Search

Background: Children in hospital experience significant pain, either inherent with their pathology, or caused by diagnostic/therapeutic procedures. Little is known about pediatric pain practices in sub‐Saharan Africa. This survey aimed to gain insight into current pain management practices among specialist physician anesthetists in four sub‐Saharan African countries. Methods: A survey was sent to 365 specialist physician anesthetists in Nigeria, South Africa, Uganda and Zambia. Content analysis included descriptive information about the respondents and their work environment. Thematic analysis considered resources available for pediatric pain management, personal and institutional pain practices. Results: One hundred and sixty‐six responses were received (response rate 45.5%), with data from 141 analyzed; Nigeria (27), South Africa (52), Uganda (41) and Zambia (21). Most respondents (71.83%) worked at tertiary/national referral hospitals. The majority of respondents (130/141, 91.55%) had received teaching in pediatric pain management. Good availability was reported for simple analgesia, opioids, ketamine, and local anesthetics. Just over half always/often had access to nurses trained in pediatric care, and infusion pumps for continuous drug delivery. Catheters for regional anesthesia techniques and for patient‐controlled analgesia were largely unavailable. Two thirds (94/141, 66.67%) did not have an institutional pediatric pain management guideline, but good pharmacological pain management practices were reported, in line with World Health Organization recommendations. Eighty‐eight respondents (62.41%) indicated that they felt appropriate pain control in children was always/often achieved in their setting. Conclusion: This survey provides insight into pediatric pain practices in these four countries. Good availability of a variety of analgesics, positive pain prescription practices, and utilization of some non‐pharmacological pain management strategies are encouraging, and suggest that achieving good pain control despite limited resources is attainable. Areas for improvement include the development of institutional guidelines, routine utilization of pain assessment tools, and access to regional anesthesia and other advanced pain management techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fever is the most common clinical sign during infancy. Nurses deal with fever in children most directly and it is an integral aspect of their role as pediatric nurses. The objective of this study is to analyze the perceptions, knowledge and attitudes toward childhood fever of nurses in three health contexts: pediatric hospitalization, pediatric emergency and primary care. To respond this objective, a qualitative study with ethnomethodological approach has been carried out. In-depth interviews were conducted and theoretical clinical cases were presented to nurses working in pediatrics in the three settings studied. After the analysis of the discourses, the codes were classified into three categories: static and number-centric knowledge, dependent nursing attitude, and unconscious model nurses. On the one hand, when we analyze and compare the perceptions, attitudes and knowledge of the nurses between the different contexts, we find differences that consist mainly of what the context requires of them. On the other hand, in general and regardless of the context, the nurses interviewed place themselves in a traditional framework when faced with the phenomenon of fever in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: With improved survival in pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT) care has focused on optimizing functional, developmental, and psychosocial outcomes, roles often supported by Allied Health and Nursing professionals (AHNP). However, there is a scarcity of research examining frameworks of clinical practice. Methods: The International Pediatric Transplant Association AHNP Committee developed and disseminated an online survey to transplant centers as a quality improvement project to explore AHNP practice issues. Participant responses were characterized using descriptive statistics, and free‐text comments were thematically analyzed. Responses were compared across professional groups; Group 1: Advanced Practice Providers, Group 2: Nursing, Group 3: Allied Health. Results: The survey was completed by 119 AHNP from across the globe, with responses predominantly (78%) from North America. Half of respondents had been working in pediatric transplant for 11+ years. Two‐thirds of respondents were formally funded to provide transplant care; however, of these not funded, over half (57%) were allied health, compared to just 6% of advance practice providers. Advanced practice/nursing groups typically provided care to one organ program, with allied health providing care for multiple organ programs. Resource constraints were barriers to practice across all groups and countries. Conclusion: In this preliminary survey exploring AHNP roles, professionals provided a range of specialized clinical care. Challenges to practice were funding and breadth of care, highlighting the need for additional resources, alongside the development of clinical practice guidelines for defining, and supporting the role of AHNP within pediatric SOT. Professional organizations, such as IPTA, can offer professional advocacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]