Search

In 2014, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) released for comment a draft reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. A twelve-member International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) taskforce was convened to coordinate the ISOQOL response. Twenty-one ISOQOL members provided detailed comments and suggestions on the paper: 81 % from academia and 19 % from industry. Taskforce members consolidated and further refined these comments and shared the recommendations with the wider ISOQOL membership. A final response was submitted to the EMA in November 2014. The impending publication of the EMA reflection paper presents a valuable opportunity for ISOQOL to comment on the current direction of EMA PRO guidance and strategy. The EMA paper, although focused on cancer, could serve as a model for using PROs in other conditions, as it provides a useful update surrounding some of the design issues common to all trial research including PRO endpoints. However, we believe there are a number of additional areas in need of greater consideration. The purpose of this commentary is therefore to highlight the strengths of this timely and potentially useful document, but also to outline areas that may warrant further discussion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have published guidelines on the use of cancer treatments in young people of reproductive potential. However, no such guideline is available in Japan. Therefore, this project aimed to gather relevant data and draft a respective guidance paper. Methods: From April 2019 to March 2021, the Study Group for Providing Information on the Proper Use of Pharmaceuticals in Patients with Reproductive Potential at the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development gathered opinions from experts in reproductive medicine, toxicology, and drug safety measures. The group considered these opinions, the FDA and EMA guidelines, and relevant Japanese guidelines and prepared a guidance paper, which they sent to 19 related organizations for comment. Results: By November 2020, the draft guidance paper was completed and sent to the related organizations, 17 of which provided a total of 156 comments. The study group finalized the guidance paper in March 2021. Conclusions: The "Guidance on the Need for Contraception Related to Use of Pharmaceuticals" (The report of the Study Group for Providing Information on the Proper Use of Pharmaceuticals in Patients with Reproductive Potential, Research on Regulatory Science of Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development: JP20mk0101139) is expected to help Japanese healthcare professionals provide fertility-related care and advice to adolescents, and young adults with cancer and their families. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Orally inhaled and nasal drug products (OINDP) are regulated in Europe via national (country) legislation and guidelines and/or legislation established in the European Union and resulting guidelines developed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Recent movement in EMA guidance and European Commission legislation implies potential significant changes in OINDP regulation. The UK exiting the European Union (“Brexit”) has also raised a number of questions related to OINDP development and regulation in the region. The International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) European outreach working group provides and overview and analysis of the current state of European regulatory activity for OINDP (International Pharmaceutical Aerosol Consortium on Regulation and Science (IPAC-RS) 2018). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: CT-P43 is a candidate ustekinumab biosimilar in clinical development. Objectives: This paper aims to demonstrate equivalent efficacy of CT-P43 to originator ustekinumab in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Methods: This double-blind, phase III trial randomised patients (1:1) to receive subcutaneous CT-P43 or originator ustekinumab (45/90 mg for patients with baseline body weight ≤ 100 kg/> 100 kg) at week 0 and week 4 in Treatment Period I. Prior to week 16 dosing in Treatment Period II, patients receiving originator ustekinumab were re-randomised (1:1) to continue originator ustekinumab or switch to CT-P43; patients initially randomised to CT-P43 continued receiving CT-P43 (at weeks 16, 28 and 40). The primary endpoint of the trial was mean per cent improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12. Equivalence was concluded if confidence intervals (CIs) for the estimate of treatment difference were within pre-defined equivalence margins: ± 10% [90% CI; modified intent-to-treat set; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approach] or ± 15% [95% CI; full analysis set for patients only receiving 45 mg doses in Treatment Period I; European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach]. Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity endpoints were evaluated through week 52. Results to week 28 are reported here. Results: In Treatment Period I, 509 patients were randomised (CT-P43: N = 256; originator ustekinumab: N = 253). The mean per cent improvement in PASI score at week12 was 77.93% and 75.89% for CT-P43 and originator ustekinumab, respectively (FDA approach); per the EMA approach, corresponding values were 78.26% and 77.33%. Estimated treatment differences were 2.05 (90% CI −0.23, 4.32) and 0.94 (95% CI −2.29, 4.16); equivalence was achieved for both sets of assumptions. Further efficacy parameters and pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity outcomes were comparable between treatment groups, including after switching from originator ustekinumab to CT-P43. Conclusions: CT-P43 demonstrated equivalent efficacy to originator ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with comparable pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity profiles. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04673786; date of registration: 17 December, 2020 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The diagnosis of idiopathic short stature (ISS) refers to children who are considerably shorter than average without any identified medical reason. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorised marketing of recombinant human growth hormone (hGH) for ISS in 2003, while the European Medicines Agency (EMA) refused it in 2007. This paper examines the arguments for these decisions as detailed in selected FDA and EMA documents. It combines argumentative analysis with an approach to policy analysis called 'What's the problem represented to be'. It argues that the FDA presents its approval as an argument for equity of access to the treatment (given that hGH was already authorised for other indications), describing short stature as a potential disadvantage, and assuming that height normalisation is a clinically meaningful result. The EMA, instead, refuses marketing authorisation with an argument that there is an imbalance of risks and benefits, describing ISS as a healthy condition, and arguing that hGH should provide some psychosocial and/or quality of life benefits to children with ISS other than height gain. This paper then discusses how these arguments could be read through different models of disability, particularly through the medical model of disability and the relational, experiential, and cultural understandings of disability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is an increasing body of evidence supporting a more flexible approach in clinical data requirements for the approval of more complex biosimilar substances such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Objective: The aim of this paper is to further analyse the role of quality/chemistry, manufacturing and controls (CMC) and clinical data for the conclusion on biosimilarity and the decision on marketing authorisation (MA). Methods: In the present study, we analysed the MA applications (MAAs) of all 33 mAbs and three fusion proteins evaluated by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between July 2012 and November 2022 with special emphasis on all submitted rituximab (four products) and trastuzumab (seven products) biosimilar candidates, including withdrawn applications. For the two withdrawn applications, the comparative efficacy trials suggested biosimilarity, but the quality/CMC package was not accepted by EMA. We therefore investigated whether a negative MAA outcome could have been predicted based on the evidence generated in the quality/CMC packages, regardless of clinical trial data. For this purpose, we reviewed the respective European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) or withdrawal assessment reports, and the first regulatory assessments for all these 36 MAAs (i.e. day 120 of the centralized procedure), which are not publicly available. During EMA review, where significant issues are identified which would preclude a marketing authorisation, these issues are raised as questions to the applicant and are classified as major objections (MO). Results: In 67% of cases, the outcome of the quality and clinical assessment was the same, i.e. both the quality and clinical assessments either supported approval or did not support approval. In 11% of cases, MO were identified in the quality part of the submission but not in the clinical data. In 22% of cases, MO were raised on the clinical data package but not on the quality data. However, we found no instance where seemingly negative clinical data, including failed efficacy trials, led to a negative overall decision. In each instance, the failure to confirm similar clinical performance in all investigated aspects was eventually viewed as not being related to the biosimilar per se but as being due to imbalances in the trial arms, immaturity of secondary endpoint results, change in the reference product, or even chance findings. Furthermore, when performing an in-depth analysis of the quality and clinical packages of trastuzumab and rituximab biosimilars, we found that in no case were clinical trial data necessary to resolve residual uncertainties regarding the quality part. Conclusion: The results further support the argument that sufficient evidence for biosimilarity can be obtained from a combination of analytical and functional testing and pharmacokinetic studies which may also generate immunogenicity data. This calls into question the usefulness of comparative efficacy studies for the purposes of regulatory decision-making when approving biosimilar mAbs and fusion proteins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory human and veterinary medicine widely detected in European surface waters, especially downstream from Wastewater Treatment Plants. With some notable exceptions, veterinary uses of diclofenac in Europe are greatly restricted, so wastewater is the key Europe-wide exposure route for wildlife that may be exposed via the aquatic environment. Proposed Environmental Quality Standards (EQS) which include an assessment of avian exposure from secondary poisoning are under consideration by the European Commission (EC) to support the aims of the Water Framework Directive (WFD). In this paper we summarise information on avian toxicity plus laboratory and field evidence on diclofenac bioaccumulation and bioconcentration in avian food items. A safe diclofenac threshold value for birds of 3 μg kg−1 wet weight in food was previously derived by the European Medicines Agency and should be adopted as an EQS under the WFD to maintain consistency across European regulations. This value is also consistent with values of 1.16–3.99 µg kg−1diet proposed by the EC under the WFD. Water-based EQS of 5.4 or 230 ng L−1 in freshwater are derived from these dietary standards, respectively, by the EC and by us, with the large difference caused primarily by use of different values for bioaccumulation. A simple assessment of potential water-based EQS compliance is performed for both of these latter values against reported diclofenac concentrations in samples collected from European freshwaters. This shows that exceedances of the EC-derived EQS would be very widespread across Europe while exceedances of the EQS derived by us are confined to a relatively small number of sites in only some Member States. Since there is no evidence for any declines in European waterbird populations associated with diclofenac exposure we recommend use of conservative EQS of 3 µg kg−1diet or 230 ng L−1 in water to protect birds from diclofenac secondary poisoning through the food chain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One year since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid response measures have been implemented internationally to mitigate the spread of the virus. Following rapid and successful pre-clinical and human trials, several vaccines have been authorised for use across Europe through the European Medicines Agency and national regulatory authorities. Clinical trials have shown promising results including important reductions in disease severity, hospitalisation and mortality. In order to maximise the public health benefit of available vaccines, there is a pressing need to vaccinate a large proportion of the population. Internationally, this has prompted coordination of existing services at enormous scale, and development and implementation of novel vaccination strategies to ensure maximum inoculation over the shortest possible timeframe. Pharmacists are being promoted as healthcare professionals that enhance roll-out of COVID-19 vaccination programmes. This paper aims to summarise current policy and practice in relation to pharmacists' involvement in COVID-19 vaccination in 13 countries across Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ethnobotanical survey presents the first step in the identification of new bioactive compounds. This study aimed to collect, document and analyse data on the traditional use of medicinal plants in Jablanica district (South-Eastern Serbia) and to compare traditional knowledge with scientifically proven data. Ethnobotanical study was carried out using semi-structured interviews with 103 informants. Discussion of the results was performed after the quantitative ethnobotany factors were calculated. Comparison of the data was done with those of European Medicines Agency (EMA), Yugoslav Pharmacopoeia 1984 (Ph. Jug. IV) and relevant scientific papers. The informants reported data on 89 medicinal plants belonging to 49 families in Jablanica district. The dominantly used families were Lamiaceae and Asteraceae, while Hypericum perforatum L., Mentha × piperita L. and Matricaria chamomilla L. were the species with the highest number of use reports. The most frequently reported indications were respiratory, gastrointestinal, dermatologic, and psychological diseases. The species with most diverse uses were Taraxacum campylodes G.E.Haglund, Achillea millefolium L. and Rosa canina L. According to our results, medicinal plants in Jablanica district are mainly used for treating minor health issues as a mode of primary health care. The wide application of species belonging to Lamiaceae and Asteraceae families can be partially attributed to the fact that many cosmopolitan medicinal plant species belongs to these families and also to their predominance in the flora of Jablanica districts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GW Research Ltd. provided two separate, but similar, submissions to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of cannabidiol (CBD) 10 mg/kg/day, trade name Epidyolex®, for the adjunctive treatment of seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS). This paper highlights important methodological issues related to the company submissions, the Evidence Review Group (ERG) reports, and the subsequent development of the NICE guidance by the Appraisal Committee (AC) for the use of CBD. The company identified four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of CBD (GWPCARE1 and GWPCARE2 for DS, and GWPCARE3 and GWPCARE4 for LGS) and an ongoing open-label extension study (GWPCARE5) as relevant to both submissions. In these RCTs, CBD in addition to current clinical management (CCM) was compared to CCM without CBD (i.e. CCM plus placebo). GWPCARE2 and GWPCARE3 were three-arm studies and compared two dosages of CBD (10 mg/kg/day and 20 mg/kg/day) in addition to CCM and CCM plus placebo. GWPCARE1 and GWPCARE4 compared CBD (20 mg/kg/day) in addition to CCM and CCM plus placebo. Both DS patients in GWPCARE2 and LGS patients in GWPCARE3 who received 10 mg/kg/day CBD in addition to CCM achieved better seizure frequency outcomes than those who received CCM plus placebo. In the company's base case, use of CBD for LGS patients resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £31,107 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and, for DS patients, £36,046 per QALY gained versus CCM. The ERG considered that these ICERs were extremely uncertain and suffered from validity issues concerning model structure (e.g. patients receiving CCM moved back to baseline drop seizure frequency), input (e.g. inclusion of caregivers' QALYs), and transparency issues (e.g. hidden worksheets and coding in Visual Basic for Applications), and hence incorporated adjustments to the original base case which increased the ICERs. During the process, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) licence granted marketing authorisation for CBD only in conjunction with clobazam. Hence, the company provided evidence from this subgroup in an additional submission, which resulted in an ICER of £33,721 per QALY gained for LGS and an ICER of £32,471 per QALY gained for DS. In this submission and clarifications, the ERG was able to verify and validate most of the company's responses to the ERG's concerns. However, some issues remained regarding the face validity of model assumptions on patient pathways after treatment discontinuation. Finally, the AC recommended CBD with clobazam as an option for treating seizures associated with LGS and DS in patients aged 2 years and older only if (1) the frequency of drop seizures is checked every 6 months and CBD is stopped if the frequency has not fallen by at least 30% compared with 6 months before starting treatment and (2) the company provides CBD according to the commercial arrangement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper evaluates the relative efficiency of a sample of 37 large pharmaceutical laboratories in the period 2008-2013 using a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. We describe in detail the procedure followed to select and construct relevant inputs and outputs that characterize the production and innovation activity of these pharmaceutical firms. Models are estimated with financial information from Datastream, including R&D investment, and the number of new drugs authorized by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) considering the time effect. The relative performances of these firms-taking into consideration the strategic importance of R&D-suggest that the pharmaceutical industry is a highly competitive sector given that there are many laboratories at the efficient frontier and many inefficient laboratories close to this border. Additionally, we use data from S&P Capital IQ to analyze 2071 financial transactions announced by our sample of laboratories as an alternative way to gain access to new drugs, and we link these transactions with R&D investment and DEA efficiency. We find that efficient laboratories make on average more financial transactions, and the relative size of each transaction is larger. However, pharmaceutical companies that simultaneously are more efficient and invest more internally in R&D announce smaller transactions relative to total assets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reviews the main tools for communicating benefit-risk medicines information to patients that are used, or could be used, by pharmaceutical regulators. One highly successful tool from the food safety sector (front-of-package traffic-light labelling) and the mental models approach (which provides a framework for developing new tools) are also reviewed as they show great promise for being usefully adapted to the pharmaceutical context. The evolution of benefit-risk medicines communication is first contextualised within the broader risk communication literature. Three distinct goals are then made explicit before critically examining the evidence for and against tools developed in the US (e.g. at the Food and Drug Administration [FDA]) and Europe (e.g. at the European Medicines Agency [EMA]). These goals are (i) sharing information (e.g. publishing clinical trial and adverse event data online); (ii) changing patients' beliefs by conveying factual knowledge (e.g. patient information leaflets and the drugs facts box); and (iii) changing behaviour (e.g. patient alert cards and warning labels). The mental models approach and traffic-light labelling, developed outside the pharmaceutical context, are then examined. Ultimately, the paper provides a helicopter view of the variety of benefit-risk communication tools that are used, or could be used, by pharmaceutical regulators in the US and Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In 2010 the European Medicines Agency allowed a two-stage design in bioequivalence studies. However, in the public domain there are mainly articles describing the theoretical and statistical base for the application of the two-stage design. One of the reasons seems to be the lack of practical guidance for the Sponsors on when and how the two-stage design can be beneficial in bioequivalence studies. Methods: Different variants with positive and negative outcomes have been evaluated, including a pivotal study, pilot + pivotal study and two-stage study. The scientific perspective on the two-stage bioequivalence study has been confronted with the industrial one. Results: Key information needed to conduct a bioequivalence study – such as in vitro data and pharmacokinetics – have been listed and organized into a decision scheme. Advantages and disadvantages of the two-stage design have been summarized. Conclusion: The use of the two-stage design in bioequivalence studies seems to be a beneficial alternative to the 2 × 2 crossover study. Basic information on the properties of the active substance and the characteristics of the drug form are needed to make an initial decision to carry out the two-stage study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we study approaches for dealing with treatment when developing a clinical prediction model. Analogous to the estimand framework recently proposed by the European Medicines Agency for clinical trials, we propose a 'predictimand' framework of different questions that may be of interest when predicting risk in relation to treatment started after baseline. We provide a formal definition of the estimands matching these questions, give examples of settings in which each is useful and discuss appropriate estimators including their assumptions. We illustrate the impact of the predictimand choice in a dataset of patients with end-stage kidney disease. We argue that clearly defining the estimand is equally important in prediction research as in causal inference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Today, the approval for a generic topical product includes the presentation of therapeutic equivalence to the originator based on clinical trials. To facilitate this procedure, in 2018 the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published a draft guideline on quality and equivalence of topical products, which includes request parameters regarding the quality of the newly developed generic product and test protocols for the implementation of equivalence tests regarding efficacy. Methods: To date, no data are available on the quality and evidence of the proposed test conditions. In this study, we performed an in vitro penetration test (IVPT) following the terms of the EMA draft guideline on two authorized topical products for which therapeutic equivalence was already proven during the approval process. Results: The complex biometric data processing revealed that in vitro equivalence could not be observed for all skin sections for either originator or generic product. Moreover, the necessity of the negative control proposed in the draft guideline is more than questionable. From the results presented, there were indications that a reduced number of skin donors would be sufficient to achieve statistically significant equivalence in the comparison of all applied formulations. Here, n = 7 donors was proposed instead of n ≥ 12 as the EMA draft guideline demands, decreasing the degree of biodiversity simultaneously. Moreover, a higher number of independent replicates (n > 2) was proposed for proper statistics. Conclusion: This bioequivalence study shows insufficient parameters, which should be discussed together with the EMA draft guideline. Plain Language Summary (PLS): Today in Europe the approval of generic drugs requires clinical trials to present therapeutic equivalence to the originator. To facilitate this time- and cost-intensive process, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) published a draft guideline in 2018 proposing test protocols for carrying out equivalence tests for drugs applied on human skin. Although its publication is over 5 years old, it is still in a draft version; moreover, so far no evidence has been presented on whether the experimental settings in the test protocols can prove equivalence. This study should prove the EMA test protocol for in vitro permeation tests (IVPT) as closely as possible on two authorized topical products for which therapeutic equivalence was already proven during the approval process to determine whether their equivalence could be observed by this pharmacokinetic approach as well. Due to the experimental setup, a penetration test was performed to survey the drug diffusion behavior over the skin cross section instead of the amount of drug which permeates through the skin. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first work published regarding that topic. Here, bioequivalence of the preparations applied, which were equivalent when they were tested on patients during their approval, was not found overall. We recommend reducing the number of donors and increasing the number of replicates to achieve a higher power for the statistical data evaluation. Moreover, an evaluation of the drug amount at the pharmaceutical place of action should be considered in the EMA guideline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a final decision on September 01, 2014 that restricts the maximum daily dose of domperidone to 30 mg and treatment duration to 7 days. This paper presents a critical review of the scientific basis of the literatures having a role in the decision of EMA on domperidone with an approach based on statistical and epidemiological perspective. Although observational studies used by EMA were published, the EMA didn't use an algorithm including "randomized clinical trials" according to evidence-based medicine when presenting their results. In conclusion, the results obtained from published studies are controversial, especially for the bias. From these publications, it cannot be concluded that domperidone exposure definitely increases the risk of "sudden cardiac death", "death associated with ventricular arrhythmia" or "ventricular arrhythmia" The most concrete result of these studies is that the risk is higher with metoclopramide exposure compared to domperidone exposure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The North Eastern Himalayan (NEH) regions of India are considered as one of the major repositories of the ' Capsicum annuum complex' which comprises of three cultivated species namely C. annuum, C. frutescens, and C. chinense. The interspecific delimitation within this large complex is ill-defined due to poorly developed crossing barriers and lack of discontinuous morphological characters. The present study elucidates the relationship among nine different cultivars of three Capsicum species on the basis of floral morphology and karyological parameters for the first time. Different floral characteristics such as margins and constrictions of calyx, type of pedicel, flower size, and color were found to have paramount importance in the species delimitation within the studied members of ' C. annuum complex.' The present karyomorphometric study explicitly revealed differences between the observed chromosomal data such as karyotype formulae, ordering of satellite bearing chromosome pairs and total diploid chromatin length which aid in resolving interspecific relationship among the studied cultivars of Capsicum. The present analyses unambiguously distinguished all cultivars of C. annuum from the members of C. frutescens and C. chinense and also proposed that among the five cultivars of C. annuum, Ghee lanka was comparatively distant from the other four cultivars on the basis of their karyomorphological characteristics. For the first time karyotype of hottest Indian chili is included in this paper. Comprehensive knowledge on floral morphology and karyotypes of some Himalayan Capsicums not only help to conserve genetic diversity but also help capsicum breeders for their basic and applied research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Biosimilar insulin analogues are increasing market access for diabetic patients globally. Scientific establishment of biosimilarity is cornerstone of this key change in the medical landscape. BGL-ASP is a biosimilar insulin aspart developed by BioGenomics Limited, India. BioGenomics has considered a stepwise approach in generating the totality of evidence required to establish similarity with reference product. Insulin aspart is a recombinant rapid-acting human insulin analogue utilised in the treatment of type-1 and type-2 diabetes mellitus. The single amino acid substitution at position B28 where proline is replaced with aspartic acid results in a decreased propensity to form hexamers, thus increasing the absorption rate on subcutaneous administration compared to native insulin. In order to establish the safety and efficacy of BGL-ASP, the critical quality attributes (CQAs) of BGL-ASP are identified based on the impact created on biological activity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD), immunogenicity and safety. The CQAs of insulin aspart are related to product structure, purity and functionality and are characterised using a series of state-of-the-art orthogonal analytical tools. The primary protein sequence, the secondary, tertiary and quaternary structure are found to be highly similar for BGL-ASP and reference product. The product related impurities of insulin aspart and the assay content are determined using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) based analysis and is similar for BGL-ASP and reference insulin aspart sourced from United States of America (US), Europe Union (EU) and India. The safety, efficacy and immunogenicity of BGL-ASP is also found to be comparable with reference product and is confirmed through the clinical trials conducted as recommended by International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. The data encompassed in this study demonstrates that reference insulin aspart and BGL-ASP are highly similar in terms of structural, physicochemical, and biological properties, thus confirming its safety and efficacy for usage as potential alternative economical medicinal treatment for diabetes mellitus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Numerous investigations on herbal medicine that have been undertaken in the past several years demonstrate the general acceptance of its safety. The Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) established the Herb–Drug Interaction (HDI) project to detect and assess potential HDIs to ensure safety. The aim is to detect safety signals and assess them based on available evidence. Methods: First, SFDA-registered herbal products (n = 30) were selected and prioritized based on commonly used herbs. Second, reported potential HDIs were retrieved from the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports (VigiBase), AdisInsight®, and the Natural Medicines database. We excluded drugs non-registered by SFDA and labeled interactions in the product information of SFDA, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Finally, a comprehensive evaluation of potential HDIs was carried out using several evidence sources: literature, global cases, local cases, and other relevant documents. The Drug Interaction Probability Scale (DIPS) scale was used to assess the probability of a causal relationship between the interacting herb and drug and the event. Results: The search yielded 566 potential signals, and 41 had published evidence and were referred for assessment. The assessment results using DIPS were: 22 possible (53.6 %), 7 probable (17%), and 12 doubtful (29.2%) interactions. The recommendation was to include probable HDIs in the product information, including turmeric–tacrolimus, etoposide–Echinacea, Ginkgo biloba–ibuprofen, green tea–warfarin, and licorice–thiazides interactions. Conclusion: The HDI project assessed the screening and identification of potential HDIs. The action plan of this project can be used in post-marketing activities to identify potential drug interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: There is a lack of well-controlled US studies of intramuscular (IM) interferon beta (IFNβ)-1a use in pregnant women with multiple sclerosis; however, in the European Medicines Agency region, IFNβ formulations may be considered during pregnancy if clinically needed based on data from European Union cohort registries. The AVONEX Pregnancy Exposure Registry was established to prospectively study the effects of IM IFNβ-1a on the risk of birth defects and spontaneous pregnancy loss in a US population. Methods: Pregnant women with multiple sclerosis exposed to IM IFNβ-1a within ~ 1 week of conception or during the first trimester were included. Participants were followed until there was a pregnancy outcome, live-born infants were followed until age 8–12 weeks. Data were collected on IM IFNβ-1a exposure, demographics, patient characteristics, medical history, and pregnancy outcomes, including live births (with or without birth defect), spontaneous abortions/miscarriages and fetal death/stillbirth, elective abortions (with and without birth defect), and ectopic pregnancies. A population-based birth defect surveillance program, the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP), served as the primary external control group for evaluating the risk of birth defects. Results: Three-hundred and two patients with a median (range) age of 31.0 (16–48) years and a median (range) gestational age at the time of enrollment of 10.1 (4–39) weeks were evaluable. Most patients (n = 278/302; 92%) reported IM IFNβ-1a exposure in the week before conception and most (n = 293/302; 97%) discontinued treatment before the end of the first trimester. Of 306 pregnancy outcomes, there were 272 live births, 28 spontaneous abortions of 266 pregnancies enrolled before 22 weeks' gestation (rate 10.5%; 95% confidence interval 7.2–15.0), five elective abortions, and one stillbirth. There were 17 adjudicator-confirmed major birth defects of 272 live births (rate 6.3%; 95% confidence interval 3.8–10.0); the pattern of birth defects observed was not suggestive of a relationship to prenatal IM IFNβ-1a exposure. Conclusions: This large US registry study suggests IM IFNβ-1a exposure during early pregnancy was not clinically associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with multiple sclerosis. These findings help inform clinicians and patients in weighing the risks and benefits of IM IFNβ-1a use during pregnancy. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00168714, 15 September, 2005. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: SB12 is a biosimilar to eculizumab reference product [SolirisTM (Soliris is a trademark of Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)] that acts as a C5 complement protein inhibitor. The infusion stability of in-use (diluted) SB12 outside the conditions stated in the reference product's label is unknown. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the stability of SB12 after extended storage in conditions not claimed in the originator label. Methods: Infusion stability was assessed in SB12 samples (diluted in 0.9% NaCl, 0.45% NaCl, and 5% dextrose, final concentration of 5 mg/mL per clinical trial protocol and the reference product's label) kept at 5 ± 3 °C for up to 3 months, then 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) for 72 h. The product was stored in different containers [polyolefin (PO) bags, glass bottles and syringes], and the protocol followed International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) requirements for stability evaluation of biological products. Stability was evaluated using complementary assays, including pH, protein concentration (A280), purity (size exclusion-high-performance liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate, and imaged capillary isoelectric focusing), biological activity (C5 binding and inhibition), and safety (subvisible particles). Results: Except for charge variants in SB12 diluted in 5% dextrose, all results met the stability acceptance criteria. There were no major changes in terms of physicochemical stability, biological activity, and subvisible particles. Conclusions: The infusion stability of SB12 after extended storage (5 ± 3 °C for up to 3 months, then 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% RH for 72 h) was demonstrated for longer periods and at higher temperatures than what is stated in the EU and US labels of the reference product. The physicochemical properties, biological activity, and subvisible particles of in-use SB12 diluted in 0.9% NaCl and 0.45% NaCl were maintained under the described conditions and for all tested containers. However, instability was observed for the diluted SB12 in 5% dextrose. These results may reduce the workload of clinical staff and minimize drug waste from treatment delays without any loss in product quality and biological activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmaceutical residues can harm the environment. Therefore any Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA) for a medicinal product for human use shall be accompanied by an "indication of any potential risks presented by the medicinal product for the environment" according to Article 8(3)(g) of the Directive 2001/83/EC. Since 2006 a guideline document from the European Medicines Agency (EMA, formerly EMEA) is available for this task, which is now called the "Environmental Risk Assessment" (ERA). Recently the EMA released a draft revision of an updated ERA guideline. The present paper provides a summary of the intended innovation. A number of options have been discontinued, but some of them cannot be easily recognised, even though they are potentially affecting the MAA and its costs in a relevant way. A new specifically tailored experimental testing course for antibiotics and a secondary poisoning assessment is introduced. The selection of required study types is altered and the environmental fate evaluation is adapted to the scientific progress. In the recent situation it is suggested that marketing authorisation applicants may reconsider the conduct of water/sediment studies for substances not requiring these according to the guideline revision. The new tailored testing approach for antibiotics avoids any vertebrate use, because it demands no fish study, therefore it may be applied henceforth. If the new prescriptions are not yet in force at the point in time of the MAA submission, appropriate waivers should be stated in the ERA. No further HPLC-study types and acute earthworm toxicity tests should be performed, since the guideline update draft does not accept them. In preclinical toxicity and pharmacokinetic studies, additional data gathering on metabolites should be considered in order to avoid unnecessary leaflet warnings. The cost for ERA may change significantly, with a tendency to increase for generic pharmaceutical MAA, but with a possible reduction for substances of low environmental concern. Earlier consideration of ERA in the drug development process is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New European Union (EU) pharmacovigilance legislation, effective from July 2012, introduced new concepts and procedures to optimise the way medicines are regulated within the Union and provided new channels for public health interventions. Triggered by the EU legislation, the work done by the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) has provided a common standard for periodic benefit-risk evaluation reporting within the ICH regions. The present paper provides a review of the concepts behind the use of periodic benefit-risk evaluation reports (PBRER) in supporting safety evaluation and assessment of benefit-risk balance and covers essential points in the documentation of safety information, risk evaluation and benefit-risk assessment. The review incorporates the experience to-date with the PBRER at EU level led by the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee of the European Medicines Agency. The scope of the PBRER, the main content topics and the challenges relevant to the different stakeholders are highlighted together with key success factors for the report to deliver its objectives and maximise the use of the regulatory assessment procedure. It is clear that the PBRER extends beyond new ways of data presentation and analysis and reflects a further shift in pharmacovigilance in the EU towards more integrated benefit-risk assessment of marketed medicines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prices of oncology drugs have been rising progressively in recent years. Despite accounting for only a small share of prescriptions, oncology drugs are the most expensive drugs on the market. However, the association between drug price and clinical benefit often remains questionable. Therefore, we set out to analyze the development of prescription and benefit assessment of protein kinase inhibitors. We identified 20 protein kinase inhibitors with oncological indications that were newly approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) between 2015 and 2019, based on the Arzneiverordnungsreport (AVR, Drug Prescription Report). For these 20 drugs, the number of prescriptions, sales, defined daily dose (DDD), and DDD costs were identified for the year of approval and for 2020, respectively, based on data from the Wissenschaftliches Institut der Ortskrankenkassen (WIdO, Scientific Institute of the General Local Health Insurance Fund, AOK). Moreover, the additional benefit assessments by the Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (GBA, Federal Joint Committee) were considered for each drug. It is shown that the share of a drug in prescriptions, sales, and DDD does not correlate with the clinical benefit of the drug as measured by the additional benefit assessment by the GBA. Lastly, the advertisement pattern of protein kinase inhibitors in a representative oncology journal does not correlate with drug benefit. In conclusion, the immense costs of oncology drugs are therefore largely caused by drugs for which no additional benefit has been proven by the GBA. In order to ensure the long-term stability of health care systems, price-regulation measures are urgently needed, especially for drugs whose additional benefit has not been proven. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Rare diseases negatively impact patients' quality of life, but the estimation of health state utility values (HSUVs) in research studies and cost–utility models for health technology assessment is challenging. Objectives: This study compared the methods for estimating the HSUVs included in manufacturers' submissions of orphan drugs to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) with those of published studies addressing the same rare diseases to understand whether manufacturers fully exploited the existing literature in developing their economic models. Methods: All NICE Technology Appraisal (TA) and Highly Specialized Technologies (HST) guidance documents of non-cancer European Medicines Agency (EMA) orphan medicinal products were reviewed and compared with any published primary studies, retrieved via PubMed until November 2020, and estimating HSUVs for the same conditions addressed in manufacturers' submissions. Results: We identified 22 NICE TA/HST appraisal reports addressing 19 different rare diseases. Sixteen reports presented original HSUVs estimated using EQ-5D or Health Utility Index (n = 12), direct methods (n = 2) or mapping (n = 2), while the other six included values obtained from the literature only. In parallel, we identified 111 published studies: 86.6% used preference-based measures (mainly EQ-5D, 60.7%), 12.5% direct techniques, and 2.7% mapping. The collection of values from non-patient populations (using 'vignettes') was more frequent in manufacturers' submissions than in the literature (22.7% vs. 8.0%). Conclusions: The agreement on methodological choices between manufacturers' submissions and published literature was only partial. More efforts should be made by manufacturers to accurately reflect the academic literature and its methodological recommendations in orphan drugs submissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An economical & eco-friendly spectrofluorometric method has been developed for the determination of prucalopride succinate (PRU) in human urine on the basis of the drug's native fluorescence. The type of solvent and the wavelengths of excitation and emission have been carefully selected for optimal experimental conditions. In deionized water, the fluorescence intensity was measured at λ emission 362 nm upon excitation at 310 nm. This bio-validated method was carried out using 30uL urine without any preliminary steps. The calibration curve for prucalopride succinate shows a linear relationship in a concentration range of 0.75–5.5 µg/mL. Accuracy and precision were obtained using 4 quality control samples which are: 0.75 μg/ mL (LLOQ), 2.25 μg/mL (QCL), 2.5 μg/mL (QCM) & 4.125 µg/mL (QCH). The validation of this proposed technique obeys European Medicines Agency (EMA) Guidelines for validating bioanalytical methods and the greenness assessment was evaluated according to the Analytical GAPI approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To describe whether for the cardiovascular and antithrombotic medicines approved in the period 2006-2016 (a) the pivotal trial was designed with an upper ageexclusion criterion, (b) the age distribution of the participants in the registration trials reflected expected use, (c) post-authorisation studies were planned, and d) the age distribution of participants was clearly presented in the approval documents.Methods: The data provided to EMA in support of centralized marketing authorisations of were analysed.Results: Two out of 19 protocols excluded patients over 80 and 85 years old. In the heart failure, atrial fibrillation and antithrombotic drug registration trials, the proportion of patients aged 65-74 years was 33-50%, and 13-20% over 75 years. For antithrombotic drugs, it was 25-35% for the 65-74 age, and around 15% for the 75+ age. For statins and antihypertensives, it was 20-40% for the 65-74 age and 3-6% for 75+ age. Post-authorisation studies were planned in two cases. An improvement on the transparency of public data is apparent, although information is not always presented clearly and uniformly.Conclusions: There is more publicly available information since 2006, but data on older patients with frailty and multimorbidity are generally scant. To address this, CHMP Geriatric Expert Group has currently published a Reflection paper on physical frailty to support subgroup categorisation of older patients beyond age with the aim of ensuring that clinical trial populations are representative of the users of the medicine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Concerns of the persistence and severity of the adverse effects of fluoroquinolones, mainly involving the nervous system, muscles and joints, resulted in the 2018 referral procedure led by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). They advised to stop prescribing fluoroquinolones for infections of mild severity or of a presumed self-limiting course and for prevention of infections, plus to restrict prescriptions in cases of milder infections where other treatment options are available, and restrict in at-risk populations. We aimed to examine whether the impact of EMA regulatory interventions implemented throughout 2018–2019 had an impact on fluoroquinolone prescribing rates. Methods: A retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted using electronic health care records from six European countries between 2016 and 2021. We analysed monthly incident fluoroquinolone use rates overall and for each fluoroquinolone active substance through flexible modelling via segmented regression to detect time points of trend changes, in monthly percentage change (MPC). Results: The incidence of fluoroquinolone use ranged from 0.7 to 8.0/1000 persons per month over all calendar years. While changes in fluoroquinolone prescriptions were observed over time across countries, these were inconsistent and did not seem to be temporally related to EMA interventions (e.g., Belgium: February/May 2018, MPC − 33.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 35.9 to − 30.7; Germany: February/May 2019, MPC − 12.6%, 95% CI − 13.7 to − 11.6]; UK: January/April 2016, MPC − 4.9%, 95% CI − 6.2 to − 3.6). Conclusion: The regulatory action associated with the 2018 referral did not seem to have relevant effects on fluoroquinolone prescribing in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: SB11 (Byooviz™) is a ranibizumab biosimilar that acts as a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A inhibitor. Stability data for unopened SB11 vials at room temperature are limited and no data are available for SB11 withdrawn into syringes (in-use) for intravitreal administration. Methods: SB11 stability was assessed in two different settings: unopened vials stored at 30 ± 2 °C/65 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) for 2 months, and in-use SB11 withdrawn into syringes stored at 5 ± 3 °C for 98 days and then 25 ± 2 °C/60 ± 5% RH for 24 h. The product was stored in the absence of light, and the experimental design followed International Conference on Harmonization and European Medicines Agency requirements for stability evaluation of biological products. Analysis included visual appearance (color, clarity, and presence of visible particles), pH, protein concentration (A280) and purity (size-exclusion high-pressure liquid chromatography, capillary electrophoresis–sodium dodecyl sulfate, imaged capillary isoelectric focusing), biological activity (VEGF binding and neutralization), and safety (sub-visible particulates). Results: Except for charge variants in unopened vials at room temperature after 1 month by US standards, all results met the stability acceptance criteria (US and EU) for both unopened vials and for in-use SB11. There were no major changes in terms of physicochemical stability, biological activity and sub-visible particulates. Conclusion: SB11 was stable for longer periods and at higher temperatures than what is stated in the labels of the reference product (Lucentis) and SB11. The physicochemical properties, biological activity, and sub-visible particulates of SB11 in both tested settings (unopened vials at room temperature and in-use product withdrawn into syringes) were maintained under the described storage periods. This information can help to avoid unnecessary delays in patient treatment without any loss in quality and biological activity, lower the workload of health care providers and reduce costs associated with drug waste. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The paper addresses the question of adaptation of existing regulatory frameworks in the face of innovation in biotechnologies, and specifically the roles played in this by various expert knowledge practices. We identify two overlapping ideal types of adaptation: first, the stretching and maintenance of a pre-existing legal framework, and second, a breaking of existing classifications and establishment of a novel regime. We approach this issue by focusing on varieties of regulatory knowledge which, contributing to and parting of political legitimacy, in principle enable the making of legally binding decisions about risks and benefits of technologies. We base the discussion around two case studies, one of animal biotechnology ethical regulation, the other of 'advanced therapy' medicinal product regulation, both in the context of European Union frameworks. Specifically, we explore the knowledge configurations constituting expert committees and other institutional formations of expert regulatory knowledge in their political context. We show that where sectoral and moral boundaries are challenged, different modes of regulatory knowledge beyond scientific forms - legal, procedural, moral, economic and industrial - can shape regulatory innovations either by maintenance of regimes through commensuration and stretching, or through differentiation and separation creating new frameworks. We conclude that establishing an essential techno-scientific difference between pre-existing and novel technologies does not in itself require new regulatory structures, and that the regulatory strategy that is followed will be determined by a combination of different forms of knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and Objective: European Union legislation has mandated the submission of European Economic Area non-serious reports to the EudraVigilance database since November 2017. As spontaneous reports of suspected adverse reactions to medicines represent a key source of safety signals, the European Medicines Agency has undertaken this work to assess the effects of this requirement on the characteristics of the reports submitted to EudraVigilance and on the detection of adverse drug reactions through routine analyses of the database. Methods: Changes in the numbers of serious and non-serious reports transmitted to EudraVigilance were examined over the period during which the legislation was implemented. The numbers and nature of potential safety signals emerging from established statistical algorithms used at the European Medicines Agency applied either to only the serious reports or to all reports in EudraVigilance were compared. Results: Up to November 2017, less than 25% of European Economic Area reports in EudraVigilance were classified as non-serious, since than this figure was slightly above 60%. This change accompanied an increase in the total number of reports received. Addition of non-serious reports to the signal detection process resulted in a small overall increase in signals of disproportionate reporting with some new signals of disproportionate reporting appearing and some existing signals of disproportionate reporting disappearing; the sensitivity of the signal detection system was slightly increased and the proportion of signals of disproportionate reporting that corresponded to known adverse drug reactions (a measure of efficiency) was unchanged. Conclusions: The change in legislation has led to a small increase in sensitivity, without affecting the efficiency of the routine statistical measures used. The number of non-serious reports as a proportion of reports in EudraVigilance is likely to increase over time and further monitoring of the impact on signal detection is required. Further work is also required on the qualitative impact of non-serious reports on the nature of signals detected and on their evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) administered to livestock might affect the environment. Therefore, an environmental risk assessment (ERA) is conducted during the approval process of VMPs. In the European Union (EU), the ERA, which was established approximately 10 years ago, consists of two phases. In the present review, we examined the first phase. In this phase, VMPs are subjected to a decision-making process comprising 19 questions and several tables with default values published in the "Guideline on environmental impact assessment for veterinary medicinal products in support of the VICH guidelines GL6 and GL38 (European Medicines Agency 2016)." Since a proportion of livestock husbandry systems is currently shifting toward ecological husbandry and free-range production systems, there is a lower risk of VMP consumption in general, but livestock excretions possibly containing VMPs might be directly released into the environment instead of being stored and applied as manure. In the present study, the first phase of the current ERA of VMPs in the EU was critically discussed with respect to the changes in animal husbandry. The large number of default values used in the ERA were checked for topicality. In a three-step approach, firstly trends and changes in animal husbandry in Europe that might be relevant for the ERA were collected, secondly, the interactions between Phase I and animal husbandry were evaluated and thirdly, the default values used in Phase I were verified in order to identify research gaps. Results: Several default values used in the current ERA were identified as outdated. Together with the lack of valid data (e.g., on animal husbandry systems or VMP treatments), this may have an impact on the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) as the central decision threshold of the ERA. Conclusions: The results of the present study indicate that an update of the ERA of VMPs in the EU is required to consider the changes in animal husbandry. Several aspects related to this issue are critically discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Input from patients and healthcare professionals to regulatory assessments is essential for benefit–risk management of medicines. How to best obtain input in different risk scenarios is uncertain. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate whether the International Risk Governance Council (IRGC) Framework is applicable to pharmacovigilance and can guide selecting engagement mechanisms for optimising stakeholder input. Methods: For proof-of-concept, classify 'iconic' cases of pharmacovigilance engagement at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) by IRGC risk scenario types and compare the engagement that happened with the engagement discourse recommended by the IRGC Framework for different risk scenarios. If the concept is proven, derive proposals for strengthening engagement. Results: Six iconic cases were classified by risk scenario type at the respective time points when deciding on engagement: venous thromboembolism with combined hormonal contraceptives (complex risk); lipodystrophy with highly active antiretroviral therapy medicines, carcinogenicity with contaminated nelfinavir products (uncertain risks); teratogenicity with thalidomide, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with natalizumab, teratogenicity and developmental disorders with valproate (ambiguous risks). The comparison of the engagement events with IRGC recommendations showed correspondence between the scope/outcomes of the events and the features of the recommended discourse. Conclusions: The IRGC Framework appears applicable to pharmacovigilance. Proposals derived from the IRGC recommendations may be valuable for guiding regulators when selecting mechanisms for engagement with patients and healthcare professionals in given risk scenarios. The proposed decision guide aims at ensuring systematic and consistent engagement across regulatory assessments and providing for the most purposeful discourse, to effectively obtain real-world input for regulatory risk assessment, evaluation of risk minimisation measures and decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Biosimilars have been used for 15 years in the European Union (EU), and have been shown to reduce costs and increase access to important biological medicines. In spite of their considerable exposure and excellent safety record, many prescribers still have doubts on the safety and interchangeability of biosimilars, especially monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and fusion proteins. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyse the short- and long-term safety and interchangeability data of biosimilar mAbs and fusion proteins to provide unbiased information to prescribers and policy makers. Methods: Data on the safety, immunogenicity and interchangeability of EU-licensed mAbs and fusion proteins were examined using European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) and postmarketing safety surveillance reports from the European Medicines Agency (EMA). As recent biosimilar approvals allow self-administration by patients by the subcutaneous route, the administration devices were also analyzed. Results: Prelicensing data of EPARs (six different biosimilar adalimumabs, three infliximabs, three etanercepts, three rituximabs, two bevacizumabs, and six trastuzumabs) revealed that the frequency of fatal treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment, serious adverse events (SAEs), and main immune-mediated adverse events (AEs) were comparable between the biosimilars and their reference products. The availability of new biosimilar presentations and administration devices may add to patient choice and be an emerging factor in the decision to switch patients. Analysis of postmarketing surveillance data covering up to 7 years of follow-up did not reveal any biosimilar-specific adverse effects. No product was withdrawn for safety reasons. This is in spite of considerable exposure to biosimilars in treatment-naïve patients and in patients switched from the reference medicinal product to the biosimilar. Analysis of data from switching studies provided in regulatory submissions showed that single or multiple switches between the originator and its biosimilar versions had no negative impact on efficacy, safety or immunogenicity. Conclusions: In line with previous reports of prelicensing studies of biosimilar mAbs and etanercepts, this study demonstrated comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity compared with the reference products. This is the first study to comprehensively analyze postmarketing surveillance data of the biosimilar mAbs and etanercept. An analysis of more than 1 million patient-treatment years of safety data raised no safety concerns. Based on these data, we argue that biosimilars approved in the EU are highly similar to and interchangeable with their reference products. Thus, additional systematic switch studies are not required to support the switching of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Various incentives are provided by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to facilitate the development and marketing of orphan drugs. A 10-year period of market exclusivity is reserved to an orphan medicinal product. Sometimes, the sponsor renounces the designation before the expiration of that standard period. Our aim was to focus on these premature withdrawals. Methods: We retrieved all the molecules included in the Community Register of Orphan Medicinal Products for Human Use from 2000 to November 2020. We considered the active substance, therapeutic indication, sponsor, year of designation, year of approval of the corresponding medicinal product, and that of the withdrawal of the orphan designation, if occurred. Results: Overall, 2350 orphan designations were approved from 2000 to November 2020. Of these, 141 have been marketed. Premature withdrawal of orphan designation concerned 23 drugs (20 being antineoplastic agents), corresponding to 16 medicinal products. These withdrawals occurred after almost 2 years (range <1–7 years). Conclusions: A not negligible fraction of marketed orphan medicinal products underwent premature removal of their orphan designation. No motivation is requested by the EMA for this renouncement, although the peculiarity of the orphan medicinal products would need a greater transparency. We can only speculate about possible compensations in support of this decision, for instance in terms of commercial agreements between pharmaceutical companies, giving way to alternative products, as a couple of examples suggest. An open debate on this topic among members of academia, regulatory bodies, price and reimbursements committees, and pharmaceutical industry representatives will be welcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since March 2020, the world has been fighting a global pandemic caused by a new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for severe acute respiratory syndrome, an airway disease that can be severe and fatal in a percentage of cases. Patients with severe COVID-19 can develop extrapulmonary lesions, with renal, hepatic, cardiac, neurological, and tissue involvement that can cause further severe complications. On December 21, 2021, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorized the marketing of the first COVID-19 vaccine. However, several randomized trials are ongoing to find effective, safe, and widely available treatments. The most severe stages of COVID-19 infection are characterized by a multi-system inflammatory state induced by a cytokine storm causing multi-organ injury. Epidemiologic evidence has shown that glucocorticoids (GCs), particularly dexamethasone, are used in severe, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with good therapeutic benefit. COVID-19 can also damage the endothelial system, causing microcirculatory disturbances and consequently leading to functional organ disorders. The combination of endothelial dysfunction with a generalized inflammatory state may contribute to the general pro-coagulative state described in patients with COVID-19 with increased risk of venous and arterial occlusions. The aim of this article is to describe the therapeutic utility of GCs in stabilizing the vascular endothelial barrier in COVID-19 infection. Indeed, we believe that the stabilization of the endothelial barrier and the anti-inflammatory effect of GCs could be the main effect underlying the therapeutic efficacy in COVID-19 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gene therapy has entered a new era after decades-long efforts, where the recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) has stood out as the most potent vector for in vivo gene transfer and demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety profiles in numerous preclinical and clinical studies. Since the first AAV-derived therapeutics Glybera was approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2012, there is an increasing number of AAV-based gene augmentation therapies that have been developed and tested for treating incurable genetic diseases. In the subsequent years, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved two additional AAV gene therapy products, Luxturna and Zolgensma, to be launched into the market. Recent breakthroughs in genome editing tools and the combined use with AAV vectors have introduced new therapeutic modalities using somatic gene editing strategies. The promising outcomes from preclinical studies have prompted the continuous evolution of AAV-delivered therapeutics and broadened the scope of treatment options for untreatable diseases. Here, we describe the clinical updates of AAV gene therapies and the latest development using AAV to deliver the CRISPR components as gene editing therapeutics. We also discuss the major challenges and safety concerns associated with AAV delivery and CRISPR therapeutics, and highlight the recent achievement and toxicity issues reported from clinical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cannabidiol (CBD), which is one major constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, has anti-seizure properties and does not produce euphoric or intrusive side effects. A plant-derived, highly purified CBD formulation with a known and constant composition has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and tuberous sclerosis complex. In the European Union, the drug has been authorized by the European Medicines Agency for the treatment of seizures associated with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, in conjunction with clobazam, and is under regulatory review for the treatment of seizures in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.Objectives: This systematic review aimed to summarize the currently available body of knowledge about the use of this US Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency-approved oral formulation of pharmaceutical-grade CBD in patients with epileptic conditions, especially developmental and epileptic encephalopathies other than Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.Methods: The relevant studies were identified through MEDLINE and the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry in October 2020. There were no date limitations or language restrictions. The following types of studies were included: clinical trials, cohorts, case-control, cross-sectional, clinical series, and case reports. Participants had to meet the following criteria: any sex, any ethnicity, any age, diagnosis of epilepsy, receiving plant-derived, highly purified (> 98% w/w) CBD in a sesame oil-based oral solution for the treatment of seizures. Data extracted from selected records included efficacy, tolerability, and safety outcomes.Results: Five hundred and seventy records were identified by database and trial register searching. Fifty-seven studies were retrieved for detailed assessment, of which 42 were eventually included for the review. The participants of the studies included patients of both pediatric and adult age. Across the trials, purified CBD was administered at dosages up to 50 mg/kg/day. In a randomized double-blind controlled trial in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex, CBD was associated with a significantly greater percent reduction in seizure frequency than placebo over the treatment period. Open-label studies suggested the effectiveness of CBD in the treatment of children and adults presenting with other epilepsy syndromes than those addressed by regulatory trials, including CDKL5 deficiency disorder and Aicardi, Dup15q, and Doose syndromes, SYNGAP1 encephalopathy, and epilepsy with myoclonic absences. The most common adverse events observed during treatment with CBD included somnolence, decreased appetite, diarrhea, and increased serum aminotransferases.Conclusions: The currently available data suggest that response to treatment with a highly purified, plant-derived CBD oil-based solution can be seen in patients across a broad range of epilepsy disorders and etiologies. The existing evidence can provide preliminary support for additional research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used in clinical trials to provide patients' perspectives regarding symptoms, health-related quality of life, and satisfaction with treatments. A range of guidance documents exist for the selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical trials, and it is unclear to what extent these documents present consistent recommendations. Methods: We conducted a targeted review of publications and regulatory guidance documents that advise on the selection of PROMs for use in clinical trials. A total of seven guidance documents from the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, and scientific consortia from professional societies were included in the final review. Guidance documents were analyzed using a content analysis approach comparing them with minimum standards recommended by the International Society for Quality of Life Research. Results: Overall there was substantial agreement between guidance regarding the appropriate considerations for PROM selection within a clinical trial. Variations among the guidance primarily related to differences in their format and differences in the perspectives and mandates of their respective organizations. Whereas scientific consortia tended to produce checklist or rating-type guidance, regulatory groups tended to use more narrative-based approaches sometimes supplemented with lists of criteria. Conclusion: The consistency in recommendations suggests an emerging consensus in the field and supports use of any of the major guidance documents available to guide PROM selection for clinical trials without concern of conflicting recommendations. This work represents an important first step in the international PROTEUS Consortium's ongoing efforts to optimize the use of PROs in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Additional risk minimisation measures (aRMMs) may be required to minimise important risks of medicines. aRMMs may be required at the time of authorisation, but may also be introduced or discontinued during the product life cycle as new safety information arises. The aim of this study is to describe post-authorisation introductions of new aRMMs and discontinuations of existing aRMMs for medicines authorised in the European Union (EU). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study that included all new active substances authorised through the EU centralised procedure between January 1st 2006 and December 31st 2017. Data was extracted from European Public Assessment Reports available on the website of the European Medicines Agency (ema.europa.eu). Medicines were followed up from the date of marketing authorisation (MA) until first introduction or discontinuation of aRMMs, excluding Direct Healthcare Professional Communications (DHPCs), withdrawal/suspension/revocation of the MA, or July 1st 2018, when data extraction took place. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse frequency data, and survival analysis was used to calculate 5- and 10-year probability of introduction or discontinuation of aRMMs. Results: A total of 476 medicines were authorised during the study period. The probability of getting aRMMs after authorisation for products authorised without aRMMs was 3.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–5.7] within 5 years after authorisation and 6.9% (95% CI 2.6–11) within 10 years after authorisation. For products authorised with aRMMs, the probability of discontinuation of aRMMs was 0.9% (95% CI 0–2.6) within 5 years and 8.3% (95% CI 0–16.1) within 10 years after authorisation. Conclusions: We found low probabilities of introduction and discontinuation of aRMMs (excluding DHPCs) during the product life cycle for medicines authorised between 2006 and 2017. The low rate of discontinuation may potentially be due to a lack of robust data on effectiveness of aRMMs. Further research is needed to get more insight into the dynamics of aRMMs during the medicine life cycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Domperidone is used to treat gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease. Because of an increased risk of cardiac adverse events, the European Medicines Agency has issued recommendations restricting its use mainly in terms of age, dose, and treatment duration. Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate current prescription practices of domperidone in Parkinson's disease among French neurologists. Methods: A cross-sectional study based on a questionnaire was conducted among French neurologists from Parkinson's disease expert centers from the French NS-Park/FCRIN network, general hospitals, and private practice. Results: Among the 253 neurologists who completed the questionnaire, 86 (34%) were physicians from expert centers and 167 (66%) were from other healthcare settings; 209 (83%) were aware of recommendations restricting domperidone use. The majority of neurologists (92%) declared prescribing domperidone regardless of the age of the patients. Sixty-one percent of neurologists prescribed domperidone beyond 7 days in newly diagnosed patients, 33% in patients with orthostatic hypotension, and 79% in patients receiving continuous apomorphine treatment. They did not follow the recommendation on posology in newly diagnosed patients (7% of neurologists), patients with orthostatic hypotension (10%), and patients receiving continuous apomorphine therapy (25%). Finally, only 58% of neurologists declared taking specific precautions before prescribing domperidone. Conclusions: These findings show most French neurologists who responded to our questionnaire do not fully follow the restrictions on domperidone use, particularly in terms of treatment duration, and in patients receiving continuous apomorphine treatment. This may reflect the unmet need to prevent nausea in patients with Parkinson's disease treated with dopaminergic drugs, particularly continuous apomorphine therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This manuscript presents the development, validation and application of a multi-residue supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of 140 chiral and non-chiral chemicals of emerging concern in environmental samples, with 81 compounds being fully quantitative, 14 semi-quantitative and 45 qualitative, validated according to European Medicine Agency (EMA) guidelines (European Medicines Agency 2019). One unified LC-MS method was used to analyse all analytes, which were split into three injection methods to ensure sufficient peak resolution. The unified method provided an average of 113% accuracy and 4.5% precision across the analyte range. Limits of detection were in the range of 35 pg L−1–0.7 μg L−1, in both river water and wastewater, with an average LOD of 33 ng L−1. The method was combined with solid-phase extraction and applied in environmental samples, showing very good accuracy and precision, as well as excellent chromatographic resolution of a range of chiral enantiomers including beta-blockers, benzodiazepines and antidepressants. The method resulted in quantification of 75% of analytes in at least two matrices, and 56% in the trio of environmental matrices of river water, effluent wastewater and influent wastewater, enabling its use in monitoring compounds of environmental concern, from their sources of origin through to their discharge into the environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High budget impact (BI) estimates of new drugs have led to decision-making challenges potentially resulting in restrictions in patient access. However, current BI predictions are rather inaccurate and short term. We therefore developed a new approach for BI prediction. Here, we describe the validation of our BI prediction approach using oncology drugs as a case study. Methods: We used Dutch population-level data to estimate BI where BI is defined as list price multiplied by volume. We included drugs in the antineoplastic agents ATC category which the European Medicines Agency (EMA) considered a New Active Substance and received EMA marketing authorization (MA) between 2000 and 2017. A mixed-effects model was used for prediction and included tumor site, orphan, first in class or conditional approval designation as covariates. Data from 2000 to 2012 were the training set. BI was predicted monthly from 0 to 45 months after MA. Cross-validation was performed using a rolling forecasting origin with e^|Ln(observed BI/predicted BI)| as outcome. Results: The training set and validation set included 25 and 44 products, respectively. Mean error, composed of all validation outcomes, was 2.94 (median 1.57). Errors are higher with less available data and at more future predictions. Highest errors occur without any prior data. From 10 months onward, error remains constant. Conclusions: The validation shows that the method can relatively accurately predict BI. For payers or policymakers, this approach can yield a valuable addition to current BI predictions due to its ease of use, independence of indications and ability to update predictions to the most recent data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) regards the potential risks of human medicinal products to the environment and their impacts are assessed, as well as management to limit this impact. Hazard assessment of novel materials, which differ from conventional chemicals, e.g. nanobiomaterials, poses testing challenges and represents a work-in-progress with much focus on the optimization of required methodologies. For this work-in-progress, we here highlight where changes/updates are required in relation to the main elements for international testing based on OECD guidelines, supported by knowledge from the nanotoxicity area. The outline describes two major sections, nanobiomaterials and environmental hazards, including its challenges and learned lessons, with recommendations for implementation in OECD guidelines. Finally, the way forward via a testing strategy is described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background Busulfan is an antineoplastic drug that is used widely as part of a conditioning regimen in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. It has a narrow therapeutic index and highly variable pharmacokinetics; therefore therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize busulfan dosing. Objective To study the population pharmacokinetics of busulfan in Saudi pediatric patients to optimize its dosing. Settings King Abdullah Specialist Children's Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods This pharmacokinetic observational study was conducted between January 2016 and December 2018. All pediatric patients receiving IV busulfan and undergoing routine therapeutic drug monitoring were included. Population pharmacokinetics modeling was conducted using Monolix2019R1. Pharmacokinetic data of busulfan in children. Results The study included 59 patients and 513 samples. The mean ± SD age was 6.10 ± 3.17 years, and the dose administered was 0.994 ± 0.15 mg/kg. The mean ± SD Cmax and area under the curve (AUC) were 900.60 ± 402.8 ng/mL and 1031.14 ± 300.75 µM min, respectively. Based on our simulations, the European Medicines Agency recommended dose were adequate for most patient's groups to achieve the conventional target of an AUC0-tau of 900-1350 µM min. For patients in the lower weight group < 9 kg, higher doses were need at 1.2 mg/kg. With regards to the newly proposed target of AUC 78-101 mg h/mL, all of the doses we tested had low probability of achieving it. Conclusions Most of our patients had less than a proportional increase in busulfan concentration suggesting autoinduction. The high interindividual variability and autoinduction make dose adjustments challenging and AUC at steady state difficult to predict from the first dose. One approach to improve dose predictions is to use Bayesian dosing software. Based on our simulations, the European Medicines Agency recommended doses were adequate for most patient groups, except those in the lower (< 9 kg) and higher weight groups (> 34 kg). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To review the marketing authorization of biosimilars and provide a critical analysis of the pivotal trials supporting their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Methods: EMA website to identify the biosimilars approved up to July 2019 and the European Public Assessment Report for information on pivotal trial design, duration, intervention and control, primary outcome, data on immunogenicity, and comparability margins. Results: The EMA has approved 55 biosimilars (62% in 2017–2019) of 16 biologic products, used in several clinical indications. Some biosimilars were licensed as multiple products, with different commercial names, by the same or different companies. The comparability exercise and subsequent approval of 49/55 (89%) biosimilars were based on one or more pivotal phase III trials testing their clinical efficacy. In all, biosimilars were approved on the basis of 55 trials, mostly phase III (42/55, 76%) assessing clinical efficacy; these were mainly equivalence trials (31/55, 56%). The pivotal phase III trials assessed surrogate measures of clinical effect, and 71% reported immunogenicity data. Conclusion: Analysis of the approval of biosimilars in Europe depicts a complex and heterogeneous scenario. The requirement for showing similarity in terms of clinical efficacy and safety provides a robust demonstration of comparable clinical outcomes but lays a burden on biosimilar manufacturers and may delay the introduction of the drugs. The development, licensing, and monitoring of biosimilars would benefit from new strategies to accelerate access to these drugs while reducing uncertainties about their use in practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Patient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies.Methods: We conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiative-led multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these.Results: Ten factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments.Conclusions: These are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) increase lesion detection and improve disease characterization for many cerebral pathologies investigated with MRI. These agents, introduced in the late 1980s, are in wide use today. However, some non-ionic linear GBCAs have been associated with the development of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with kidney failure. Gadolinium deposition has also been found in deep brain structures, although it is of unclear clinical relevance. Hence, new guidelines from the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine advocate cautious use of GBCA in clinical and research practice. Some linear GBCAs were restricted from use by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in 2017. This review focuses on non-contrast-enhanced MRI techniques that can serve as alternatives for the use of GBCAs. Clinical studies on the diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced as well as contrast-enhanced MRI methods, both well established and newly proposed, were included. Advantages and disadvantages together with the diagnostic performance of each method are detailed. Non-contrast-enhanced MRIs discussed in this review are arterial spin labeling (ASL), time of flight (TOF), phase contrast (PC), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI), and amide proton transfer (APT) imaging. Ten common diseases were identified for which studies reported comparisons of non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced MRI. These specific diseases include primary brain tumors, metastases, abscess, multiple sclerosis, and vascular conditions such as aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, arteriovenous fistula, intracranial carotid artery occlusive disease, hemorrhagic, and ischemic stroke. In general, non-contrast-enhanced techniques showed comparable diagnostic performance to contrast-enhanced MRI for specific diagnostic questions. However, some diagnoses still require contrast-enhanced imaging for a complete examination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]