Search

Background and Aims: The management of chronic hepatitis B patients is not well characterized in real-world practice. We compared baseline characteristics of CHB patients on entecavir, the frequency of on-treatment monitoring, and the effectiveness of ETV treatment between academic and community practices.Methods: Treatment-naïve CHB patients ≥18 years old, treated with ETV for ≥12 months from 2005 to 2013, in 26 community and academic practices throughout the USA were retrospectively evaluated.Results: Of 841 patients enrolled, 658 (65% male, 83% Asian, median age 47, 9% with cirrhosis) met inclusion criteria. Half of the patients (52%) were from community practices. A lower percentage of patients in community practices had cirrhosis or liver cancer (5 vs. 14%). Community practices more often treated patients with baseline ALT < 2 × ULN. Over a median follow-up of 4 years, community practices were more likely to discontinue ETV with less frequent laboratory monitoring compared to academic practices. The 5-year cumulative probability of ALT normalization was greater among patients treated in community practices (70 vs. 50%, p < 0.001), but the 5-year cumulative probability of undetectable HBV DNA was lower (45 vs. 70%, p < 0.001) than those treated in academic practices.Conclusion: Academic practices saw CHB patients with more advanced liver disease, more often followed AASLD guidelines, and monitored patients on ETV treatment more frequently than community practices. While patients in community practices were less likely to achieve undetectable HBV DNA and more likely to achieve ALT normalization, the rates of HBeAg loss and seroconversion as well as HBsAg loss were similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Administrative databases that include diagnostic codes are valuable sources of information for research purposes.Aim: To validate diagnostic codes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in chronic hepatitis B patients.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients with chronic HBV seen in the national Veterans Administration (VA). HCC cases were identified by the presence of ICD-9 code 155.0. We randomly selected 200 HBV controls without this code as controls. We manually reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) of all cases and controls to determine HCC status. We calculated the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity for the HCC code. We conducted an implicit review of the false-positive cases to determine possible reasons for the miscoding.Results: Of the 8350 patients with HBV, 416 had an ICD-9 code for HCC. Of these 416, 332 patients had confirmed HCC and 61 did not; HCC status was indeterminate for 23 patients. Of the 200 controls, none had HCC confirmed in the EMR. The PPV ranged from 85.3 to 80.0% and specificity ranged from 99.2 to 99.0% based on classification of indeterminate cases as true versus false positives, respectively. The NPV, sensitivity, and specificity were 100%. Two-thirds of false-positive cases were diagnosed with HCC prematurely as a workup of liver mass and latter imaging and/or biopsy were not diagnostic for HCC.Conclusion: The diagnostic code of HCC in chronic HBV patients in the VHA data is predictive of the presence of HCC in medical records and can be used for epidemiological and clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections remain one of the leading causes of chronic liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Healthcare initiatives for chronic viral hepatitis to facilitate early diagnosis and linkage to care in an effort to reduce inpatient resource utilization associated with late diagnosis and end-stage liver disease have been partially successful.Aims: Our objective was to determine the impact of liver-related complications from chronic HBV and HCV infections on inpatient cost of care, length of stay, and mortality.Methods: Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, National Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS), we studied the impact of chronic HBV and HCV infections on inpatient healthcare system following hospitalizations from 2003 to 2012.Results: Of the 79,185,729 million hospitalizations among adult patients in the USA from 2003 to 2012, 143,896 (0.18 %) hospitalizations were HBV related and 1,073,269 (1.36 %) hospitalizations HCV related. HBV hospitalizations had a higher inpatient mortality (OR 1.34; 95 % CI 1.30, 1.38), median cost of care per hospitalization (+$2100.33; 95 % CI 1982.53, 2217.53), and increased length of hospitalization stay (+0.64 days; 95 % CI 0.60, 0.68; p < 0.01) compared to HCV.Conclusions: Despite higher per case resource utilization following hospitalization, HBV-infected patients demonstrate a lower inpatient survival in comparison with chronic HCV infection. These disparate observations underscore the need for early diagnosis of chronic HBV infection in at-risk population and prompt linkage to care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major cause of cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. Not all patients with CHB require antiviral treatment but long-term monitoring is critical to identify patients who would benefit from antiviral therapy. CHB patients followed in various clinical settings may differ in disease characteristics and rates of treatment eligibility in long-term follow-up.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 359 consecutive treatment-naive, treatment-ineligible CHB patients (228 from community GI clinics; 73 from university hepatology clinic; 58 from primary care clinic). Primary end points were the proportion of patients meeting eligibility criteria in follow-up, and the eligibility comparison among patients in various clinical settings. Univariate and multivariate Cox's proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios to identify predictors of treatment eligibility in follow-up.Results: While the majority of patients remained treatment ineligible by guideline recommendations, a sizeable proportion (23 %, 95 % CI 18-27 %) of patients subsequently met treatment eligibility in study follow-up. Reasons for meeting US Panel treatment eligibility on multivariate analysis included baseline ALT ≥ ULN (HR 1.91, p = 0.03) and baseline HBV DNA ≥ 2000 IU/mL (HR 2.6, p = 0.001). Practice setting was not a predictor.Conclusions: A significant number of patients with CHB (23 %) who were not initially treatment eligible later met treatment criteria in longer-term follow-up. Significant independent predictors of treatment eligibility included a baseline ALT ≥ ULN and elevated HBV DNA (≥2000 IU/mL for US Panel eligibility and ≥20,000 IU/mL for AASLD eligibility). This study underscores the importance of long-term follow-up for patients with CHB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]