segundo lugar, se mostrará cómo Ricoeur no reduce el acceso al otro a la constitución egológica, sino que, por el contrario, la subordina al a priori ético del respeto, que pone al otro como otro antes de cualquier tipo de constitución fenomenológica o de aproximación simpática. Es nuestra intención mostrar que no se trata en Ricouer de excluir ninguno de los dos accesos, sino que se trata de una fenomenología genética que rastrea lo extraño desde lo propio, atendiendo ante todo a la intencionalidad ética del hombre como lo definitorio en el orden intersubjetivo.This paper pretends to be an introduction to the problem of intersubjectivity from Paul Ricouer's point of view, considering the double access, ethical and gnoseological, to otherness reality. First, it will be examined how, according to Ricoeur, husserlian phenomenology must face its more definitory test, the explicitation of intersubjectivity phenomenon, and how can it be surpassed. Second, it will be shown that Ricoeur does not reduce the access to the other to egological constitution, but, on the contrary, subordinates it to the ethical a priori of respect, which poses the other as other before any attempt of phenomenological constitution or sympathetic approach. Our intention is to state that Ricoeur does not exclude any of these two approaches: Ricouer's position is one of a genetical phenomenology which tracks foreign from owness, attending principally to the ethical intentionality of man as definitory in the intersubjective order.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Au-delà de l’étiquette historiographique : l’empirisme singulier de J. N. Tetens
- Author
-
David Wittmann
- Subjects
cognition ,understanding ,métaphysique ,psychology ,metaphysics ,philosophie transcendantale ,transcendental philosophy ,Johann Nikolaus Tetens ,theory of knowledge ,lcsh:B1-5802 ,perfectibilité ,psychologie ,lcsh:History (General) and history of Europe ,Philosophy ,activity ,lcsh:Philosophy (General) ,entendement ,Immanuel Kant ,théorie de la connaissance ,empiricism ,connaissance ,General Medicine ,perfectibility ,lcsh:D ,activité ,empirisme ,Humanities ,imagination - Abstract
Au-delà de l’étiquette de « Locke allemand » dont a été affublé Johann Nikolaus Tetens, nous essayons de restituer le contexte, proprement allemand, de la référence à l’empirisme dans son œuvre, et ce à partir de l’Essai sur la réforme de la philosophie spéculative (1775) et des Essais philosophiques sur la nature humaine et son développement (1777) ; ce parcours permet de montrer que Tetens produit en réalité une véritable critique de l’empirisme, qui refuse de confondre l’activité de l’entendement avec la passivité de la réception sensible, et pour ce faire développe une théorie tout à fait originale de la connaissance humaine qui accorde une place déterminante aux productions autonomes de l’imagination et à celles de l’entendement. Beyond the usual conception of Johann Nikolaus Tetens as the “German Locke”, this paper wants to reassess the distinctive German context of the empiricist reference in the Essay on the Reform of the Speculative Philosophy (1775) and in the Philosophical Essays on Human Nature and Its Development (1777). This move shows that Tetens delivers a critical view of the empiricist philosophy and refuses to conflate the activity of the understanding and the passivity of the sensibility; he produces for that purpose a highly original philosophy of human cognition which gives a pivotal place to the autonomous productions of the imagination and the understanding.
- Published
- 2018
16. Empathie et cruauté : le paradoxe de l’imaginaire des viandes au XVIIIe siècle
- Author
-
Capucine Lebreton
- Subjects
viande ,métaphysique ,medicine ,psychology ,metaphysics ,philosophie transcendantale ,meat ,histoire ,éthique ,transcendental philosophy ,Johann Nikolaus Tetens ,theory of knowledge ,lcsh:B1-5802 ,perfectibilité ,philosophy ,psychologie ,lcsh:History (General) and history of Europe ,Philosophy ,lcsh:Philosophy (General) ,Immanuel Kant ,théorie de la connaissance ,digestive, oral, and skin physiology ,food and beverages ,General Medicine ,perfectibility ,ethics ,lcsh:D ,philosophie ,history ,médecine ,Humanities - Abstract
Les écrits du XVIIIe siècle sur l’habitude de manger de la viande affrontent certains problèmes qui ne sont abordés aujourd’hui que dans une optique de défense de la cause animale, comme la sensibilité des animaux tués pour la viande ou le devenir de l’être humain lorsqu’il consomme de la chair. Ce discours au XVIIIe siècle n’est cependant pas le fait de défenseurs des animaux, et se trouve même paradoxalement exempt de conséquences pratiques : les auteurs qui déplorent la consommation de chair n’appellent pas pour autant à abandonner celle-ci. Comment les penseurs occidentaux du XVIIIe siècle résolvent-ils le paradoxe qui consiste à souligner l’empathie avec les animaux tout en les tuant pour s’en nourrir ? À travers des textes de philosophes et de médecins du XVIIIe siècle sur les effets de la consommation de viande, il s’agit ici d’interroger la représentation de l’être humain sous-jacente à un discours qui appartient aujourd’hui à l’inconscient de l’alimentation carnée. XVIIIth-century writings about the habit of eating meat deal with problems that are only addressed today when defending animal rights, such as the sensibility of animals that are killed for their flesh or what human beings become through the process of eating meat. But in the XVIIIth century this kind of discourse doesn’t belong to animal rights activists, and is even paradoxically exempt from practical consequences: writers who deplore the eating of animal flesh however don’t ask their fellow humans to cease this consumption. How do western XVIIIth-century thinkers solve this paradox: emphasizing empathy with animals, while at the same time killing them to eat their flesh? Through philosophic and medical XVIIIth-century writings dealing with the consequences of eating meat, this paper examines the representation of mankind underlying a discourse that belongs nowadays to meat diet’s subconscious.
- Published
- 2018
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.