Search

The health and wellbeing of older adults have taken center-stage in global policy agendas in recent times. In 2003, Ghana introduced an insurance exemption policy to eliminate financial barriers to healthcare for older adults and other vulnerable population groups. Embedded within the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), this policy ostensibly guarantees free healthcare for older adults at publicly-funded facilities across the country. In this paper, we applied the implementation problem framework to identify gaps in the implementation of the exemptions policy and their impact on the healthcare experiences of older adults. Our data collection involved qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of community-residing older adults, health workers, community leaders, and policymakers. Our thematic data analysis identified resource, substantive, bureaucratic, political, and administrative constraints in the policy implementation process which, in turn, affected quality healthcare delivery. While most of these constraints are general challenges confronting the NHIS, they serve to undermine the intent of the scheme's exemptions policy. In particular, despite the exemptions, older adults continued to pay out-of-pocket for certain categories of treatments and medications, creating as yet financial barriers to healthcare. We present policy recommendations for addressing these implementation challenges, including suggestions to decentralize, depoliticize, and financially liberate the operations of the NHIS. Ghana's health insurance scheme has not eliminated financial barriers to healthcare for older adults. Older Ghanaians reported unmet healthcare needs, despite implementation of health insurance. Resource, substantive, bureaucratic, and political constraints impede the policy implementation process. Measures are needed to decentralize and depoliticize the NHIS implementation process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Persons with disabilities have often been overlooked in the context of HIV and AIDS risk prevention and service provision. This paper explores access to and use of HIV information and services among persons with disabilities. Methods: We conducted a multi-country qualitative research study at urban and rural sites in Uganda, Zambia, and Ghana: three countries selected to exemplify different stages of the HIV response to persons with disabilities. We conducted key informant interviews with government officials and service providers, and focus group discussions with persons with disabilities and caregivers. Research methods were designed to promote active, meaningful participation from persons with disabilities, under the guidance of local stakeholder advisors. Results: Persons with disabilities emphatically challenged the common assumption that persons with disabilities are not sexually active, pointing out that this assumption denies their rights and – by denying their circumstances – leaves them vulnerable to abuse. Among persons with disabilities, knowledge about HIV was limited and attitudes towards HIV services were frequently based upon misinformation and stigmatising cultural beliefs; associated with illiteracy especially in rural areas, and rendering people with intellectual and developmental disability especially vulnerable. Multiple overlapping layers of stigma towards persons with disabilities (including internalised self-stigma and stigma associated with gender and abuse) have compounded each other to contribute to social isolation and impediments to accessing HIV information and services. Participants suggested approaches to HIV education outreach that emphasise the importance of sharing responsibility, promoting peer leadership, and increasing the active, visible participation of persons with disabilities in intervention activities, in order to make sure that accurate information reflecting the vulnerabilities of persons with disabilities is accessible to people of all levels of education. Fundamental change to improve the skills and attitudes of healthcare providers and raise their sensitivity towards persons with disabilities (including recognising multiple layers of stigma) will be critical to the ability of HIV service organisations to implement programs that are accessible to and inclusive of persons with disabilities. Discussion: We suggest practical steps towards improving HIV service accessibility and utilisation for persons with disabilities, particularly emphasising the power of community responsibility and support; including acknowledging compounded stigma, addressing attitudinal barriers, promoting participatory responses, building political will and generating high-quality evidence to drive the continuing response. Conclusions: HIV service providers and rehabilitation professionals alike must recognise the two-way relationship between HIV and disability, and their multiple overlapping vulnerabilities and stigmas. Persons with disabilities demand recognition through practical steps to improve HIV service accessibility and utilisation in a manner that recognises their vulnerability and facilitates retention in care and adherence to treatment. In order to promote lasting change, interventions must look beyond the service delivery context and take into account the living circumstances of individuals and communities affected by HIV and disability. Persons with disabilities are vulnerable to HIV infection but have historically been excluded from HIV and AIDS services, including prevention education, testing, treatment, care and support. Fundamental change is needed to address practical and attitudinal barriers to access, including provider training. Rehabilitation professionals and HIV service providers alike must acknowledge the two-way relationship between HIV and disability: people with disability are vulnerable to HIV infection; people with HIV are increasingly becoming disabled. Peer participation by persons with disabilities in the design and implementation of HIV services is crucial to increasing accessibility. Addressing political will (through the National Strategic Plan for HIV) is crucial to ensuring long-term sustainable change in recognizing and responding to the heightened vulnerability of people with disability to HIV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Expanding access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services is one of the key targets of the Sustainable Development Goals. The extent to which sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) targets will be achieved largely depends on how well they are integrated within Universal Health Coverage (UHC) initiatives. This paper examines challenges and facilitators to the effective provision of three SRHR services (maternal health, gender-based violence (GBV) and safe abortion/post-abortion care) in Ghana. The analysis triangulates evidence from document review with in-depth qualitative stakeholder interviews and adopts the Donabedian framework in evaluating provision of these services. Critical among the challenges identified are inadequate funding, non-inclusion of some SRHR services including family planning and abortion/post-abortion services within the health benefits package and hidden charges for maternal services. Other issues are poor supervision, maldistribution of logistics and health personnel, fragmentation of support services for GBV victims across agencies, and socio-cultural and religious beliefs and practices affecting service delivery and utilisation. Facilitators that hold promise for effective SRH service delivery include stakeholder collaboration and support, health system structure that supports continuum of care, availability of data for monitoring progress and setting priorities, and an effective process for sharing lessons and accountability through frequent review meetings. We propose the development of a national master plan for SRHR integration within UHC initiatives in the country. Addressing the financial, logistical and health worker shortages and maldistribution will go a long way to propel Ghana's efforts to expand population coverage, service coverage and financial risk protection in accessing essential SRH services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The need to improve the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and rights of women with disabilities is increasingly acknowledged. Unfortunately, women with disabilities in low- and middle-income settings, including Ghana, face several barriers (including structural, financial, physical, social and attitudinal) to accessing SRH services and care. This paper explores the enablers and barriers to accessing SRH services and care among visually impaired women in the Ashanti and Brong Ahafo Regions of Ghana. Qualitative data from in-depth interviews and focus group discussions were collected from 21 visually impaired women, selected through purposive and snowballing sampling techniques. Thematic analysis was used to develop codes, and data were further grouped into emerging themes. The barriers to accessing SRH services and care were financial difficulties and lack of preferential treatment. The enablers which facilitated access to SRH services and care were the support provided by caregivers and friendly relationships with health providers. To address these challenges and promote access, SRH related policies, services and programmes should be inclusive of the needs of visually impaired women, and measures to remove financial challenges to service utilisation and foster positive relationships with health workers, church and community members should be adopted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We assessed the challenges facing 29 women in their quest for maternal health services in the Shai Osudoku District of Ghana. In-depth, semi-structured interviews with health professionals and focus-group discussions with women on uptake of maternal health services were conducted. Findings showed inadequate human resources and logistics for maternal health care and transportation problems. Women whose pregnancies required specialized care at district or regional hospitals deliberately reported late to the community clinics in an advanced stage of labor to avoid referrals. Findings have implications for health policymakers, implementers, and researchers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drawing on Earnshaw and Chaudoir’s HIV stigma framework, this study explored the experiences of persons living with HIV and AIDS regarding stigmatization and discrimination in accessing health services. Using a qualitative research methodology, 42 participants were purposively recruited during support group meetings of persons living with HIV and AIDS (PLWHA) at Amasaman in Accra, Ghana. Four focus group discussions (n= 22) and 10 in-depth interviews were conducted. Discussions and interviews were audio-taped, transcribed, and categorized based on the objectives of the study. The findings indicated that PLWHAs had knowledge of stigma that was experienced through enacted, anticipated, and internalized stigma mechanisms. Evidence showed that PLWHA did not experience stigma and discrimination when they accessed services at the Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, the largest hospital in Ghana. However, the situation was different when they accessed services at other public health facilities. Based on the findings, implications are discussed for policy, social work, and public health practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]