Search

HIV prevention for gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and transgender women (TGW) is critical to reducing health disparities and population HIV prevalence. To understand if different types of stigma impact engagement with HIV prevention services, we assessed associations between stigmas and use of HIV prevention services offered through an HIV prevention intervention. This analysis included 201 GBMSM and TGW enrolled in a prospective cohort offering a package of HIV prevention interventions. Participants completed a baseline survey that included four domains of sexual identity/behavior stigma, HIV-related stigma, and healthcare stigma. Impact of stigma on PrEP uptake and the number of drop-in visits was assessed. No domain of stigma was associated with PrEP uptake. In bivariate analysis, increased enacted sexual identity stigma increased number of drop-in visits. In a logistic regression analysis constrained to sexual identity stigma, enacted stigma was associated with increased drop-in visits (aIRR = 1.30, [95% CI: 1.02, 1.65]). Participants reporting higher enacted stigma were modestly more likely to attend additional services and have contact with the study clinics and staff. GBMSM and TGW with higher levels of enacted stigma may seek out sensitized care after negative experiences in their communities or other healthcare settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective HIV prevention intervention; however, most studies of PrEP adherence and persistence among men who have sex with men (MSM) have been conducted with MSM who live in urban areas. The experiences of PrEP-using MSM in non-urban areas might differ due to increased barriers to culturally competent care. We examined similarities and differences among urban and non-urban PrEP-using MSM in the southern United States, the region with the highest number of annual HIV diagnoses. We surveyed a total of 78 (n = 25 non-urban, n = 53 urban) PrEP-using MSM. Self-reported adherence was high across all participants. No differences were observed with respect to PrEP persistence, source of PrEP, or reasons for PrEP initiation. Fewer non-urban than urban men reported STI testing in the past 12 months. Overall, we observed few differences comparing urban and non-urban PrEP-using MSM. Additional studies are needed to describe differences in PrEP initiation comparing urban and non-urban MSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Men who have sex with men (MSM) who use smartphone applications (apps) to meet sexual partners represent a high-risk subset of MSM. As such, the use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) may be highly suitable. The purpose of the study was to evaluate awareness of and willingness to use PrEP among 179 HIV-uninfected MSM recruited in London who use these apps. Regression models were fit to assess the associations between perceived barriers and willingness to use PrEP in the future. Most (84.9%) had heard of PrEP and more than half (57.1%) were willing to use PrEP in the future if it were to become available. Low perceived risk for acquiring HIV (prevalence ratio (PR): 0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.04, 0.33) and concerns about PrEP-related side effects (PR: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00, 0.04) were associated with being unwilling to use PrEP. Efforts to make PrEP widely available should be continued. Uptake interventions should focus on correcting self-perceptions of HIV risk and educate MSM about the potential side effects of PrEP use so that MSM can make more informed decisions about prevention options. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Men who have sex with men (MSM) have a high HIV burden and also often face multiple other challenges accessing HIV services, including legal and social issues. Although Swaziland recently started responding with interventions for MSM, significant gaps still exist both in information and programming. This study aimed to explore the HIV prevention needs of MSM in Swaziland, including factors elevating their risks and vulnerabilities to HIV infection; to find out what HIV prevention strategies exist; and to determine how best to meet the prevention needs of MSM. A total of 50 men who reported anal sex with other men in the past 12 months were recruited through simple respondent driven sampling. They completed either a structured quantitative survey (n= 35) or participated in a semi-structured qualitative interview (n= 15). Both quantitative and qualitative findings indicated perceived and experienced stigma among MSM. This predominantly manifested as internalised stigma, which may lead to alcohol abuse and sexual risky behaviours. At least 83% (29/35) of the quantitative sample had been labelled with derogatory terms because of their sexual orientation, while 66% (23/35) had experienced being avoided. There was limited knowledge of risk practices: When asked, 54% (19/35) of quantitative respondents reported that vaginal and anal sex carry an equal risk of HIV infection. Participants also had little knowledge on new HIV prevention methods such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and rectal microbicides. MSM needs included safe spaces in form of drop-in centres and non-hostile HIV services. Although Swaziland recently started interventions for key populations, including MSM, there is still a general lack on information to inform managers and implementers on the HIV prevention needs of MSM in Swaziland. Such information is crucial for designers of official and HIV programmes. Research is needed to increase knowledge on the HIV prevention needs for key populations, including MSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sexual networks among men who have sex with men (MSM) across health jurisdictions may play a role in HIV transmission and acquisition. Levels of HIV prevention activities may be different across health jurisdictions leading to differential risk for HIV transmission with partners in and outside of San Francisco (SF). We examined MSM sexual partnerships within and outside SF. Data were collected during the 2011 National HIV Behavioral Surveillance MSM data collection cycle. Participants were asked to report characteristics of and sexual behaviors with up to five most recent sexual partners. Restricting our analysis to sexually active San Franciscans (n = 329 MSM reporting 927 partnerships), we found that SF MSM have similar numbers of partnerships (SF mean = 1.3, non-SF mean = 1.2) and levels of risk behavior with men within and outside SF. With the current intensity of HIV prevention occurring in SF additional strategies may be needed to address the fact that SF MSM have many sexual connections to men in other health jurisdictions where HIV prevention may not be similar to those in SF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This mixed-methods investigation combines a quantitative survey, focus groups, and in-depth interviews to examine sexual risk behaviors and HIV status disclosure among HIV-positivehijras(male-to-female transgender people) and HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) in Chennai and Mumbai, India. From the survey results, the authors found a relatively high prevalence of inconsistent condom use for anal sex with male partners—about one-fifth to almost one-half, depending on the type of partner (regular, casual) and sexual role (receptive, insertive). One-quarter of MSM and two-fifths ofhijrasreported having disclosed their HIV status to their male regular partner. The qualitative data helped in understanding social and structural factors that created barriers to disclosure of HIV status and to condom use. Disclosure was not uniformly followed by safer sex, and nondisclosure did not always lead to unprotected sex. Implications for practice and policies and potential interventions are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]