Search

In Taiwan, men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to be disproportionately affected by HIV, and the main route of HIV transmission is condomless anal intercourse (CAI). This study examined the associations between psychosociobehavioral characteristics and CAI intention among MSM in Taiwan who had ever engaged in anal intercourse with men, and compared the differences across three sexual roles (receptive, versatile, and insertive) using online survey data (N = 563). For all MSM, those that were in a relationship (AOR = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.61–4.03), had three or more steady partners (AOR = 2.58; 95% CI: 1.19–5.58), did not use a condom during last anal intercourse (AOR = 6.81; 95% CI: 4.36–10.63), perceived high HIV risk (AOR = 2.13; 95% CI: 1.26–3.60), and had high sexual sensation seeking (AOR = 2.80; 95% CI: 1.82–4.30) were more likely to have high CAI intention. After stratification, the significant characteristics differed depending on sexual role, except for no condom use during last anal intercourse remaining significant in all models (AOR = 5.09–20.30; 95% CI: 2.49–66.69, depending on sexual role). Tailoring the programs for MSM of different sexual roles may improve the effectiveness of future prevention efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has proven to be effective in reducing the risk of HIV transmission in uninfected individuals who engaged in sexual activity with HIV-infected partners. Serodiscordant couples are the key targets of PrEP implementation. The study aimed to compare awareness of and willingness to use PrEP and anticipated condom use among 112 HIV-serodiscordant couples: 32 heterosexuals couples, 70 men who have sex with men (MSM) couples, and 10 people who inject drugs (PWID) couples. A cross-sectional study was conducted in an AIDS designated hospital in Taiwan. The PrEP survey for discordant couples included questions on awareness of non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) and PrEP, attitudes toward PrEP, anticipated condom use if using PrEP, and sexual behaviors. Overall, 46.2% were aware of PrEP, only 33% were willing to take PrEP, and 44.6% would continue condom use if they were taking PrEP. Among the three key populations, MSM couples had the highest awareness of and willingness to use PrEP. Awareness of and willingness to use PrEP did not differ by HIV status, with moderate agreement (Cohen’s Kappa coefficient: 0.56) between HIV-serodiscordant partners. Both HIV-serodiscordant partners’ willingness to use PrEP was significantly associated with being MSM (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 4.28 [1.28-14.30], p = 0.018), previous receipt of nPEP (AOR, 6.98 [1.23-39.65], p = 0.028), anticipated condom use (AOR, 0.14 [0.05-0.41], p < 0.001), and income ≥ NT$30,000 per month (AOR, 2.25 (0.99-5.04), p = 0.05). Policy makers need to consider the differences among key populations to scale up PrEP implementation. More efforts should be focused on improving awareness of and willingness to use PrEP among heterosexual and PWID serodiscordant couples to scale up PrEP implementation in Taiwan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]