Search

It is unclear whether slowness and higher reaction time of individuals with Down syndrome (DS) are because of inability to pre-program and using the generalized motor program (GMP) or not. So, the purpose of this study was to examine the consistency of relative timing as a fixed feature of a GMP in overhand throwing with changing the distance to target as a varied feature. Fifteen individuals with DS (age = 13 ± 2 y) and a control group of 12 individuals without intellectual disability (ID; age = 13 ± 2 y) were asked to throw a tennis ball to a fixed target from three distances of 2, 2.75, and 3.25 m, respectively. Instant of occurrence of the following discrete variables was recorded by motion analysis: initiation of elbow extension, maximum shoulder angular velocity, maximum elbow angular velocity, and maximum resultant hand velocity. Results of two-way analysis of variance test did not show any significant difference in any of the relative kinematic variables in distances and groups (p > 0.05). It seems that individuals with DS are able to motor preprogram and they use a GMP to overhand throwing from different distances as well as those without ID. Also, slowness and reaction time are unrelated to pre-programming and GMP as it relates to overhand throwing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In infants with indications of upper cervical dysfunction, the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test are used to indicate reduced upper cervical range-of-motion (ROM). In infants, the inter-rater reliability of these tests is unknown. Objective: To assess the inter-rater reliability of subjectively and objectively measured ROM by using the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test. Methods: 36 infants (<6 months) and three manual therapists participated in this cross-sectional observational study. Pairs of two manual therapists independently assessed infants' upper cervical ROM using the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test, blinded for each other's outcomes. Two inertial motion sensors objectively measured cervical ROM. Inter-rater reliability was determined between each pair of manual therapists. For subjective outcomes, Cohen's kappa (ĸ) and the proportion of agreement (Pra) were calculated. For objectively measured ROM, Bland Altman plots were conducted and Limits of Agreement and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated. Results: The inter-rater reliability of the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test for subjective (ĸ: 0.077–0.727; Pra: 0.46–0.86) and objective outcomes (ICC: 0.019–0.496) varied between pairs of manual therapists. Conclusion: Assessed ROM largely depends on the performance of the assessment and its interpretation by manual therapists, leading to high variation in outcomes. Therefore, the Flexion-Rotation-Test and Lateral-Flexion-Test cannot be used solely as a reliable outcome measure in clinical practice and research context. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study compares people with recurrent low back pain (rLBP) and people with pre-clinical low back pain (standing-induced low back pain developers; PDs) to each other and back-healthy controls (non-pain developers; NPDs). Movement variability and muscular co-activity related to coordination are important for both rLBP and PDs, and these two groups also have altered static spine extension. Methods: Eleven participants with recurrent low back pain, and twenty-one asymptomatic participants, categorized as PDs (11) and NPDs (10) through an established standing protocol, volunteered for this study. Three phases of standing extension motion (lean, hold, and return to neutral) were analyzed. Root mean square angular jerk was calculated from trunk and pelvis kinematics, co-activation of the trunk and hip musculature were assessed in four-muscle sets. Results: Root-mean-square jerk was greater when returning to neutral than when leaning back during standing extension in all three groups. People with rLBP had reduced co-activity in their trunk extensors, people classified as PD had more co-activity in their hip extensors compared with the other groups, and anterior trunk co-activity was phase-dependent, and similar between groups. Discussion: Movement control alterations with low back pain may start as an over-protective co-activation strategy in those with standing-induced LBP and progress to an under-protective strategy in those with recurrent low back pain. Level of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]